Psychological Framework for Gifted Children’s Cognitive and Socio-Emotional Development: A Review of the Research Literature and Implications

Year 2020, , 305 - 323, 15.03.2020

Dimitrios Papadopoulos

https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.666308

Cited By: 18

Abstract

A literature review was conducted to examine the shaping of giftedness during childhood, a period when crucial developmental changes that affect academic outlook and psychosocial wellness take place. The search of the literature covered articles published in English without restriction on publication year in the following databases: PsycINFO, Google Scholar, EBSCOhost, ERIC, and ProQuest. A total of 95 sources were categorized into two thematic areas that include (a) cognitive development of gifted children and (b) socio-emotional development of gifted children. The analysis of the literature reveals that although superior performance constitutes a key element in the notion of giftedness, ability alone cannot lead a gifted child to personal excellence and long-term commitment within a talent domain as it is insufficient to explain outstanding achievements across the life course. Indeed, these publications provide some evidence that the process of nurturing giftedness in children is determined by the dynamic interaction between individual strengths and a supportive environment, which can stimulate or inhibit the full use of a child’s ability. Finally, this review is intended to change the way researchers, school practitioners, and policymakers think about the limits and capabilities of gifted children, and to provide suggestions for strategies to support their development.

Keywords

gifted children, gifted education, cognitive and socio-emotional development, childhood

Supporting Institution

Greek Association of Mental Health for Children and Adults (Office for Gifted Child Development and Education)

