The effectiveness of blended learning model based on inquiry collaborative tutorial toward students’ problem-solving skills in physics

Abstract

In this study, a collaborative inquiry-based blended learning model was developed. The model was supported by model books, learning instruments, and test instruments for problem-solving skills. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the model to practice problem-solving skills for physics students. This research included research and development. The development model used uses the 4-D model (define, design, develop, and disseminate). The model and instruments were validated by the expert. The testing phase using the effectiveness test was carried out in one shot case study pre-post test design on three classes. The model implementation test was carried out on pre-service physics teachers at a private university in Mataram. Data collection was performed using observation sheets, problem-solving tests, and student response questionnaires. The data analysis technique used was descriptive, quantitative, and qualitative. The results showed that the inquiry collaborative tutorial-based blended learning model is effective in improving problem-solving skills. Students' problem-solving skills at the visualization step and describing the problem is high, while the next stage is still in the medium category. Students also gave positive responses to learning physics using this model.

Keywords

• blended learning,inquiry,collaborative,tutorial,problem-solving skills

Supporting Institution

Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Mataram.

Thanks

The authors would like to thank all the teams at the Physics Education and Technology Research Center and the Indonesian Publication Center (IPC) Team, who have helped with the media development process, the research process, and recommendations for improving this article. The authors are also grateful to the journal editor and reviewers for helpful comments to improve the paper.

References

1. Adawiyah, R., Harjono, A., Gunawan, G., & Hermansyah, H. (2019). Interactive e-book of physics to increase students’ creative thinking skills on rotational dynamics concept. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1153 (1), p. 012117.
2. Ajayi, L. (2011). “How ESL teachers’ sociocultural identities mediate their teacher role identities in a diverse urban school setting.” The Urban Review, 43(5), 654-680.
3. Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). “Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4).
4. Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2017). “Investigating the effect of learning styles in a blended e-learning system: An extension of the technology acceptance model (TAM).” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2).
5. Arends, R.I. (2012). Learning to Teach Ninth Edition. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Companies, Inc.
6. Aydogdu, M., Guven, E., & Aka, I. E. (2012). “Effect of Problem-solving Method on Science Method on Science Process Skills and Academic Achievement.” Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(4).
7. Ayse, O., & Sertac, A. (2011). Overviews on Inquiry Based and Problem Based Learning Meth
8. Balram, S. (2019). Teaching and Learning Pedagogies in Higher Education Geographic Information Science. In GIScience Teaching and Learning Perspectives. Springer, Cham.

9. Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). “Teaching for Meaningful Learning: A Review of Research on Inquiry-Based and Cooperative Learning. Book Excerpt.” George Lucas Educational Foundation.
10. Brad, A. (2011). “A Study of the Problem-solving Activity in High School Students: Strategies and Self-Regulated Learning.” Acta Didactica Napocensia, 4(1), 21-30.
11. Bradford, A. (2015, october 19). Science & scientific method: A definition. Diambil kembali dari www.livescience.com:http://www.livescience.com/20896-science-scientific-method.html//
12. Byun, H., Lee, J., & Cerreto, F. A. (2014). “Relative effects of three questioning strategies in ill-structured, small group problem-solving.” Instructional Science, 42(2), 229-250.
13. Chakravarthi, S., & Haleagrahara, N. (2010). “Implementation of PBL curriculum involving multiple disciplines in undergraduate medical education programme.” International Education Studies, 3(1), 165-169.
14. Cheung, W., S., and Hew K., F. (2011). “Critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: an investigation of student facilitation techniques.” New Horizons in Education, 59(1), 52-65.
15. Chu, S. K. W., Tse, S. K., & Chow, K. (2011). “Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills.” Library & Information Science Research, 33(2), 132-143.
16. Coşkun, Y. D., Garipağaoğlu, Ç., & Tosun, Ü. (2014). “Analysis of the relationship between the resiliency level and problem-solving skills of university students.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 673-680.
17. Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). “Conceptual problem-solving in high school physics.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 11(2), 020106.
18. Duran, M. (2014). “A Study on 7th Grade Students’ Inquiry and Communication Competencies.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4511-4516.
19. Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., & Hartman, J. (2005). Higher education, blended learning, and the generations: Knowledge is power: No more. Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education, 88-89.
20. Efendioglu, A. (2015). “Problem-based learning environment in basic computer course: Pre-service teachers’ achievement and key factors for learning. Journal of International Education Research, 3(1),205-216.
21. Ersoy, E., & Guner, P. (2015). “The Place of Problem-solving and Mathematical Thinking in The Mathematical Teaching.” The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education-January, 5(1).
22. Etkina, E., Van Heuvelen, A., White-Brahmia, S., Brookes, D. T., Gentile, M., Murthy, S., ... & Warren, A. (2006). Scientific abilities and their assessment. Physical Review special topics-physics education research, 2(2), 020103.
23. Feng, L., & Ha, J. L. (2016). “Effects of teachers’ information literacy on lifelong learning and school effectiveness.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1653-1663.
24. Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J. (2014). Complex Problem-solving: The European perspective. Psychology Press.
25. Friesen, S., & Scott, D. (2013). Inquiry-based learning: A review of the research literature. Alberta Ministry of Education.
26. Garnham, C. & Kaleta, R. 2002. “Introduction to hybrid courses.” Teaching with Technology Today, 8 (6). [Online]. Available: http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm.
27. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). “Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education.” American Journal of Distance Education, 15 (1), 17-23
28. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to assess cognitive presence.
29. Godwin, O., Adrian, O., & Johnbull, E. (2015). “The impact of physics laboratory on students offering physics in Ethiopia west local government area Oddelta state.” Education Research and Review, 10(7), 952-956.
30. Gok, T., & Gok, O. (2016). Peer instruction in chemistry education: Assessment of students' learning strategies, conceptual learning and problem-solving. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching (Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1-21). The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies
31. Gök, T., & Silay, I. (2010). “Efects Of Problem-Solving Strategies Teaching on Problem-Solving Attitudes of Cooperative Learning Groups In Physics Education.” Journal of Theory & Practice in Education (JTPE), 4(2).
32. Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). “Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence.” International journal for the scholarship of teaching and learning, 3(2), 16.
33. Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Herayanti, L., & Husein, S. (2019). Problem-Based Learning Approach with Supported Interactive Multimedia in Physics Course: Its Effects on Critical Thinking Disposition. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1075-1089.
34. Gunawan, G., Mashami, R. A., & Herayanti, L. (2020). Gender Description on Problem-Solving Skills in Chemistry Learning Using Interactive Multimedia. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 561-579.
35. Gunawan, G., Suranti, N. M. Y., Nisrina, N., & Herayanti, L. (2018). Students’ Problem-Solving Skill in Physics Teaching with Virtual Labs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2, 79-90.
36. Gunawan, G., Suranti, N. M. Y., Nisrina, N., Herayanti, L., & Rahmatiah, R. (2018). The effect of virtual lab and gender toward students’ creativity of physics in senior high school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1108 (1) p. 012043.
37. Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25-41.
38. Hämäläinen, R., De Wever, B., Malin, A., & Cincinnato, S. (2015). “Education and working life: VET adults' problem-solving skills in technology-rich environments.” Computers & Education, 88, 38-47.
39. Herayanti, L., Habibi, H., & Fuaddunazmi, M. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Moodle pada Matakuliah Fisika Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(2), 210-219.
40. Hermansyah, H., Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., & Adawiyah, R. (2019). Guided inquiry model with virtual labs to improve students’ understanding on heat concept. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1153 (1), p. 012116.
41. Honebein, P. H., & Honebein, C. H. (2014). “Effectiveness, efficiency, and appeal: pick any two? The influence of learning domains and learning outcomes on designer judgments of useful instructional methods.” Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 53–69.
42. Huffman, D. (1997). “Effect of explicit problem-solving instruction on high school students' problem‐solving performance and conceptual understanding of physics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 551-570.
43. Husein, S., Gunawan. G., Harjono, A., & Wahyuni, S. (2019). Problem-Based Learning with Interactive Multimedia to Improve Students’ Understanding of Thermodynamic Concepts. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), p. 012028.
44. Jahanpour, F., Azodi, P., Azodi, F., & Khansir, A. A. (2016). “Barriers to practical learning in the field: a qualitative study of iranian nursing students’ experiences.” Nursing and midwifery studies, 5(2).
45. Jin, S., & Shang, Y. (2019). Basic Research on Blended Teaching Mode in Colleges and Universities. In 2019 International Conference on Advanced Education Research and Modern Teaching (AERMT 2019). Atlantis Press.
