Akademik Tartışma Modelinin Bibliyometrik Analizi: Trendler, Etkili Çalışmalar ve Önemli Katkıda Bulunanlar.

Öz

Bu çalışmanın birincil amacı, SCOPUS veritabanından alınan 37 yayının bibliyometrik analizi ile akademik tartışma (AT) modelinin ayrıntılı bir şekilde incelenmesidir. İkincil hedefler ise bu model üzerinde çalışan yazarlar arasındaki işbirliklerini keşfetmek, en etkili yazarlar ve referans makaleleri belirlemek, en sık kullanılan anahtar kelimeleri tespit etmek ve son araştırma trendlerini analiz etmektir. Analizler, VOSviewer programı kullanılarak yapılmış ve görselleştirmeler, niceliksel göstergeler, niteliksel göstergeler ve yapısal göstergelere dayalı olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, Lauren B. Resnick'in en etkili yazar olduğunu ve “İdealize edilmiş ve gerçekleştirilmiş müzakereci söylem: Sınıfta ve sivil yaşamda akademik tartışma” (2008) makalesinin bu model için ana referans olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Lauren B. Resnick ve Einat Heyd-Metzuyanim, alandaki en işbirlikçi yazarlar olarak belirlenmiştir. Anahtar kelime analizi, “diyalojik öğretim” ve “sınıf söylemi” terimlerinin en sık kullanılan kelimeler olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, bu yazarların araştırma ilgi alanları, öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi ve konuşma hareketlerinin yazılım analizleri etrafında yoğunlaşmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Akademik Tartışma
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Atıf Analizi
• Kavram Birlikteliği Analizi
• Ortak Yazarlık Analizi
• Bibliyografik Eşleşme

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Accountable Talk Model: Trends, Influential Works, and Key Contributors

Öz

The primary objective of this study is to conduct a detailed examination of the accountable talk (AT) model through a bibliometric analysis of 37 publications sourced from the SCOPUS database. The secondary goals include exploring collaborations among authors working on this model, identifying the most influential authors and reference articles, determining the most frequently used keywords, and analyzing recent research trends. The analyses were carried out using a visualization program, with visualizations evaluated based on quantity indicators, quality indicators, and structural indicators. The findings reveal that Lauren B. Resnick is the most influential author, with the article “Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life” (2008) serving as the key reference for this model. Lauren B. Resnick and Einat Heyd-Metzuyanim are recognized as the most collaborative authors in the field. The keyword analysis highlights "dialogic teaching" and "classroom discourse" as the most frequently used terms. Additionally, the research interests of these authors primarily revolve around teacher professional development and the software analysis of talk moves.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Accountable talk
• bibliometric analysis
• citation analysis
• co-authorship analysis
• bibliographic coupling analysis

Kaynakça

1. Baker, D. R. (1990). Citation analysis: A methodological review. In Social Work Research and Abstracts (Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 3-10). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/swra/26.3.3
2. Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419
3. Calcagni, E., & Lago, L. (2018). The three domains for dialogue: A framework for analysing dialogic approaches to teaching and learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 18, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.03.001
4. Cadavid Higuita, L., Awad, G., & Franco Cardona, C. J. (2012). A bibliometric analysis of a modeled field for disseminating innovation. Estudios Gerenciales, 28(spe), 213-236. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2012.1486
5. Cobo, M. J., Lopez-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
6. Durieux, V., & Gevenois, P. A. (2010). Bibliometric indicators: quality measurements of scientific publication. Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, Vol. 255 No. 2, pp. 342-351. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090626
7. HabibAgahi, M. R., Kermani, M. A. M. A., & Maghsoudi, M. (2022). On the Co-authorship network analysis in the Process Mining research Community: A social network analysis perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 206, 117853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117853
8. Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106, 787-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9

9. Herrera-Franco, G., Montalván-Burbano, N., Carrión-Mero, P., Apolo-Masache, B., & Jaya-Montalvo, M. (2020). Research trends in geotourism: A bibliometric analysis using the scopus database. Geosciences, 10(10), 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100379
10. Hou, J., Yang, X., & Chen, C. (2018). Emerging trends and new developments in information science: A document co-citation analysis (2009–2016). Scientometrics, 115, 869-892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2695-9
11. Huai, C., & Chai, L. (2016). A bibliometric analysis on the performance and underlying dynamic patterns of water security research. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1531–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2019-x
12. Kumar, M., George, R. J., & Anisha, P.S. (2023). Bibliometric analysis for medical research. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 45(3), 277-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176221103617
13. Mas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N., Sarin, S., Haon, C., Sego, T., Belkhouja, M., ... & Merigó, J. M. (2021). Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and leading authors, institutions and countries in the 50 years of Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165, 120487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120487
14. Michaels, S., O’Connor, M. C., Hall, M. W., & Resnick, L. B. (2010). Accountable talk® sourcebook. Pittsburg, PA: Institute for Learning University of Pittsburgh. Murphy, PK, Wilkinson, IAG, Soter, AO, Hennessey, MN, & Alexander, JF. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
15. Nadi-Ravandi, S., & Batooli, Z. (2022). Gamification in education: A scientometric, content and co-occurrence analysis of systematic review and meta-analysis articles. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 10207-10238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11048-x
16. Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. S., & Clarke, S. N. (2018). Accountable talk: Instructional dialogue that builds the mind. Geneva, Switzerland: The International Academy of Education (IAE) and the International Bureau of Education (IBE) of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
17. Savić, M., Ivanović, M., &Jain, L. C. (2019). Co-authorship Networks: An Introduction. In: Complex Networks in Software, Knowledge, and Social Systems. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 148. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91196-0_5 Scopus Content Coverage Guide; Elsevier: Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2020.
18. Suban, S. A. (2023). Bibliometric analysis on wellness tourism–citation and co-citation analysis. International Hospitality Review, 37(2), 359-383. https://doi.org/10.1108/ihr-11-2021-0072
19. Trujillo, C. M., & Long, T. M. (2018). Document co-citation analysis to enhance transdisciplinary research. Science Advances, 4(1), e1701130. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701130
20. Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
21. Yalçın, V. (2024). A program design study whitin the framework of accountable talk model in preparation for mathematics Olympiads [Unpublished doctoral dissertation] Marmara University
22. Wang, S. B. (2014). Empirical analysis of the research hotspot in the field of port logistics based on complex network. Computer Systems & Applications, 23(7), 246–251.