Sanal Gerçeklik Ortamında Geometri Öğretimi için Metaverse Uygulamasının Geliştirilmesi

Abstract

Metaverse, üç boyutlu, küresel, birbirine bağlı, sürükleyici ve gerçek zamanlı çevrimiçi öğrenme deneyimi sunma potansiyeli taşıyan bir sanal gerçeklik ortamıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, sanal gerçeklik ortamında geometri öğretimi için Metaverse uygulaması geliştirme sürecini açıklamaktır. Geometri öğretimi için Metaverse uygulaması, öğretim tasarımı modellerinden analiz, tasarım, geliştirme, uygulama ve değerlendirme modeline uygun olarak geliştirilmiştir. Analiz aşamasında, ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin sanal gerçeklik deneyimleri ve Metaverse uygulamasını öğrenme amaçlı kullanma ihtiyaçları belirlenmiştir. Geometri öğretimi için Metaverse uygulamasının içeriğini belirlemek için Ortaöğretim Matematik Dersi Öğretim Programındaki kazanımlar seçilmiştir ve Metaverse ortamındaki yazılımlar incelenmiştir. Tasarım aşamasında, Metaverse uygulamasını geliştirmek için Metaverse yazılımı seçilmiş ve uygulamadaki etkinliklerde kullanılacak nesneler tasarlanmıştır. Geliştirme aşamasında üç boyutlu tasarımlar, seçilen Metaverse uygulaması geliştirme yazılımına taşınmıştır. Gerekli düzeltmelerden sonra uygulamadaki etkinlikler son halini almıştır. Uygulama aşamasında, uygun örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen 10. sınıfta öğrenim gören 15 öğrencinin geometri öğretimi için Metaverse uygulamasını kullanmaları sağlanmıştır. Değerlendirme aşamasında geometri öğretimi için Metaverse uygulaması hakkında katılımcıların görüşleri alınmış uygulamanın etkililiği hakkında değerlendirme yapılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, geometri öğretimi için Metaverse uygulamasının iyileştirilmesi ve geniş çapta uygulanması için önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Metaverse application development for teaching geometry in virtual reality environment

Abstract

This study aims to explain the Metaverse application development process for teaching geometry in a virtual reality environment. The application was developed based on the instructional design model including analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation phases. The target group was secondary school students. During the analysis phase, students’ virtual reality experiences and their needs for using the Metaverse application academically were identified. Additionally, learning outcomes from the Secondary School Mathematics Course Curriculum were selected to determine the application content, and convenient educational software programs for a Metaverse environment were examined. During the design phase, Metaverse software that was suitable for the study's purpose was selected. Also, three-dimensional models of the objects and the environment for the application activities were designed through three-dimensional drawing programs. During the development phase, the activities’ visualization and manipulation trials were conducted by transferring the three-dimensional designs into the Metaverse application. After necessary corrections, activities took their final form. During the implementation phase, 15 students in grade 10th used the Metaverse application. During the evaluation phase, participants stated their opinions about the application. Accordingly, suggestions for improving the Metaverse application in the field of teaching geometry and its widespread implementation were proposed.

Keywords

• Metaverse
• Application Development
• Virtual Reality
• Geometry Learning
• Geometry Teaching

References

1. Abraham, A., Suseelan, B., Mathew, J., Sabarinath, P., & Arun, K. (2023, February 23-25). A study on Metaverse in education. In 2023 7th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) (pp. 1570-1573). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCMC56507.2023.10083910
2. Accascina, G., & Rogora, E. (2006). Using Cabri 3D diagrams for teaching geometry. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 11-22. Retrieved November 20, 2024, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ874199
3. Akay, S. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının geometrik düşünme düzeyleri ve beyin baskınlıklarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [The analysis of geometric thinking levels and hemispheric dominance of preservice teachers in terms of some variables] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Eskişehir Osmangazi University.