46. Kanadli, S., & Saglam, Y. (2016). ”Investigating the effectiveness of professional development program designed to improve science teacher classroom discourse.” International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(3), 97-112.
47. Kashefi, H., Ismail, Z., & Yusof, Y. M. (2012). “Supporting engineering students’ thinking and creative problem-solving through blended learning.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 117-125.
48. Kaya, S., Akaydin, B. B., & Demir, D. (2015). “Teachers awareness and perceived effectiveness of instructional activities in relation to the allocation of time in the classroom.” Science Education International, 26(3), 344-357.
49. Keller, J. M. (1984). “The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training.” Aspects of educational technology, 17, 140-145.
50. Keller, J. M. (1987). “Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design.” Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2.
51. Kennedy I. G., Gloria L., & Hélia J. (2016). Education Skills for 21st Century Teachers:Voices From a Global Online Educators’ Forum. London: SpringerBriefs in Education. DOI 10.1007/978-3- 319-22608-8
52. Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). “Scaffolding problem-solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice.” Computers and Education, 56(2), 403–417.
53. Kinoshita, T. J., Knight, D. B., & Gibbes, B. (2017). The positive influence of active learning in a lecture hall: an analysis of normalised gain scores in introductory environmental engineering. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(3), 275-284.
54. Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, C. H., Jian, P. H., & Liou, P. Y. (2012). “The dynamics of motivation and learning strategy in a creativity-supporting learning environment in higher education.” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(1), 172-180.
55. Mashami, R. A., & Gunawan, G. (2018). The Influence of Sub-Microscopic Media Animation on Students' Critical Thinking Skills Based on Gender. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1108 (1), p. 012106.
56. McNeill, K. L., Pimentel, D. S., & Strauss, E. G. (2013). “The impact of high school science teachers’ beliefs, curricular enactments and experience on student learning during an inquiry-based urban ecology curriculum.” International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2608-2644.
57. Moreno, R. (2010). Educational Psychology. John Wiley and Sons.
58. Ngang, T. K., Nair, S., & Prachak, B. (2014). “Developing instruments to measure thinking skills and problem-solving skills among Malaysian primary school pupils.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3760-3764.
59. Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (2007). An introduction to educational design research. Shanghai: China Normal University Press.
60. Nur M, Wikandari P.R., & Sugiarto B. (2008), Teori-teori Pembelajaran Kognitif, Pusat Sains dan Matematika Sekolah, Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
61. Ogunleye, A. O. (2009). “Teachers' and students' perceptions of students' problem-solving difficulties in physics: implications for remediation.” Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 6(7), 85-90.
62. Owston, R., York, D. N., & Malhotra, T. (2019). Blended learning in large enrolment courses: Student perceptions across four different instructional models. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 29-45.
63. Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). “Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle.” Educational research review, 14, 47-61.
64. Plomp, T. (2013). “Educational design research: An introduction.” Educational design research, 11-50.
65. Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. (2016). Exploration of mathematics problem-solving process based on the thinking level of students in junior high school. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 11 (14). 7278-7285.
66. Ramadhani, R., Umam, R., Abdurrahman, A., & Syazali, M. (2019). The Effect of Flipped-Problem Based Learning Model Integrated With LMS-Google Classroom for Senior High School Students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 137-158.
67. Santrock, J. W. (2011). Masa perkembangan anak. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
68. Santrock, J.W. (2011). Educational Psychology. New York: McGraw Hill.
69. Shibley, I., Amaral, K. E., Shank, J. D., & Shibley, L. R. (2011). “Designing a blended course: Using ADDIE to guide instructional design.” Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(6), 80-85.
70. Simone, & de, C. (2014). “Problem-based learning in teacher education: trajectories of change.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(12), 17-29.
71. Slavin, (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
72. Slavin, R. E., & Davis, N. (2006). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Vermont: Johnson State College.hasil ujicoba
73. Stebbings, S., Bagheri, N., Perrie, K., & Blyth, P. (2012). “Blended learning and curriculum renewal across three medical schools: The rheumatology module at the University of Otago.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7).
74. Stockwell, B. R., Stockwell, M. S., Cennamo, M., & Jiang, E. (2015). Blended learning improves science education. Cell, 162(5), 933-936.
75. Sumarni, S., Ramadhani, R., Sazaki, Y., Astika, R. T., Andika, W. D., & Prasetiyo, A. E. (2019). Development of" Child Friendly ICT" Textbooks to Improve Professional Competence of Teacher Candidates: A Case Study of Early Childhood Education Program Students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 643-658.
76. Tatar, N. (2006). The effect of inquiry-based learning approaches in the education of science in primary school on the science process skills, academic achievement and attitude. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara.
77. Temel, V. (2015). “The problem-solving skills of the teachers ın various branches.” Educational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 641-647.
78. Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Indiana: Indiana University.
79. Voughan. (2010). Designing for a Blanded Community of Inquiry. Blanded Learning in Finland. Helsinki: Faculty of Social Science at the University of Helsinki.
80. Walkington, C., Petrosino, A., & Sherman, M. (2013). “Supporting algebraic reasoning through personalized story scenarios: How situational understanding mediates performance.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(2), 89-120.
81. Walsh, L. N., Howard, R. G., & Bowe, B. (2007). “phenomenographic study of students’ problem-solving approaches in physics.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020 108.
82. Wenning, C. J. (2010). “Levels of inquiry: Using inquiry spectrum learning sequences to teach science.” Journal of Physics Teacher education online, 5(4), 11-19.
83. Wilhelm, J., Thacker, B., & Wilhelm, R. (2007). “Creating constructivist physics for introductory university classes.” Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2).
84. Wu, H. K., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). “Inscriptional practices in two inquiry‐based classrooms: A case study of seventh graders' use of data tables and graphs.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 63-95.
85. Yen, J. C., & Lee, C. Y. (2011). “Exploring problem-solving patterns and their impact on learning achievement in a blended learning environment.” Computers & Education, 56(1), 138-145.