Comparison of self-tapping and self-drilling screws in open reduction of mandible fracture

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 568 - 572, 15.03.2022

Bahadır Sancar İrfan Üstündağ

https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1021921

Öz

Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess the early postoperative stability of screw systems with mini plates in the treatment of open reduction mandibular angulus fractures.
Material and Method: This study consisted of 3 groups of mini plate or screw fixation: a 1.6 mm diameter drill for Group 1, a 1.2 mm diameter drill for Group 2, and self-drilling screws without drilling in Group 3. We used 9 hemimandibles, 9 plates, and 36 screws in each group. We compared the self-tapping and self-drilling screw systems while maintaining the plate system constant. We generated angulus fractures in 27 hemimandibles taken from 14 sheep mandibles. We separated the samples into 3 groups, each with 9 hemimandibles. All the screws used in the study were 2 mm in diameter and 5 mm in length. We used the servo hydraulic test unit to apply force to the hemimandibles. We applied forces of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, and 150 N to the hemimandibles and recorded the resulting displacements. Data were analyzed with IBM SPSS V23, and conformity to normal distribution was evaluated by the Shapiro-Wilk test.
Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of the amount of displacement that occurred as a result of the applied forces.
Conclusion: In the treatment of mandibular fractures with open reduction, surgeons should focus on plate-related parameters rather than self-drilling and self-tapping of screws, or drill diameter.

Anahtar Kelimeler

self drilling screw, self tapping screw, open reduction, mandible fracture

Kaynakça

• Haug RH, Prather J, Indresano AT. An epidemiologic survey of facial fractures and concomitant injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48: 926-32.
• Adeyemo WL, Iwegbu IO, Bello SA, et al. Management of mandibular fractures in a developing country: a review of 314 cases from two urban centers in Nigeria. World J Surg 2008; 32: 2631-5.
• Sakr K, Farag IA, Zeitoun IM. Review of 509 mandibular fractures treated at the University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 44: 107-11.
• Motamedi MHK. An assessment of maxillofacial fractures: a 5-year study of 237 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61: 61-4.
• Chuong R, Donoff RB, Guralnick WC. A retrospective analysis of 327 mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983; 41: 305-9.
• Ellis III E. Treatment methods for fractures of the mandibular angle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28: 243-52.
• Schierle HP, Schmelzeisen R, Rahn B, Pytlik C. One-or two-plate fixation of mandibular angle fractures? J Cranıo Maxıll Surg 1997; 25: 162-8.
• Olate S, Assis AF, Pozzer L, Cavalieri-Pereira L, Asprino L, Moraes M. Pattern and treatment of mandible body fracture. Int J Burns Travma 2013; 3: 164.
• Iatrou I, Samaras C, Theologie-Lygidakis N. Miniplate osteosynthesis for fractures of the edentulous mandible: a clinical study 1989–96. J Cranıo Maxıll Surg 1998; 26: 400-4.
• Sauerbier S, Schön R, Otten JE, Schmelzeisen R, Gutwald R. The development of plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of fractures of the mandibular body–A literature review. J Cranıo Maxıll Surg 2008; 36: 251-9.
• Van Sickels JE, Cunningham LL. Management of atrophic mandible fractures: are bone grafts necessary? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 1392-5.
• Champy M, Lodde JP, Schmitt R, Jaeger JH, Müster D. Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. J maxillofac Surg 1978; 6: 14-21.
• Guimond C, Johnson JV, Marchena JM. Fixation of mandibular angle fractures with a 2.0-mm 3-dimensional curved angle strut plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63: 209-14.
• Schortinghuis J, Bos RK, Vissink A. Complications of internal fixation of maxillofacial fractures with microplates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57: 130-4.
• Son S, Motoyoshi M, Uchida Y, Shimizu N. Comparative study of the primary stability of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofac 2014; 145: 480-5.
• Sowden D, Schmitz JP. AO self-drilling and self-tapping screws in rat calvarial bone: an ultrastructural study of the implant interface. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60: 294-9.
• Heidemann W, Terheyden H, Gerlach KL. Analysis of the osseous/metal interface of drill free screws and self-tapping screws. J Cranıo Maxıll Surg 2001; 29: 69-74.
• Duncan WJ. Sheep mandibular animal models for dental implantology research. 2005; University of Otago.
• Uckan S, Schwimmer A, Kummer F, Grönberg AM. Effect of the angle of the screw on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a study in sheep mandibles. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 39: 266-8.
• Haug RH, Barber JE, Punjabi AP. An in vitro comparison of the effect of number and pattern of positional screws on load resistance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57: 300-8.
• Subhashraj K, Ramkumar S, Ravindran C. Pattern of mandibular fractures in Chennai, India. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 46: 126-7.
• Ozyurtseven BT, Karsli ED, Balkanlioglu AC. Evaluation of the relationship between wisdom teeth and mandibular fractures. Med-Science 2021; 10: 835-8.
• Braasch DC, Abubaker AO. Management of mandibular angle fracture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 25: 591-600.
• Cural Ü, Atalay B, Yildirim MS. Comparison of mechanical stabilization of the mandibular angulus fracture fixation, with titanium plates and screws, resorbable plates and screws, and bone adhesives. J Cranio Maxill Surg 2018; 29: 1780-7.
• Bohluli B, Mohammadi E, Oskuic IZ, Moharamnejad N. Treatment of mandibular angle fracture: Revision of the basic principles. Chinese J Traumatol 2019; 22: 117-9.
• Gear AJ, Apasova E, Schmitz JP, Schubert W. Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63: 655-63.
• Levy FE, Smith RW, Odland RM, Marentette LJ. Monocortical miniplate fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Arch Otolaryngol 1991; 117: 149-54.
• Barry CP, Kearns GJ. Superior border plating technique in the management of isolated mandibular angle fractures: a retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65: 1544-9.
• Ellis III E, Walker LR. Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using one noncompression miniplate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54: 864-71.
• Regev E, Shiff JS, Kiss A, Fialkov JA. Internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures: a meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 1753-60.
• Ellis III E. A prospective study of 3 treatment methods for isolated fractures of the mandibular angle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 2743-54.
• Chrcanovic BR. Fixation of mandibular angle fractures: clinical studies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 18: 123-52.
• Gerlach K, Schwarz A. Bite forces in patients after treatment of mandibular angle fractures with miniplate osteosynthesis according to Champy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31: 345-8.
• Heidemann W, Gerlach KL, Gröbel KH, Köllner HG. Influence of different pilot hole sizes on torque measurements and pullout analysis of osteosynthesis screws. J Cranıo Maxıll Surg 1998; 26: 50-5.
• Sancar B, Dedeoglu N. Morphometric Analysis of Cleft Lip Palate and Prognathic Mandibles in Relation to Mandibular Canal Course. J Cranıofac Surg 2021; 32: 694-7.
• Cankaya AB, Kasapoğlu MB, Erdem MA, Kasapoğlu Ç. Effects of polymethylmethacrylate on the stability of screw fixation in mandibular angle fractures: A study on sheep mandibles. Int J Med Sci 2018; 15: 1466.