Project Number

267/09-18

References

• Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003
• Aslan, S., & Yukay-Yuksel, M. (2018). An investigation of the relationship between social behavior characteristics and self-perceptions of gifted children in primary school. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(1), 17-42. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.2018.71
• Bailey, C. L. (2011). An examination of the relationships between ego development, Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration, and the behavioral characteristics of gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986211412180
• Beckmann, E., & Minnaert, A. (2018). Non-cognitive characteristics of gifted students with learning disabilities: An in-depth systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00504
• Bekey, S. W., & Michael, W. B. (1987). The performance of gifted girls in upper elementary school grades on Piagetian tasks of concrete and formal operations. Educational Research Quarterly, 10(4), 2–9.
• Benbow, C. P., & Minor, L. L. (1990). Cognitive profiles of verbally and mathematically precocious students: Implications for identification of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629003400105
• Bénony, H., Van Der Elst, D., Chahraoui, K., Bénony, C., & Marnier, J. P. (2007). Link between depression and academic self-esteem in gifted children. L’Encephale, 33(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7006(07)91554-7
• Berninger, V. W., & Yates, G. M. (1993). Formal operational thought in the gifted: A post-piagetian perspective. Roeper Review, 15(4), 220–224. doi: 10.1080/02783199309553511
• Birlean, C., & Shore, B. M. (2018). Cognitive development of giftedness and talents: From theory to practice. In J. L. Roberts, T. F. Inman, & J. H. Robins (Eds.), Introduction to gifted education (pp. 95–118). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
• Borland J. H. (2009). Myth 2: The gifted constitute 3% to 5% of the population. Moreover, giftedness equals high IQ, which is a stable measure of aptitude: Spinal tap psychometrics in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 236–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0016986209346825
• Callahan, C. M., Sowa, C. J., May, K. M., Tomchin, E. M., Plucker, J. A., Cunningham, C. M., et al. (2004). The social and emotional development of gifted students (RM04118). Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
• Carter, K. R. (1985). Cognitive development of intellectually gifted: A Piagetian perspective. Roeper Review, 7(3), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198509552889
• Cohen, L. M., & Kim, Y. M. (1999). Piaget’s equilibration theory and the young gifted child: A balancing act. Roeper Review, 21(3), 201–206. doi: 10.1080/02783199909553962
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Colangelo, N., & Assouline, S. G. (2000). Counseling gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. S. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 595–607). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
• Coleman, L. J., & Cross, L. T. (2005). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, Inc. Columbus Group. (1991). Unpublished transcript of the meeting of the Columbus Group. Columbus, OH.
• Cross, J. R., & Cross, T. L. (2015). Clinical and mental health issues in counseling the gifted individual. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00192.x
• Cross, T. L., Anderson, L., Mammadov, S., & Cross, J. R. (2017). Social and emotional development of students with gifts and talents. In J. L. Roberts, T. F. Inman, & J. H. Robins (Eds.), Introduction to gifted education (pp. 95–118). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
• Cross, T. L., Cross, J. R., & Davis, A. S. (2009). Social and emotional development of students with gifts and talents. In B. McFarlane & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Leading change in gifted education: The festschrift of Dr. Joyce VanTassel-Baska (pp. 49–60). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
• Cross, T. L., Speiers Neumeister, K. L., & Cassady, J. C. (2007). Psychological types of academically gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207302723
• Cukierkorn, J. R., Karnes, F. A., Manning, S. J., Houston, H., & Besnoy, K. (2008). Recognizing giftedness: Defining high ability in young children. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 36(2), 3–13.
• Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
• Dark, V. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). Differential enhancement of working memory with mathematical versus verbal precocity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.48
• DeVries, A. R., & Webb, J. T. (2007). Gifted parent group: The SENG model (2nd ed.). Scottsdale: Great Potential Press.
• DeYoung, C. G. (2011). Intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 711-737). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977244.036
• Feldman, D. H. (1982). A developmental framework for research with gifted children. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1982(17), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219821705
• Feldman, D. H. (2000). Developmental theory and the expression of gifts and talents. In C. F. M. Van Lieshout & P. G. Heymans (Eds.), Developing talent across the lifespan (pp. 3–16). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
• Free, S.-A. (2017). Group support for parents of gifted children in the western region of Melbourne, Australia. In N. Ballam & R. Moltzen (Eds.), Giftedness and talent: Australasian perspectives (pp. 84–95). Singapore: Springer.
• Freeman, J. (2000). Families: The essential context for gifts and talents. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. S. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 573–585). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
• Geary, D. C., & Brown, S. C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27(3), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.3.398
• Gross, M. U. M. (2009). Highly gifted young people: Development from childhood to adulthood. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (part 1) (pp. 337–351). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer Science.
• Guignard, J.-H., Jacquet, A.-Y., & Lubart, T. I. (2012). Perfectionism and anxiety: A paradox in intellectual giftedness? PLoS ONE, 7(7):e41043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone/0041043
