Psychometric Properties of The Turkish Version of The Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy Scale

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 351 - 360, 25.12.2023

Harun Özbey , Kazım Bağcı , Metin Karabulut , Meral Bayat

Öz

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish validity and reliability of the Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy Scale.
Method: This was a methodological study that was conducted in 2020-2021. The sample consisted of 294 bachelor nursing students of a university in Turkey. Data were collected using a student information form and Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy Scale. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the university and permission and informed consent was obtained from participants prior to the onset of research. Reliability was determined using test-retest, Cronbach’s Alpha (α), Guttman Split-Half Coefficient, Hotelling’s T2 test, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. Validity was determined using the First-Order Multifactor Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
Results: Participants had a mean age of 19.95±1.47 years. 86.7% were women and 28.6% were first-year students. Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy Scale had a content validity index of 0.814. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale had factor loadings of 0.554 to 0.872, the goodness of fit indices of >0.85, and a root mean square error of approximation index of <3. The total scale had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.910, while the subscales had Cronbach’s alpha values of >0.70. The total scale Tukey’s test of additivity was F=67.467 (p≤0.001), and the Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy Scale had an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.91.
Conclusion and Suggestions: The results showed that the Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy Scale is a valid and reliable scale for the Turkish sample.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Academic self-efficacy, Scale, Reliability, Validity

Teşekkür

We would like to thank Giampiera Bulfone for allowing us to adapt the scale to Turkish.

Hemşire Akademik Öz Yeterlik Ölçeğinin Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, Hemşire Akademik Öz Yeterlik Ölçeğinin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliğini yapmak amacıyla metodolojik olarak yürütülmüştür.
Yöntem: Çalışma, Türkiye’deki bir üniversitenin Hemşirelik bölümü öğrencileri ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın örneklemi, Türkiye'deki bir üniversitenin 294 lisans hemşirelik öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın verileri Öğrenci Tanıtıcı Form ve Hemşire Akademik Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği ile toplanmıştır. Araştırmaya başlanmadan önce etik onay, kurum izni ve öğrencilerden onamları alınmıştır. Güvenilirlik test-tekrar test, Cronbach's Alpha (α), Guttman Split-Half Katsayısı, Hotelling's T2 testi, Sınıf İçi Korelasyon Katsayısı kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Geçerlilik, Birinci Dereceden Çok Faktörlü Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi kullanılarak belirlenmiştir.
Bulgular: Öğrencilerin yaş ortalaması 19,95±1,47 yıl idi. Katılımcıların %86,7'si kadın, %28,6'sı birinci sınıf da öğrenin görmektedir. Ölçeğin Kapsam Geçerlik İndeksi 0,814 olarak belirlenmiştir. Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi sonucunda faktör yüklerinin 0,554-0,872 arasında değiştiği, tüm uyum indekslerinin >0.85 olduğu ve RMSEA indeksinin <3 olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğin tamamının Cronbach alfa değeri 0.910, alt boyutlarının ise >0.70 olarak belirlenmiştir. Toplam ölçek Tukey'nin toplamsallık testi F=67.467 (p≤0.001) ve ölçeğin Sınıf İçi Korelasyon Katsayısı 0.91'di.
Sonuç ve Öneriler: Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre, Hemşire Akademik Öz Yeterlik Ölçeğinin Türkiye örnekleminde güçlü geçerlik ve güvenirliğe sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Akademik öz yeterlik, Ölçek, Güvenirlik, Geçerlik

