Exploring the effect of online learners’ academic self-concepts on student engagement

Abstract

The present study intends to evaluate the degree to which online university students’ academic self-perceptions predict variations in student engagement. The relational screening method was employed in this research. Data were collected from a total of 653 university students, 113 male and 539 female. The Student Engagement Scale (SES) and the Matovu Academic Self-concept Scale (ASCS) were utilised. Stepwise regression data analyses were conducted. Based on the results that the study yielded, it was observed that ASC had a high level of impact on student engagement, the levels of which varied across different factors of engagement. Academic effort and academic confidence variables accounted for 44% of the variance in behavioural engagement and showed a high positive relationship, while accounting for 33% of cognitive engagement with a moderate level of positive relationship. However, only academic effort was found to have a relationship with affective engagement, which was at a moderate level, accounting for 17% of the variance. Academic effort is relation with all student engagement factors. However, while academic confidence is only relation with behavioural and cognitive engagement, it is not relation with affective engagement. As a result, positively influencing student engagement in online learning environments will lead to positive changes in students' academic self-concept.

Keywords

• Academic self-concept
• engagement
• online learning
• academic effort

References

1. Ackerman, P. L. (2003). Cognitive ability and non-ability trait determinants of expertise. Educational Researcher, 32, 15– 20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032008015
2. Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001
3. Albayrak, A. S. (2006). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Asil yayın dağıtım.
4. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
5. Arens, A. K., Jansen, M., Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., & Brunner, M. (2021). The structure of academic self-concept: A methodological review and empirical illustration of central models. Review of Educational Research, 91(1), 34-72. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320972186
6. Arseven, A. (1986). Çocukta benlik gelişimine ailenin etkisi ve çocuğun okuldaki başarısı. Eğitim ve Bilim, 10(60), 11-17.
7. Arslan, B. Z., Bulut, E., Özcan, B., Ural, F., & Yıldırım, F. B. (2023). Academic engagement experiences of pre-service teachers during the Covid-19 online education process. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 6(2), 315-328.
8. Bilgin, E., Bulca, Y., & Demirhan, G. (2020). Fiziksel aktivite düzeyi, fiziksel uygunluk, akademik başarı ve akademik benlik kavramı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 45(202). http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8343

