STRENGTHENING THE EUROPEAN UNION’S FOREIGN POLICY AGENDA IN THE FACE OF RUSSIA’S INVASION OF UKRAINE

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 15, 1 - 19, 28.12.2025

Yosua Saut Marulitua Gultom , Abel Josafat Manullang

https://doi.org/10.69494/jirps.1605532

Öz

This article provides an analysis of the EU's collective response to Russia's foreign policy, particularly in the context of Ukraine in 2014 and 2022. This article uses the qualitative descriptive research method. The ongoing developments reflect a significant shift in the EU's view of relations with Russia, transitioning from the concept of strategic partnership to a more assertive framework of strategic competition. This transformation became sharper with Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014, and reached its peak during the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022. This article highlights aspects of the development of norms and values in the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in response to Russia's aggressive policy, as well as their impact on strengthening EU institutionalism as a global player. Using a normative institutionalism approach, this article shows that the norms held by the EU, such as peace, democracy, and human rights, play a key role in forming the basis for strengthening EU institutions in the implementation of the CFSP. This collective response not only reflects the EU's stance towards Russia, but also has a significant impact on the evolution of the dynamics of EU institutionalism itself.

Anahtar Kelimeler

CFSP , European Union , Normative Institutionalism , Russia

RUSYA'NIN UKRAYNA'YI İŞGALİ KARŞISINDA AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ'NİN DIŞ POLİTİKA GÜNDEMİNİN GÜÇLENDİRİLMESİ

Öz

Bu makale, AB'nin Rusya'nın dış politikasına, özellikle 2014 ve 2022 yıllarında Ukrayna bağlamında verdiği kolektif tepkinin bir analizini sunmaktadır. Bu makalede nitel betimsel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Devam eden gelişmeler, AB'nin Rusya ile ilişkilere bakışında, stratejik ortaklık kavramından daha iddialı bir stratejik rekabet çerçevesine geçiş yapan önemli bir değişimi yansıtmaktadır. Bu dönüşüm Rusya'nın 2014'te Kırım'ı ilhak etmesiyle daha da keskinleşmiş ve 2022'deki Rusya-Ukrayna savaşı sırasında zirveye ulaşmıştır. Bu makale, Rusya'nın saldırgan politikasına karşılık olarak AB'nin Ortak Dış ve Güvenlik Politikası'ndaki (ODGP) norm ve değerlerin gelişiminin yönlerini ve bunların küresel bir oyuncu olarak AB kurumsallığının güçlendirilmesi üzerindeki etkilerini vurgulamaktadır. Bu makale, normatif kurumsalcılık yaklaşımını kullanarak, AB'nin sahip olduğu barış, demokrasi ve insan hakları gibi normların, ODGP'nin uygulanmasında AB kurumlarının güçlendirilmesi için temel oluşturmada kilit bir rol oynadığını göstermektedir. Bu kolektif tepki sadece AB'nin Rusya'ya karşı duruşunu yansıtmakla kalmamakta, aynı zamanda AB kurumsallığının kendi dinamiklerinin evrimi üzerinde de önemli bir etkiye sahip olmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ODGP , Avrupa Birliği , Normatif Kurumsalcılık , Rusya

