Holding an Inquiry into the Instruction in Türkiye: A Systematic Review

Öz

The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate the studies focusing inquiry based instruction and learning conducted in the context of Türkiye. The review reported on 27 research articles, published from 2005 till 2024 in ERIC, Web of Science, ULAKBIM, and EBSCOhost in accordance with the following criteria; 1) contemporary research articles dating from 2005 to 2024, (2) studies conducted in the context of Türkiye, sampling Turkish population, (3) studies published in English and Turkish, (4) Peer-reviewed articles as the source (5) exclusion of conference proceedings or book chapters, thesis, and books (6) implementation of inquiry based instruction in comparison to traditional lecture-based classrooms, attitudes of students and teachers towards the relevant method and use of this method in a combination with other tools. The results of the review showed that inquiry based instruction related studies conducted in Turkey have the following major focuses: achievement, attitudes, its effect on various skills, its implications for teacher education and perspectives of the students in Inquiry based method and traditional classrooms. The results of the majority of the studies indicated that students taught through inquiry based instruction developed a range of skills such as research skills, scientific processing and problem solving, developed more positive attitudes towards classes and improved their self-efficacy. The studies reviewed in the context of Türkiye focusing on inquiry based instruction show that it has a positive contribution on various skills such as science processing, problem solving and researching, attitude towards the course and achievement. However, the studies in this context also signaled some difficulties to address such as lack of enough materials, guidance and skills and also time constraints. Therefore, experimental studies illuminating under which conditions this method is working efficiently are needed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Inquiry Based Instruction
• Case-Base Learning
• Project- Based Learning
• Problem- Based Learning
• Systematic review
• Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Adanali, R., & Alim, M. (2017). The Views of Preservice Teachers for Problem Based Learning Model Supported by Geocaching in Environmental Education. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 7(3), 264-292. Alkan, C. (1983) Eğitim Felsefesi. Bursa, Türkiye: Uludağ University Publishing.
2. Akinoglu, O. (2008). Assessment of the Inquiry-based Project Implementation Process in Science Education Upon Students' Points of Views. Online Submission, 1(1), 1-12.
3. Aslan, S. (2017). The effect of learning by teaching on pre-service science teachers’ attitudes towards chemistry. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(3), 3-17.
4. Ayyildiz, Y. (2012). Effect of Case Studies on Primary School Teaching Students' Attitudes toward Chemistry Lesson. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(43).
5. Azizoglu, N., Pekdag, B., Sarioglan, A. B., & Kuzucu, G. (2022). An Inquiry-Based Instruction on the Main Subatomic Particles: Enhancing High-School Students' Achievement and Motivation. Science Education International, 33(1), 75-85.
6. Balim, A. G., Inel-Ekici, D., & Özcan, E. (2016). Concept Cartoons Supported Problem Based Learning Method in Middle School Science Classrooms. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(2), 272-284.
7. Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–486.
8. Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., & Granger, E. M. (2008). No silver bullet for inquiry: Making sense of teacher change following an inquiry-based research experience for teachers. Science Teacher Education, 93, 342–360.

9. Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Vye, N., & Sherwood, R. D. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can’t be told. In S. Vosniadou, & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 470–491). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Brooks, M. G., & Brooks, J. G. (1999). The courage to be constructivist. Educational leadership, 57(3), 18-24.
11. Buyruk, A. A., & Bekiroglu, F. O. (2018). Comparison of Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Dynamics in Model-Based Scientific Inquiry and Scientific Inquiry Environments. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 4(1), 93-109.
12. Büyükbayraktar, F. (2023). Deficiencies and needs for the application of inquiry-based learning in physics classes. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 7 (13), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1214553
13. Çelik, S., Demirarslan Cevik, Y., & Haslaman, T. (2012). Reflections of Prospective Teachers Regarding Case-Based Learning. Online Submission, 3(4), 64-78.
14. Çelik, H. C., Ertas, H., & Ilhan, A. (2018). The Impact of Project-Based Learning on Achievement and Student Views: The Case of AutoCAD Programming Course. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 67-80.
15. Cevik, G. K., & Surmeli, H. (2024). Conceptual Development of 7th Grade Students Provided Inquiry-based Geoscience Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(2), 292-314.
16. Corlu, M. A., & Corlu, M. S. (2012). Scientific Inquiry-based Professional Development Models in Teacher Education. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 514-521.
17. Çibik, A. S. (2016). The Effect of Project-Based History and Nature of Science Practices on the Change of Nature of Scientific Knowledge. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(4), 453-472.
18. Sahintepe, S., Erkol, M., & Aydogdu, B. (2020). The Impact of Inquiry-based Learning Approach on Secondary School Students' Science Process Skills. Open Journal for Educational Research, 4(2), 117-142.
19. Gençtürk, H. A. & Türkmen, L. (2007). İlköğretim 4. sınıf fen bilgisi dersinde sorgulama yöntemi ve etkinliği üzerine bir çalışma. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 277-292.
20. Güler, B., & Şahin, M. (2018). “The Inquiry-Based Learning” From The View Of Pre-Service Science Teachers. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(5), 1561-1569.
21. Havuz, A. C., & Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2016). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının araştırma-sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenme algılarının incelenmesi. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 233-247.
22. Isiksal-Bostan, M., Sahin, E., & Ertepinar, H. (2015). Teacher Beliefs toward Using Alternative Teaching Approaches in Science and Mathematics Classes Related to Experience in Teaching. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(5), 603-621.
23. Kırıcı, M. G., & Bakırcı, H. (2021). The effect of STEM supported research-inquiry-based learning approach on the scientific creativity of 7th grade students. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(2), 19-35.
24. Kilinc, A. (2007). The Opinions of Turkish High School Pupils on Inquiry-based Laboratory Activities. Online Submission, 6(4).
25. Kimsesiz, F. (2017). The Effect of Project Based Learning in Teaching EFL Vocabulary to Young Learners of English: The Case of Pre-School Children. Online Submission, 5(4), 426-439.
26. Kilis, S., & Uzun, A. M. (2018). Teaching Information and Communication Technology Ethics with Case-Based Instruction: Effectiveness and Preservice Teachers’ perspectives. Mojes: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(4), 34-47.
27. Koç, H. (2018). Teaching Geography in Higher Education: A Case Study of Problem-Based Learning. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 8(2), 311-337.
28. Konokman, Y. (2016). Preparing Digital Stories through the Inquiry-Based Learning Approach: Its Effect on Prospective Teachers' Resistive Behaviors toward Research and Technology-Based Instruction. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16(6), 2141-2165.
29. Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2014). The effect of guided-inquiry instruction on 6th grade Turkish students' achievement, science process skills, and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66-78.
30. Loyens, S. M. M. and Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2011). Instruction Based on Inquiry. In Mayer, R.E. and Alexander P. A. (ed.). Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction. (pp.376-396) New York: Routledge.
31. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., ... & Prisma-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews, 4, 1-9.
32. MEB, (2013). İlköğretim kurumları (İlkokullar ve Ortaokullar) Fen bilimleri dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. Ankara: MEB Yayınevi.
33. MEB (2017). Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı. Ankara.
34. Piaget, J. To Understand Is to Invent: The Future of Education; Grossman Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1973 Senler, B. (2015). Middle School Students' Views of Scientific Inquiry: An International Comparative Study. Science Education International, 26(2), 166-179.
35. Sarı, U., Alıcı, M., & Şen, Ö. F. (2018). The Effect of STEM Instruction on Attitude, Career Perception and Career Interest in a Problem-based Learning Environment and Student Opinions. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 22(1).
36. Sarıoğlan, A. B., & Abacı, B. (2017). Sorgulamaya dayalı öğretimin “lamba parlaklığı” kavramının ortaokul 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin başarısına etkisi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(3), 164-171.
37. Sarioglan, A. B. & Gedik, I., (2020). Investigated effects of guided inquiry-based learning approach on students’ conceptual change and durability. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. 15(4), 674-685. DOI: 10.18844/cjes.v%vi%i.5050
38. Sen, S., & Oskay, O. O. (2017). The Effects of 5E Inquiry Learning Activities on Achievement and Attitude toward Chemistry. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 1-9.
39. Sen, C., & Sezen Vekli, G. (2016). The Impact of Inquiry-based Instruction on Science Process Skills and Self-Efficacy Perceptions of Pre-Service Science Teachers at a University Level Biology Laboratory. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 603-612.
40. Schweingruber, H., Keller, T., & Quinn, H. (Eds.). (2011). A framework for K-12science education: Practices, crosscuttingconcepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
41. Singer, J., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35, 165–178.
42. Şensoy, A., & Güneş, M. (2023). Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 12(3), 471-487.
43. Şişman, M. (2000) Öğretmenliğe Giriş. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
44. Tekin, G., & Mustu, Ö. E. (2021). The Effect of Research-Inquiry-based Activities on the Academic Achievement, Attitudes, and Scientific Process Skills of Students in the Seventh Year Science Course. European Educational Researcher, 4(1), 109-131.
45. Toprakçi, E., Buldur, S., Bozpolat, E., Oflaz, G., Dağdeviren, C., & Türe, E. (2013). The Philosophy of Turkish National and Higher Education. Policy Futures in Education, 11(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.1.89
46. Ulu, C., & Bayram, H. (2015). Effects of Laboratory Activities through the Argumentation Based Inquiry Approach on 7th Grade Students' Conceptual Learning Electricity in Our Daily Life Unit. Pamukkale Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi-Pamukkale University Journal of Education, (37), 61-75.
47. Yaşar, Ş., & Duban, N. (2009). Students’ opinions regarding to the inquiry-based learning approach. Elementary Education Online, 8(2), 457-475.
48. Wu, H. K. & Hsieh, C. E. (2006). Developing sixth graders’ inquiry skills to construct explanations in inquiry-based learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1289-1313.