The Mediation Role of Human Resource Management Capabilities in Relationship with Resource Based View, Core Competence and Innovation

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1 - 26, 01.06.2017

Gönül Kaya Özbağ

Öz

The importance of organizational resources and capabilities are realized by business practitioners and researchers as they support firm performance and competitive advantage. However, what exactly core competence is not clearly understood since terms such as resource, capability and competence are used interchangeably by researchers. From this point forth, this article provides a framework for separating organization's core competencies from resource and capability. In the first part of the research the relations and interactions among resource, capability and competence is explained. In the second part core competence concept is described and three empirical determiners such as uniqueness, inimitability and extendibility is proposed to discriminate core competence from resources and competences. The relationship between innovation and core competence and past researches in the related literature is presented in the third part. After the role of human resources management capability is investigated in fourth part, the paper is completed by evaluation of the research findings, the limitation of the research and recommendations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Resources, competences, core competence, innovation, human resource management capability

Kaynak Tabanlı Yönetim, Temel Yetenek ve Yenilik İlişkisinde İnsan Kaynakları Yönetim Yeteneklerinin Aracı rolü

Öz

Örgüt performansını artıran ve rekabetçi bir avantaj olarak değerlendirilen organizasyonel kaynakların ve yeteneklerin önemi uygulayıcılar ve araştırmacılar tarafından bilinmektedir. Ancak kaynak, yetenek ve temel yetenek gibi kavramların, araştırmacılar tarafından birbirinin yerine kullanılması, bu kavramları ve aralarındaki farkları anlamayı zorlaşmaktadır. Bu noktadan hareketle, bu makale organizasyonun temel yeteneklerini daha kolay belirleyebilmek amacıyla bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Araştırmanın ilk bölümünde kaynak, yetenek kabiliyet, beceri ve temel yetenek arasındaki ilişki ve etkileşimler açıklanmaktır. İkinci bölümde ise temel yetenek kavramına açıklık getirilmekte ve temel yetenekleri kaynak ve yeteneklerden ayırmak amacıyla müşteri değeri, taklit edilemezlik ve yaygınlaştırılabilirlik olarak isimlendirilen üç temel yetenek belirleyici unsur önerilmektedir. Yenilik ve temel yetenek arasındaki ilişkiler ve ilgili literatürde yapılan çalışmalara ise üçüncü bölümde yer verilmektedir. İnsan kaynakları yönetim yeteneklerinin yenilik üzerindeki aracılık rolü Baron ve Kenny 1986 tarafından önerilen üç aşamalı regresyon analizi ile dördüncü bölümde ölçülmüştür. 192 yöneticiden elde edilen anketlerin değerlendirmesiyle ulaşılan araştırma sonuçları, temel yetenek ve yenilik ilişkisinde İKY yeteneklerinin kısmi aracılık etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynaklar, yetenekler, temel yetenek, yenilik, insan kaynakları yönetim yetenekleri

