Clinical research for low back pain in Turkiye: analysis of PubMed-indexed randomized controlled trials

Yıl 2024, , 638 - 642, 27.10.2024

Mahir Topaloğlu , Enes Efe İş

https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1549171

Öz

Aims: Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition and a major contributor to disability worldwide. Despite bibliometric analyses of LBP literature, no study has specifically explored Turkiye’s contribution to this field through randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This study aims to examine the characteristics of Turkiye-based RCTs on LBP, utilizing PubMed, the most frequently used biomedical search engine.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed using the terms “low back pain [Title]” and “(Turkiye) OR (Turkiye).” Only interventional RCTs were included. Data points such as publication year, open-access status, first author’s specialty, study content, journal quartile (Web of Science), and citation count (Google Scholar) were analyzed.
Results: Most publications are authored by Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR) specialists (26) and physiotherapists (24), with emergency medicine specialists (6) in third place. The number of publications increased over time, peaking in 2021 (10). Most publications appeared in Q1-Q2-Q3 journals (67). The average citation count is 46.9, median is 29, ranging from 0 to 305, with citation counts strongly influenced by publication year (p<0.001). The most common research topics are Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) (15), Physical Therapy Agents (14), and Injections (10). PMR specialists have more citations than other groups (p=0.001). Open access status did not significantly affect citation counts (p=0.277).
Conclusion: Turkiye-based RCTs on low back pain have steadily increased, with PMR specialists and physiotherapists leading the field. Publications are primarily found in high-impact journals. Key research topics include CAM, physical therapy agents, and injections.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Low back pain, randomized controlled trial, Turkiye, bibliometric analysis, PubMed

Kaynakça

• Knezevic NN, Candido KD, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Zundert J, Cohen SP. Low back pain. Lancet. 2021;398(10294):78-92. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00733-9
• Kongsted A, Kent P, Axen I, Downie AS, Dunn KM. What have we learned from ten years of trajectory research in low back pain?. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:220. doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1071-2
• Itz CJ, Geurts JW, van Kleef M, Nelemans P. Clinical course of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies set in primary care. Eur J Pain. 2013;17(1):5-15. doi:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00170.x
• Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211-1259. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32154-2
• Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(6):2028-2037. doi:10.1002/art.34347
• Islamaj Dogan R, Murray GC, Névéol A, Lu Z. Understanding PubMed user search behavior through log analysis. Database (Oxford). 2009;2009:bap018. doi:10.1093/database/bap018
• Lu Z. PubMed and beyond: a survey of web tools for searching biomedical literature. Database. 2011;2011:baq036. doi:10.1093/database/baq036
• Šajnović U, Kokol P, Završnik J, Vošner HB. Trends in physiotherapy of chronic low back pain research: knowledge synthesis based on bibliometric analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(16):1676. doi:10.3390/healthcare12161676
• Weng LM, Zheng YL, Peng MS, Chang TT, Wu B, Wang XQ. A bibliometric analysis of nonspecific low back pain research. Pain Res Manag. 2020;2020:5396734. doi:10.1155/2020/5396734
• Zheng DKY, Kawchuk GN, Bussières AE, et al. Trends of low back pain research in older and working-age adults from 1993 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis. J Pain Res. 2023;16:3325-3341. doi: 10.2147/jpr.S425672
• Subbarayalu AV, Idhris M, Prabaharan S, et al. Physiotherapy research on low back pain in the Indian context: A bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(4):861-869. doi:10.3233/bmr-210363
• Huang F, Zheng B, Wu C, et al. International publication trends in low back pain research: a bibliometric and visualization analysis. Front Public Health. 2022;10:746591. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.746591
• Ng JY, Mohiuddin U. Quality of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations in low back pain guidelines: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(8):1833-1844. doi:10.1007/s00586-020-06393-9
• Yilmaz E, Aydin T. Fiziksel tip ve rehabilitasyon tarihçesi. 2023:240-251.
• Turkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Derneği. Tarihçe. Accessed 12.09.2024, https://www.tftr.org.tr/tarihce
• Akhaddar A. Contribution of moroccan neurosurgeons to the world neurosurgical data in PubMed: a bibliometric evaluation over time. World Neurosurg. 2019;126:59-65. doi:10.1016/j.wneu. 2019.02.122
• Bayramlar H, Karadag R, Sari U, Cakici O. Turkish contribution to ophthalmic literature from 1990 to 2013. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2014;44(6):465-471.