• Harrison, G. E., & Van Haneghan, J. P. (2011). The gifted and the shadow of the night: Dabrowski’s overexcitabilities and their correlation to insomnia, death anxiety, and fear of the unknown. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(4), 669–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321103400407
• Hébert, T. P. (2011). Understanding the social and emotional lives of gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
• Hindal, H. S. (2014). Visual-spatial learning: A characteristic of gifted students. European Scientific Journal, 10(13), 557–574.
• Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet: Origin and development. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book Company.
• Horowitz, F. D. (2004). A developmental view of giftedness. In S. M. Reis & R. J. Sternberg, (Eds.), Definitions and conceptions of giftedness (pp. 145–154). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• Jackson, P. S., & Peterson, J. (2003). Depressive disorder in highly gifted adolescents. Journal of Advanced Academics, 14(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2003-429
• Jung, J. Y. (2012). Giftedness as a developmental construct that leads to eminence as adults: Ideas and implications from an occupational/career decision-making perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212456072
• Jung, J. Y, & Worrell, F. C. (2017). School psychological practice with gifted students. In M. Thielking & M. Terjesen (Eds.), Handbook of Australian school psychology: Integrating international research, practice, and policy (pp. 575–593). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
• Kornmann, J., Zettler, I., Kammerer, Y., Gerjets, P., & Trautwein, U. (2015). What characterizes children nominated as gifted by teachers? A closer consideration of working memory and intelligence. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1033513
• Košir, K., Horvat, M., Aram, U., & Jurinec, N. (2016). Is being gifted always an advantage? Peer relations and self-concept of gifted students. High Ability Studies, 27(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1108186
• Kroesbergen, E. H., van Hooijdonk, M., Van Viersen, S., Middel-Lalleman, M. M. N., & Reijnders, J. J. W. (2016). The psychological well-being of early identified gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215609113
• Lang, M., Matta, M., Parolin, L., Morrone, C., & Pezzuti, L. (2017). Cognitive profile of intellectually gifted adults: Analyzing the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Assessment, 26(5), 929–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117733547
• Limont, W., Dreszer-Drogorób, J., Bedyńska, S., Śliwińska, K., & Jastrzębska, D. (2014). ‘Old wine in new bottles’? Relationships between overexcitabilities, the Big Five personality traits and giftedness in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.003
• McClain, M.-C., & Pfeifer, S. (2012). Identification of gifted students in the United States today: A look at state definitions, policies, and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28(1), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2012.643757
• Mendaglio, S. (2007). Affective-cognitive therapy for counseling gifted individuals. In S. Mendaglio & J. S. Peterson (Eds.), Models of counseling gifted children, adolescents, and young adults (pp. 35–68). Austin, TX: Prufrock Press.
• Mofield E. L., & Chakraborti-Ghosh, S. (2010). Addressing multidimensional perfectionism in gifted adolescents with affective curriculum. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(4), 479–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003300403
• Mueller, C. E., & Winsor, D. L. (2018). Depression, suicide, and giftedness: Disentangling risk factors, protective factors, and implications for optimal growth. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children, (pp. 255–284). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
• National Association for Gifted Children. (2018). Use of the WISC-V for gifted and twice exceptional identification. Retrieved from https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/Misc_PDFs/WISC-V%20Position%20Statement%20Aug2018.pdf
• Neihart, M., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Cross, T. L. (2015). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
• Neihart, M., & Yeo, L. S. (2018). Psychological issues unique to the gifted student. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 399–415). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Lee, S.-Y., & Thomson, D. (2014). Family environment and social development in gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214526430
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., & Worrell, F. C. (2015). Conceptualizations of giftedness and the development of talent: Implications for counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00190.x
• Papadopoulos, D. (2016). Psycho-pedagogical and educational aspects of gifted students, starting from the preschool age; How can their needs be best met? Journal of Psychological Abnormalities, 5(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-9900.1000153
• Peterson, J. S. (2018). Counseling gifted children and teens. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 511–527). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/0000038-033
• Peterson, J. S. (2000). Gifted and gay: A study of the adolescent experience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(4), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 001698620004400404
• Piechowski, M. M. (2006). Mellow out, they say. If only I could. Madison, WI: Yunasa Press.
• Pierson, E. E., Kilmer, L. M., Rothlisberg, B. A., & McIntosh, D. E. (2012). Use of brief intelligence tests in the identification of giftedness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911428193
• Piirto, J., Montgomery, D., & May, J. (2008). A comparison of Dabrowski’s overexcitabilities by gender for American and Korean high school gifted students. High Ability Studies, 19(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130802504080
• Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302
• Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10144
• Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2009). Myth 1: The gifted and talented constitute one single homogeneous group and giftedness is a way of being that stays in the person over time and experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346824
