Job Satisfaction of Teachers Working in Science and Art Centers

Yıl 2023, , 99 - 124, 30.12.2023

Arif Aydeniz , Ramazan Gök

https://doi.org/10.47503/jirss.1257930

Öz

This research aims to reveal the opinions of teachers working in Science and Art Centers (BİLSEM) about their job satisfaction. In the study, case study was applied as one of the qualitative research methods. The research was conducted with 15 teachers, 9 male and 6 female, working in Antalya Science and Art Centers in the spring term of the 2020-2021 academic year. The data for the study were collected using open-ended questions created by the researcher. The data were analyzed by face-to-face and descriptive analysis technique by the researcher. According to the findings obtained from the research that a significant number of the teachers stated that the physical facilities and technological infrastructure in the institutions were insufficient and the interest and desire of the students towards the lesson were low. Teachers also stated that they have experienced problems due to the increase in the number of students in their institutions in recent years, so they had difficulty in having enough time to each student and that some courses were not given the necessary importance by the school administrators. Based on the relevant findings of the study, it was concluded that the teachers' expectations of the profession could not be fulfilled by the institution, students and the program due to these reasons, and this situation negatively affected their job satisfaction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Job satisfaction, teacher, Science and Art Centers, gifted

Bilim Sanat Merkezlerinde Çalışan Öğretmenlerin İş Doyumu

Öz

Bu araştırmada Bilim ve Sanat Merkezlerinde görev yapan öğretmenlerin iş doyumlarına ilişkin görüşlerinin ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada, nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden durum desenine yer verilmiştir. Araştırma, 2020-2021 Eğitim-Öğretim yılı bahar döneminde Antalya ili Bilim ve Sanat Merkezlerinde görev yapan 9’u erkek, 6’sı kadın olmak üzere toplam 15 öğretmen ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmanın verilerine, araştırmacı tarafından oluşturulan açık uçlu sorular ile ulaşılmıştır. Veriler, araştırmacı tarafından yüz yüze gerçekleştirilerek elde edilmiş ve betimsel analiz tekniği ile çözümlenmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgularda, öğretmenlerin önemli bir kısmı kurumlarda fiziksel imkân ve teknolojik altyapının yetersiz kaldığını, öğrencilerin derse karşı ilgi ve isteklerinin düşük olduğunu belirtmişlerdir. Öğretmenler, ayrıca son yıllarda kurumlarında yaşanan öğrenci sayılarındaki artışlardan kaynaklı sorunlar yaşadıklarını dolayısıyla her öğrenciye yeterli zaman ayırmakta zorlandıklarını ve bazı derslere okul idarecileri tarafından gerekli önemin verilmediğini ifade etmişlerdir. Araştırmanın ilgili bulgularından hareketle öğretmenlerin söz konusu nedenlere dayalı olarak mesleğe karşı beklentilerinin kurum, öğrenciler ve program tarafından karşılanamadığı, bu durumun iş doyumlarını olumsuz yönde etkilediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İş doyumu, öğretmen, Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri, üstün yetenekli

