Objectives: The incidence of thyroid nodules has increased significantly and malignancy detected in 5-15% of them. While biopsy is recommended for all nodules larger than 1 cm in multinodular goiter, this is practically not possible in many patients. In addition, the relationship between nodule size and malignancy is not clear. We aimed to examine the value of additional biopsy from a nondominant nodule in terms of changing treatment and follow-up decisions and the relationship between nodule size and malignancy risk.
Material and Method: Patients (n=2,541) with thyroid nodules who applied to our clinic for various indications and performed fine needle aspiration between January 1, 2016 and March 1, 2021 were included in the study. Some of our patients with multinodular goiter were biopsied from a second additional nodule. Cytologic evaluations reported according to the Bethesta system. Pathology reports of the operated patients were scanned retrospectivelly.
Results: Fine needle aspiration biopsy was performed from a total of 3382 nodules of 2541 patients. The average age of our patient group was 56 (46-65) and 79% of them were women. When a comparison was made between nodule size and malignancy rate; the highest malignancy rate was detected in nodules between 1-2 cm (61,8%). Finally, a diagnosis of Bethesta-4,-5,-6 was reached in only 7 (0.9%) of 823 patients who underwent additional biopsy from nondominant nodule.
Conclusion: The value of an additional biopsy from a second nodule in terms of changing follow-up is very low and not significant and most of the cancers arise from nodules between 1-2 cm. According to our study, the assumptions that the malignancy risk increases as the nodule size or nodule count increase were not found to be correct.
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
Bölüm | Orijinal Makale |
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 5 Eylül 2021 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2021 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 5 |
Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği: Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]
Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.
Not: Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.
Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show
Dergi Dizin ve Platformları
Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.
Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.