4. Alkhwaldi, A. F. (2024). Investigating the social sustainability of immersive virtual technologies in higher educational institutions: students’ perceptions toward Metaverse technology. Sustainability, 16(2), 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020934
5. Arslan, Z., & Unal, H. (2022). Bilişsel yük kuramı ve matematik problemlerinin bilişsel yük ataması [Cognitive load theory and cognitive load of mathematical problems]. Türk Eğitim Değerlendirmeleri Dergisi, 1(1), 7-32. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tedd/issue/83246/1439494
6. Arthur Technologies (2024). Why Arthur? Be one step ahead. Retrieved November 25, 2024, from https://www.arthur.digital/product
7. Asmaroini, A. P., Hermawan, C., & Padillah, R. (2024). The Metaverse revolution: The end of traditional classrooms? Journal of Public Health, 46(1), e161-e162. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad132
8. Aydın, F., & Şahin, Ç. (2021). Class teacher candidates’ views on the use of virtual reality in education. Gaziantep University Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 123-139. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2063012

9. Bakar, E. (2023). Fen bilimleri dersinde beceri eğitimi için disiplinlerarası ilişkilendirme [Interdisciplinary associations for skills education in science lesson]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 52(1), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1309008
10. Baldoni, S., Battisti, F., Chiariotti, F., Mistrorigo, F., Shofi, A. B., Testolina, P., Traspadini, A., Zanella, A., & Zorzi, M. (2024, April 15-18). Questset: A VR dataset for network and quality of experience studies. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (pp. 408-414). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3625468.3652187
11. Ball, M. (2021, June 29). Framework for the Metaverse. MatthewBall.co. Retrieved September 10, 2024, from https://www.matthewball.vc/all/forwardtothemetaverseprimer
12. Barnett, E.A., Chavarín, O., & Griffin, S. (2018). Math transition courses in context: Preparing students for college success. Community College Research Center. Retrieved September 8, 2024, from https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/math-transition-courses-context.html
13. Bayrakçı, M. (2013). Social learning theory and its educational applications. Sakarya University Journal of Education Faculty, 14, 198-210. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sakaefd/issue/11210/133874
14. Burns, B. A., & Hamm, E. M. (2011). A comparison of concrete and virtual manipulative use in third‐and fourth‐grade mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 111(6), 256-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00086.x
15. Camilleri, M. A. (2024). Metaverse applications in education: A systematic review and a cost-benefit analysis. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(2), 245-269. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-01-2023-0017
16. Çetintav, G. (2023). Geometri öğretiminde artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamalarının kullanımının ortaokul öğrencilerin öz düzenleme becerilerine, akademik motivasyonlarına ve başarılarına etkisi [Effects of the use of augmented reality applications in geometry teaching on self-regulation skills, academic motivation and achievement of secondary school students] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Bartın University.
17. Chen, Z. (2024). Metaverse office: Exploring future teleworking model. Kybernetes, 53(6), 2029-2045. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-10-2022-1432
18. Çifci, E. (2021). Görme engelli öğrencilere ortaokul matematiği öğreten matematik öğretmenlerinin öğretim uygulamaları ve karşılaştıkları zorluklar [Teaching practices and challenges of mathematics teachers who teach middle school mathematics for visually impaired students] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
19. Clements, D. (2003). Learning and teaching geometry. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.). A Research Companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, (pp. 151-178). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://www.academia.edu/12978334/Teaching_and_learning_geometry
20. Dikkartın Övez, F. T.., & Acar, İ. G. (2022). The effect of block-based game development activities on the geometry achievement, computational thinking skills and opinions of seventh-grade students. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 5(4), 1106-1121. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1151170
21. Domínguez Vázquez, B. C., & Díaz Palencia, J. L. (2024). A classroom experience for teaching and learning of high school geometry through virtual reality. Pedagogical Research, 9(3), em0210. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14634
22. Eşin, Ş., & Özdemir, E. (2022). The Metaverse in mathematics education: The opinions of secondary school mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(4), 1041-1060. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1149802
23. Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2007). Learners’ understanding of the definitions and hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals: towards a theoretical framing. Research in Mathematics Education, 9(1&2), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520167
24. Gadanidis, G. (2017). Artificial intelligence, computational thinking, and mathematics education. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(2), 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-09-2016-0048
25. Gao, K., & Lee, D. (2024). Exploring the effect of youth cultural heritage education using the Metaverse platform: A case study of “Pingyao Ancient City”. IEEE Access, 12, 89234-89247. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3417256
26. Gao, T. (2023). College education: Problem-solving creativity in an interactive learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11150-0
27. Gokbulut, B., & Durnali, M. (2023). Professional skills training in developing digital materials through augmented and virtual reality applications. Psychology in the Schools, 60(11), 4267-4292. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22991
28. Gökkurt, B., Şahin, Ö., Soylu, Y., & Doğan, Y. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge regarding student mistakes on the subject of geometric shapes. Elementary Education Online, 14(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2015.55159
29. González, N. A. A. (2018). Development of spatial skills with virtual reality and augmented reality. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 12, 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-017-0388-x
30. Gravity Sketch (2019). Higher education: Invest in the future of creativity. Retrieved November 26, 2024, from https://gravitysketch.com/education/
31. Gülburnu, M. (2013). 8. sınıf geometri öğretiminde kullanılan Cabri 3D’nin akademik başarıya etkisi ve öğrenci görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi [Using Cabri 3D in geometry teaching on 8th grade effect on academic success and assessment of students opinions] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Adıyaman University.