Kaynakça

• Amabile M.Teresa, Conti Regina, Coon Heather, Lazenby Jeffrey, Heron Micheal (1996),“Assing The Work Enviroment for Creativity”, Acedemy of Management Journal, 39 (5), 1154–1184.
• Andrews, K. (1971). The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, Ill.
• Amit Raphael and Schoemaker J. Paul, (1993). “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent”, Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), 33-46
• Barney Jay (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal Of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
• Baer M. ve Freze M., (2002). “Innovation is not Enough: Climates for Initiative and Psychological Safety, Process Innovations and Firm Performance”, Journal of Organizational Behavious, 24(1), 45-68.
• Christensen, Clayton M.; Raynor, Michael E.; Anthony, Scott D. (2003). Six Keys to Creating New Growth Business, Harvard Management Update, Jan. 8(1).
• Cooper, Robert G.; De Brentani, Ulricke (1991). “New Industrial Financial Services: What Distinguishes the Winners”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(2),75-90
• Cooper Robert, G.; Kleinschmidt, Elko J. (1993). “Stage Gate Systems for New Product Success”, Marketing Management, 1(4).
• Collis David ve Montgomery A. Cynthia (1995).” Competing On Resources: Strategy In The 1990s”, Harvard Business Review, Temmuz-Ağustos (73), 118-128.
• Danneels Erwin (2002). “The Dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competences”, Strategic Management Journal, 23 (12), 1095-1121.
• Cummings, A. ve Oldham, G.R. (1997). “Enhancing Creativity: Managing Work Contexts For The High Potential Employee”, California Management Review, 40, 22- 38.
• Damanpour Fariborz, Kathryn A. Szabat ve William M. Evan (1989). “The Relationship Between Types of Innovation and Organizational Performance”, Journal of Management Studies, 26/6, 587–602.
• Dierickx P.J., Cool K., (1989), “Asset stock accumulation and the sustainability of competitive advantage”, Management Science, 35, 1504-1511.
• Dorothy Leonard-Barton (1992). “Core Capabilities, Core Rigidities: A Paradox In Managing New Product Development”, Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 13, 111-147
• Dougherty Deborah ve Hardy Cynthia, Sustained Product Innovation In Large, Mature Organizations: Overcoming Innovation-to-Organization Problems, The Academy of Management Journal, 39/5, Aralık, 1996.
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (2000). “Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change and pluralism”, Academy of Management Review, (25), 703-705.
• Erwin Danneels (2002). “The Dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competences”, Strategic Management Journal, 23: Ekim, 1092-1112.
• Güleş Hasan K. ve Bülbül Hasan (2004). Yenilikçilik, Nobel Yayınları, Ankara.
• Grant, R., (1996), “Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge creation”, Organization Science, 7, 375-387
• Godbout J. Alain, Managing Core Competencies (2000). “The Impact of Knowledge Management on Human Resources Practices in Leading-edge Organizations”, Knowledge Process Management, 7(2), 76-86.
• Gupta Samir, Woodside Arch, Dubelaara Chris, Bradmore Don (2009). “Diffusing Knowledge-Based Core Competencies For Leveraging Innovation Strategies: Modelling Outsourcing To Knowledge Process Organizations (KPOs) in pharmaceutical Networks”, Industrial Marketing Management, 38 (2), February, 219– 227.
• Hafeez Khalid Hafeez ve Essmail Ali (2007), “Evaluating Organisation Core Competences And Associated Personal Competencies Using Analytical Hierarchy Process”, Management Research News, 30(8), 530-547.
• Hafeez K., Zhang Y. ve Malak N. (2002), “Core Competence for Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Structured Methodology for Identifying Core Competence”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49-1, 28-35.
• Helfat E.Constance ve Peteraf A.Margaret (2003). “The Dynamic Resource Based-View: Capability Lifecycles, Strategic Management Journal”, 24-10, 997-1010.
• Henderson Rebecca ve Cockburn Iain (1996). “Scale, Scope and Spill overs: The Determinants Of Research Productivitiy In Drug Discovery”, The Rand Journal of Economics, 27 (1), 32-59.
• Advantage: What Is The Difference?”, Journal Of Education For Business, 83(2), 110- 115.
• Pastor Isabel Ma Prieto, Ma Pilar Pe´rez Santana and Celia Martı´n Sierra (2010). Managing Knowledge Through Human Resource Practices: Empirical Examination On The Spanish Automotive Industry, The International Journal of Human Resource Management,Vol. 21, No. 13.
• Penrose, E. G. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Wiley, New York.
• P. Rumelt Richard (1994). Competence-Based Competition, edited by G. Hamel and A. Heene, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Robert M. Grant (1991).”The Resource-Based Theory Of Competitive Advantage: Implication For Strategy Formulation”, California Management Review, 114-135.
• Selznick, H.A., (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation, New York: Harper & Row.
• Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: Mastering the five practices of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday
• Srivastava C. Shirish (2005).”Managing Core Competence of The Organization”, Vikalpa, 30(4), 49-63.
• Song, X. Michael; Parry, Mark E. (Sep97). “Teamwork Barriers in Japanese High-Technology Firms: The Sociocultural Differences Between R&D and Marketing Managers”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(5), 356–367.
• Shalley, C. E. Gilson, L., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 215-223.
• Shipton, H., Fay, D., West, M., Patterson, M. and Birdi, K. (2005). “Managing people to promote innovation’, Creativity and Innovation Management”, 14: 3, 118– 128.
• Shanthi G. ve Fariborz D. (2000). “The Impact Of Organizational Context On Innovation Adoption in Commercial Banks”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Manegemant, 47(1), 10-24.
• Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A., (1997). ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533
• Thompson Arthur A., Strickland A. Alonzo, Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, McGraw-Hill Comp. Inc., 11. Basım, Singapure, 1999.
• Tushman, Michael ve Charles O’Reilly (1996), “Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change”, California Management Review, 8-29.
• Özbağ, G. K., (2012). “Örgüt İkliminin Yeniliğe Destek Algısı Üzerindeki Etkilerini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma” Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:27, Sayı:2, 145-161.
• Zirger B. J. ve Maidique M. A. (1990), “A Model of New Product Development: An Empirical Test”, Management Science, 36(7), 867-883
• Zeynep Düren (2000). 2000’li Yıllarda Yönetim, 1.Basım, Alfa Yayınları, İstanbul
• Wang S., Guidice R., Tansky J. ve Wang, Z. (2010). When R&D spending is not enough: The critical role of
• culture when you really want to innovate, Human Resource Management, 49(4).
• Wei Li- Qun ve Lou Chung-Ming (2005). “Market Orientation HRM Importance and Competency; Determinants of Strategic HRM in Chinese Firms”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1901-1918.
• Wernerfelt Birger (1984). “An information based theory of microeconomics and its consequences for corporate strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171- 180.