The Effects of Zinc, Iron and Bio-fertilizers on Forage Yield and Some Quality properties of Soybean (Glycine max. (L) Merril) in Alkaline Soil Conditions

Öz

This study, conducted for two years in Iran under alkaline soil conditions, aimed to determine the effects of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria (PGPB) used as biological fertilizer along with the application of zinc and iron as foliar fertilizers on the forage soybean's green forage yield and some quality parameters. The experiment was established in a completely randomized block design with four replications. In the research, seeds of forage soybean variety Williams were used, and nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Azotobacter), phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (Pseudomonas putida, strain P13, Pantoea agglomerans, strain P5), and zinc and iron fertilizers were applied. The study investigated green forage yield, dry forage yield, crude protein yield, acid detergent fiber (ADF) content, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content, and relative feed values (RFVs). According to the results obtained from the experiment, the green forage yield ranged from 43193 to 58908 kg ha-1, dry forage yield ranged from 13650 to 18615 kg ha-1, crude protein yield ranged from 1641 to 2732 kg ha-1, ADF content ranged from 28.9% to 35.8%, NDF content ranged from 42.6% to 49.0%, and RFVs ranged from 87.4 to 110.3. Due to the inadequate levels of phosphorus, iron, and zinc in the trial area soils, it was observed that the application of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria with iron and zinc, as well as the use of nitrogen-fixing bacteria, significantly influenced the forage yield and quality of forage soybean.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Azotobacter
• Biological fertilizer
• Forage quality
• Iron
• Soybean

Alkali Toprak Koşullarında Uygulanan Çinko, Demir ve Biyogübrelerin Yemlik Soya (Glycine Max. (L) Merril)’da Ot Verimi ve Ot Kalite Özelliklerine Etkileri

Öz

Bu çalışma, biyolojik gübre olarak kullanılan Bitki Gelişimini Teşvik Eden Bakteri'ler (kontrol, azot bağlayıcı ve fosfat çözücü) ile çinko ve demirin yaprak gübre olarak uygulanmasının yemlik soya bitkisinin yaş ot verimi ve bazı kalite unsurları üzerindeki etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla, İran'ın alkali toprak koşullarında 2013-2014 yılları arasında 2 yıl süre ile yürütülmüştür. Deneme, şansa bağlı tam bloklar deneme desenine göre dört tekerrürlü olarak kurulmuştur. Araştırmada yemlik soya (Glycine max.(L) Merril)’nın Williams çeşidinin tohumları, azot bağlayıcı (Azotobakter), fosfor çözücü (Pseudomonas putida, strain P13, Pantoea agglomerans, strain P5) bakteri ile çinko ve demir gübreleri kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada yaş ot verimi, kuru ot verimi, ham protein verimi, asit deterjan fiber (ADF) oranı, nötral deterjan fiber (NDF) oranı ve nispi yem değeri (NYD) incelenmiştir. Denemede elde edilen sonuçlara göre yaş ot veriminin 4319,3-5890,8 kg/da, kuru ot veriminin 1365,0-1861,5 kg/da, ham protein veriminin 164,1- 273,2 kg/da, asit deterjan fiber (ADF) oranının %28.9-35,8, nötral deterjan fiber (NDF) oranının %42,6-49,0 ve nispi yem değerinin (NYD) 87,4-110,3 arasında olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Deneme alanı toprakları fosfor, demir ve çinko yönünden yetersiz olduğu için fosfat çözücü (Pseudomonas putida, strain P13, Pantoea agglomerans, strain P5) bakteri ile demir ve çinko uygulamalarının ve ayrıca azot bağlayıcılarının (Azotobakter) yemlik soyanın ot verimi ve kalitesi üzerine önemli bir etki yaptığı gözlemlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Azotobakter
• Biyolojik gübre
• Çinko
• Demir
• Ot kalitesi

Kaynakça

1. Abasi, R., Siadat, S.A., Bakhshandeh, A. & Mosavi, S. Y. (2016). Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria on quantitative and qualitative yield of forage maize. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 6(21):133-145.
2. Abdelaal, K., AlKahtani, M., Attia, K., Hafez, Y., Király, L. & Künstler, A. (2021). The Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria in Alleviating the Adverse Effects of Drought on Plants. Biology, 10(6): 520.