32. Hagge, P. D. (2024). Metaverse in the geography lecture classroom? Evaluating ‘group VR’ possibilities using the multiplayer ‘Wooorld’ VR app. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 48(5), 864-872. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2024.2333290
33. Hawes, Z., & Ansari, D. (2020). What explains the relationship between spatial and mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 27, 465-482. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01694-7
34. Hwang, G. J., & Chien, S. Y. (2022). Definition, roles, and potential research issues of the Metaverse in education: An artificial intelligence perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100082
35. Hwang, W. Y., Su, J. H., Huang, Y. M., & Dong, J. J. (2009). A study of multi-representation of geometry problem solving with virtual manipulatives and whiteboard system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 229-247. Retrieved November 28, 2024, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.3.229
36. İbili, E. (2013). Geometri dersi için artırılmış gerçeklik materyallerinin geliştirilmesi, uygulanması ve etkisinin değerlendirilmesi [Development, implementation and assessment of the effect augmented reality on geometry teaching materials for geometry classes] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi University.
37. İbili, E., & Şahin, S. (2015). Investigation of the effects on computer attitudes and computer self-efficacy to use of augmented reality in geometry teaching. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 332-350. https://doi.org/10.17522/nefefmed.84518
38. İbili, E., Ölmez, M., Cihan, A., Bilal, F., İbili, A. B., Okumus, N., & Billinghurst, M. (2023). Investigation of learners’ behavioral intentions to use Metaverse learning environment in higher education: A virtual computer laboratory. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2240860
39. İnan, B. & Kılıçer, K. (2022). The effect of mobile-assisted online flipped learning process on pre-service teachers’ information literacy skills and education beliefs. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 5(4), 1160-1184. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1159183
40. Inceoglu, M. M., & Ciloglugil, B. (2022, July 4-7). Use of Metaverse in education. In O. Gervasi, B. Murgante, S. Misra, A. M. A. C. Rocha, & C. Garau (Eds.) Computational science and its applications – ICCSA 2022 workshops (ICCSA 2022). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol 13377). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10536-4_12
41. Indarta, Y., Ambiyar, A., Samala, A. D., & Watrianthos, R. (2022). Metaverse: Tantangan dan peluang dalam pendidikan [Metaverse: Challenges and opportunities in education]. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 3351-3363. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2615
42. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2016). The NMC horizon report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. The New Media Consortium. Retrieved December 2, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171478/
43. Kaddoura, S., & Al Husseiny, F. (2023). The rising trend of Metaverse in education: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical considerations. PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1252. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1252
44. Karakuş, Ö. (2008). Bilgisayar destekli dönüşüm geometrisi öğretiminin öğrenci erişisine etkisi [The effects on the students’ success of computer based transformation geometry learning] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Eskişehir Osmangazi University.
