Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Sezaryen sonrası ağrının karakteristik özelliği

Yıl 2021, , 1 - 6, 21.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.719225

Öz

Amaç: Çalışmada, elektif veya acil nedenlerden dolayı sezaryen yapılan hastalarda postoperatif ağrının karakteristik özelliklerini analiz etmek amaçlanmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışma, sezaryen yapılan 78 hastayı içeren gözlemsel ve tanımlayıcı bir kesitsel analizdir. Araştırma esnasında hastaların ilk 6 saatteki görsel ağrı skalası (VAS) skorları değerlendirilmiş ve ağrılarının karakteristik tanımlamaları sorgulanmıştır.
Bulgular: Postoperatif ilk 6 saatteki ortalama VAS skorları 5.56 ± 1.31'dir. Hastaların ağrı hissettiği vücut lokalizasyonu insizyon bölgesinde %7.7, umbilikus altında %14.1, tüm karın bölgesinde %23.1, insizyonun sağ tarafında %50, insizyonun sol tarafında %1.3, insizyonun her iki yanında %3,8 olarak saptanmıştır. Hastaların anestezi tipleri ve VAS skorları karşılaştırıldığında, ortalamalar arasındaki fark, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmamıştır (p> 0.05). Ağrının yeri ile sezaryen sayısı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark tespit edilmemiştir (p> 0.05). Postoperatif mobilizasyon saatleri ile hastaların memnuniyet skorları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmıştır (p <0.05).
Sonuç: Sezaryen sonrası ağrının azaltılması; annenin iyileşme süreci ve anne ile bebek arasındaki erken bağın gelişimi için oldukça önemlidir. Sezaryen sonrası ağrının en çok hissedilen yeri tespit edilir, değerlendirilir ve özellikleri belirlenirse; ağrıyı azaltmak veya ortadan kaldırmak için uygun müdahaleler planlanabilir.

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Kaynakça

  • 1. Yanıkkerem UE, Kitapçıoğlu G, Karadeniz G. Women's view of birth methods, experience and satisfaction. Fırat Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi. 2010;5(13):107-123.
  • 2. Yanıkkerem UE, Göker A, Nicole Piro N. Women’s opinions about mode of delivery and satisfaction with hospital care after cesarean delivery. Selçuk Tıp Dergisi. 2013;29(2):75-81.
  • 3. Çapık A, Sakar T, Yıldırım N, Karabacak K, Korkut M. Determining the satisfaction levels of the mothers according to their mode of birth. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi.2016;19(2):92-99.
  • 4. Pınar G, Doğan N, Algıer L,Kaya N, Çakmak F. Factors that affecting mothers’ postnatal comfort.Dicle Tıp Dergisi .2015; 36(3), 184-190.
  • 5. Brown AK, Christo PJ, Wu CL. Strategies for Postoperative Pain Management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2004;18(4):703-17.
  • 6. Shea RA, Brooks JA, Dayhoff NE, Keck J. Pain Intensity and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Among the Elderly After Abdominal Surgery. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care. 2002;31(6):440-9.
  • 7. Wang H-L, Keck JF. Foot and Hand Massage as an Intervention for Postoperative Pain. Pain Management Nursing. 2004;5(2):59-65.
  • 8. Huang SY, Sheu SJ, Tai CJ, Chiang CP, Chien LY. Decision-making process for choosing an elective cesarean delivery among primiparas in Taiwan. Matern Child Health J. 2013; 17: 842–851.
  • 9. Henriksen L, Grimsrud E, Schei B, Lukasse M. Factors related to a negative birth experience - A mixed methods study. Midwifery. 2017; 51:33-39.
  • 10. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, et al. Cesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. The Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1819-29.
  • 11. Eyi EGY, Mollamahmutoglu L. An analysis of the high cesarean delivery rates in Turkey by Robson classification. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;1:1-11.
