OPTIMIZATION OF IN-VITRO BIOFILM FORMATION IN STRAINS OF STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS AND STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS IN DIFFERENT GROWTH CONDITIONS

Öz

Objective: Microorganisms reside in polymer-coated communities known as biofilms, which represent a major virulence factor by conferring resistance to treatment in associated infections. Biofilms are therefore a frequent subject of health-related research. However, standard laboratory strains have been cultured under inconsistent conditions, with limited data available on optimal biofilm production parameters. This study aimed to determine the optimal in vitro biofilm formation conditions for Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175 and Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984 by systematically evaluating growth media, sugar types/concentrations, atmospheric conditions, and incubation periods.

Material and Method: S. mutans and S. epidermidis strains were cultured under various conditions, including media (Brain Heart Infusion and Mueller Hinton Broth), sugar types/concentrations (sucrose and glucose), atmospheres (aerobic vs. 5% CO₂), and incubation times (24 and 48 hours). Biofilm production was quantified by standard crystal violet staining in microtiter plates.

Result and Discussion: Highest biofilm production for S. mutans occurred in BHI with 2% sucrose, under 5% CO₂, after 24-48 hours. For S. epidermidis, peak biofilm was in MHB with 1% glucose, under aerobic conditions, after 24 hours. These findings highlight the need for species-specific optimization of biofilm-inducing conditions when using standard strains.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Biofilm
• glucose
• Staphylococcus epidermidis
• Streptococcus mutans
• sucrose

STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS VE STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPİDERMİDİS SUŞLARINDA FARKLI BÜYÜME KOŞULLARINDA İN-VİTRO BİYOFİLM OLUŞUMUNUN OPTİMİZASYONU

Öz

Amaç: Mikroorganizmalar, polimer kaplı topluluklar olan biyofilmler içinde yaşarlar. Biyofilm, önemli bir virülans faktörü olup neden olduğu enfeksiyonların tedavisi güçtür ve birçok sağlık çalışmasının konusudur. Ancak, bu çalışmalarda kullanılan standart suşların optimum biyofilm üretim koşulları yeterince bilinmemektedir. Bu çalışma, Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175 ve Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984 suşlarının optimum biyofilm üretim koşullarını; farklı büyüme ortamları, şeker konsantrasyonları, atmosferik koşullar ve inkübasyon süreleri açısından araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Gereç ve Yöntem: S. mutans ve S. epidermidis suşları, farklı kültür ortamları (Brain Heart Infusion – BHI ve Mueller Hinton Broth – MHB), şeker türleri/konsantrasyonları (sükroz ve glukoz), atmosferik koşullar (aerobik ve %5 CO₂) ile inkübasyon süreleri (24 ve 48 saat)’nde in vitro koşullarda kültüre edilerek, biofilm üretimi mikrotiter plakalarda standart kristal viyole boyama yöntemiyle kantitatif olarak ölçülmüştür.

Sonuç ve Tartışma: Elde edilen bulgulara göre; S. mutans’ın en yüksek biyofilm üretimi, %2 sükroz ilaveli BHI ortamında, %5 CO₂ atmosferinde ve 24–48 saat inkübasyonda gözlenmiştir. S. epidermidis için ise en yüksek biyofilm üretimi, %1 glukoz içeren MHB ortamında, aerobik koşullarda ve 24 saat inkübasyonda tespit edilmiştir. Bu bulgular, özellikle standart laboratuvar suşlarının kullanıldığı sağlık odaklı araştırmalarda, biyofilm indükleyici koşulların türe özgü optimizasyonunun önemini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Biyofilm
• glukoz
• Staphylococcus epidermidis
• Streptococcus mutans
• sükroz

Kaynakça

1. 1. Shakya, P., Nayak, A., Sharma, R.K., et al. (2022). Effect of incubation time on the biofilm formation by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 59(7), 1220-1223. [CrossRef]
2. 2. Shamsulddin, D.Z., Bunyan, A.I. (2024). Isolation and identification of Streptococcus mutans and study of biofilm formation. Thi-Qar Medical Journal, 27(1), 255-262.
3. 3. Jakubovics, N.S., Goodman, S.D., Mashburn-Warren, L., et al. (2021). The dental plaque biofilm matrix. Periodontology 2000, 86(1), 32-56. [CrossRef]
4. 4. Manandhar, S., Singh, A., Varma, A., et al. (2018). Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates. BMC Research Notes, 11(1), 714. [CrossRef]
5. 5. Efimenko, A., Ishchenko, O., Stepanskyi, O., et al. (2023). Microbiological features of Staphylococcus associated with complications of dental implantation. Wiadomosci Lekarskie, 76(5 Pt 1), 936-943. [CrossRef]
6. 6. Jonblat, S., As-Sadi, F., Zibara, K., et al. (2024). Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm assembly and self-dispersion: bacteria and matrix dynamics. International Microbiology, 27(3), 831-844. [CrossRef]
7. 7. Shemesh, M., Tam, A., Steinberg, D. (2007). Expression of biofilm-associated genes of Streptococcus mutans in response to glucose and sucrose. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 56(Pt 11), 1528-1535. [CrossRef]
8. 8. Tang, B., Gong, T., Cui, Y., et al. (2020). Characteristics of oral methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from dental plaque. International Journal of Oral Science, 12(1), 15. [CrossRef]

9. 9. Divakar, D.D., Alfawaz, A.S., AlKheraif, A.A., et al. (2017). High proportions of Staphylococcus epidermidis in dental caries harbor multiple classes of antibiotics resistance, significantly increase inflammatory interleukins in dental pulps. Microbial Pathogenesis, 109, 29-34. [CrossRef]
10. 10. Asai, K., Yamada, K., Yagi, T., et al. (2015). Effect of incubation atmosphere on the production and composition of staphylococcal biofilms. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, 21(1), 55-61. [CrossRef]
11. 11. Dursun, A.D., Uçak, S., Yavuz, O., et al. (2022). Determination of the effect of glucose, sucrose and sodium chloride addition in different culture media on biofilm formation of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, 4(2), 152-157. [CrossRef]
12. 12. Christensen, G.D., Simpson, W.A., Younger, J.J., et al. (1985). Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: A quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 22(6), 996-1006. [CrossRef]
13. 13. Knobloch, J.K., Horstkotte, M.A., Rohde, H., et al. (2002). Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Medical Microbiology and Immunology, 191(2), 101-106. [CrossRef]
14. 14. Singh, A.K., Prakash, P., Achra, A., et al. (2017). Standardization and classification of in vitro biofilm formation by clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Global Infectious Diseases, 9(3), 93-101. [CrossRef]
15. 15. Stepanovic, S., Djukic, N., Djordjevic, V., et al. (2003). Influence of the incubation atmosphere on the production of biofilm by staphylococci. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 9(9), 955-958. [CrossRef]