Doğum Şeklini Tahmin Etmede Baş-Simfizis Mesafesi, Baş İlerleme Mesafesi Ve Kaput Suksadeneum Boyutunun Yeri

Öz

Amaç: Biz bu çalışmamızda intrapartum ultrasonografi ile ölçülen ve doğum eylemi takibinde kullanılabilecek parametrelerden baş-simfizis mesafesi, baş ilerleme mesafesi ve kaput suksadeneum boyutunun doğum şekli ile ilişkini anlamayı amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Termde, baş prezentasyonda, aktif doğum eyleminde ve membran rüptürü olan 146 gebe araştırmaya dahil edildi. Aktif doğum eylemi, 10 dakika içinde en az üç ağrılı uterin kontraksiyon toplam 200-250 Montevideo ünite ve >5-6 cm servikal dilatasyon olması şeklinde kabul edildi. İntrapartum ultrasonografi ile baş-simfizis mesafesi, baş ilerleme mesafesi ve kaput suksadeneum boyutu ölçülerek kaydedildi. Hemen sonrasında klinik vajinal muayene uygulandı ve not edildi. Gebe ve yenidoğan özellikleri, doğum şekli, ultrasonografik ve klinik veriler istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi.Bulgular: Vajinal doğum yapan gebelerin ortalama baş-simfizis mesafesi değeri 18,6 ± 5,25 milimetre, ortalama baş ilerleme mesafesi değeri 39,1 ± 9,44 milimetre, ortalama kaput suksadeneum değeri 6,59 ± 6,46 milimetre bulundu. Sezaryen doğum yapan gebelerin ortalama baş-simfizis mesafesi değeri 23,15 ± 5,88 milimetre, ortalama baş ilerleme mesafesi değeri 26,53 ± 8,79 milimetre, ortalama kaput suksadeneum değeri 15,61 ± 4,8 milimetre bulundu. Vajinal doğum yapan gebelere kıyasla sezaryen doğum yapan gebelerdeki bu farklılıklar istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı sırasıyla p:0,004, p

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İntrapartum ultrasonografi
• baş simfizis mesafesi
• baş ilerleme mesafesi
• kaput suksadeneum
• doğum şekli.

Importance Of Head-Symphysis Distance, Head Progression Distance, And Caput Succedaneum Size In Estimating The Delivery Mode

Öz

Aim: In this study, we aimed to understand the relationship between the delivery mode and the sonographic parameters which can be used in the follow-up of labor such as head-symphysis distance, head progression distance, caput succedaneum.Material and Methods: 146 term pregnant women who were in active phase of labor and had ruptured membranes with cephalic presentation were included in the investigation. Active phase of labor accepted as being >5-6 centimeters of cervical dilatation and at least three uterine contraction total >200 Montevideo units within 10 minutes. Head-symphysis distance, head progression distance and caput succedaneum size were measured via intrapartum ultrasound and recorded. After immediately clinical vaginal examination was performed and noted. Patient characteristics, mode of delivery, ultrasonographic and clinic data were analyzed.Results: The mean values of head-symphysis distance, head progression distance and caput succedaneum of pregnant women who had vaginal delivery were 18,6 ± 5,25 milimeters, 39,1 ± 9,44 milimeters and 6,59 ± 6,46 milimeters, respectively. The mean values of head-symphysis distance, head progression distance and caput succedaneum of pregnant women who had cesarean delivery were 23,15 ± 5,88 milimeters, 26,53 ± 8,79 milimeters and 15,61 ± 4,8 milimeters, respectively. These differences were statistically significant in pregnant women who had cesarean delivery compared to vaginal delivery p:0,004, p

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İntrapartum ultrasonography
• head symphysis distance
• head progression distance
• caput succedaneum
• mode of delivery

