Özel Gereksinimli Öğrencilere Yabancı Dil Öğretiminde Karşılaşılan Zorluklar ve Bunlar İçin Çözüm Önerileri: Öğretmen Algıları Üzerine Nitel Bir Çalışma

Öz

Bu çalışma, özel gereksinimi olan öğrencilerin yabancı dil öğrenme süreçlerinde karşılaştıkları güçlükleri ve öğretmenlerin bu süreçte edindiği deneyimleri derinlemesine incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Özellikle engel türlerine göre farklılaşan dil edinim güçlüklerinin pedagojik yaklaşımlara etkisi incelenerek bu alandaki kuramsal boşluk doldurulmak istenmiştir. Çalışma, nitel araştırma desenlerinden fenomenolojik yaklaşım temelinde yürütülmüş, çalışma grubunu Van ilindeki devlet okullarında görev yapan sınıf ve İngilizce öğretmenleri oluşturmuştur. Katılımcılar, amaçlı örnekleme yöntemiyle maksimum çeşitlilik örnekleme stratejisiyle belirlenmiştir. Veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmış, içerik analizi yöntemiyle çözümlenmiştir. Bulgular, öğrencilerin dilsel anlamlandırma, bilişsel işlemleme, duygusal uyum ve sosyal etkileşim alanlarında çok boyutlu güçlükler yaşadığını ortaya koymuştur. Öğretmenlerin ise yapılandırılmış etkinlikler, özelleştirilmiş materyaller, görsel-işitsel destekler ve teknoloji tabanlı uygulamalardan yararlanarak bireyselleştirilmiş öğretim stratejileri geliştirdikleri belirlenmiştir. Araştırma, öğretmenlerin mesleki yeterliliklerinde çeşitlilik olduğunu ve çoğunlukla süreci bireysel çabayla yürüttükleri belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, kapsayıcı eğitim uygulamalarının öğretmen destek mekanizmalarıyla güçlendirilmesi gerektiği; etkili öğretim için materyal desteği, uygulamalı eğitimler ve bireyselleştirilmiş planlamalara ihtiyaç duyulduğu ortaya konmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Özel Gereksinimli Öğrenciler
• Yabancı Dil Eğitimi
• Dil Öğretimi
• Dil Edinimi
• Öğretmen Algıları

A Qualitative Investigation into Teachers’ Perceptions of Challenges and Solutions in Teaching Foreign Languages to Learners with Special Educational Needs

Öz

This study aims to explore in depth the challenges faced by students with special educational needs (SEN) in the process of foreign language learning, as well as the experiences of teachers involved in this process. This study seeks to address this gap by examining how language acquisition difficulties—particularly those that vary by type of disability—affect pedagogical approaches. Adopting a qualitative research design grounded in the phenomenological approach, the study was conducted with classroom and English language teachers working in public schools in the province of Van, Türkiye. Participants were selected through purposive sampling, specifically employing the maximum variation sampling strategy. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using content analysis. Findings reveal that students experience multifaceted challenges in linguistic comprehension, cognitive processing, emotional adaptation, and social interaction. Teachers, on the other hand, reported developing individualized instructional strategies through the use of structured activities, customized materials, visual-auditory aids, and technology-based tools. The study also found considerable variation in teachers’ professional competencies, with many relying on personal initiative to manage the instructional process. In conclusion, the research highlights the necessity of strengthening inclusive education practices with robust teacher support mechanisms. Effective instruction for students with SEN (Special Educational Needs) requires access to teaching materials, hands-on training, and individualized planning support.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Students with Special Educational Needs
• Foreign Language Education
• Language Teaching
• Language Acquisition
• Teacher Perceptions