3. Abdili, J., Roshdi M., Majidi A., Gorttappeh H.A. & Henareh M. (2009). Effect of zinc sulphate application method on soybean var. Williams. Journal of Research in Crop Sciences, 1(4): 39-50.
4. Akalin, K.M., (2019). Çinko uygulamasının nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) çeşitlerinin tane çinko içeriğinin zenginleştirilmesi ve verim öğelerine etkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarla Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, 239 Sayfa.
5. Alizadeh, M.B., Makarian, H., Ebadi, K.G.A., Izadi, D.E. & Gholami, A. (2019). The effect of organic and biological fertilizers on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) at the climate of Ardabil region. Saffron Agronomy & Technology.7(2): 227-244.
6. Alloway, B.J. (2004). Brussels, Belgium: International Zinc Association.
7. Alloway. B.J. (2008). Zinc in Soils and Crop Nutrition. Second edition, published by IZA and IFA, Brussels, Belgium and Paris, France.
8. Alpago, Ö., (2019). Bitki gelişimini uyaran kök bakterilerinin (PGPR) Kivircik marul (Lactuca sativa var. crispa) yetiştiriciliğine etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı. Iğdır Üniversitesi. 41 sayfa.

9. Arıoğlu, H. (2013). Soya Tarımı. Ç.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi. Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü. Adana.1-13.
10. Aydın, A., & Sezen, Y. (1995). Toprak Kimyası Laboratuvar Kitabı. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Yayınları No: 174, Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Ofset Tesisi, Erzurum.
11. Aydın, İ., 2019. Çevre dostu tarım uygulamalarının vazgeçilmezi olan biyogübre üretim faaliyetlerine gönen örneği. Kesit Akademi Dergisi (The Journal of Kesit Academy), 5(20):11-25.
12. Bagheri Dehabadi, M., Moghadam, H., Chaichi, M. R., & Ziloee, N. (2017). The mycorrhiza and iron and zinc foliar application on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of forage sorghum. Journal of Crops Improvement, 19(3), 799-815.
13. Blount, A.R., Wright D.L., Sprenkel R.K., Hewitt T.D. & Myer R.O. (2013). Forage Soybeans for Grazing, Hay and Silage. Agronomy Department, UF/IFAS Extension. SSAGR-180.
14. Burdman, S., Jurkevitch, E., & Okon, Y. (2000). Recent advances the use of plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (BGTB) in agriculture. In Microbiol Interactions in Agriculture and Forestry. Subba, R.N., Dommergues, Y.R.(eds). Vol II Chp. 10, 29-250. Pub. Inc. UK.
15. Coşkan, A., Gök, M., & Doğan, K. (2006). Anız yakılmış ve yakılmamış parseller üzerine uygulanan tütün atığının soyada biyolojik azot fiksasyonuna ve verime etkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 12 (3) 239-245.
16. Çetin, S. H. & Öztürk, Ö. (2012). Soyada Farklı Fosfor Dozlarının Verim ve Verim Unsurları Üzerine Etkisi. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 5 (1): 157-161.
17. Çırak, C. (2005). Soyada bitki gelişim dönemleri. OMÜ Zir. Fak. Dergisi, 20(2):57-65.
18. Çolak, E. & Sancak, C. (2017). Azotlu gübre dozlarının İtalyan çimi (Lolium italicum L.) çeşitlerinin ot kalitesine etkisi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 30(3): 245-251.
19. Demkin, V.I. & Ageev V.V. (1990). Productivity of maize as dependent on weather conditions and fertilizers and methods of covering them in a zone of unstable moisture supply, Agrokhimiya, 7: 73-82.
20. Dhaliwal, S.S., Sharma, V., Shukla, A.K., Verma, V., Sandhu, P.S., Behera, S.K., Singh, P., Kaur, J., Singh, H., Abdel-Hafez, S.H., … (2021). Interactive Effects of Foliar Application of Zinc, Iron and Nitrogen on Productivity and Nutritional Quality of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Agronomy, 11(11), 2333.
21. Efe, L., & Yarpuz E. (2011). The effect of zinc application methods on seed cotton yield, lint and seed quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in east Mediterranean region of Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10: 8782-8789.
22. Ergene, A. (1993). Toprak Biliminin Esasları (4. Baskı). Atatürk Üniv. Yayınları No: 586. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No: 267. Ders Kitapları Serisi No: 42. Erzurum.
