Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 301 - 305, 17.01.2022
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1021618

Öz

Destekleyen Kurum

HERHANGİ BİR MALİ DESTEK ALINMAMIŞTIR.

Proje Numarası

YOK

Kaynakça

  • Khan M, Adil SF, Alkhathlan HZ, et al. COVID-19: A global challenge with old history, epidemiology and progress so far. Molecules 2020; 26: 39. 
  • D'Souza RS, D'Souza S, Strand N, Anderson A, Vogt MNP, Olatoye O. YouTube as a source of medical information on the novel coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Glob Public Health 2020; 15: 935-42.
  • Uğraş Dikmen A, Kına HM, Özkan S, İlhan MN. Epidemiology of COVID-19: what we learn from pandemic. J Biotechinol & Strategic Health Res 2020; 4: 29-36.
  • Li HO, Bailey A, Huynh D, Chan J. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation? BMJ Global Health 2020; 5: e002604.
  • T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı. COVID-19 Bilgilendirme Platformu. Available online: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/TR-66177/koronavirus-riskine-karsi-14-kural-kamu-spotu.html (Accessed date:05.08.2021)
  • Wikipedia. YouTube. Available online: https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube. (Accessed date:05.08.2021).
  • Kwan G, Shaw JA, Murnane L. Internet usagewithin healthcare: how college students use the internet to obtain health information. J Consumer Health Internet Vol 2019; 23: 366-77.
  • National Cancer Institute. 2017. “Health Information National Trends Survey, HINTS-FDA Cycle2.” Last updated 2017; Accessed date:26.10.2020. https://hints.cancer.gov/viewquestions-topics/question-details.aspx?PK_Cycle=9&qid=757.
  • Paré G, Malek JN, Sicotte C, Lemire M. Internet as a source of health information and its perceived influence on personal empowerment. IJHISI 2009; 4: 1-18.
  • Pathak R, Poudel DR, Karmacharya P, et al. YouTube as a source of information on Ebola virus disease. N Am J Med Sci 2015; 7: 306-9.
  • Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M, Sood A, Singh G. YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38: e1-3.
  • Pant S, Deshmukh A, Murugiah K, Kumar G, Sachdeva R, Mehta JL. Assessing the credibility of the "YouTube approach" to health information on acute myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol 2012; 35: 281-5.
  • Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis 2016; 22: 202-8.
  • Syed-Abdul S, Fernandez-Luque L, Jian WS, et al. Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: anorexia on YouTube. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: e30.
  • Donzelli G, Palomba G, Federigi I, et al. Misinformation on vaccination: A quantitative analysis of YouTube videos. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2018; 14: 1654-9.
  • Babayiğit M, Babayiğit MA. Evaluation of YouTube videos related to intubation in the pandemic process in terms of quality and content in Turkish and English. Anatolian Curr Med J 2021; 3; 234-8.
  • Dutta A, Beriwal N, Van Breugel LM, et al. YouTube as a source of medical and epidemiological information during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of content across six languages around the globe. Cureus 2020; 12: e8622.
  • Ataç Ö, Özalp YC, Kurnaz R, Güler OM, İnamlık M, Hayran O. Youtube as an information source during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: evaluation of the Turkish and English content. Cureus 2020; 12: e10795.

Evaluation of the quality and the content of YouTube videos in Turkish on protection from coronavirus

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 301 - 305, 17.01.2022
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1021618

Öz

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the videos in Turkish on protection from coronavirus published on YouTube in terms of general quality and content.
Material and Method: Search on YouTube website "coronavirus; protection "in line with the keyword" all the time, Turkey and the Turkish language "was held. Among the first 100 results, 63 non-repetitive and completely ad-free videos with a duration of 1-40 minutes were included in the study. The person or institution who provided the information for each video, the video length, the number of views, the number of likes and dislikes were recorded. The Global Quality Scale (GQS) was used to determine the overall quality of the videos. In addition, a scoring system was created and examined whether the information regarding the 14 rules determined by the Turkish Ministry of Health to protect the public from coronavirus was found or not in the published videos.
Results: While 50.8% (n=32) of the videos analyzed in this study were personal sharing videos for educational and informative purposes, 31.8% (n=20) of them were TV health /news programs. While 71.2% of those who provided information in the videos were medical doctors, 26.9% were out of health. When the general quality of the videos is evaluated according to the GQS scale; It was determined that 39.7% (n=25) of them were of medium quality, and 30.2% (n=19) of them were of good quality.
Conclusion: As a result of our study, it was determined that the videos that contain at least five rules and have practical application content are of better quality. In pandemic periods when preventive measures are superior to treatment, effective use of social media platforms should be ensured to raise society's awareness.