45. Kim, J. (2021). Advertising in the Metaverse: Research agenda. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 21(3), 141-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2021.2001273
46. King, C. E., & Salvo, D. (2024). Phenomenological evaluation of an undergraduate clinical needs finding skills through a virtual reality clinical immersion platform. Biomedical Engineering Education, 4, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-024-00139-5
47. Kye, B., Han, N., Kim, E., Park, Y., & Jo, S. (2021). Educational applications of Metaverse: possibilities and limitations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18, 32. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32
48. Lamb, H. (2022). Second Life lessons. Engineering & Technology, 17(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1049/et.2022.0407
49. Law, Y. C., Mendieta-Dávila, H., García-Fallas, D., González-Quirós, R., & Chacón-Rivas, M. (2024, November 4-8). User-defined interaction for very low-cost head-mounted displays. In Companion Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 1-5). ICMI Companion ‘24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3686215.3690157
50. Lee, J., Lee, T. S., Lee, S., Jang, J., Yoo, S., Choi, Y., & Park, Y. R. (2022). Development and application of a Metaverse-based social skills training program for children with autism spectrum disorder to improve social interaction: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 11(6), e35960. https://doi.org/10.2196/35960
51. Lin, H., Wan, S., Gan, W., Chen, J., & Chao, H. C. (2022, December 17-22). Metaverse in education: Vision, opportunities, and challenges. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 2857-2866). IEEE. https://doi.org/0.1109/BigData55660.2022.10021004
52. Liu, L., Yao, X., Chen, J., Zhang, K., Liu, L., Wang, G., & Ling, Y. (2024). Virtual reality utilized for safety skills training for autistic individuals: A review. Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14020082
53. Lohman, D. F. (1996). Spatial ability and g. In I. Dennis, & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and assessment (pp. 97–116). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-98789-006
54. MacCallum, K., & Parsons, D. (2019, September 16). Teacher perspectives on mobile augmented reality: The potential of Metaverse for learning. In World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (pp. 21-28). IAmLearn. Retrieved December 1, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/210597/
55. Mandacı Şahin, S., & Kendir, F. (2013). The effect of using metacognitive strategies for solving geometry problems on students’ achievement and attitude. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(19), 1777-1792. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2013.1578
56. Marini, A., Nafisah, S., Sekaringtyas, T., Safitri, D., Lestari, I., Suntari, Y., Umasih, Sudrajat, A., & Iskandar, R. (2022). Mobile augmented reality learning media with Metaverse to improve student learning outcomes in science class. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(7), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i07.25727
57. Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2018). Ortaöğretim matematik dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Secondary school mathematics course (9th, 10th, 11th and 12th grades) curriculum]. MEB Basımevi.
58. Mystakidis, S. (2022). Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2(1), 486-497. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2010031
59. Mystakidis, S., Fragkaki, M., & Filippousis, G. (2021). Ready teacher one: Virtual and augmented reality online professional development for K-12 schoolteachers. Computers, 10(10), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10100134
60. Nakov, O., Harizanova, O., Lazarova, M., & Mladenov, V. (2023, July 3-5). Optimal virtual reality experience for cultural heritage education. In EDULEARN23 Proceedings (pp. 1473-1481). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2023.0456
61. Nasution, T. K., & Sinaga, B. (2017). Development of student worksheet geometry based metacognitive strategy through creative thinking ability. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(4), 10-18.
62. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and evaluation standards for school mathematics. NCTM. Retrieved December 1, 2024 from https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Principles-and-Standards/Principles,-Standards,-and-Expectations/
63. Nelson, M. E., & Ahn, B. (2018, October). Virtual reality activities for teaching engineering students’ professional development skills. 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8659258
64. Nurrahmah, A., Zaenuri, & Wardono (2021). Analysis of students difficulties in mathematical abstraction thinking in the mathematics statistic course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (ICMSE 2020), 1918, 042112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042112
65. Onu, P., Pradhan, A., & Mbohwa, C. (2024). Potential to use Metaverse for future teaching and learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 8893-8924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12167-9
66. Park, M. (2022). A study on the possibilities of using Metaverse in mathematics education. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 25(4), 397-422. https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2022.25.4.005
67. Permatasari, G. I., & Andayani, S. (2021). Teachers’ challenges in teaching geometry using augmented reality learning media. Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2159. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.3889
68. Phakamach, P., Senarith, P., & Wachirawongpaisarn, S. (2022). The Metaverse in education: The future of immersive teaching & learning. RICE Journal of Creative Entrepreneurship and Management, 3(2), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.14456/rjcm.2022.12
69. Pişkintunç, M., Durmuş, S., & Akkaya, R. (2012). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematik öğretiminde somut materyalleri ve sanal öğrenme nesnelerini kullanma yeterlikleri [Primary school mathematics teacher candidates’ competencies in using concrete materials and virtual learning objects in teaching mathematics]. MATDER Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(1), 13-20. Retrieved December 1, 2024 from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/109320
