13.-14. Yüzyıllarda Yanya'da Yerel Kimlik ve Politik Aidiyet

Öz

Bu çalışma, Bizans İmparatorluğu'nda kimlik inşasının tarihsel bağlamında Romanitas ile bölgesel aidiyet biçimleri arasındaki etkileşimi, analitik bir çerçeve olarak Yanya örneğini kullanarak incelemektedir. Araştırmanın temel amacı, özellikle Epir bölgesindeki mülteci hareketleri ve 1359'daki Achelous Muharebesi gibi tarihsel dönüm noktaları bağlamında, Bizans İmparatorluğu'nun bütünleştirici politikaları doğrultusunda, Yanya'da kurumsallaşmış Romanitas söyleminin çok boyutlu bir şekilde dönüşümünü ortaya koymaktır. Metodolojik olarak, dönemin baskın tarihsel anlatılarını oluşturan çağdaş kronik metinler sistematik içerik analizi yöntemleri kullanılarak değerlendirilmiş; elde edilen veriler tarihsel-karşılaştırmalı analiz perspektifinden bağlamlandırılmıştır. Bulgular, Ortodoks inanç sistemi ile Hellenofon dilsel kimliğinin kesiştiği noktada yeniden üretilen Romanitas anlayışının, yalnızca dini ve kültürel düzeylerde değil, aynı zamanda kurumsal yapılar ve normatif yasal anlayış aracılığıyla da toplumsal bilincin oluşumunu şekillendirdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma, Bizans kimlik paradigmasının bölgesel farklılıklarına ışık tutmakta ve Romanitas ile yerel kimlik arasındaki ilişkiyi Yanya örneğinde yeniden değerlendiren özgün bir tarihsel analiz sunmakta, böylece mikro-tarihsel bağlamda Bizans kimlik literatürüne katkıda bulunacak kavramsal bir yeniden okuma önermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Achelous Savaşı
• Epirüs
• Patris
• Romanitas
• Yanya

Local Identity and Political Belonging in Ioannina in the 13th–14th Centuries

Öz

This study examines the interaction between Romanitas and regional forms of belonging within the historical context of identity construction in the Byzantine Empire, using the example of Ioannina as an analytical framework. The main objective of the research is to reveal the transformation of the institutionalised discourse of Romanitas in Ioannina in a multidimensional manner, particularly in the context of refugee movements in the Epirus region and historical turning points such as the Battle of Achelous in 1359, in line with the Byzantine Empire's integrative policies. Methodologically, contemporary chronicle texts that constitute the dominant historical narratives of the period were evaluated using systematic content analysis methods; the data obtained were contextualised from a historical-comparative analysis perspective. The findings reveal that the conception of Romanitas, reproduced at the intersection of the Orthodox belief system and Hellenophone linguistic identity, shaped the formation of social consciousness not only at the religious and cultural levels, but also through institutional structures and normative legal understanding. In conclusion, this study sheds light on the regional variations of the Byzantine identity paradigm and offers an original historical analysis that re-evaluates the relationship between Romanitas and local identity in the case of Ioannina, thereby proposing a conceptual re-reading that contributes to the Byzantine identity literature in a micro-historical context.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Battle of Achelous
• Epirus
• Ioannina
• Patris
• Romanitas

Kaynakça

1. Acropolitae, Georgii. Opera. Edited by A. Heisenberg. Vol. 1. Leipzig: Aedibus B. G. Teubneri, 1903.
2. Barzós, Kônstantinos. Ē Genealogía Tōn Komnēnṓn. Vol. 2. Vyzantina Keimena Kai Meletai; 20β; 20b. Thessaloníkī: Kéntro Vyzantinṓn Ereunṓn, 1984.
3. Cantacuzenus, Ioannis. Ioannis Cantacuzeni Eximperatoris Historiarum Libri IV. Edited by Ludwig Schopen. Vol. 1. Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae. Bonn, 1828.
4. Chouliaras, Ioannis. ‘Thirteenth-Century Frescoes in Epirus with Western Influences’. In Between East and Wesr Saint Alexander Nevsky His Time and Image in Art, 302–16. Moscow: State Institute of Art Sciences, 2023.
5. Fine, John V. A. The Late Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey From the Late Twelfth Century to the Ottoman Conquest. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994.
6. Fundic, Leonela. ‘Η μνημειακή τέχνη του Δεσποτάτου της Ηπείρου την περίοδο της Δυναστείας των Κομνηνών Αγγέλων: 1204-1318 [I mnimeiakí téchni tou Despotátou tis Ipeírou tin período tis Dynasteías ton Komninón Angélon: 1204-1318]’.
7. Dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 2013. https://doi.org/10.12681/eadd/47315.
8. Goodyear, Michael. ‘Despotate of Epirus’. World History Encyclopedia, 10 August 2020. https://www.worldhistory.org/Despotate_of_Epirus/.