9. Bingham, G.E.,& Okagaki, L. (2012). Ethnicity and student engagement. In: Christenson, S., Reschly, A., Wylie, C. (eds) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_4
10. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic-self concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really?. Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1-40.
11. Böheim, R., Knogler, M., Kosel, C., & Seidel, T. (2020). Exploring student hand-raising across two school subjects using mixed methods: An investigation of an everyday classroom behaviour from a motivational perspective. Learning and Instruction, 65, 101250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101250
12. Bracken, B. A. (1996). Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations. John Wiley & Sons.
13. Brunner, M., Keller, U., Dierendonck, C., Reichert, M., Ugen, S., Fischbach, A., & Martin, R. (2010). The structure of academic-self concepts revisited: The nested Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 964. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019644
14. Bums, R. B. (1979). The Self-concept in theory, measurement and behaviour. Longman.
15. Burns R.A., Crisp, D.A., & Burns R.B. (2020). Re-examining the reciprocal effects model of self-concept, self-efficacy, and academic achievement in a comparison of the Cross-Lagged Panel and Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel frameworks. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1):77-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12265
16. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. PegemA.
17. Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation. American Psychological Association.
18. Cantekin, Ö. F. ve Gökler, R. (2019). Matovu Akademik Benlik Kavramı Ölçeği'nin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Social Sciences, 14(4), 1355-1366. https://doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.22993
19. Christenson, S., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement (Vol. 840). New York: Springer.
20. Cohen, M., Buzinski, S. G., Armstrong-Carter, E., Clark, J., Buck, B., & Reuman, L. (2019). Think, pair, freeze: The association between social anxiety and student discomfort in the active learning environment. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 5(4), 265. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000147
21. Cokley, K. (2000). An investigation of academic-self concept and its relationship to academic achievement in African American college students. Journal of Black Psychology, 26(2), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798400026002002
22. Cokley, K., & Patel, N. (2007). A psychometric investigation of the academic-self concept of Asian American college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(1), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406288175
23. Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: a motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology, self-processes, and development (Vol. 23, pp. 43–77). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Conner, J. O., & Pope, D. C. (2013). Not just robo-students: Why full engagement matters and how schools can promote it. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(9), 1426–1442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9948-y
25. Coopersmith, S. (1982). The Antecedents of self-confidence. The Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 21, 18-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4683.1982.tb00207.x
26. Das, R. M., & Madhusudan, J. V. (2023). Collaborative learning and learner engagement within the community of inquiry model: A systematic review. International Journal of Computers in Education, 6(2), 60-68.
27. Ergün, E., & Kurnaz, F. B. (2017). Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarında sınıf topluluğu hissi ve öğrenci bağlılığı arasındaki ilişki. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 25(4), 1515-1532.
28. Ergün, E., & Kurnaz Adıbatmaz, F. B. (2020). Exploring the predictive role of e-learning readiness and e-learning style on student engagement. Open Praxis, 12(2), 175-189. https://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.2.1072
29. Ergün, E., & Usluel, Y. K. (2015). Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarında öğrenci bağlılık ölçeği’nin türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 5(1), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.64661
30. Filiz, O. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarının dönüştürülmüş öğrenme ortamlarındakı deneyimlerinin eğitim teknolojisi standartlarına yönelik özyeterliklerine, yenilikçilik düzeylerine ve çevrimiçi bağlılıklarına etkisi. Phd Dissertation, Anadolu Üniversitesi.
31. Finn, J.D., Zimmer, K.S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter?. In: Christenson, S., Reschly, A., Wylie, C. (eds) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5
32. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
33. Fung, F., Tan, C. Y. & Chen, G. (2018). Student engagement and mathematics achievement: unraveling main and interactive effects. Psychology in the Schools, 55(7), 815–831. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22139
34. Green, J., Nelson, G., Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. (2006). The causal ordering of self-concept and academic motivation and its effect on academic achievement. International Education Journal, 7(4), 534-546.
35. Gottfried, A. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.525
36. Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., & Boivin, M. (2003). Academic-self concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.124
37. Guo, J. P., Yang, L. Y., Zhang, J., & Gan, Y. J. (2022). Academic-self concept, perceptions of the learning environment, engagement, and learning outcomes of university students: Relationships and causal ordering. Higher Education, 83(4), 809-828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00705-8
38. Hansford, B. C. & Hattie, J. A. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement/performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52, 123-142. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052001123
39. Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
40. Herrera Torres, L., Al-Lal, M., & Mohamed Mohand, L. (2020). Academic achievement, self-concept, personality and emotional ıntelligence in primary education. Analysis by gender and cultural group. Frontiers in Psychology, 10:3075. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03075
41. Hospel, V., Galand, B., & Janosz, M. (2016). Multidimensionality of behavioural engagement: Empirical support and implications. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.02.007
42. Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2013). How student characteristics affect girls’ and boys’ verbal engagement in physics instruction. Learning and Instruction, 23, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.002