  • 12. Güngör I, Kızılkaya Beji N. Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and cesarean birth. Midwifery 2012;28(3):348-5.
  • 13. Saunders WB. Cesarean Delivery, High RiskPregnancy. 2 nd ed. Harcourt Publishers Limited. 1999;1:10-12.
  • 14. Klopfenstein CE, Herrmann F, Mamie C, Van Gessel E, Forster A. Pain intensity and pain relief after surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2000;44(1):58-62.
  • 15. D'Arcy YM. Pain management: Evidence-based tools and techniques for nursing professionals: marblehead, MA: Hcpro Incorporated; 2007;2:164.
  • 16. Duncan GH, Bushnell MC, Lavigne GJ. Comparison of verbal and visual analogue scales for measuring the intensity and unpleasantness of experimental pain. Pain.1989;37(3):295-303.
  • 17. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27(1):117-26.
  • 18. D'Arcy YM. Pain assessment in medical-legal aspects of pain and suffering. Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company. 2003.
  • 19. Olofsson CI, Legeby MH, Nygards EB, Ostman KM. Diclofenac in The Treatment of Pain After Cesarean Delivery. An Opioid-Saving Strategy. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2000;88(2):143-6.
  • 20. Valente SM. Hypnosis for Pain Management. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 2006;44(2):22-30.
  • 21. Coll MA.,Jemel R M.,Mead D. Postoperative pain assesment tools in day surgery: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46:2.
  • 22. Ngan Kee W, Khaw K, Wong E. Randomised double-blind comparison of morphine vs. a morphine–alfentanil combination for patient controlled analgesia. Anaesthesia. 1999; 54(7): 629-33.
  • 23. Vijayan R, Delilkan A. First year’s experience with an acute pain service–University Hospital Kuala Lumpur. Med J Malaysia. 1994;49(4):385-400.
  • 24. Taenzer P, Melzack R, Jeans ME. Influence of psychological factors on postoperative pain, mood and analgesic requirements. Pain. 1986;24(3):331-42.
  • 25. Boyle P, Parbrook GD. The interrelation of personality and postoperative factors. Br J Anaesth. 1977; 49 (3): 259-264.
  • 26. Chung F, Ritchie E, Su J. Postoperative pain in ambulatory surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1997;85(4):808-16.
  • 27. Fecho K, Miller NR, Merritt SA, Klauber, DeMore N, Hultman CS, Blau WS. Acute and persistent postoperative pain after breast surgery. Pain Medicine. 2009;10(4):708-15.
  • 28. Kessous R, Weintraub AY, Wiznitzer A, et al. Spinal versus general anesthesia in cesarean deliverys: the effects on postoperative pain perception. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2012;286(1):75-79.
  • 29. Gonano C, Leitgeb U, Sitzwohl C, Ihra G, Weinstabl C, Kettner SC. Spinal versus general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery: anesthesia drug and supply costs. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2006;102(2):524-9.
  • 30. SousaI L., Pitangui ACR, Gomes FA, Nakano AMS, Ferreira CHJ. Measurement and characteristics of post-cesarean delivery pain and the relationship to limitation of physical activities. Acta paul. enferm. 2009; 22: 6.
  • 31. Astepe B.S. The Relationship Between Preoperative Anxiety Level and Postoperative Pain in Patients With Cesarean Delivery. Kocaeli Med J. 2018; 7; 3:64-69.
  • 32. Niven C. How helpful is the presence of the husband at childbirth? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 1985;3(2):45-53.
  • 33. Granot M, Lowenstein L, Yarnitsky D, Tamir A, Zimmer EZ. Postcesarean delivery pain prediction by preoperative experimental pain assessment. Anesthesiology.2003;98(6):142-226.

