Finansal destekçi yoktur
Projeden üretilen bir yayın değildir. Etik Kurul Numarası;2017/002
Yoktur
Aim: We carried out this study to examine the level of pain catastrophizing (PC) among migraine patients and factors possibly affecting PC.
Material and Method: The sample of this study comprised 120 patients who applied to the neurology clinic of a state hospital and were diagnosed with migraine by the International Headache Society’s (IHS) criteria between April 2017 – March 2019. Then, we collected the data from those meeting the inclusion criteria using a socio-demographic information form, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Barrat Impulsiveness Scale Short Form (BIS-11-SF). Data analysis was performed on the SPSS 25.0 statistics software. To explore the relationships between the variables, we ran one-way ANOVA and multiple regression analyses and calculated Pearson’s correlation coefficients.
Results: We divided the participants into three groups: Group 1 included 30 patients who got full benefit from the treatment during a migraine attack (25%); Group 2 included 25 patients who were unable to obtain any benefit from the treatment at all (20.8%); Group 3 included 65 patients with partial benefit from the treatment (54.17%). The PCS scores were higher in Group 1 and Group 3, while Group 2 had significantly higher PCS total and Rumination scores than Group 1. The number of attacks and impulsiveness levels of the patients explained 18.6% of the variance in PC.
Conclusion: The cognitive capacity of individuals is essential in identifying the prognosis of migraine. Catastrophizing pain is likely to lower treatment response in migraine patients. Besides, the increased number of attacks and impulsiveness levels of patients influence their PC levels. Finally, migraine is a disorder with a psychiatric aspect; therefore, performing appropriate mental evaluations and offering necessary psychiatric support may enhance the chance of success in migraine treatment.
Migraine pain catastrophizing clinical aspects ımpulsiveness
Projeden üretilen bir yayın değildir. Etik Kurul Numarası;2017/002
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
Bölüm | Orijinal Makale |
Yazarlar | |
Proje Numarası | Projeden üretilen bir yayın değildir. Etik Kurul Numarası;2017/002 |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 24 Eylül 2021 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2021 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 6 |
Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği: Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]
Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.
Not: Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.
Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show
Dergi Dizin ve Platformları
Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.
Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.