23. Farzana, Y., Saad, R. O. S., & Kamaruzaman, S. (2009). Growth and storage root development of sweet potato inoculated with rhizobacteria under glasshouse conditions. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3 (2):1461-1466.
24. Fateh, A. (2007). The effect of different soil fertility systems on the performance and medicinal properties of conger. Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran. PhD thesis.
25. Galavi, M., Yosefi, K., & Ramrodi, M. (2011). Effect of biophosphate and chemical phosphorus fertilizer accompanied with foliar application of micronutrients on yield, quality and phosphorus and zinc concentration of maize. Journal of Agricultural Science, 3(4), 22-30.
26. Gharanjiki, A., Dawoudi M.H., & Malakoti M.J. (2002). Study causes of zinc deficiency in the calcareous soils and rich of phosphorus. Institute of research soil and water. Technical Journal of Agricultural Education, Iran, Kraj, 117, 1 -20.
27. Goering, H.K., Van Soest, P.J. (1970). Forage Fibre Analyses. Agriculture Handbook No: 379, ARS-USDA, Washington DC, pages, 829.
28. Imriz, G., Özdemir F., Topal İ., Ercan B., Taş M.N., Yakışır E., & Okur O. (2014). Bitkisel üretimde bitki gelişimini teşvik eden rizobakteri (PGPR)'ler ve etki mekanizmaları. Elektronik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi TR, 12(2): 1-19.
29. Javaheri, S., Astaraei, A.R., Khorassani, R., Zabihi, H.R., & Emami, H. (2020). Effect of Zinc and Iron nano particles and organic fertilizers on quality and quantity yields of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Applied Research in Field Crops, 32 (4): 16-32.
30. Jha, A.B., & Warkentin, T.D. (2020). Biofortification of pulse crops: Status and future perspectives. Plants. 9-73.
31. Kadıoğlu, S. (2011). Fosforlu gübre ve bakteri uygulamalarının farklı yem bezelyesi özelliklerine etkileri. Atatürk Üni. Ziraat Fk. Doktora Tezi. Erzurum.
32. Kamaei, R., Parsa, M., Jahan, M., Rajari Sharifabadi, H., & Naserian, A.A. (2017). The effects of biological fertilizers, chemical fertilizers and manure application on some qualitative characteristics of Vicia villosa roth forage under greenhouse condition. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 14(4): 699-710.
33. Keshavarz Afshar, R., Chaichi, M. R., Moghadam, H., & Ehteshami, S. M. R. (2012). Irrigation, Phosphorus Fertilizer and Phosphorus Solubilizing Microorganism Effects on Yield and Forage Quality of Turnip (Brassica rapa L.) in an Arid Region of Iran. Agricultural Research, 1(4): 370-378.
34. Khalili, M.J., & Rushdi, M. (2009). Effect of foliar application of micronutrients on quality and quantity characteristics of silage corn (Var 704) in Khoy. Journal of Seedlings and Seed, 2(24), 281-293.
35. Labidi, S.1., Jeddi F.B., Tisserant B., Yousfi M., Sanaa M., Dalpé Y., & Sahraoui A.L. (2015). Field application of mycorrhizal bio-inoculants affects the mineral uptake of a forage legume (Hedysarum coronarium L.) on a highly calcareous soil. Mycorrhiza, 25(4):297-309.
36. Leong, J. (1986). Siderophores: Their biochemistry and possible role in the bioconrol of plant pathogens. Annual Reviw of Phytopathology, 24: 187-209.
37. Lindsay, W. L., & Norwell, W. A. (1969). Development of DTPA Soil Test for Zinc, Iron, Manganese and Copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. Vol: 33, p: 49-54.
38. Mehrvarz, S., & Chaichi, M.R. (2008). Effect of Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms and phosphorus chemical fertilizer on forage and grain quality of barely (Hordeum vulgare L). American-Eurasian Journal Agricultural and Environmental Science, 3: 855-860.
39. Moghaddam, N. R., Saberi M. H., & Sayyari M. H. (2013). The effect of soil application of iron sulfate and manganese on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of forage corn. Journal of Agricultural Cultivation, 15 (2): 75 -86.
40. Mohan, S., Singh M., & Rakesh Kumar R. (2015). Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and zinc fertilization on yield and quality of kharif fodder. Agricultural Reviews, 36 (3): 218-226.