9. Haldon, John. ‘Military Service, Military Lands, and the Status of Soldiers: Current Problems and Interpretations’. Dumbarton Oaks Papers 47 (1993): 1–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1291670.
10. Harris, Jonathan, Catherine Holmes, and Eugenia Russell. Byzantines, Latins, and Turks in the Eastern Mediterranean World after 1150. Oxford Studies in Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
11. Kaldellis, Anthony. Romanland: Ethnicity and Empire in Byzantium. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019.
12. Lambropoulos, K. Ιωάννης Απόκαυκος. Συμβολή Στην Έρευνα Του Βίου Και Του Συγγραφικού Έργου Του [Ioánnis Apókafkos. Symvolí Stin Érevna Tou Víou Kai Tou Syngrafikoú Érgou Tou ]. Athens: n.p., 1988.
13. Leidholm, Nathan. Elite Byzantine Kinship, ca. 950-1204: Blood Reputation, and the Genos. Leeds: Arc Humanities Press, 2019.
14. Macrides, R., trans. George Akropolites: The History. Oxford, 2007.
15. Nicol, Donald MacGillivray. ‘Refugees, Mixed Population and Local Patriotism in Epiros and Western Macedonia after the Fourth Crusade’. In Studies in Late Byzantine History, 3–33, 1976.
16. ———. The Despotate of Epiros, 1267-1479: A Contribution to the History of Greece in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1984.
17. Nikephoros. Patriarch of Constantinople Short History. Edited and translated by Cyril Mango. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 1990.
18. Niketas Choniates. O City of Byzantium, Annals of Niketas Choniatēs. Translated by Harry J. Magoulias. Detroit, 1984.
19. Osswald, Brendan. ‘Citizenship in Medieval Ioannina’. In Citizenship in Historical Perspective, 97–105. Pisa University Press, 2006.
20. ———. ‘The Ethnic Composition of Medieval Epirus’. In Imagining Frontiers, Contesting Identities, edited by L. Klusáková and S. G. Ellis, 125–54. Pisa: Pisa University Press, 2007. https://univ-tlse2.hal.science/hal-02083128v1.
21. Page, Gill. Being Byzantine: Greek Identity before the Ottomans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Schirò, Giuseppe, ed. Cronaca Dei Tocco Di Cefalonia. Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae. Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 1975.
22. Shea, A. ‘The Late Byzantine City: Social, Economic and Institutional Profile’. Dissertation, The University of Birmingham, 2010.
23. Sherwin-White, A. N. The Roman Citizenship. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.
24. Smarnakis, Ioannis. ‘Political Power, Space, and Identities in the State of Epiros (1205–1318)’. In The Routledge Handbook on Identity in Byzantium, by Michael Edward Stewart, David Alan Parnell, and Conor Whately, 300–311, 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429031373-20.
25. Soustal, Peter, and Johannes Koder. Nikopolis Und Kephallēnia. Tabula Imperii Byzantini 3. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1981.
26. Theodoropoulos, Panagiotis. ‘The Migration of Syrian and Palestinian Populations in the 7th Century: Movement of Individuals and Groups in the Mediterranean’. In Migration Histories of the Medieval Afroeurasian Transition Zone, 261–87. BRILL, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004425613.
27. Veikou, Myrto. Byzantine Epirus: A Topography of Transformation: Settlements of the Seventh-Twelfth Centuries in Southern Epirus and Aetoloacarnania, Greece. The Medieval Mediterranean : Peoples, Economies and Cultures, 400-1500 95. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2012.
28. Vranousis, Leandros I. ‘To Chronikon ton Ioanninon Kat’ Anekdoton Dimodi Epitomin’. In Epetiris tou Mesaionikou Archeiou, 12:57–115. Athens: Academy of Athens, 1965.