YouTube as a source of patient information on positron emission tomography

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 597 - 603, 31.05.2023

Mustafa Genç

https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1245143

Öz

Aim: With the technological developments and the widespread use of smart phones, patients frequently use the internet to get information. YouTube is also one of the most popular sources for patient information. Positron emission tomography is one of the most common and important imaging methods specific to nuclear medicine. The aim of this study was to investigate the videos on YouTube about positron emission tomography imaging.
Material and Method: This study was conducted in October 2022. Videos were accessed on YouTube using the keywords "positron emission tomography" and "pozitron emisyon tomografisi". These videos were evaluated using the global quality scale (GQS), the DISCERN scale, and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria.
Results: In total, 123 videos were reviewed and 75 videos were included in the study. Most of these videos were uploaded by non-physician person. The number of views, the number of comments, the number of video likes and the viewing rate of the non-physician sourced videos were found to be higher than the physician sourced videos. On the other hand, JAMA scores, GQS scores and DISCERN scores of non-physician sourced videos were found to be lower than physician sourced videos. These findings were statistically significant. In addition, significant positive correlations were found between JAMA score, GQS score and DISCERN score.
Conclusions: Widely used YouTube platform for any information. Patients and their relatives can also search specifically for any disease and treatment. Physicians and specialty associations can upload official videos to the YouTube platform to ensure that patients have access to higher quality and more accurate content. URLs of these videos can also be added to patient information forms.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Video-audio media, quality control, nuclear medicine, information source, internet

Kaynakça

• El-Galaly TC, Gormsen LC, Hutchings M. PET/CT for Staging; past, present, and future. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2018; 48: 4-16.
• Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, et al. Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology. J Nuclear Medicine 2008; 49: 480.
• Schöder H, Erdi YE, Larson SM, Yeung HW. PET/CT: a new imaging technology in nuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 1419-37.
• Rutten LJ, Squiers L, Hesse B. Cancer-related information seeking: hints from the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Health Commun 2006; 11 Suppl 1: 147-56.
• Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J 2015; 21: 173-94.
• Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Pleis J. Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res 2009; 11: e4.
• Fox S. Online health search 2006: Pew Internet &American Life Project W, DC; October 2006 [Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2006/10/29/online-health-search-2006/ [Accesed December 2022].
• Fox S. The Engaged E-patient Population: Pew Internet &American Life Project W, DC; 2008 [Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2008/08/26/the-engaged-e-patient-population/ [Accesed December 2022].
• Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A. Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review. JMIR Med Educ 2018; 4: e3.
• YouTube statistics California [Available from: https://www.viralblog.com/research-cases/youtube-statistics/ [Accesed December 2022].
• Zengin O, Onder ME. Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasound. Clin Rheumatol 2021; 40: 4243-51.
• Kocyigit BF, Akaltun MS. Does YouTube provide high quality information? Assessment of secukinumab videos. Rheumatol Int 2019; 39: 1263-8.
• Gokcen HB, Gumussuyu G. A quality analysis of disc herniation videos on YouTube. World Neurosurg 2019; 124: e799-e804.
• Kocyigit BF, Nacitarhan V, Koca TT, Berk E. YouTube as a source of patient information for ankylosing spondylitis exercises. Clin Rheumatol 2019; 38: 1747-51.
• Kocyigit BF, Akaltun MS, Sahin AR. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 and rheumatic disease link. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39: 2049-54.
• Tolu S, Yurdakul OV, Basaran B, Rezvani A. English-language videos on YouTube as a source of information on self-administer subcutaneous anti-tumour necrosis factor agent injections. Rheumatol Int 2018; 38: 1285-92.
• Şan A. YouTube as a source of patient information on myofascial pain syndrome. Aktuelle Rheumatologie 2021; 46: 577-82.
• Ozsoy-Unubol T, Alanbay-Yagci E. YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia. Int J Rheum Dis 2021; 24: 197-202.
• Şan H. Use of YouTube as an information source for radioactive iodine therapy: Do YouTube videos have high quality? Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2022; 31: 42-8.
• Şan H. Youtube videos for the most commonly applied radionuclide treatments: sufficient for patients as an information source? Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43: 656-62.
• Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 2070-7.
• Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53: 105-11.
• Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet: caveant lector et viewor—let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997; 277: 1244-5.