41. Mugenzi, I., Yongli, D., Ngnadong, W.A., Dan, H., Niyigaba, E., Twizerimana, A., & Jiangbo, H. (2018). Effect of combined zinc and iron application rates on summer maize yield, photosynthetic capacity and grain quality. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research. 12 (5): 36-46.
42. Munir, I., Ranjha A.M., Sarfraz M., Obaid-ur-Rehman, Mehdiand S.M., & Mahmood K. (2004). Effect of residual phosphorus on sorghum fodder in two different textured soils. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 6(6): 967-969.
43. Mut, Z., Demirtaş, N., & Doğanay Erbaş Köse, Ö. (2021). Farklı yulaf (Avena sativa L.) genotiplerinin destek sulamalı ve sulamasız koşullarda bazı kalite özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, (36): 234-243.
44. Naghdi Badi, H., Omidi, H., Golzad, A., Torabi, H., & Fotookian, M.H. (2011). Change in Crocin, Safranal and Picrocrocin Content and Agronomical Characters of Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) under Biological and Chemical of Phosphorous Fertilizers. Journal of Medical Plants, 10 (40):58-68.
45. Naserirad, H., Soleymanifard, A., & Naseri, R. (2011). Effect of integrated application of bio-fertilizer on grain yield, yield components and associated traits of maize cultivas. Am- Eurasian. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 10(2): 271-277.
46. Omidi, H., Naghdi Badi, HA., Golzad, A., Torabi, H., & Footoukian, MH. (2009). The Effect of Chemical and Bio-fertilizer Source of Nitrogen on Qualitative and Quantitative Yield of Saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Journal of Medicinal Plants, 8 (30): 98 - 109.
47. Öztürk, A., Bulut, S., Yıldız, N., & Karaoğlu, M. (2012). Effects of organic manures and non-chemical weed control on wheat: I-Plant growth and grain yield. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 18(1), 9-20.
48. Parsaeimeher, A., Alizadeh O., & Hagigi J.B. (2008). The effect of Azotobacter, Azospirillum biofertilizers on reducing nitrogen consumption and their interaction with Streptomyces in sustainable wheat farming. https://www.civilica.com. NABATAT10-147.
49. Pejuhan, J., Çomaklı, B., Güllap, M.K., Amirnia, R., & Pourali, B. (2016). Organik yem bitkilerinde biyolojik gübrelerin (BGTB) ot verimi ve ot kalitesi üzerine etkileri. Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı.7. Ulusal Bitki Besleme ve Gübre Kongresi.12-15 Ekim, Adana, Türkiye.
50. Pejuhan, J., & Çomaklı, B. (2018). Kireçli Topraklarda Uygulanan Demir, Çinko ve Bazı Biyolojik Gübrelerin Yemlik Soya (Glycine max. (L) Merrill)’da Verim ve Bazı Özelliklere Etkileri. Alınteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 33(2): 153-163.
51. Poshtdar, A., Siadat, S. A., Abdali mashhadi, A., Mosavi, S. A., & Hamdi, H. (2012). Comparison between application of PGPR bacteria and chemical fertilizers on quality and total silage yield of Maize under different organic seed bed. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 11:713-717.
52. Raei, Y., Sardaroud, S.N., & Bageri, A. (2013). The effect of chemical and biological fertilizers on the performance of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) cultivar Speedfed in different harvests. Agroecology, 5(3):231-242.
53. Ram, R.L., Maji, C., & Bindroo, B.B. (2013). Role of PGPR in different crops-an overview. Indian Journal of Sericulture, 52(1):1-13.
54. Raut, V.M., Kanitkar, S., Kulkarni, M., Vyas, A.K., Das, A., & Kadam, M. (2019). Effect of vitormone (Azotobacter chroococcum) liquid bio-inoculant on crop growth components and yield of soybean (Glycine max. L. Merrill). Pestology, XLIII (7):31-38.
55. Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E., Rahimi, S., Rahimi, A., Hadi, H., & Mahdavikia, H. (2018). Response of Seed Yield and Essential oil of Black Cumin (Nigella sativa L.) Affected as Foliar Spraying of Nano-fertilizers. Journal of Medicinal Plants and By-products, 1:33-40.
56. Rezvani, M., Afshang, B., Gholizadeh, A., & Zaefarian, F., (2011). Evaluation of Mycorrhizal Fungus and Phosphate Rock Effectiveness on Growth and Uptake of Phosphorous in Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Electronic Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 1 (2): 97-117.
