A Study on Inclusive Education in Turkey

Öz

The purpose of this research is to examine inclusive education research and to guide applications and research according to the results obtained. Within the framework of this aim, the studies carried out in the field of inclusive education in Turkey were systematically examined. Articles published in national and international refereed journals in English or Turkish between 2009-2019 were included in the research The research is qualitative research in which the studies are examined according to the publication year, publication language, subject, research design, the field of the researchers and the scope of the articles. The data of the study were collected through document review. In this study, it has been concluded that the studies about inclusive education have started to increase in recent years, generally, qualitative research methods are used and more specifically, researchers in special education field have made inclusive education studies. When the articles were examined in terms of scope, it was seen that the majority of the studies were on attitude and descriptive studies. At this point, it can be said that the priority of the studies related to inclusive education in Turkey is not to produce theoretical knowledge or to create the infrastructure of new studies by examining the studies done. In the studies carried out, studies that reveal the opinions, attitudes and perceptions of the participants regarding inclusive education were more prominent. In order to contribute to both national and international literature, it would be useful to conduct further research on theoretical and literature research and to plan experimental research to reveal the effectiveness of inclusive education-related practices. Similar studies will be conducted in different countries and the comparison of the findings will contribute to the literature in terms of revealing the international trend.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• inclusive education
• individual differences
• cultural differences
• education for each student

Kaynakça

1. Adem, M. (2008). Eğitim planlaması [Education planning] (4th ed.). Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınları.
2. Ainscow, M., Booth T. & Dyson, A. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion. London: Routledge.
3. Amor, A. M., Hagiwara M., Shogren K. A., Thompson J. R., Verdugo M. Á., Burke K. M. & Aguayo, V. (2018). International perspectives and trends in research on ınclusive education: a systematic review. International Journal of Inclusive Education: 1–19. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1445304
4. Barton, L. (1995). The politics of education for all. Support for Learning 10 (4): 156-160.
5. Booth, T. & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion. developing learning and participation in schools. 3rd ed. Bristol: CSIE.
6. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage Publications.
7. Deng, M., Wang, S., Guan, W. & Wang, Y. (2017). The development and initial validation of a questionnaire of inclusive teachers’ competency for meeting special educational needs in regular classrooms in China. International Journal of Inclusive Education 21 (4): 416–427.
8. Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S.. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications

9. Düşkün, Y. (2016). Türkiye’de ortaöğretimde kapsayıcı eğitim durum analizi [Inclusive education situation analysis in secondary education in Turkey]. İstanbul: Eğitim Reformu Girişimi.
10. Ekiz. D. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
11. Eğitim Reformu Girişimi (2016). Türkiye’de ortaöğretimde kapsayıcı eğitim durum analizi [Inclusive education situation analysis in secondary education in Turkey]. İstanbul: Eğitim Reformu Girişimi.
12. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2019). Integrating students from migrant backgrounds in to schools in europe: national policies and measures. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
13. Florian, L. (2008). Inclusion: special or inclusive education: future trends. British Journal of Special Education 35 (4), 202-208.
14. Guba, E. G., Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In. N. K. Denzin ve Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.). The Sage
15. Handbook of Qualitative Research (Third Edition). (pp. 191-216). Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
16. http://www.herkesicinegitim.org/urunler/kapsayici-egitim-literatur-incelemesi-2/ Retrieved at 22.05.2019
17. Kaya, F. (2019). Yorumsamacı yaklaşımda anlama kavramının önemi ve pozitivizm eleştirisi [The importance of understanding ın hermeneutic approach and positivism criticism] . Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 11 (22), 271 – 280.
18. Keat, R., Urry, J. (2010). Social theory as science. London: Routledge.
19. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics (8th ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
20. McCart, A., Sailor, W., Bezdek, J. & Satter, A. (2014). A Framework for inclusive educational delivery systems. Inclusion 2 (4): 252–264.
21. Merriam, S. B., Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (Fourth Edition). CA: Jossey Bass.
22. Messiou, K. (2017). Research in the field of inclusive education: time for a rethink?. International Journal of Inclusive Education 21 (2): 146–159. doi:10.1080/13603116.2016.1223184.
23. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: qualitative data analysis (2nd. edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
24. Nilholm, C., Göransson, K. (2017). What is meant by inclusion? An analysis of European and North American journal articles with high impact. European Journal of Special Needs Education 32 (3): 437–451. doi:10.1080/08856257.2017.1295638.
25. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2003). Education policy analysis diversity, inclusion and equity: Insights from special needs provision. Paris.
26. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2016). PISA 2015 results: Excellence and equity in education (Vol. I). Paris.
27. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L. (2004). Enhancing the interpretation of significant findings: The role of mixed methods research. The Qualitative Report 9(4): 770-792. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol9/iss4/10, 22.05.2019.
28. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Polat, F. (2011). Inclusion in education: A step towards social justice. International Journal of Educational Development 31(1): 50-58.
30. Robson, C. & McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research: A resource for users of social research methods in applied settings (4th Edition). West Sussex: Wiley.
31. TBMM (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi/Grand National Assembly of Turkey). (2018). Göç ve uyum raporu [Migration and integration report]. Aralık 2018, https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/komisyon/ insanhaklari/docs/2018/goc_ve_uyum_raporu.pdf
32. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası/ Constitution of Turkey (1982). Law Number: 2709, Government Journal: 9.11.1982, Retrieved from https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/illeridaresi/turkiye-cumhuriyeti-anayasasi, 22.05.2019
33. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organizations) (2008). Inclusive education: the way of the future. Paris: Author.
34. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organizations) (2009a). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. France: UNESCO.
35. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organizations) (2009b). 2009 World conference on higher education: the new dynamics of higher education and research for societal change and development (pp. 5–8).
36. UNICEF (United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund) (2011). The right of children with disabilities to education: a rights-based approach to inclusive education. United Nations Children’s Fund. Retrieved from www.unicef.org/ceecis.
37. United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). https://www.danistay.gov.tr/upload/insanhaklarievrenselbeyannamesi.pdf, Retrieved at 22.05.2019.
38. Ünal, L. I. (1996). Eğitim ve yetiştirme ekonomisi [Economics of education and training] (1st ed.). Ankara: Epar Yayınları.
39. Yıldırım A., Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştirma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. (9. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık
40. Yılmaz, S., R. Sarpkaya. (2017). Eğitimin temel kavramları [Basic concepts of education]. In A. Tanrıöğen & R. Sarpkaya (Ed.), Eğitim Bilimine Giriş [Introduction to Education] (1-38). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.