Kaynakça

1. Abu-Alghayth, K. M., Alharbi, A. R., Alsubaie, A. S. ve Al-Thubaiti, A. S. (2020). Teachers’ use of assistive technology in Saudi special education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(8), 230–238. doi:10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110831
2. Aktan, O. (2020). Determination of educational needs of teachers regarding inclusive students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research.
3. Avramidis, E. ve Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147. doi:10.1080/08856250210129056
4. Balıkçı, N. ve Melekoğlu, M. A. (2023). A special call from inclusive classroom teachers of Turkish students with specific learning disabilities. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(2), 325–351.
5. Balıkçı, N. ve Melekoğlu, M. A. (2023). A special call from inclusive classroom teachers of Turkish students with specific learning disabilities. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi.
6. Boylu, E. ve Süğümlü, Ü. (2025). Students with special needs in teaching Turkish as a foreign language: Affective and instructional challenges. Journal of Language and Education Research, 11(1), 45–62. Erişilmiştir: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4469072
7. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
8. Creswell, J. W. ve Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

9. Eigsti, I. M., de Marchena, A. B., Schuh, J. M. ve Kelley, E. (2011). Language acquisition in autism spectrum disorders: A developmental review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(2), 681–691. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2010.09.001
10. Ellis, R. (2004). Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
11. Elo, S. ve Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
12. Florian, L. (2015). Conceptualising inclusive pedagogy: The inclusive pedagogical approach in action. International Journal of Inclusive Education.
13. Florian, L. ve Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828. doi:10.1080/01411926.2010.501096
14. Florian, L. ve Rouse, M. (2009). The inclusive practice project in Scotland: Teacher education for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(4), 594–601. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.003
15. Florian, L. ve Spratt, J. (2013). Enacting inclusion: A framework for interrogating inclusive practice. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(2), 119–135. doi:10.1080/08856257.2013.778111
16. Ganschow, L. ve Sparks, R. L. (2001). Learning difficulties and foreign language learning: A review of research and instruction. Language Teaching, 34(1), 79–98.
17. Gersten, R., Baker, S. ve Pugach, M. C. (2017). Teaching English learners with disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 236–271.
18. Jennings, P. A. ve Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. doi:10.3102/0034654308325693
19. Kamacı Gencer, D. (2022). Küreselleşme, kültür ve dil. Ankara: Paradigma Akademi Yayınları. Erişilmiştir: https://www.kitapyurdu.com/kitap/kuresellesme-kultur-ve-dil/627781.html
20. Kargın, T. (2004). Kaynaştırma: Tanımı, gelişimi ve ilkeleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi.
21. Katıtaş, E. ve Coşkun, I. (2020). What is meant by inclusive education? Perceptions of Turkish teachers towards inclusive education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 87, 55–76. Erişilmiştir: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1272786.pdf
22. Kormos, J. (2017). The second language learning processes of students with specific learning difficulties. New York, NY: Routledge.
23. Kormos, J. (2020). Specific learning difficulties in second language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 53(2), 129–143. doi:10.1017/S0261444819000442
24. Kormos, J. ve Kontra, E. H. (Ed.). (2008). Language learners with special needs: An international perspective. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
25. Kormos, J. ve Smith, A. M. (2012). Teaching languages to students with specific learning differences. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
26. Köse, E. (2022). Eğitimin temeli: Temel kavramlar. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Erişilmiştir: https://pegem.net/urun/Egitimin-Temeli-Temel-Kavramlar-60961
27. Kvale, S. ve Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
28. Lerner, J. W., Johns, B. H. ve Polloway, E. A. (2012). Strategies for teaching learners with special needs (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
29. Lightbown, P. M. ve Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30. Lincoln, Y. S. ve Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
31. Miles, M. B. ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
32. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. ve Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
33. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2021). 2021 yılı idare faaliyet raporu. Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlığı. Erişilmiştir: https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2022_03/01003833_MEB_2021_YYlY_Ydare_Faaliyet_Raporu.pdf
34. Mitchell, D. ve Sutherland, D. (2020). What really works in special and inclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
35. Mitchell, R., Myles, F. ve Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
36. Moeller, M. P. (2000). Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatrics, 106(3), e43. doi:10.1542/peds.106.3.e43
37. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
38. Nijakowska, J. (2010). Dyslexia in the foreign language classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
39. O’Malley, J. M. ve Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. OECD. (2020). Education and COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities. Paris: OECD Publishing. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. ve Leech, N. L. (2007). Sampling designs in qualitative research: Making the sampling process more public. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 238–254. Erişilmiştir: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol12/iss2/7
41. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N. ve Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
42. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
43. Sandelowski, S. (2000). Focus on research methods: Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health.