57. Roumani, A., Ehteshami, S. M. R., & Rabiei, M. (2015). Effect of seed inoculation with Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on forage quality and yield of turnip (Brassica rapa L.) at the different values of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers. Plant Production Technology, 14(2):89-99.
58. Saeed, M., & Fox, R. L. (1977). Relations between suspension ph and zinc solubility in acid and calcareous soils. Soil Science, 124(4), 199-204.
59. Saeednejad, A.H., Rezvani, M.P., khazai, H.R., & Nasiri, M.M. (2011). Investigating the effect of using organic materials, biological fertilizers and chemical fertilizers on the digestibility and protein content of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) of Speedfeed cultivar. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 9(4):23-29.
60. Sarmadi, B., Rouzbehan, Y., & Rezaei, J. (2016). Influences of growth stage and nitrogen fertilizer on chemical composition, phenolics, in situ degradability and in vitro ruminal variables in amaranth forage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 215, 73-84.
61. Sayyadi Azar, Z., Javanmard, A., Shekari, F., Abbasi, A., & Amani Machiani, M. (2019). Amount of Production and Nutritional Value of Cultivated Forage Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) with Integrated Application of Bio and Chemical Fertilizers under Different Irrigation Regims. Journal of Agroecology, 11(3):1021-1035.
62. Shenk, J. S., & Barnes R. F. (1985). Forages analysis and its application (E. Heath, F. Barnes, S. Metcalfe eds.) Forages, Iowa State University Press, Iowa, 445-451.
63. Singh, V., Singh A.K., Verma S.S., & Joshi Y.P. (1988). Effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield and quality of multicut tropical forages. Tropical Agriculture, 65 (2): 129-131.
64. Tajik khaveh, M., Allahverdi I., Daneshian J., & Armandpisheh O. (2011). Study effect of bio-fertilizers on nodulation and growth soybean (Glycine max L. Merill) under water deficit stress of seed. Journal of Agroecology,3(3):337-346.
65. Taherkhanchi, A., Akbari, G. A., Modarres-Sanavy, S. A. M., & Ghorbani Javid, M. (2013). Evaluation of effects of bio-fertilizers on some physiological and biochemical traits in soybean under water deficit condition. Journal of Crops Improvement, 15(3), 141-153.
66. Tehrani, M.M., Moshiri, F., Gheibi, M.N., Rezaei, H., Keshavarz, P., Davoodi, M.H., Ziaeian, A.H., Noorgholipour, F., Majidi, A., Hosseini, S.M., Saadat, S., Rahmani, H.A., Khademi, Z., Balali, M.R., & Mostashari, M. (2015). Comprehensive Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition Program 2014-025. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization. Soil and Water Research Institute.Volume II, Iran, Tehran.
67. Timurağaoğlu, K. A., Genç A., & Altınok S. (2004). Ankara koşullarında yem bezelyesi hatlarında yem ve tane verimleri. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 10 (4): 457-461.
68. Ülgen, N., & Yurtsever, N. (1995). Türkiye Gübre ve Gübreleme Rehberi (4. Baskı). T.C. Başbakanlık Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Genel Yayın No: 209, Teknik Yayınlar No: T.66, s.230, Ankara.
69. Van Dyke, N.J., & Anderson, P. M. (2000). Interpreting a forage analysis. Alabama cooperative extension. Circular ANR-890.
70. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary Fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583-3597.
71. Yıldız, N., & Bircan, H. (2012). Araştırma ve Deneme Metotları. Atatürk Üni. Ziraat fak. Ders Kitapları Serisi:57, Yay. No:697, Erzurum.
72. Yilmaz, M., Çomaklı, B., Severoğlu, S., & Güllap, M. K. (2025). Farklı azot dozu ve biçim zamanı uygulamalarının çayırların botanik kompozisyonu ve yem kalitesi üzerine etkileri. Journal of Ecological Harmony, 1(1), 1-16.
73. Yolcu, H., Turan, M., Lithourgidis, A., Cakmakci, R., & Koc, A. (2011). Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and manure on yield and quality characteristics of Italian ryegrass under semi arid conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5(13), 1730-1736.
74. Wissuwa, M., Ismail, A. M., & Graham, R. D. (2008). Rice grain zinc concentrations as affected by genotype, native soil-zinc availability, and zinc fertilization. Plant and Soil, 306(1), 37-48.