Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Tabakalı Örnekleme Şeması Altında Değerlendiriciler Arası Uyum

Yıl 2020, , 287 - 294, 01.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.647755

Öz

Kappa
katsayısı iki değerlendiricinin sınıflandırmaları arasındaki uyumu ölçen
popüler bir istatistiktir. Kappa katsayısı ve varyansının tahmini yaklaşık
olarak basit rasgele örnekleme yöntemiyle elde edilir. Kappa istatistiğinin
güven aralığı tahmininde daha etkin sonuçlar elde edebilmek için tabakalı rasgele
örnekleme yöntemi de kullanılabilir. Bu çalışmada, kappa katsayısının güven
aralığı tahmin etmek için tabakalı rasgele örneklem seçimi altında bir
bootstrap yöntemi önerilmiştir. Sonuçlar üç veri kümesi üzerinden
tartışılmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
  • Fleiss, J.L., Cohen, J., and Everitt, B.S. (1996). Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 323-327.
  • Stehman, S.V. (1996). Estimating the kappa coefficient and its variance under stratified random sampling. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62(4), 401-407.
  • Cochran, W.G. (1977). Sampling techniques, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • Särdal, C.E., Swensson, B., and Wretman, J. (1992). Model-assisted survey sampling, Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Efron, B., and Tibshirani R.J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap, Monographs on statistics and applied probability, no. 57., Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Klar, N., Lipsitz, S.R., Parzen, M., and Leong, T. (2002). An exact bootstrap confidence interval for κ in small samples. The Statistician, 51(4), 467-478.
  • Jiménez-Navarro, M.F., Garcia-Pinilla, J.M., and Garrido-Sanchez, L., et al. (2010). Poor reproducibility of the oral glucose tolerance test in the diagnosis of diabetes during percutaneous intervention. International Journal of Cardiology, 142(3), 245-249.
  • Landis, J.R., and Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observed agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
  • Stuart, A., (1953). The estimation and comparison of strengths of association in contingency tables. Biometrika, 40: 105-110.

Inter-Rater Agreement under Stratified Random Sampling Scheme

Yıl 2020, , 287 - 294, 01.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.647755

Öz

Kappa coefficient is a popular statistic to measure
the agreement between the classifications of two raters. The estimator of the coefficient
and its variance are approximately satisfied by a simple random sampling method.
To get more efficient results for confidence interval estimation of kappa,
stratified random sampling method can also be used, alternatively. In this
study, a bootstrap method under stratified sampling is suggested to use to
estimate the confidence interval of kappa coefficient. The results are
discussed over three data sets.

Kaynakça

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
  • Fleiss, J.L., Cohen, J., and Everitt, B.S. (1996). Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 323-327.
  • Stehman, S.V. (1996). Estimating the kappa coefficient and its variance under stratified random sampling. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62(4), 401-407.
  • Cochran, W.G. (1977). Sampling techniques, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • Särdal, C.E., Swensson, B., and Wretman, J. (1992). Model-assisted survey sampling, Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Efron, B., and Tibshirani R.J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap, Monographs on statistics and applied probability, no. 57., Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Klar, N., Lipsitz, S.R., Parzen, M., and Leong, T. (2002). An exact bootstrap confidence interval for κ in small samples. The Statistician, 51(4), 467-478.
  • Jiménez-Navarro, M.F., Garcia-Pinilla, J.M., and Garrido-Sanchez, L., et al. (2010). Poor reproducibility of the oral glucose tolerance test in the diagnosis of diabetes during percutaneous intervention. International Journal of Cardiology, 142(3), 245-249.
  • Landis, J.R., and Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observed agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
  • Stuart, A., (1953). The estimation and comparison of strengths of association in contingency tables. Biometrika, 40: 105-110.
Toplam 10 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Ayfer Yılmaz 0000-0002-6214-8014

Serpil Aktaş Altunay 0000-0003-3364-6388

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Eylül 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020

Kaynak Göster

APA Yılmaz, A., & Aktaş Altunay, S. (2020). Inter-Rater Agreement under Stratified Random Sampling Scheme. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, 32(3), 287-294. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.647755
AMA Yılmaz A, Aktaş Altunay S. Inter-Rater Agreement under Stratified Random Sampling Scheme. JEPS. Eylül 2020;32(3):287-294. doi:10.7240/jeps.647755
Chicago Yılmaz, Ayfer, ve Serpil Aktaş Altunay. “Inter-Rater Agreement under Stratified Random Sampling Scheme”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32, sy. 3 (Eylül 2020): 287-94. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.647755.
EndNote Yılmaz A, Aktaş Altunay S (01 Eylül 2020) Inter-Rater Agreement under Stratified Random Sampling Scheme. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32 3 287–294.
IEEE A. Yılmaz ve S. Aktaş Altunay, “Inter-Rater Agreement under Stratified Random Sampling Scheme”, JEPS, c. 32, sy. 3, ss. 287–294, 2020, doi: 10.7240/jeps.647755.
ISNAD Yılmaz, Ayfer - Aktaş Altunay, Serpil. “Inter-Rater Agreement under Stratified Random Sampling Scheme”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32/3 (Eylül 2020), 287-294. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.647755.
JAMA Yılmaz A, Aktaş Altunay S. Inter-Rater Agreement under Stratified Random Sampling Scheme. JEPS. 2020;32:287–294.
MLA Yılmaz, Ayfer ve Serpil Aktaş Altunay. “Inter-Rater Agreement under Stratified Random Sampling Scheme”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, c. 32, sy. 3, 2020, ss. 287-94, doi:10.7240/jeps.647755.
Vancouver Yılmaz A, Aktaş Altunay S. Inter-Rater Agreement under Stratified Random Sampling Scheme. JEPS. 2020;32(3):287-94.