Linking Information Sources, Innovation Outputs and Performance in Nigeria’s Mining Sector

Öz

The paper contributes to the on-going discussion on innovation sources and innovation systems in literature. Primary data was collected from mining companies in six states in Nigeria. One hundred and fifty mining companies in the six states-being all companies with mineral title were purposively selected for the study administering a questionnaire per company. However, only one hundred and six questionnaire were completed with accuracy and found useful for analysis. Three models were used to address the study’s objectives: For models one and two, binary logistic regression maximum likelihood method was used to determine the impact of information sources on innovation outputs technological and non-technological innovations while in model three, multi-linear regression ordinary least square method was used to determine the impact of innovation output on financial performance in the mining companies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• information sources,technological innovation,non-technological innovation,performance.

Linking Information Sources, Innovation Outputs and Performance in Nigeria’s Mining Sector

Öz

Kaynakça

1. Aslesen, Isaksen, A. and Karlsen, J. (2011).Modes of innovation and differentiated responses to globalization. Journal of .Knowledge Economics, 2.
2. Chen, J., Chen, Y., Venhaverbeke, W. (2011). The influence of scope, depth and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms, Technovation31(8),363–372.
3. Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges. In:Fagerberg, J., Mowery,D., Nelson,R.(Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, NewYork.
4. Fitjar, R. and Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2013). Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Res.Policy 42, 128–138.
5. Freeman, C. (1982). Technological Infrastructure and International Competitiveness. Draft Paper Submitted to the OECD Ad hoc Group on Science, Technology and Competitiveness, August.
6. Freeman, C. (1995). „The national system of innovation in historical perspective Cambridge Journal of Economics. 19: 5-24
7. Freeman, C., (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter, London.
8. Freeman, C., (1988). Japan: a new national system of innovation. In:Dosi, G. (Ed.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, London, pp. 330–348.

9. Isaksen, A. and Karlsen, J. (2010). Different modes of innovation and the challenge of connecting universities and industry, Eur.Plan.Stud. 18(12), 1193–2010.
10. Isaksen, A. and Karlsen, J. (2012). Combined and complex modes of innovation in regional cluster development. In: Asheim, B., Parrilli, M.D. (Eds.), Interactive Learning for Innovation. Palgrave-Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp.115–135
11. Jegede, O.O., Ilori, M.O., Sonibare, J.A., Oluwale, B.A. and Siyanbola, W.O. (2012). Factors influencing Innovation and Competitiveness in the Service Sector in Nigeria: A Sub-Sectoral Approach. Journal of Management, 2(3): 69-79.
12. Jensen, M., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., Lundvall, B.A. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Res.Policy36,680–693.
13. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2008). ‘Low-Tech’ innovations. Industry and Innovation 15 (1), 19–43.
14. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Jacobson, D., Robertson, P.L. (2006). ‘Low-tech’ industries: innovativeness and development perspectives—a summary of a European research project. Prometheus 24, 3–21.
15. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Jacobson, D., Laestadius, S. (Eds.), (2005a). Low-Tech Innovation in the Knowledge Economy. Peter Lang, Frankfurt.
16. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Jacobson, D., Laestadius, S., Smith, K., (2005b). Low and medium technology industries in the knowledge economy: the analytical issues. In: Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Jacobson, D.
17. Laestadius, S. (Eds.), Low-Tech Innovation in the Knowledge Economy. Peter Lang, Frankfurt, pp. 11–30
18. Lundvall, B.A° (1985). Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. Aalborg University Press, Aalborg.
19. Lundvall, B.A° (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Dosi, G. (Ed.), Technical Change and Economic Theory Pinter Publishers, London, pp. 349–369.
20. Lundvall, B.A. (1992a). National Systems of Innovation. Economic Theory. Pinter Publishers, London, pp. 349–369.
21. Lundvall, G-A. (1992b). Explaining Interfirm Cooperation- the Limits of Transaction Cost Approach in Grabher, G.ec. The Embedded Firm; On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks. London, Routledge.
22. Lundvall, B.A° (2003). National Innovation Systems: History and Theory. Working Paper. Aalborg University.
23. Lundvall, B.A. (2007). National systems of innovation: analytical concept and development tool. Ind. Innov.14,95–119.
24. Lundvall, B. Å., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., &Vang, J. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Edward Elgar Publishing.
25. NACETEM (2011). Assessment of Innovation Capability in the Manufacturing Sector in Nigeria, Monograph Series, No 4, NACETEM, Ile-Ife.
26. Nunes, S., López, R. and Dias, J. (2013). Innovation modes and firm performance: the case of Portugal. In: ERSA Conference, Palermo, August28–31.
27. OECD (2005). Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data: Oslo Manual, 3rd ed. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Paris.
28. Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of innovation: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res. Policy, 13(6), 343–373.
29. Rothwell, R. (1994). Issues in User-Producer Relations in the Innovation Process: The Role of Government, International Journal of Technology Management. 9-5-6-7: 629-649.
30. USGS (2010). Available online at http://minerals.usgs.gov. Accesssed 10th January, 2014
31. von Tunzelmann, N. and Acha, V. (2005). Innovation in “low-tech” Industries. In: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 407–432