Kaynakça

• Ansell, C. (2021). Institutionalism. In: Riddervold, M., Trondal, J., Newsome, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51791-5_7
• Bakry, U.S. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hubungan Internasional. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
• Barkin, S. J., & Weitsman, P. (2019). Realist institutionalism and the institutional mechanisms of power politics. In A. Wivel and T. V. Paul (eds.), International Institutions and Power Politics: Bridging the Divide. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 23–39
• Bodnieks, V. (2020). The New Institutionalism: A tool for analysing defence and security institutions. Security and Defence Quarterly, 32(5), 83-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/130903
• Cardwell, P. J., & Moret, E. (2023). The EU, sanctions and regional leadership. European Security, 32(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2085997
• Chaban, N., Miskimmon, A., & O'Loughlin, B. (2017). The EU's peace and security narrative: Views from EU strategic partners in Asia. JCMS: Journal of common market studies, 55(6), 1273-1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12569
• Colomba-Petteng, L., Strasheim, J., & Grimmel, A. (2022). The EU as a Global Peace and Security Actor in Turbulent Times. Interview with Andreas Grimmel and Julia Strasheim (ERIS). https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03514210/document
• Consilium Europe. (n.d.). EU Response to Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-response-ukraine-invasion/
• Council of the EU. (2024, June 24). 14th package of sanctions on Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine: EU lists additional 69 individuals and 47 entities. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/06/24/14th-package-of-sanctions-on-russia-s-war-of-aggression-against-ukraine-eu-lists-additional-69-individuals-and-47-entities/
• Đukanović, D. (2015). The Process of Institutionalization of the EU’s CFSP in the Western Balkan Countries during the Ukraine Crisis. Croatian International Relations Review, 21(72), 81-106. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2015-0003
• European Commission. (2019). Foreign affairs and security policy, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2775/559829
• European Commission. (2024, February 23). EU adopts 13th package of sanctions against Russia after two years of its war of aggression against Ukraine. https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/news/eu-adopts-13th-package-sanctions-against-russia-after-two-years-its-war-aggression-against-ukraine-2024-02-23_en
• Fama, G., & Musiol, L. (2022, 5 April). The War in Ukraine Raises New Questions for EU Foreign Policy. International Crisis Group. https://www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/eastern-europe/ukraine/war-ukraine-raises-new-questions-eu-foreign-policy
• Greiçevci, L. (2011). EU actorness in international affairs: The case of EULEX mission in Kosovo. Perspectives on European politics and society, 12(3), 283-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2011.596307
• Hellquist, E. (2016). Either with us or against us? Third-country alignment with EU sanctions against Russia/Ukraine. Cambridge review of international affairs, 29(3), 997-1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2016.1230591
• Jönsson, C., & Tallberg, J. (2001). Institutional Theory in International Relations. Working Paper. Lund University. https://lucris.lub.lu.se/ws/files/6355177/625444.pdf
• Jorgensen, K. E., Aarstad, Å. K., Drieskens, E., Laatikainen, K., & Tonra, B. (Eds.). (2015). The SAGE handbook of European foreign policy. Sage.
• Krasner, S.D. (1999). Logics of Consequences and Appropriateness in the International System. In Organizing Political Institutions: Essays for Johan P. Olsen. Scandinavian University Press.
• Krotz, U., & Schild, J. (2013). Shaping Europe: France, Germany, and embedded bilateralism from the Elysée Treaty to twenty-first century politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660087.001.0001
• Kurniasih, D., & Nugrahani, H. S. D. (2023). Benelux and European Union CFSP Security in Response to the Russia-Ukraine War. Journal of Strategic and Global Studies, 6(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.7454/jsgs.v6i1.1111
• Liboreiro, J. (2025, 23 January). Hungary ratchets up anti-sanctions rhetoric as renewal deadline looms. Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/01/23/hungary-ratchets-up-anti-sanctions-rhetoric-as-renewal-deadline-looms
• Light, M. (2008). Russia and the EU: Strategic Partners or Strategic Rivals?. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46, 7-27.
• Maurer, H., Whitman, R. G., & Wright, N. (2023). The EU and the invasion of Ukraine: a collective responsibility to act?. International Affairs, 99(1), 219-238. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac262
• Miller, E. A., & Banaszak-Holl, J. (2005). Cognitive and normative determinants of state policymaking behavior: Lessons from the sociological institutionalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 35(2), 191-216. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pji008
• Miskimmon, A. (2010). Global governance and the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union. In The European Union and global governance (pp. 121-130). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850503
• Mix, D. E. (2013). The European Union: Foreign and Security Policy. Congressional Research Service. Congressional Research Service. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/R41959.pdf
• O'Donnell, J. (2023, December 15). Exclusive: Austria blocks Russian sanctions over Raiffeisen blacklisting - sources. https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/austria-stalls-russian-sanctions-over-raiffeisen-blacklisting-sources-2023-12-14/
• Orenstein, M. A., & Kelemen, R. D. (2017). Trojan horses in EU foreign policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12441
• Palm, T., & Crum, B. (2019). Military operations and the EU’s identity as an international security actor. European security, 28(4), 513-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2019.1667769
• Payne, J. (2023, December 19). EU adopts 12th package of sanctions against Russia. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/eu-adopts-12th-package-sanctions-against-russia-2023-12-18/
• Renard, T. (2016). Partnering for global security: the EU, its strategic partners and transnational security challenges. European Foreign Affairs Review, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2016003
• SciencesPo. (2018). Europe as Global Actor. World Atlas of Global Issue. [Online] 28 September, accessed on 10/06/2023, URL: <https://espace-mondial-atlas.sciencespo.fr/en/topic-strategies-of-transnational-actors/article-3A05-EN-europe-as-global-actor.html>
• Schmidt, V. A. (2017). Theorizing Ideas and Discourse in Political Science: Intersubjectivity, Neo-Institutionalisms, and the Power of Ideas. Critical Review, 29(2), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1366665
• Serohina, K. (2024, November 10). Borrell tells about EU's preparation of 15th sanctions package against Russia. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/borrell-tells-about-eus-preparation-of-15th-sanctions-package-against-russia/ar-AA1tOopt
• SIPRI. (2012, November 23). EU arms embargo on Uzbekistan. https://www.sipri.org/databases/embargoes/eu_arms_embargoes/uzbekistan/uzbekistan# Szép, V., Wessel, R. A., Vandendriessche, M., Uzun, E., Moreno Villar, C., Ojanen, H., Kakko, H., Rybnikárová, L.,
• Gubalova, V., & Kuruc, J. (2023). Case Studies of the EU’s CFSP Activity. (Working Paper Series; No. 20). University of Groningen. https://pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/634322393/ENGAGE_Working_Paper_20_Case_Studies_of_the_EU_s_CFSP_Activity_2.pdf
• Thomas, D. C. (2009). Explaining the negotiation of EU foreign policy: Normative institutionalism and alternative approaches. International politics, 46, 339-357. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.7
• Vanhoonacker, S. (2020). The Amsterdam Treaty. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1094
• Veebel, V., & Markus, R. (2015). Lessons From The EU-Russia Sanctions 2014-2015. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 8(1), 165-194. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2015-0015
• Wunderlich, J. U. (2010). European integration, global governance and international relations. In The European Union and global governance: a handbook (pp. 48-55). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850503
• Zagorski, A. (2004). Policies towards Russia, Ukraine, Moldova and Belarus. In European Union foreign and security policy (pp. 79-97). Routledge