Öğrencilerin Gürültü ve Akustik Travma Hakkındaki Bilgi Düzeyleri ve Odyogramlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Çalışma, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek

Yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin gürültü ve akustik travma bilgileri

ile odyogram ölçüm düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi amacıyla

planlandı.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırmaya, 2013-2014 eğitim-öğretim

yılında, birinci ve ikinci sınıflarda eğitimlerine devam eden 200

öğrenci katıldı. Öğrencilerin tanımlayıcı özellikleri ile ilgili bilgi

düzeyleri; hazırlanan anket formu, odyogram ölçümleri ise işitme

testi yapılarak belirlendi. İstatistiksel analiz için SPSS 17.0 paket

programı kullanıldı.

Bulgular: Öğrencilerin tanımlayıcı özelliklerinden işitme sorunu

olanlar ile sol ve sağ kulak, işitme sorunu olanlar ile sol ve sağ

kemik, gürültülü çalışma ile sağ kemik, gürültüye maruz kalma ile

sol kulak ve sağ kemik, ulaşım ile sol ve sağ kemik, mekanik ile

sol ve sağ kulak, konsantrasyon ile sol ve sağ kemik, yorgunluk ile

sol kemik ve rekreasyon ile sol ve sağ kemik arasında istatistiki

(p<0.05) olarak önemli bir etkilenmenin olduğu bulundu.

Diğer tanımlayıcı özellikler ile odyogram ölçümleri arasında

etkilenmenin olmadığı belirlendi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ses,akustik travma,odyogram

Students’ Knowledge Levels About Acoustic Trauma and Noise and Evaluation of Audiogram

Öz

Objective: This study was planned to evaluate the knowledge of

noise and acoustic trauma and audiogram measurement levels of

students studying at Ataturk University, Health Services Vocational

School.

Material and Method: 200 students studying in the first and

second years in 2013-2014 academic year were included in the

study. Descriptive features of students and their related knowledge

levels were determined through questionnaires, audiogram

measurements and hearing tests. SPSS 17.0 software package was

used for statistical analysis.

Results: There was a significant statistical relationship (p<0.05)

between the descriptive features of students and left and right

ear; between hearing problems and left and right bone; between

studying in noisy environments and right bone; between exposure

to noise and left ear and right bone; between transportation and

left and right bone; between mechanic and left and right bone;

between concentration and left and right bone; between burnout

and left bone; and between recreation and left and right bone. No

relationship was observed between other descriptive features and

audiogram measurements.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Noise,acoustic trauma,audiogram

Kaynakça

1. 1. Peter T, Sian, E. Emery’s Elements of Medical Genetics. Twelfth edition. Elsevier Churchchill Livingstone. London. 2005; 161-79
2. 2. Man YK, Trolove C, Tattersall D, Thomas AC, Papakonstantinopoulou A, Patel D, Scott C, Chong J, Jagger DJ, O’toole EA, Navsaria H, Curtis MA, Kelsell DP. A deafness-associated mutant human connexin 26 ımproves the epithelial barrier in vitro. Membr Biol. 2007; 218: 29-37.
3. 3. Rabinowith PM. The public health significance of noiseinduced hearing loss. In: Le Prell CG, Henderson D, Fay RR, Pooper AN, eds. Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Scientific Advances. New York: Springer. 2012; 13-25.
4. 4. Garrioch D. Sounds of the city: the soundscape of early modern European towns. Urban History. 2003; 30(1): 5-25.
5. 5. Daniel E. Noise and Hearing Loss: A Review.J School Health. 2007; 77 (5): 225-31.
6. 6. Hu B. Noise-induced structural damage to the cochlea. In: Le Prell CG, Henderson D, Fay RR, Pooper AN, eds. Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Scientific Advances. New York:Springer. 2012; 57-86.
7. 7. Henderson D, Hamernik RP. The use of Kurtozis measurement in the assessment of potential noise trauma. In: Le Prell CG, Henderson D, Fay RR, Pooper AN, eds. Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Scientific Advances.New York:Springer. 2012; 41-55.
8. 8. Snow DJ. Noise hazards: the issues, the remedies and the trends in regulation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A:J Power & Energy. 1999;213 (6): 447-63.