Charecteristics of postcesarean section pain

Yıl 2021, , 1 - 6, 21.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.719225

Öz

Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of postoperative pain in patients undergoing cesarean delivery for elective or urgent reasons.
Material and Methods: This study is an observational descriptive cross-sectional analysis involving 78 patients who underwent cesarean delivery. Visual Pain Scale (VAS) scores of 78 patients were evaluated in the first 6 hours and the patients were asked about the characteristic descriptions of the pain.
Results: Mean VAS scores in the first 6 hours postoperatively were 5.56 ± 1.31. Body localizations where the patients feel pain were 7.7% in the incision site, 14.1% under the umbilicus, 23.1% in the whole abdominal region, 50% on the right side of the incision, 1.3% on the left side of the incision and 3.8% on both sides of the incision. When the anesthesia types and VAS scores of the patients were compared, the differences between the averages were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the location of pain and the number of cesarean sections (p >0.05). There was a statistically significant relationship between the postoperative mobilization hours and the patients' satisfaction scores (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Treatment of the post-cesarean pain is very important for the recovery process of the mother and the development of the early bond between the mother and the infant. If the post-cesarean delivery pain is identified, evaluated and its characteristics are determined, appropriate interventions can be made to reduce or eliminate the pain.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Yanıkkerem UE, Kitapçıoğlu G, Karadeniz G. Women's view of birth methods, experience and satisfaction. Fırat Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi. 2010;5(13):107-123.
  • 2. Yanıkkerem UE, Göker A, Nicole Piro N. Women’s opinions about mode of delivery and satisfaction with hospital care after cesarean delivery. Selçuk Tıp Dergisi. 2013;29(2):75-81.
  • 3. Çapık A, Sakar T, Yıldırım N, Karabacak K, Korkut M. Determining the satisfaction levels of the mothers according to their mode of birth. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi.2016;19(2):92-99.
  • 4. Pınar G, Doğan N, Algıer L,Kaya N, Çakmak F. Factors that affecting mothers’ postnatal comfort.Dicle Tıp Dergisi .2015; 36(3), 184-190.
  • 5. Brown AK, Christo PJ, Wu CL. Strategies for Postoperative Pain Management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2004;18(4):703-17.
  • 6. Shea RA, Brooks JA, Dayhoff NE, Keck J. Pain Intensity and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Among the Elderly After Abdominal Surgery. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care. 2002;31(6):440-9.
  • 7. Wang H-L, Keck JF. Foot and Hand Massage as an Intervention for Postoperative Pain. Pain Management Nursing. 2004;5(2):59-65.
  • 8. Huang SY, Sheu SJ, Tai CJ, Chiang CP, Chien LY. Decision-making process for choosing an elective cesarean delivery among primiparas in Taiwan. Matern Child Health J. 2013; 17: 842–851.
  • 9. Henriksen L, Grimsrud E, Schei B, Lukasse M. Factors related to a negative birth experience - A mixed methods study. Midwifery. 2017; 51:33-39.
  • 10. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, et al. Cesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. The Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1819-29.
  • 11. Eyi EGY, Mollamahmutoglu L. An analysis of the high cesarean delivery rates in Turkey by Robson classification. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;1:1-11.
  • 12. Güngör I, Kızılkaya Beji N. Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and cesarean birth. Midwifery 2012;28(3):348-5.
  • 13. Saunders WB. Cesarean Delivery, High RiskPregnancy. 2 nd ed. Harcourt Publishers Limited. 1999;1:10-12.
  • 14. Klopfenstein CE, Herrmann F, Mamie C, Van Gessel E, Forster A. Pain intensity and pain relief after surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2000;44(1):58-62.
  • 15. D'Arcy YM. Pain management: Evidence-based tools and techniques for nursing professionals: marblehead, MA: Hcpro Incorporated; 2007;2:164.
  • 16. Duncan GH, Bushnell MC, Lavigne GJ. Comparison of verbal and visual analogue scales for measuring the intensity and unpleasantness of experimental pain. Pain.1989;37(3):295-303.
  • 17. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27(1):117-26.
  • 18. D'Arcy YM. Pain assessment in medical-legal aspects of pain and suffering. Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company. 2003.
  • 19. Olofsson CI, Legeby MH, Nygards EB, Ostman KM. Diclofenac in The Treatment of Pain After Cesarean Delivery. An Opioid-Saving Strategy. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2000;88(2):143-6.
  • 20. Valente SM. Hypnosis for Pain Management. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 2006;44(2):22-30.
  • 21. Coll MA.,Jemel R M.,Mead D. Postoperative pain assesment tools in day surgery: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46:2.
  • 22. Ngan Kee W, Khaw K, Wong E. Randomised double-blind comparison of morphine vs. a morphine–alfentanil combination for patient controlled analgesia. Anaesthesia. 1999; 54(7): 629-33.
  • 23. Vijayan R, Delilkan A. First year’s experience with an acute pain service–University Hospital Kuala Lumpur. Med J Malaysia. 1994;49(4):385-400.
  • 24. Taenzer P, Melzack R, Jeans ME. Influence of psychological factors on postoperative pain, mood and analgesic requirements. Pain. 1986;24(3):331-42.
  • 25. Boyle P, Parbrook GD. The interrelation of personality and postoperative factors. Br J Anaesth. 1977; 49 (3): 259-264.
  • 26. Chung F, Ritchie E, Su J. Postoperative pain in ambulatory surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1997;85(4):808-16.
  • 27. Fecho K, Miller NR, Merritt SA, Klauber, DeMore N, Hultman CS, Blau WS. Acute and persistent postoperative pain after breast surgery. Pain Medicine. 2009;10(4):708-15.
  • 28. Kessous R, Weintraub AY, Wiznitzer A, et al. Spinal versus general anesthesia in cesarean deliverys: the effects on postoperative pain perception. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2012;286(1):75-79.
  • 29. Gonano C, Leitgeb U, Sitzwohl C, Ihra G, Weinstabl C, Kettner SC. Spinal versus general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery: anesthesia drug and supply costs. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2006;102(2):524-9.
  • 30. SousaI L., Pitangui ACR, Gomes FA, Nakano AMS, Ferreira CHJ. Measurement and characteristics of post-cesarean delivery pain and the relationship to limitation of physical activities. Acta paul. enferm. 2009; 22: 6.
  • 31. Astepe B.S. The Relationship Between Preoperative Anxiety Level and Postoperative Pain in Patients With Cesarean Delivery. Kocaeli Med J. 2018; 7; 3:64-69.
  • 32. Niven C. How helpful is the presence of the husband at childbirth? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 1985;3(2):45-53.
  • 33. Granot M, Lowenstein L, Yarnitsky D, Tamir A, Zimmer EZ. Postcesarean delivery pain prediction by preoperative experimental pain assessment. Anesthesiology.2003;98(6):142-226.
Toplam 33 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Orijinal Makale
Yazarlar

Tuğba Gürbüz 0000-0003-3555-3767

Nefise Tanrıdan Okçu 0000-0003-2307-7628

Yayımlanma Tarihi 21 Ocak 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021

Kaynak Göster

AMA Gürbüz T, Tanrıdan Okçu N. Charecteristics of postcesarean section pain. J Health Sci Med /JHSM /jhsm. Ocak 2021;4(1):1-6. doi:10.32322/jhsm.719225

Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği:  Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç  uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]

Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.

Not:
Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.

Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show 


Dergi Dizin ve Platformları

Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.

Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.