Current treatment approaches of newly graduated, intern dentists and dentists in doctoral and specialty training to teeth with excessive substance loss (cross-sectional study)

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 307 - 314, 27.03.2023

Bike Altan , Mehmet Ali Fildişi , Şevki Çınar , Elifnur Aydemir , Davut Özkan

https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1228414

Öz

Aim: New treatment options have been developed as alternative post-retaining restorations and crowns that preserve remaining tooth tissue in endodontically treated teeth with excessive substance loss. This study, current treatment approaches newly graduated, intern and doctoral or specialist dentists in teeth excessive coronal destruction were evaluated.
Material and Method: This cross-sectional study, online questionnaire consisting of 22 questions, 3 parts was applied. First part consists of demographic information participants, second part consists of questions measuring awareness about preferred indirect restorations, last part consists of current treatment approaches newly graduated, intern and doctoral or specialist dentists. Total 234 voluntary participants questionnaires were evaluated. Obtained data were analyzed with IBM SPSS V23.
Results: In restoration of endodontically treated buccal mesial walls (least 2 mm thick) molars, participants all 3 groups preferred posterior adhesive indirect restorations according to their titles. Considering level of awareness, participants high group preferred posterior adhesive indirect restorations more in restorations endodontically treated buccal lingual walled molar teeth. Participants all 3 groups preferred use fiber under composite strengthen teeth in the restoration of teeth with excessive substance loss.
Conclusion: According to the results, it was determined that awareness and knowledge level of dentists who received specialty or doctoral training about new current treatments was higher than other newly graduated and intern dentists. It was observed that participants group with high level awareness mostly preferred posterior region indirect adhesive restorations such as endocrown and onlay.

Anahtar Kelimeler

doctoral student, dentistry student, endocrown, fiber, onlay

Kaynakça

• Tosun S, Özsevik AS, Aydın U. Endodontik tedavili dişlerin restorasyonu. Gaziantep Med J 2016; 22: 33-8.
• Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations. J Dent 2011; 39: 527-35.
• Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites. Clin Oral Investig 2009; 13: 427-38.
• Flury S, Hayoz S, Peutzfeldt A, Hüsler J, Lussi A. Depth of cure of resin composites: is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials? Dent Mater J 2012; 28: 521-8.
• Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of three composite resins for the inlay/onlay technique. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 322-4.
• Fildisi MA, Eliguzeloglu ED. The effect of fiber insertion on fracture strength and fracture modes in endocrown and overlay restorations. Microsc Res Tech 2022; 85: 1799-807.
• Genovese K, Lamberti L, Pappalettere C. Finite element analysis of a new customized composite post system for endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech 2005; 38: 2375-89.
• Magne P, Knezevic A. Thickness of CAD–CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars. Dent Mater J 2009; 25: 1264-8.
• Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995; 7: 83-94.
• Ereifej NS, Oweis YG, Altarawneh SK. Fracture of fiber-reinforced composites analyzed via acoustic emission. Dent Mater J 2015; 34: 417-24.
• Belli S, Erdemir A, Yildirim C. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root‐filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 136-42.
• Hshad M, Dalkılıç E, Ozturk G, Dogruer I, Koray F. Influence of different restoration techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth: In vitro investigation. Oper Dent 2018; 43: 162-9.
• Tunac A, Celik E, Yasa B. Two‐year performance of CAD/CAM fabricated resin composite inlay restorations: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019; 31: 627-38.
• Van Dijken J. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent 2000; 28: 299-306.
• Garoushi S, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of span length of flexural testing on properties of short fiber reinforced composite. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012; 23: 325-8.
• Martins RC, Seijo MOS, Ferreira EF, Paiva SM, Ribeiro Sobrinho AP. Dental students' perceptions about the endodontic treatments performed using NiTi rotary instruments and hand stainless steel files. Braz Dent J 2012; 23: 729-36.
• Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Giesinger JM, Dumfahrt H. Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 395-402.
• Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989; 15: 512-6.
• Biacchi G, Basting R. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 130-6.
• Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu LS et al. Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2011; 37: 895-902.
• Dejak B, Młotkowski A. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dent Mater 2013; 29: e309-e17.
• Sedrez-Porto JA, da Rosa WLdO, da Silva AF, Münchow EA, Pereira-Cenci T. Endocrown restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2016; 52: 8-14.
• Roggendorf MJ, Kunzi B, Ebert J, Roggendorf HC, Frankenberger R, Reich SM. Seven-year clinical performance of CEREC-2 all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations placed within deeply destroyed teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 1413-24.
• Bindl A, Richter B, Mörmann WH. Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 219-24
• Faria ACL, Rodrigues RCS, de Almeida Antunes RP, de Mattos MdGC, Ribeiro RF. Endodontically treated teeth: characteristics and considerations to restore them. J Prosthodont 2011; 55: 69-74.
• Wendt JS, Harris BM, Hunt TE. Resistance to cusp fracture in endodontically treated teeth. Dent Mater J 1987; 3: 232-5.