Kaynakça

1. Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M, et al. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gyne- cologists classification. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2005;192(3):868-74. Epub 2005/03/05.
2. Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, Kamena A, Tutschek B. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;28(6):753-60. Epub 2006/10/26.
3. Sherer DM, Abulafia O. Intrapartum assessment of fetal head engage- ment: comparison between transvaginal digital and transabdominal ultra- sound determinations. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gyne- cology. 2003;21(5):430-6. Epub 2003/05/28.
4. Akmal S, Tsoi E, Kametas N, Howard R, Nicolaides KH. Intrapartum so- nography to determine fetal head position. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal So- cieties, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2002;12(3):172-7. Epub 2003/01/18.
5. Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultra- sound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;33(3):313-9. Epub 2009/02/28.
6. Usman S, Wilkinson M, Barton H, Lees CC. The feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound assessment in the labor room. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal So- cieties, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2018:1-10. Epub 2018/05/02.
7. Youssef A, Maroni E, Ragusa A, De Musso F, Salsi G, Iammarino MT, et al. Fetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;41(4):419-24. Epub 2012/11/06.
8. Gilboa Y, Kivilevitch Z, Spira M, Kedem A, Katorza E, Moran O, et al. Head progression distance in prolonged second stage of labor: relationship with mode of delivery and fetal head station. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;41(4):436-41. Epub 2013/01/29.

9. Hassan WA, Eggebo TM, Salvesen KA, Lindtjorn E, Lees C. Intrapar- tum assessment of caput succedaneum by transperineal ultrasound: a two-centre pilot study. The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology. 2015;55(4):401-3. Epub 2015/07/24.
10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Ma- ternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 1: Safe Preven- tation of the Primary Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;123(3):693-711.
11. Tutschek B, Torkildsen EA, Eggebo TM. Comparison between ultra- sound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;41(4):425-9. Epub 2013/02/02.
12. Youssef A, Maroni E, Cariello L, Bellussi F, Montaguti E, Salsi G, et al. Fetal head-symphysis distance and mode of delivery in the second stage of labor. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2014;93(10):1011- 7. Epub 2014/07/22.
13. Ciaciura-Jarno M, Cnota W, Wojtowicz D, Niesluchowska-Hoxha A, Ruci A, Kierach R, et al. Evaluation of selected ultrasonography parameters in the second stage of labor in prediction mode of delivery. Ginekologia polska. 2016;87(6):448-53. Epub 2016/07/16.
14. Wiafe YA, Whitehead B, Venables H, Odoi AT. Sonographic parame- ters for diagnosing fetal head engagement during labour. Ultrasound. 2018;26(1):16-21. Epub 2018/02/20.
15. Gluszak M, Dziadecki W, Wielgos M, Wegrzyn P. Evaluation of so- nographic assessment of the progress of labor. Ginekologia polska. 2015;86(2):126-31. Epub 2015/03/27.
16. Dietz HP, Lanzarone V. Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique. Ultrasound in obs- tetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005;25(2):165-8. Epub 2004/10/27.
17. Erlik U, Weissmann-Brenner A, Kivilevitch Z, Moran O, Kees S, Karp H, et al. Head progression distance during the first stage of labor as a predictor for delivery outcome. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2018:1-5. Epub 2018/10/03.
18. Ghi T, Maroni E, Youssef A, Morselli-Labate AM, Paccapelo A, Montaguti E, et al. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with dura- tion of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery. Ultra- sound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;44(1):82-9. Epub 2014/02/06.
19. Gilboa Y, Kivilevitch Z, Kedem A, Spira M, Borkowski T, Moran O, et al. Caput succedaneum thickness in prolonged second stage of labour: a clinical evaluation. The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology. 2013;53(5):459-63. Epub 2013/06/28.
20. Eggebo TM, Wilhelm-Benartzi C, Hassan WA, Usman S, Salvesen KA, Lees CC. A model to predict vaginal delivery in nulliparous women based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum ultrasound. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2015;213(3):362 e1-6. Epub 2015/05/27.
21. Hassan WA, Eggebo T, Ferguson M, Gillett A, Studd J, Pasupathy D, et al. The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;43(2):189-94. Epub 2013/10/10.