Kaynakça

• Alpar, R. (2018). Applied Statistics and Validity-Reliability with Examples from Sports, Health and Education Sciences. 5th Ed. Ankara: Detay Publications. (Turkish book)
• Ayre, C., Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0748175613513808
• Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., Young, S. L. (2018). Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Front Public Health, 6, 149. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpubh.2018.00149
• Bulfone, G., Badolamenti, S., Biagioli, V., et al. (2021). Nursing students' academic self-efficacy: A longitudinal analysis of academic self-efficacy changes and predictive variables over time. J Adv Nurs, 77(5), 2353-2362. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14771
• Bulfone, G., Vellone, E., Maurici, M., Macale, L., & Alvaro, R. (2020). Academic self-efficacy in Bachelor-level nursing students: Development and validation of a new instrument. Journal of advanced nursing, 76(1), 398-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14226
• Çelik, H. E., Yılmaz, V. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL 9.1. Ankara: Anı Publications. (Turkish book)
• DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale Development. 4th ed. USA: Sage Publications.
• Eser, M. T., Güzeller, C. O. (2017). Structural Equation Model Applications with Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Ankara: Detay Publications. (Turkish book)
• Esin, N. (2018). Data collection methods and tools & reliability and validity of data collection tools. In: Erdoğan, S., Nahcivan, N., Esin, N. (eds), Research Process, Practice and Critical in Nursing (pp. 193-233). 3rd ed. Nobel Medicine Publications. (Turkish book)
• Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th ed. India: Sage Publications.
• George, D., Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step A Simple Guide and Reference. 15th ed. New York: Taylor&Francis.
• George, D., Mallery, P. (2020). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step A Simple Guide and Reference. 16th ed. New York: Taylor&Francis.
• Heavey, E. (2019). Statistics For Nursing A Practical Approach. 3rd ed. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning. International Test Commission (ITC). (2018). Guidelines for translating and adapting tests. International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101-134.
• Kankaya, H., Keskin, H., Akyol, A. (2021). Effects of clinical practicum on nursing students' self-efficacy: Example of internal medicine wards. Perspect Psychiatr Care, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12995
• Karagöz, Y. (2018). SPSS ve AMOS 23 Applied Statistical Analysis. 1st ed. Ankara: Nobel Medicine Publications. (Turkish book)
• Kasapoğlu F. (2022). The Relationship Among Spirituality, Self-Efficacy, COVID-19 Anxiety, and Hopelessness During the COVID-19 Process in Turkey: A Path Analysis. Journal of religion and health, 1–19. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01472-7
• Kesen, M., Akyüz, B. (2015). The investigation of the relationships among academic self- efficacy perception, organizational trust and organizational cynicism via structural equation modeling: An application on university students. Current Perspectives in Social Sciences, 19(3), 47-68.
• Koo, T. K., Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med, 15(2), 155-163. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jcm.2016.02.012
• Kryshko, O., Fleischer, J., Grunschel, C., Leutner, D. (2022). Self-efficacy for motivational regulation and satisfaction with academic studies in STEM undergraduates: The mediating role of study motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 93, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102096
• Lee, S. W. (2017). Encyclopedia Of School Psychology, Usa: Sage Publications Inc. Liu, J. W., Reed, M., Girard A. T. Advancing Resilience: An İntegrative, Multi-System Model Of Resilience. Personality And Individual Differences, 111, 111-118.
• McCabe, E. M., McDonald, C., Connolly, C., & Lipman, T. H. (2019). A Review of School Nurses' Self-Efficacy in Asthma Care. The Journal of school nursing : The official publication of the National Association of School Nurses, 35(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059840518808886
• Mohebi, S., Azadbakht, L., Feizi, A., Sharifirad, G., & Kargar, M. (2013). Review the key role of self-efficacy in diabetes care. Journal of education and health promotion, 2, 36. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.115827
• Morgado, F., Meireles, J., Neves, C. M., Amaral, A., & Ferreira, M. (2017). Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicologia, reflexao e critica: Revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS, 30(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1
• Özcan, D. A., Esen, K. B. (2016). Investigation of the relationship between cognitive flexibility and selfefficacy of adolescents. International Journal of Eurasian Education Ande Culture, 1, 1-8.
• Özdamar, K. (2017). Scale and Test Development–Structural Equation Modeling. Eskişehir: Nisan Publications. (Turkish book)
• Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T. (2017). Essentials Of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence For Nursing Practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer & Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Prudon, P. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis as a tool in research using questionnaires: A critique. Comprehensive Psychology, 4(10), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.2466%2F03.CP.4.10
• Seçer, İ. (2018). Psychological Test Development and Adaptation Process SPSS and LISREL Applications. Ankara: Anı Publications. (Turkish book)
• Sharma, H. L., Naza, G. (2014). Academic Self-Efficacy: Predictor of Education Performances. British Journal Of Education, 2(3), 57-64.
• Yada, H., Odachi, R., Adachi, K., Abe, H., Yonemoto, F., Fujiki, T., Fujii, M., & Katoh, T. (2022). Validity and reliability of Psychiatric Nurse Self-Efficacy Scales: Cross-sectional study. BMJ open, 12(1), e055922. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055922