Aims: In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the difficult patient perceptions of physicians/dentists, midwives/nurses, medical secretaries, security personnel and other healthcare professionals working in public hospitals in Samsun by comparing them according to their gender, age, marital status, profession, educational status and place of duty.
Methods: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted within the scope of the validity and reliability analysis of the survey created to evaluate the perceptions of difficult patients among 238 healthcare professionals working in public hospitals in Samsun, and 28 statements were collected under 4 dimensions. Student-t test, ANOVA test and post-hoc analyzes were performed at 5% significance level to test the research hypotheses.
Results: While the struggle levels of health workers were generally low, it was observed that the struggle levels of women, under 40 years of age, and health workers working in polyclinics and emergency services were lower when compared according to gender, age and the units they worked in. While the burnout levels of healthcare professionals are generally found to be above average or high, it was found that the burnout levels of female, single, undergraduate and graduate educated healthcare professionals, physicians and nurses working in outpatient clinics, emergency services and inpatient services were higher when compared according to gender, marital status, education, profession and the units where they work.
Conclusion: Within the framework of health management and organization, it is thought that in-service training should be organized for healthcare professionals with lower levels of struggle to increase their level of coping with difficult patients, and to reduce the burnout levels of healthcare professionals with higher levels of burnout, and they should be supported with tools that will enable staff empowerment.
Difficult patient healthcare workers level of struggle level of burnout health management
Ethics committee permission for the non-invasive study was obtained from Samsun University Ethics Committee.
No financial support was received from any institution during the research process.
-
I would like to thank the managers of Samsun Provincial Health Directorate for allowing the research and all healthcare professionals who participated in the research.
-
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi, Sağlık Yönetimi |
Bölüm | Orijinal Makale |
Yazarlar | |
Proje Numarası | - |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Temmuz 2024 |
Gönderilme Tarihi | 24 Mayıs 2024 |
Kabul Tarihi | 15 Temmuz 2024 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2024 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4 |
Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği: Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]
Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.
Not: Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.
Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show
Dergi Dizin ve Platformları
Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.
Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.