Examining Children’s Art Products and Determining Their Aesthetic Judgment in a Preschool Classroom Where Learning Centers were Used

Yıl 2015, Sayı: 7, 1 - 16, 24.01.2015

Demet Özer Kocamanoğlu Dilek Acer

Öz

The aim of this study was to examine children’s art products and determine their aesthetic judgment in a preschool classroom where learning centers were used. The participants of this study were 19 children aged 60 to 72 months, enrolled in Ankara University Practice School for Preschool Education (1) and Child Club in 2011-2012 academic year. In the group, 10 children were male and 9 were female. Furthermore, qualitative data were collected from 17 parents, two of whom had twins. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used together in the study, based on a pretest-posttest model, involving a single group. The data-collecting instruments were Taylor-Helmstadter Pair Comparison Scale of Aesthetic Judgment, Product File Evaluation Form developed by the researcher and interview forms for children and parents. The art products created by children were evaluated by experts in consideration of five criteria. According to their evaluation, children received the highest average scores for the formal quality of art products. There was a significant difference between pretest and posttest scores in the Scale of Aesthetic Judgment. The mean ranks and sums of test scores suggest that the difference is in favor of the posttest score. All children indicated that they liked the learning centers in the educational environment. The study reports the details of the reasons children mentioned for liking the learning environment. Moreover, all parents agreed that the learning environment had positive impacts on the development of children. The part of recommendations in this study outlines the need for and content of further studies required in the field. 

Keywords: learning centers, preschool learning environment, aesthetic judgment, art products

Anahtar Kelimeler

learning centers, preschool learning environment, aesthetic judgment, art products

Kaynakça

• Batic, J. (2014). Implenting change in architectural design in elementary school art education in slovenia. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 33 (1), 130-140.
• Berris, R., & Miller, E. (2011). How design of the physical environment impacts early learning: educators and parents perspectives. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36 (4).
• Branzi, A., Rinaldi, C., Vecchi V., Petrillo, A., Bruner, J., Icaro, P., Sarti, A., & Veca, A. (2003). Children, spaces, relations metaproject for an environment for young children. Italy: Domus Academy Research Center.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Ç. E., Akgün E.Ö, Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem.
• Fox, J. E., & Schirrmacher, R. (2014). Çocuklarda sanat ve yaratıcılığın gelişimi. Ankara: Nobel.
• Güven, G., & Azkeskin, E. K, (2010). Erken çocukluk eğitimi ve okul öncesi eğitim. Ankara: Pegem.
• Kaya, Ö., & Gültekin, M. (2004). Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarında uygulanan programlara ebeveynlerin ilgi ve katılımları ile okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarının ebeveyn eğitimine katkısı konusunda anne-baba görüşleri. Omep 2003 Dünya Konsey Toplantısı ve Konferansı Bildiri Kitabı. İstanbul: Kelebek.
• Kırışoğlu, O. T. (2002). Sanatta eğitim. Ankara: Pegem.
• Oktay, A. (2000). Yaşamın sihirli yılları: Okul Öncesi Dönem. İstanbul: Epsilon.
• Şen, S. (2007), Okul Öncesi Dönem Çocuklarının Temel Özellikleri ve Gereksinimleri. In G. Haktanır (Eds.), Okul öncesi eğitime giriş. Ankara: Anı.
• Uysal, F. (2006). Okul öncesi çocuk eğitim merkezlerinde iç ve diş mekan organizasyonlarinin eğitim yaklaşimlari çerçevesinde incelenmesi. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.
• Yıldız, V. (2003). Çocukların okul öncesi eğitime yönelik algıları. G. Haktanır & T. Güler (Eds.), Omep 2003 Dünya Konsey Toplantısı ve Konferansı Bildiri Kitabı. İstanbul: Kelebek.