70. Plato (1989). Symposium (A. Nehamas, & P. Woodruff, Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company.
71. Radanliev, P., De Roure, D., Novitzky, P., & Sluganovic, I. (2024). Accessibility and inclusiveness of new information and communication technologies for disabled users and content creators in the Metaverse. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 19(5), 1849-1863. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2241882
72. Recker, J., Lukyanenko, R., Jabbari, M., Samuel, B. M., & Castellanos, A. (2021). From representation to mediation: A new agenda for conceptual modeling research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 269-300. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/16027
73. Rendevski, N., Trajcevska, D., Dimovski, M., Veljanovski, K., Popov, A., Emini, N., & Veljanovski, D. (2022, June 16-18). PC VR vs standalone VR fully-immersive applications: History, technical aspects and performance. In 2022 57th International Scientific Conference on Information, Communication and Energy Systems and Technologies (ICEST) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEST55168.2022.9828656
74. Ritala, P., Ruokonen, M., & Kostis, A. (2024). The Metaverse flywheel: Creating value across physical and virtual worlds. California Management Review, 66(4), 80-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256241252700
75. Riva, G., & Wiederhold, B. K. (2022). What the Metaverse is (really) and why we need to know about it. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 25(6), 355-359. https://doi.org/0.1089/cyber.2022.0124
76. Rockcastle, S. F., Sollom-Brotherton Whalen, G., Milgrim, A., & Davis, R. (2024). The use of virtual screens in perceptual studies on electric light: A comparison between 2D, panoramic, cardboard, and head-mounted displays. LEUKOS The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 20(3), 275-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2023.2279517
77. Romoser, C., Nelson, R., & Ferrill, T. (2024). Recreational therapists’ usability perceptions of the Meta Quest 2 VR system. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 58(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.18666/TRJ-2024-V58-I2-12077
78. Sanglier Contreras, G., Martínez Cepa, C. B., Serrano Fernández, I., & Zuíl Escobar, J. C. (2020). Higher education in the face of the push of new technologies. Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in the teaching environment. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 13(1), 247-261. https:/doi.org/10.12988/ces.2020.91601
79. Sarıtaş, M. T., & Topraklıkoğlu, K. (2022). Systematic literature review on the use of Metaverse in education. International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(4), 586-607. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.319
80. ShapesXR (2023). Spatial design for everyone. Retrieved November 28, 2024, from https://www.shapesxr.com/
81. Silverman, D. (2018). Nitel verileri yorumlama [Interpreting qualitative data]. (E. Dinç, Trans.). Pegem Akademi. (Original work published in 2015)
82. Siyaev, A., & Jo, G. S. (2021). Towards aircraft maintenance Metaverse using speech interactions with virtual objects in mixed reality. Sensors, 21(6), 2066. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062066
83. Su, Y. S., Cheng, H. W., & Lai, C. F. (2022). Study of virtual reality immersive technology enhanced mathematics geometry learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 760418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.760418
84. Sun, M., Xie, L., Liu, Y., Li, K., Jiang, B., Lu, Y., Yang, Y., Yu, H., Song, Y., Bai, C., & Yang, D. (2022). The Metaverse in current digital medicine. Clinical eHealth, 5, 52-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceh.2022.07.002
85. Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123-138. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
86. Talan, T., & Kalinkara, Y. (2022). Students’ opinions about the educational use of the Metaverse. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 6(2), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.385
87. Topraklıkoğlu, K. (2018). Üç boyutlu modellemenin kullanıldığı artırılmış gerçeklik etkinlikleri ile geometri öğretimi [Teaching of geometry through the activities of the augmented reality used in three dimensional modeling] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Balıkesir University.
88. Topraklıkoğlu, K., & Öztürk, G. (2021). Teaching geometry through augmented reality activities using three-dimensional modelling. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(5), 1325-1342. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2021.05.003
89. Topraklıkoğlu, K., & Öztürk, G. (2023a). The Metaverse and mathematics education: A literature review. In G. Durak & S. Çankaya (Ed.), Shaping the future of online learning: Education in the Metaverse (pp.250-266). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6513-4.ch013
90. Topraklıkoğlu, K. & Öztürk, G. (2023b). Eğitimde Metaverse: Uygulama örnekleri [Metaverse in education: Examples of applications]. A. M. Güneş & E. Yünkül (Eds.). Eğitimde yeni paradigmalar [New paradigms in education] (pp. 479-514). Nobel.