• Renzulli, J. S. (2016). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In S. M. Reis (Ed.), Reflections on gifted education: Critical works by Joseph S. Renzulli and colleagues (pp. 55–90). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
• Robins, J. H., Coleman, L. J., Micko, K. J., & Cross, T. L. (2015). Twenty-five years of research on the lived experience of being gifted in school: Capturing the students’ voices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(4), 358–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215607322
• Robinson A., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (2008). History of giftedness: Perspectives from the past presage modern scholarship. In S. I. Pfeiffer, (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 13–31). Boston, MA: Springer.
• Robinson, E. L. (2002). What is the school psychologist’s role in gifted education? Gifted Child Today, 25(4), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2002-78
• Roebers, C. M. (2017). Executive function and metacognition: Towards a unifying framework of cognitive self-regulation. Developmental Review, 45, 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2017.04.001
• Roeper, A. (1996). A personal statement of philosophy of George and Annemarie Roeper. Roeper Review, 19(1), 18–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199609553776
• Rogers, K. B. (1986). Do the gifted think and learn differently? A review of recent research and its implications for instruction. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10(1), 17–39.
• Rowe, E. W., Kingsley, J. M., & Thompson, D. F. (2010). Predictive ability of the General Ability Index (GAI) versus the Full Scale IQ among gifted referrals. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020148
• Rubenstein, L. D., Siegle, D., Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., & Burton, M. G. (2012). A complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 678–694. doi:10.1002/pits.21620
• Sak, U. (2004). A synthesis of research on psychological types of gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15(2), 70–79.
• Schuler, P. (2002). Perfectionism in gifted children and adolescents. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 71–79). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
• Shore, B. M. (2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative differences in how gifted children think. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 167–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10373-008
• Siegle, D. (2018). Understanding underachievement. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 285–297). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_16
• Silverman, L. K. (1997). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3–4), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.1997.9681865
• Silverman, L. K. (1998). Through the lens of giftedness. Roeper Review, 20(3), 204–210.
• Silverman, L. K. (2000). Identifying visual-spatial and auditory-sequential learners: A validation study. In N. Colangelo & S. G. Assouline (Eds.), Talent development V: Proceedings from the 2000 Henry B and Jocelyn Wallace national research symposium on talent development. Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.
• Silverman, L. K. (2009). The measurement of giftedness. In L.V. Shavinina (Ed.). International handbook on giftedness (pp. 947–970). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
• Silverman, L. (2018). Assessment of giftedness. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (2nd ed., pp. 183–207). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Science.
• Simonton, D. K. (2014). The mad-genius paradox: Can creative people be more mentally healthy but highly creative people more mentally ill? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614543973
• Speirs Neumeister, K. L., Flechter, K. L., & Burney, V. H. (2015). Perfectionism and achievement motivation in high-ability students: An examination of the 2 × 2 model of perfectionism. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215592502
• Speirs Neumeister, K. L., Williams, K. K., & Cross, T. L. (2009). Gifted high-school students’ perspectives on the development of perfectionism. Roeper Review, 31(4), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190903177564
• Steiner, H. H., & Carr, M. (2003). Cognitive development in gifted children: Toward a more precise understanding of emerging differences in intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 15(3), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024636317011
• Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Successful intelligence: A model for testing intelligence beyond IQ tests. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8(2), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejeps.2015.09.004
• Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Explorations in giftedness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
• Terman, L. M. (1925–1959). Genetic studies of genius (Vols. I–V). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Tippey, J. G., & Burnham, J. J. (2009). Examining the fears of gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2009-861
• Tong, J., & Yewchuk, C. (1996). Self-concept and sex-role orientation in gifted high school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(1), 15–23. doi: 10.1177/001698629604000103
• Tortop, H.S. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of in-service training program for the education of the academically gifted students in Turkey: A Case Study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientist, 2(2), 67-86
• Vaivret-Douret, L. (2011). Developmental and cognitive characteristics of “high-level potentialities” (highly gifted) children. International Journal of Pediatrics, 2011, 420297. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/420297
• Worrell, F. C., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Subotnik, R. F. (2012). Important issues, some rhetoric, and a few straw men: A response to comments on “rethinking giftedness and gifted education.” Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212456080
• Zenasni, F., Mourgues, C., Nelson, J., Muter, C., & Myszkowski, N. (2016). How does creative giftedness differ from academic giftedness? A multidimensional conception. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.003