Araştırma Makalesi

Analysis of Thermotherapy with Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in Cancer Tissues and Comparison with NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4

Cilt: 11 27 Mart 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

Analysis of Thermotherapy with Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in Cancer Tissues and Comparison with NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4

Öz

Treatment of cancer, the most common and deadly disease worldwide, requires more targeted and effective methods due to the fact that conventional methods such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy also damage healthy tissues. Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) offer a promising approach for selective heating and destruction of tumor cells, especially in magnetic hyperthermia (thermotherapy) applications. In this study, researchers numerically investigated the thermotherapy effects of magnetic iron hydroxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles (NPs) on cancer tissues, comparing them with NiFe₂O₄ and CoFe₂O₄ NPs. The thermal behaviors, magnetic field parameters, and treatment efficacy of MNPs were evaluated. In the simulations, the time- and space-dependent temperature distributions of the NPs in the injection site were evaluated; temperature changes were recorded for a period of 70 seconds and for various radial distances and angular positions. In addition, the NP density formed 18 hours after injection was analyzed, and the capacity of the particles to spread in the tissue was observed. According to the findings, NiFe₂O₄ provided the highest temperature increase (~39–40°C) and the most homogeneous thermal distribution, while CoFe₂O₄ showed the medium level (~37–38°C) and Fe₃O₄ the lowest (~34–35°C) thermal efficiency. Diffusion analyses revealed that NiFe₂O₄ spread over a wider area in the tissue, whereas Fe₃O₄ remained more localized. These results show that NiFe₂O₄ is the most suitable candidate for thermotherapy in terms of both its thermal efficiency and diffusion potential.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. [1] Alphandéry, E., Guyot, F., Chebbi, I., “Preparation of chains of magnetosomes, isolated from magnetospirillum magneticum strain amb-1 magnetotactic bacteria, yielding efficient treatment of tumors using magnetic hyperthermia”, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 434(1-2) (2012) : 444-452.
  2. [2] Gawne, P.J., Ferreira, M., Papaluca, M., Grimm, J., Decuzzi, P., “New opportunities and old challenges in the clinical translation of nanotheranostics”, Nature reviews. Materials 8(12) (2023) : 783-798.
  3. [3] Johannsen, M., Gneveckow, U., Thiesen, B., Taymoorian, K., Cho, C.H., Waldöfner, N., Scholz, R., Jordan, A., Loening, S.A., Wust, P., “Thermotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic nanoparticles: Feasibility, imaging, and three-dimensional temperature distribution”, European Urology 52(6) (2007) : 1653-1661.
  4. [4] Yang, X., Kubican, S.E., Yi, Z., Tong, S. “Advances in magnetic nanoparticles for molecular medicine”, Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) 61(15) (2025) : 3093-3108.
  5. [5] Chen, J., Fan, T., Xie, Z., Zeng, Q., Xue, P., Zheng, T., Chen, Y., Luo, X., Zhang, H., “Advances in nanomaterials for photodynamic therapy applications: Status and challenges”, Biomaterials 237 (2020). Article ID: 119827.
  6. [6] Huang, H., Zheng, Y., Chang, M., Song, J., Xia, L., Wu, C., Jia, W., Ren, H., Feng, W., Chen, Y., “Ultrasound-based micro-/nanosystems for biomedical applications”, Chemical reviews 124(13) (2024) : 8307-8472.
  7. [7] Wust, P., Hildebrandt, B., Sreenivasa, G., Rau, B., Gellermann, J., Riess, H., Felix, R., Schlag, P.M., “Hyperthermia in combined treatment of cancer”, The Lancet. Oncology 3(8) (2002) : 487-497.
  8. [8] Molaei, M.J., “Magnetic hyperthermia in cancer therapy, mechanisms, and recent advances: A review”, Journal of Biomaterials Applications 39(1) (2024) : 3–23.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Makine Mühendisliğinde Sayısal Yöntemler

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

27 Mart 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

8 Mayıs 2025

Kabul Tarihi

6 Ocak 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 11

Kaynak Göster

APA
Mustafaoğlu ( Mansour Nasiri Khalaji ), M., & Yeşilyurt, M. K. (2026). Analysis of Thermotherapy with Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in Cancer Tissues and Comparison with NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences, 11, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.30931/jetas.1695394
AMA
1.Mustafaoğlu ( Mansour Nasiri Khalaji ) M, Yeşilyurt MK. Analysis of Thermotherapy with Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in Cancer Tissues and Comparison with NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences. 2026;11:1-17. doi:10.30931/jetas.1695394
Chicago
Mustafaoğlu ( Mansour Nasiri Khalaji ), Mansur, ve Muhammet Kaan Yeşilyurt. 2026. “Analysis of Thermotherapy with Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in Cancer Tissues and Comparison with NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4”. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences 11 (Mart): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.30931/jetas.1695394.
EndNote
Mustafaoğlu ( Mansour Nasiri Khalaji ) M, Yeşilyurt MK (01 Mart 2026) Analysis of Thermotherapy with Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in Cancer Tissues and Comparison with NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences 11 1–17.
IEEE
[1]M. Mustafaoğlu ( Mansour Nasiri Khalaji ) ve M. K. Yeşilyurt, “Analysis of Thermotherapy with Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in Cancer Tissues and Comparison with NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4”, Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences, c. 11, ss. 1–17, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.30931/jetas.1695394.
ISNAD
Mustafaoğlu ( Mansour Nasiri Khalaji ), Mansur - Yeşilyurt, Muhammet Kaan. “Analysis of Thermotherapy with Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in Cancer Tissues and Comparison with NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4”. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences 11 (01 Mart 2026): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.30931/jetas.1695394.
JAMA
1.Mustafaoğlu ( Mansour Nasiri Khalaji ) M, Yeşilyurt MK. Analysis of Thermotherapy with Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in Cancer Tissues and Comparison with NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences. 2026;11:1–17.
MLA
Mustafaoğlu ( Mansour Nasiri Khalaji ), Mansur, ve Muhammet Kaan Yeşilyurt. “Analysis of Thermotherapy with Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in Cancer Tissues and Comparison with NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4”. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences, c. 11, Mart 2026, ss. 1-17, doi:10.30931/jetas.1695394.
Vancouver
1.Mansur Mustafaoğlu ( Mansour Nasiri Khalaji ), Muhammet Kaan Yeşilyurt. Analysis of Thermotherapy with Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in Cancer Tissues and Comparison with NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences. 01 Mart 2026;11:1-17. doi:10.30931/jetas.1695394