91. Tran, T., Nguyen, T. T. T., Le, T. T. T., & Phan, T. A. (2020). Slow learners in mathematics classes: the experience of Vietnamese primary education. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education 3-13, 48(5), 580-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1633375
92. Trinidad-Fernández, M., Bossavit, B., Salgado-Fernández, J., Abbate-Chica, S., Fernández-Leiva, A. J., & Cuesta-Vargas, A. I. (2023). Head-mounted display for clinical evaluation of neck movement validation with Meta Quest 2. Sensors (Basel), 23(6), 3077. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063077
93. Ünveren Kapanadze, D. (2019). Evaluation of teaching Turkish in the context of Vygotsky’s theory of socio-cultural and cognitive development. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(47), 181-195. https://doi.org/10.35237/sufesosbil.565193
94. Uyen, B. P., Tong, D. H., Loc, N. P., & Thanh, L. N. P. (2021). The effectiveness of applying realistic mathematics education approach in teaching statistics in grade 7 to students’ mathematical skills. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(2), 185-197. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.82.185.197
95. Veith, J. M., Beste, M. L., Kindervater, M., Krause, M., Straulino, M., Greinert, F., & Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). Mathematics education research on algebra over the last two decades: Quo vadis? Frontiers in Education, 8, 1211920. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1211920
96. Villamil, A., & King, S. (2024). A humane social learning-informed Metaverse: Cultivating positive technology experiences in digital learning environments. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 27(1), 47-56.https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.000
97. Visconti, A., Calandra, D., & Lamberti, F. (2023). Comparing technologies for conveying emotions through realistic avatars in virtual reality-based Metaverse experiences. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 34(3-4), e2188. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.2188
98. Wang, X., Mo, X., Fan, M., Lee, L. H., Shi, B., & Hui, P. (2022, October 22-23). Reducing stress and anxiety in the Metaverse: A systematic review of meditation, mindfulness and virtual reality. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium of Chinese CHI (pp. 170-180). Chinese CHI ‘22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3565698.356578
99. Waquar, A., Kareem, S., Yasmeen, N., & Hussain, S. (2024). From traditional to virtual classrooms: Unravelling themes and shaping the future of Metaverse education. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2024-0032
100. Werner, J. M., & DeSimone, R. L. (2012). Human resource development (6th edition). South-Western, Cengage Learning. Retrieved March 28, 2023, from http://dspace.vnbrims.org:13000/jspui/bitstream/123456789/4276/1/Human%20Resource%20Development.pdf
101. Wu, T., & Hao, F. (2023). Edu-Metaverse: concept, architecture, and applications. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 4352-4379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2198567
102. Wu, X., Chen, Y., & Wu, Y. (2023, March 16-18). Exploration of mathematics education by Metaverse technology. In 2023 IEEE 12th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology (ICEIT) (pp. 173-178). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEIT57125.2023.10107894
103. Yağcı, A., & Şentürk, C. (2023). Metaverse in science (physics-chemistry-biology) education. Educatione, 2(2), 262-288. https://doi.org/10.58650/educatione.1299434
104. Yılmaz, M., & Coşkun Şimşek, M. (2023). The use of virtual reality, augmented reality, and the Metaverse in education: the views of preservice biology and mathematics teachers. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practices, 13(1), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2023/v13/i1/2422
105. Yılmaz, R., & Argün, Z. (2018). Role of visualization in mathematical abstraction: The case of congruence concept. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.328337
106. Zahabi, M., & Abdul Razak, A. M. (2020). Adaptive virtual reality-based training: a systematic literature review and framework. Virtual Reality, 24(4), 725-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00434-w
107. Zhao, Z., Zhao, B., & Wan, X. (2022, September 16-19). Research on personalized learning space in educational Metaverse. In Fourth International Conference on Computer Science and Educational Informatization (CSEI 2022) (Vol. 2022, pp. 245-248). IET. https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2022.1479
108. Zyda, M. (2022). Let’s rename everything “the Metaverse!”. Computer, 55(3), 124-129. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2021.3130480