İngiliz Dil Eğitimi Öğrencilerinin Bilgisayar Destekli Dil Öğretimi ile İlgili Algıları

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Öz

Problem Statement: The way undergraduate students studying at the English Language Teaching program perceive Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) could shed light both to the course content they are enrolled in at the fourth grade just before they step into teaching and thereby to the integration of technology into their teaching during their professional life

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL), English Language Teaching (ELT), metaphor analysis

Kaynakça

1. Armstrong, S. L. (2008). Using Metaphor Analysis to Uncover Learners’ Conceptualizations of Academic Literacies in Postsecondary Developmental Contexts. The International Journal of Learning, 15 (9).
2. Armstrong, S. L., Davis, H. S. & Paulson, E. J. (2011). The Subjectivity Problem: Improving Triangulation Approaches in Metaphor Analysis Studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10 (2).
3. Aydın, F. & Ünaldı, Ü. E. (2010). The Analysis of Geography Teacher Candidates’ Perceptions towards “Geography” Concept with the Help of Metaphors. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 600-622. Retrieved May 12, 2012 from http://www.iojes.net/userfiles/Article/IOJES_217.pdf
4. Botha, E. (2009). Why metaphor matters in education. South African Journal of Education, 29, 431-444.
5. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Keith, M. (2007). Research Methods in Education. USA: Routledge.
6. Felix, U. (2001). The web’s potential for language learning: the student’s perspective. ReCALL 13 (1), 47-58.
7. Hernandez, B., Montaner, T., Javier Sese, F. & Urquizu, P. (2011). The role of social motivations in e-learning: How do they affect usage and success of ICT interactive tools? Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2224-2232.
8. Ishiki, N. (2011). Trajectories of English Learning: Through the Use and Analysis of EFL Students’ Metaphors, Proceedings- English Studies in Various Contexts, The 3rd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences.

9. Jung, U. O. H., (2005). CALL: Past-present and future- a bibliometric approach. ReCALL 17 (1), 4-17.
10. Kövecses, Z. (2003). Language, Figurative Thought, and Cross-Cultural Comparison. Metaphor and Symbol, 18 (4), 311-320.
11. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press.
12. Martinez, M. A., Sauleda, N. & Huber, G. L. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 965- 977.
13. Nikitina, L. & Furuoka, F. (2008). Measuring Metaphors: A Factor Analysis of Students’ Conceptions of Language Teachers. Metaphor.de, 15, 161-180.
14. Nikitina, L. & Furuoka, F. (2008a). “A Language Teacher is Like…”: Examining Malaysian Students’ Perception of Language Teachers through Metaphor Analysis. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 5(2), 192-205. Retrieved May 12, 2012 from http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v5n22008/nikitina.pdf
15. Oxford, R., Tomlinson, S., Barcelos, A., Harrington, C., Lavine, R.Z. & Saleh, A. (1998). Clashing metaphors about classroom teachers: Toward a systematic typology for the language teaching field. System 26(1), 3-50.
16. Pishghadam, R. & Pourali, S. (2011). Metaphorical Analysis of Iranian MA Students’ Beliefs: A Qualitative Study. Higher Education Studies, 1 (1), 27-37.
17. Twitter (2012). Retrieved April 12, 2012 from https://twitter.com/# /derice Wallwisher (2012). Retrieved April 12, 2012 from http://wallwisher.com/wall/CALLislike
18. Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer Assisted Language Learning: An Introduction. In Fotos S. (ed.) Multimedia language teaching, Tokyo: Logos International: 3-20. Retrieved May 10, 2012 from http://www.ict4lt.org/en/warschauer.htm
19. Wiebe, G. & Kabata, K. (2010). Students’ and instructors’ attitudes toward the use of CALL in foreign language teaching and learning, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23 (3), 221-234.