9. 9. Şahin E. Gürültü kontrol yöntemleri ve bir uygulama. Gazi Üniv Müh Mim Fak Der. 2003; 18 (4): 67-80.
10. 10. Babisch W. Stress hormones in the research on cardiovascular effects of noise. Noise Health. 2003; 5 (18): 1-11.
11. 11. Smith A. The concept of noise sensitivity: Implications for noise control. Noise Health. 2003; 5 (18): 57-9.
12. 12. Çetin E, Malas MA. Fetal büyümeye etki eden çevresel faktörler. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2005; 12: 65-72.
13. 13. Ravindran R, Devi RS, Samson J. Noise-stress-induced brain neurotransmitter changes and the effect of ocimum sanctum (Linn) treatment in albino rats. J Pharmacol Sci. 2005; 98:354-60.
14. 14. Abbate C, Concetto G, Fortunato MO. Influence of environmental factors on the evolution of industrial noiseinduced hearing loss. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2005; 107: 351-61
15. 15. Nelson DI, Nelson RY, Concha-Barrientos M, Fingerhut M.The global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Am J Indust Med. 2005; 48 (6): 446-58.
16. 16. Flamme GA, Stephenson MR, Deiters K, Tatro A, VanGessel D, Geda K et al. Typical noiseexposure in daily life. Int J Audiol. 2012; 51 Suppl 1:S3-11.
17. 17. Stansfeld SA, Matheson MP. Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health. British Medical Bulletin. 2003; 68: 243-57.
18. 18. Ekinci CE, Bulut T, Güler Ç. Elazığ Abdullah Paşa mahallesi gürültü düzeyinin araştırılması. F. Ü. Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2005; 17: 257-65.
19. 19. Petrescu N. Loud music listening. Mcgill J med. Jull. 2008;11(2): 169-76.
20. 20. Derebery MJ, Vermiglio A. Facing the music: pre –and postconsert assesstment of hearing in teenagers. Otol Neutol 2012; 33(7): 1136-41.
21. 21. Chung H, Roches C, Meunier J, Eavey D. Evalation of noise – ınduced hearing loss in young people using a web-based survey Technique.Official journal of the American Academy of the Pediatrics. 2005; 115 (4): 861-867.
22. 22. Tel H, Sabancıoğulları S. Hemşirelik birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin laboratuar uygulamasında ve birbirlerine intramüsküler enjeksiyon uygularken ve klinik uygulamaların ilk gününde anksiyete durumları. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi. 2004; 7(1): 27-32
23. 23. Alinier G. Nursing students’ and lecturers’ perspectives of objective structured clinical examination incorporating simulation. Nurse Education. Today. 2003; 23 (6): 419-26.
24. 24. Böke B, Belgin E, Köprülü H, Gökalp S. Atacan E. Laboratuvar gürültüsü ve diş hekimliği öğrencilerinin işitme eşiklerine etkisi. OTOSKOP. 2000; 2: 61-64
25. 25. Brenda LLM, Glen, KM. Noise-induced hearing loss. Cummings CW (editors). Cummings otolaryngology head and neck surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby. 2005; 2906-2925
26. 26. Jarup L, Dudley ML, Babisch W. Hypertension and exposure to noise near airports (HYENA): study design and noise exposure assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113:1473-78.
27. 27. Visser O, Wijnen JHV, Leeuwen FEV. Incidence of cancer in the area around Amsterdam Airport Schiphol in 1988–2003: a population-based ecological study. BMC Public Health.2005; 5: 127.
28. 28. Scenihr. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. ‘Potential health risks of exposure to noise from personal music players and mobile phones including a music playing function. Brussels: Scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks. European commission directorate general for health and consumers. 2008; 20-23.
29. 29. Jansen EJ, Helleman HW, Dreschler WA, de Laat JA. Noise induced hearing loss and other hearing complaints among musicians of symphony orchestras. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009; 82: 153-64.
30. 30. Beach E, Williams W, Gilliver M. ‘Estimating young Australian adults’ risk of hearing damage from selected leisure activities’. Ear and Hearing. 2013; 34: 75–82.
31. 31. Atalay H, Türkoğlu SB, Aydın E. Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Pilots. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 53: 155-62
32. 32. Lindgren T, Wieslander G. Hearing status among commercial pilots in a Swedish airline company. Int J Audiol 2008; 47: 515-9.
33. 33. Akan Z, Körpinar MA, Tulgar M. Effects of noise pollution over the blood serum immunoglobulins and auditory system on the VFM airport workers, Van, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess. 2011; 177(1-4): 537-43.
34. 34. Nair LC, Mshl AV, Kashyap RC. Prevalence of noise induced hearing loss in Indian Air Force Personnel. MJAFI. 2009; 65: 247-51.
35. 35. Barlı Ö. Orman Endüstri İşletmelerinde İnsan Sağlığını Etkileyen Fiziksel Çevre Faktörleri. Tr. J. of Agriculture and Forestry. 1998; 22: 521-4.
36. 36. Ertem M, İlçin E, Meriç. F. Noise Induced Hearing Loss Among Cotton Textile and Carpet Mill Workers. Tr J Medical Sciences. 1998; 28: 561-5.
37. 37. Yıldırım I, Kılınç M, Okur E, Inanc Tolun F, Kiliç MA, Kurutas EB, et al. The Effects of Noise on Hearing and Oxidative Stress in Textile Workers. Ind Health. 2007; 45(6): 743-9.
38. 38. Onder M, Onder S, Mutlu A. Determination of noise induced hearing loss in mining: an application of hierarchical loglinear modelling. Environ Monit Assess. 2012; 184(4): 2443-51.