Aims: This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic advantages of microbiological culture, histopathological examination, and the management of sonication in the diagnosis of infections related to orthopedic implants and prostheses.
Methods: The study included 21 patients suspected of orthopedic implant or prosthesis-related infections. The classification of implant and prosthesis-related infections and the choice of treatment were based on the Infectious Diseases Society of America diagnostic and treatment guidelines. During the operations, samples were taken from the implant and inflamed tissue around the implant for each patient, and these samples were evaluated using standard culture, histopathological examination, and sonication methods.
Results: The sonication method exhibited a higher sensitivity in comparison to both tissue cultures and cultures acquired from implants and prostheses without the application of sonication (61.1% vs. 38.8% vs. 27.7%, P < 0.05, respectively). The count of isolated microorganisms was greater in the sonication method when compared to both tissue cultures and conventional cultures taken from implants and prostheses (16 vs. 10 vs. 6, P < 0.05, respectively). The sensitivity of the sonication method was found to be higher compared to conventional cultures, even among patients who had been administered preoperative antibiotics (p<0.05).
Conclusion: In the diagnosis of orthopedic implant and prosthesis infections, the sonication method was more effective as a diagnostic approach compared to conventional methods. A greater number of agents can be identified using the sonication method in infected tissues.
The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Gulhane Training and Research Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval Date: 22 June 2015, Decision No. 1491-88-14/1648.4-467).
1491-88-14/1648.4-467
1491-88-14/1648.4-467
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | Ortopedi, Tıbbi Enfeksiyon Ajanları |
Bölüm | Orijinal Makale |
Yazarlar | |
Proje Numarası | 1491-88-14/1648.4-467 |
Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 28 Ekim 2023 |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 29 Ekim 2023 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2023 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 6 |
Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği: Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]
Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.
Not: Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.
Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show
Dergi Dizin ve Platformları
Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.
Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.