Proje Numarası

YOK

Kaynakça

  • Khan M, Adil SF, Alkhathlan HZ, et al. COVID-19: A global challenge with old history, epidemiology and progress so far. Molecules 2020; 26: 39. 
  • D'Souza RS, D'Souza S, Strand N, Anderson A, Vogt MNP, Olatoye O. YouTube as a source of medical information on the novel coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Glob Public Health 2020; 15: 935-42.
  • Uğraş Dikmen A, Kına HM, Özkan S, İlhan MN. Epidemiology of COVID-19: what we learn from pandemic. J Biotechinol & Strategic Health Res 2020; 4: 29-36.
  • Li HO, Bailey A, Huynh D, Chan J. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation? BMJ Global Health 2020; 5: e002604.
  • T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı. COVID-19 Bilgilendirme Platformu. Available online: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/TR-66177/koronavirus-riskine-karsi-14-kural-kamu-spotu.html (Accessed date:05.08.2021)
  • Wikipedia. YouTube. Available online: https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube. (Accessed date:05.08.2021).
  • Kwan G, Shaw JA, Murnane L. Internet usagewithin healthcare: how college students use the internet to obtain health information. J Consumer Health Internet Vol 2019; 23: 366-77.
  • National Cancer Institute. 2017. “Health Information National Trends Survey, HINTS-FDA Cycle2.” Last updated 2017; Accessed date:26.10.2020. https://hints.cancer.gov/viewquestions-topics/question-details.aspx?PK_Cycle=9&qid=757.
  • Paré G, Malek JN, Sicotte C, Lemire M. Internet as a source of health information and its perceived influence on personal empowerment. IJHISI 2009; 4: 1-18.
  • Pathak R, Poudel DR, Karmacharya P, et al. YouTube as a source of information on Ebola virus disease. N Am J Med Sci 2015; 7: 306-9.
  • Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M, Sood A, Singh G. YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38: e1-3.
  • Pant S, Deshmukh A, Murugiah K, Kumar G, Sachdeva R, Mehta JL. Assessing the credibility of the "YouTube approach" to health information on acute myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol 2012; 35: 281-5.
  • Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis 2016; 22: 202-8.
  • Syed-Abdul S, Fernandez-Luque L, Jian WS, et al. Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: anorexia on YouTube. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: e30.
  • Donzelli G, Palomba G, Federigi I, et al. Misinformation on vaccination: A quantitative analysis of YouTube videos. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2018; 14: 1654-9.
  • Babayiğit M, Babayiğit MA. Evaluation of YouTube videos related to intubation in the pandemic process in terms of quality and content in Turkish and English. Anatolian Curr Med J 2021; 3; 234-8.
  • Dutta A, Beriwal N, Van Breugel LM, et al. YouTube as a source of medical and epidemiological information during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of content across six languages around the globe. Cureus 2020; 12: e8622.
  • Ataç Ö, Özalp YC, Kurnaz R, Güler OM, İnamlık M, Hayran O. Youtube as an information source during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: evaluation of the Turkish and English content. Cureus 2020; 12: e10795.
Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Orijinal Makale
Yazarlar

Mustafa Alparslan Babayiğit 0000-0001-5313-9186

Proje Numarası YOK
Yayımlanma Tarihi 17 Ocak 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

AMA Babayiğit MA. Evaluation of the quality and the content of YouTube videos in Turkish on protection from coronavirus. J Health Sci Med /JHSM /jhsm. Ocak 2022;5(1):301-305. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1021618

Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği:  Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç  uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]

Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.

Not:
Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.

Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show 


Dergi Dizin ve Platformları

Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.

Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.