Research Article

Exploring healthcare professionals’ views and approaches regarding COVID-19 vaccines

Volume: 4 Number: 5 September 5, 2021
EN

Exploring healthcare professionals’ views and approaches regarding COVID-19 vaccines

Abstract

Aim: While going through tough times in the fight against the pandemic, the approach of healthcare professionals to vaccination can enlighten the way of society. In our study, we aimed to investigate healthcare professionals’ views and approaches regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: We carried out the study with a total of 500 voluntary healthcare professionals between January 2021 and April 2021. We administered a survey consisting of 15 multiple choice questions to the participants and put their responses into statistical analyses. Results: There were a total of 500 participants, among whom 168 were males (33.6%). The mean age of the participants was 39.68 (21-62). While the number of physicians was 48 (9.6%), there were 158 (31.6%) nurses and midwives and 294 (58.8%) other healthcare personnel. Most of the participants (84.4%) thought the COVID-19 was a fatal infection. Again, the majority of participants believed in the necessity of vaccines (87%) and, especially, the COVID-19 (73.2%). Besides, the rate of those who were vaccinated against COVID-19 was 82%. Interestingly, about half of the participants (54%) believed in the protective effect of the vaccine. The participants showed ineffectiveness (34%) and side effects (28%) as the frequent reasons for non-vaccination. Among those who were positive towards vaccination, 16.7% had not been vaccinated yet. A substantial rate of the participants (67.4%) recommended the COVID-19 vaccine to those around them, but 6.8% did not. Sixty-three per cent of the participants would trust the local vaccine more. Finally, 67% of the participants thought that the vaccine would play a significant role in ending the pandemic. Conclusion: In our study, we discovered that the vast majority of healthcare professionals were vaccinated and adopted a positive approach to vaccination. In addition, relevant training programs may help increase the number of individuals adopting entirely positive attitudes towards the vaccine.

Keywords

References

  1. Taleghani N, Taghipour F. Diagnosis of COVID-19 for controlling the pandemic: A review of the state-of-the-art. Biosens Bioelectron 2021; 174: 112830.
  2. Mohamadian M, Chiti H, Shoghli A, Biglari S, Parsamanesh N, Esmaeilzadeh A. COVID-19: Virology, biology and novel laboratory diagnosis. J Gene Med 2021; 23: e3303.
  3. Umakanthan S, Sahu P, Ranade AV, et al. Origin, transmission, diagnosis and management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Postgrad Med J 2020; 96: 753-8.
  4. Yüce M, Filiztekin E, Özkaya KG. COVID-19 diagnosis - A review of current methods. Biosens Bioelectron 2021; 172: 112752.
  5. Habas K, Nganwuchu C, Shahzad F, et al. Resolution of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2020; 18: 1201-11.
  6. Islam KU, Iqbal J. An Update on Molecular Diagnostics for COVID-19. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020; 10: 560616.
  7. Soleimanpour S, Yaghoubi A. COVID-19 vaccine: where are we now and where should we go? Expert Rev Vaccines 2021; 20: 23-44.
  8. Awadasseid A, Wu Y, Tanaka Y, Zhang W. Current advances in the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Int J Biol Sci 2021; 17: 8-19.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 5, 2021

Submission Date

June 15, 2021

Acceptance Date

August 15, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 4 Number: 5

APA
Öztürk, R. (2021). Exploring healthcare professionals’ views and approaches regarding COVID-19 vaccines. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, 4(5), 692-697. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.952354
AMA
1.Öztürk R. Exploring healthcare professionals’ views and approaches regarding COVID-19 vaccines. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2021;4(5):692-697. doi:10.32322/jhsm.952354
Chicago
Öztürk, Reyhan. 2021. “Exploring Healthcare Professionals’ Views and Approaches Regarding COVID-19 Vaccines”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 4 (5): 692-97. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.952354.
EndNote
Öztürk R (September 1, 2021) Exploring healthcare professionals’ views and approaches regarding COVID-19 vaccines. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 4 5 692–697.
IEEE
[1]R. Öztürk, “Exploring healthcare professionals’ views and approaches regarding COVID-19 vaccines”, J Health Sci Med / JHSM, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 692–697, Sept. 2021, doi: 10.32322/jhsm.952354.
ISNAD
Öztürk, Reyhan. “Exploring Healthcare Professionals’ Views and Approaches Regarding COVID-19 Vaccines”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 4/5 (September 1, 2021): 692-697. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.952354.
JAMA
1.Öztürk R. Exploring healthcare professionals’ views and approaches regarding COVID-19 vaccines. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2021;4:692–697.
MLA
Öztürk, Reyhan. “Exploring Healthcare Professionals’ Views and Approaches Regarding COVID-19 Vaccines”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, vol. 4, no. 5, Sept. 2021, pp. 692-7, doi:10.32322/jhsm.952354.
Vancouver
1.Reyhan Öztürk. Exploring healthcare professionals’ views and approaches regarding COVID-19 vaccines. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2021 Sep. 1;4(5):692-7. doi:10.32322/jhsm.952354

Cited By

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].

The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show







The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.

       images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRB9r6zRLDl0Pz7om2DQkiTQXqDtuq64Eb1Qg&usqp=CAU

500px-WorldCat_logo.svg.png

atifdizini.png

logo_world_of_journals_no_margin.png

images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTNpvUjQ4Ffc6uQBqMQrqYMR53c7bRqD9rohCINkko0Y1a_hPSn&usqp=CAU

doaj.png  

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSpOQFsFv3RdX0lIQJC3SwkFIA-CceHin_ujli_JrqBy3A32A_Tx_oMoIZn96EcrpLwTQg&usqp=CAU

ici2.png

asos-index.png

drji.png





The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.

COPE-logo-300x199.jpgimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQR6_qdgvxMP9owgnYzJ1M6CS_XzR_d7orTjA&usqp=CAU

icmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBcJw8ia8S9TI4Fun5vj3HPzEcEKIvF_jtnw&usqp=CAU

ORCID_logo.png

1*mvsP194Golg0Dmo2rjJ-oQ.jpeg


Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;

Ulakbim TR Dizin,  Index Copernicus, ICI World of JournalsDirectory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact FactorASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR,  EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC)DOAJ,  Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index


Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;

Google, Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, ICJME, COPE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, Open Access, and etc.


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review". 

Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user.  https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535

Journal charge policy   https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912

Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.

Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.


17873

Articles published in Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.