Is there any effect of long term alpha-adrenergic blocker and a single dose antibiotic usage in reducing febrile urinary tract infections after prostate biopsy?
Abstract
Material and Method: The data of 2558 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS+BX) due to elevated PSA in our clinic between January 2008 and July 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups as those who used alpha-blockers for a minimum of three months or longer before biopsy (Group 1) and those who did not use alpha-blockers before applying to the outpatient clinic (Group 2) . Demographic data of the groups and post-biopsy FUI development rates were compared.
Results: It was observed that 1340 (52.4%) of the patients were using alpha-blockers (Group 1) and 1218 (47.6%) did not (Group 2) . The median age of the patients in the pre-biopsy groups was similar [Group 1=68 (IQR=9) years and Group 2=68 (IQR=9) years, p=0.887]. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of median prostate volume [Group1=57 (31) ml and Group 2=58 (34) ml, p=0.199]. The median PSA value was found to be significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 [10.50 (5.40) ng/dl vs 10.35 (6.80) ng/dl, p=0.026]. Postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) was found to be significantly higher in Group 2 [Group 1=40 (30) ml and Group2=60 (90) ml, p<0.001]. Similarly, the frequency of FUI development after biopsy was found to be significantly higher in Group 2 [Group 1=17 (1.3%) and Group 2=65 (5.3%) , p<0.001].
Conclusion: The use of alpha-adrenergic blockers for a minimum of three months or longer before prostate biopsy significantly reduces the incidence of FUI that may develop secondary to biopsy.
Keywords
References
- Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 1079–92.
- Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989; 142: 71–4.
- Chun FK, Epstein JI, Ficarra V, et al. Optimizing performance and interpretation of prostate biopsy: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 851–64.
- Borghesi M, Ahmed H, Nam R, et al. Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy. Eur Urol 2017; 71: 353-65.
- Wagenlehner FM, van Oostrum E, Tenke P, et al. Infective complications after prostate biopsy: outcome of the Global Prevalence Study of Infections in Urology (GPIU) 2010 and 2011, a prospective multinational multicentre prostate biopsy study. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 521–7.
- Bruyère F, Malavaud S, Bertrand P, et al. Prosbiotate: a multicenter, prospective analysis of infectious complications after prostate biopsy. J Urol 2015; 193: 145–50.
- Shandera KC, Thibault GP, Deshon GE. Variability in patient preparation for prostate biopsy among American urologists. Urology 1998; 52: 644–6.
- Masumori N, Tsukamoto T, Horita H, et al. α1-blocker tamsulosin as initial treatment for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: 5-year outcome analysis of a prospective multicenter study. Int J Urol 2013; 20: 421-8.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
January 12, 2023
Submission Date
June 30, 2022
Acceptance Date
October 25, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 2023 Volume: 6 Number: 1