43. Kalaycı, Ş. (2009). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik uygulamaları. Asil Yayınevi.
44. Karasar, N. (1994). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (Beşinci baskı). 3A Araştırma Eğitim Danışmanlık.
45. Kenç, M. F., & Oktay, B. (2002). Akademik benlik kavramı ve akademik başarı arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim ve Bilim, 27(124).
46. Kornilova, T. V., Kornilov, S. A., & Chumakova, M. A. (2009). Subjective evaluations of intelligence and academic-self concept predict academic achievement: Evidence from a selective student population. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 596-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.001
47. Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099
48. Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behaviour and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 517-528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
49. Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 486–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
50. Liu, W. C., & Wang, C. K. J. (2005). Academic-self concept: A cross-sectional study of grade and gender differences in a Singapore secondary school. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024964
51. Lyon, M. A. (1993). Academic-self concept and its relationship to achievement in a sample of junior high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(1), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053001022
52. Mac Iver, D. J., Stipek, D. J., & Daniels, D. H. (1991). Explaining within-semester changes in student effort in junior high school and senior high school courses. Journal Education Psychology, 83(2), 201– 211. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.201
53. Marsh, H. W. (1992). Content specificity of relations between academic achievement and academic-self concept. Journal Educational Psychology, 84(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.35
54. Marsh, H. W. (2014). Academic-self concept: Theory, measurement, and research. In Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 59-98). Psychology Press.
55. Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20(3), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2003_1
56. Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic-self concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 691–720. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312034004691
57. Matovu, M. (2014). A structural equation modelling of the academic-self concept scale. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 185-198.
58. McNeill, P. (2006). Research methods. Routledge.
59. Muijs, R. D. (1997). Predictors of academic achievement and academic self‐concept: A longitudinal perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 263-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01243.x
60. Mupinga, D. M., Nora, R. T., & Yaw, D. C. (2006). The learning styles, expectations, and needs of online students. College Teaching, 54(1), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.54.1.185-189
61. O’Connor, C., Michaels, S., Chapin, S., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2017). The silent and the vocal: Participation and learning in whole-class discussion. Learning and Instruction, 48, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.003
62. Özen, E., & Karaca, N. (2021). Investigating learner motivation in online education in terms of self-efficacy and self-regulation. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(4), 745-758. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1016530
63. Pinxten, M., Marsh, H. W., de Fraine, B., van den Noortgate, W., & van Damme, J. (2014). Enjoying mathematics or feeling competent in mathematics? Reciprocal effects on mathematics achievement and perceived math effort expenditure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12028
64. Rady, H., Kabeer, S., & El-Nady, M. T. (2016). Relationship between academic-self concept and students’ performance among school age children. American Journal of Nursing Science, 5(6), 295-302. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20160506.19
65. Redmond, P., Abawi, L., Brown, A., Henderson, R., & Heffernan, A. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
66. Rosenberg, M. (1989). Self-concept research: A historical overview. Social Forces, 68(1), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/68.1.34
67. Schnitzler, K., Holzberger, D., & Seidel, T. (2021). All better than being disengaged: Student engagement patterns and their relations to academic-self concept and achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(3), 627-652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00500-6
68. Shavelson, R. J. (1976). Chapter XI: Teachers' Decision Making. Teachers College Record, 77(5), 372-414. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146817607700512
69. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407-441. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046003407
70. Skaalvik, E. M. (1998). Self-Enhancing and self-defeating ego-goals: Relations with task and avoidance goals, achievement, and self-perceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
71. Skaalvik, E. M. & Hagtvet, K. A. (1990). Academic achievement and self-concept: An analysis of causal predominance in a developmental perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 292-307.
72. Skaalvik, E. M., & Rankin, R. J. (1996). Studies of academic-self concept using a Norwegian Modification of the SDQ. Paper presented at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology, Montreal, Canada.
73. Skinner, E.A., Pitzer, J.R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In: Christenson, S., Reschly, A., Wylie, C. (eds) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
74. Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
75. Uçar, A., & Sarıtepeci, M. (2022). How can student engagement be improved in Massive Open Online Courses?. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 3(2), 176-206. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1194260
76. West, C. K., Fish, J. A. & Stevens, R. J. (1980). General self-concept, self-concept of academic ability and school achievement: Implications for ‘causes’ of self-concept. Australian Journal of Education, 24(2), 194-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944180024002
77. Wu, H., Guo, Y., Yang, Y., Zhao, L., & Guo, C. (2021). A meta-analysis of the longitudinal relationship between academic-self concept and academic achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 1749–1778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09600-1
78. Zhan, Z., & Mei, H. (2013). Academic-self concept and social presence in face-to-face and online learning: Perceptions and effects on students' learning achievement and satisfaction across environments. Computers & Education, 69, 131-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.002