Kaynakça

• Akhan, N. E. & Altaş, S. (2020). Opinions of social studies teachers in BİLSEMs on working conditions. A. Dinç (Moderator), in International Aegean Symposiums on Social Sciences & Humanities. International Aegean Symposium, Izmir, 29-44.
• Ataman, A. (2013). Fundamentals of special education. A. Cavkaytar (Ed.), in Special education (pp. 1-19). Vize Yayıncılık.
• Avşaroğlu, S., Deniz, E. M. & Kahraman, A. (2005). Investigation of life-long job satisfaction and professional burnout levels of technical teachers. Selcuk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 14, 115-129.
• Ayan, S., Kocacik, F. & Karakus, H. (2009). The level of job satisfaction of high school teachers and the individual and institutional factors affecting it: Sivas central district example. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 10, 18-25.
• Bakan, I. & Büyükbese, T. (2004). Relationships between organizational communication and job satisfaction elements: A field study for academic organizations. Mediterranean FEAS Journal, 4(7), 1-30.
• Bozan, I. & Savi Çakar, F. (2020). Determining the problems experienced by BİLSEM teachers and solution suggestions for these problems. Turkish Studies Education, 15(3), 1607-1628.
• Buyukozturk, S. Cakmak, E. K. Akgun, O. E. Karadeniz, S. & Demirel, F. (2008). Scientific research methods. Pegem A. Yayıncılık.
• Chiva, R. & Alegre, J. (2009). Organizational learning capability and job satisfaction: An empirical assessment in the ceramic tile industry. British Journal of Management, 20(3), 323-340.
• Cekmecelioglu, H. G. (2005). The effect of organizational climate on job satisfaction and intention to leave, CU Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 6(2), 23-39.
• Dunnette, M. D., Campbell, J. P. & Hakel, M. D. (1967). Factors contributing to job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction in six occupational groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 2(2), 143-174.
• Eginli, A. T. (2009). Job satisfaction among employees: A research on job satisfaction of public and private sector employees. Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 23(3), 35-52.
• Filak, V. F. & Sheldon, K. M. (2003). Student psychological need satisfaction and college teacher-course evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 23(3), 235-247.
• Filiz, Z. (2014). Investigation of teachers' job satisfaction and burnout levels. International Journal of Management, Economics and Business, 10(23), 157-172.
• Gencay, O. A. (2007). Investigation of physical education teachers' job satisfaction and professional burnout in terms of some variables, Kastamonu Journal of Education, 15(2), 765-780.
• Gokdere, M., Ayvaci H. S. & Small, M. (2004). The main problems faced by gifted children. Journal of Contemporary Education, 313, 23-32.
• Hackman, J.R. & Oldham, G.R. (1975), Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-70.
• Hameed, F., Ahmed-Baig, I., & Cacheiro-González, M. L. (2018). Job satisfaction of teachers from public and private sectors in Lahore, Pakistan: A comparative study. Economics & Sociology, 11(4), 230.
• Henne, D., & Locke, E. A. (1985). Job dissatisfaction: What are the consequences? International Journal of Psychology, 20(2), 221-240.
• Hopper R. (1935). A publication of the National Occupational Conference, New York: Harper, p.284-294.
• Hulin, C. L., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Job attitudes. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 12, p. 255–276).
• Izgar, H. (2008). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment in school administrators. Selcuk University Ahmet Keleşoğlu Faculty of Education Journal, 25, 317-334.
• İncir, G. (1990). A study on the job satisfaction of employees. National Productivity Center.
• Johns, G., & Saks, A. M. (2001). Understanding and managing life at work: Organizational behavior. Prentice Hall.
• Judge, T. A., Zhang, S. C., & Glerum, D. R. (2020). Essentials of job attitudes and other workplace psychological constructs, Routledge, New York and London.
• Karakose, T. & Kocabaş, İ. (2006). The effects of teachers' expectations on job satisfaction and motivation in private and public schools. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 2(1), 3-14.
• Keser, A. (2006). Investigation of the relationship between workload level and job satisfaction in call center employees. Kocaeli University Journal of Social Sciences, 11, 100-119.
• Klecker, B.M. & Loadman, W.E. (1999). Male elementary school teachers’ ratings of job satisfaction by years of teaching experience. Journal of Education, 119(3), 504–513.
• Koç, H. & Yazıcıoğlu, İ. (2011). The relationship between trust in the manager and job satisfaction: Comparison of public and private sector. Doğuş University Journal, 12(1), 46-57.
• Koç, Z. (2001) Examining the job satisfaction of counselors working in counseling and research centers according to some variables, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 9(2).
• Kumaş, V. & Deniz, L. (2010). Examination of teachers' job satisfaction levels. MU Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 32(32), 123-139.
• Kuruüzüm, A. & Çelik, N. (2005). Analysis of the factors determining teacher job satisfaction with the second order factor model, Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 29, 137-146.
• Ma, X. & MacMillan, R. B. (1999). Influence of workplace conditions on teachers' job satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 39-47.
• Merriam, S. B. (2018). Qualitative research. A guide to pattern and application. (3rd Ed.). (Trans. Edt. Selahattin Turan). Nobel.
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Ministry of National Education Bilsems Directive (2019). MEB Notifications Journal. Volume: 82. Number:2747. December 2019.
• Monyatsi, P. P. (2012). The level of the job satisfaction of teachers in Botswana. European Journal of Educational Studies, 4(2).
• Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. McGraw Hill.
• Oplatka, I., & Mimon, R. (2008). Women principals' conceptions of job satisfaction and dissatisfaction: an alternative view? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(2), 135-153.
• Özdayi, N. (1991). The job satisfaction levels of teachers working in public and private high schools. Comparison, Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 3.
• Özkaya, M. O., Near, V. & Ekinci, T. (2008). The effect of stress levels on job satisfaction of employees An empirical research on Celal Bayar University employees. Journal of Celal Bayar University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 163-179.
• Pardee, R. L. (1990). Motivation Theories of Maslow, Herzberg, McGregor & McClelland. A Literature Review of Selected Theories Dealing with Job Satisfaction and Motivation.
• Renzulli, J. S. & Reis, S.M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
• Seniwoliba, J. A. (2013). Teacher motivation and job satisfaction in senior high schools in the Tamale metropolis of Ghana. Merit Research Journals, 1(9).
• Sevimli, F. & İşcan, O. F. (2005). Job satisfaction in terms of individual and work environment factors. Aegean Journal of Academic Perspective, 5(1-2), 55-64.
• Spector, P. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, cause and consequences. Sage Publications. Sahin, I. (2013). Teachers' job satisfaction levels. YYU Faculty of Education Journal, 10(1), 142-167.
• Tan, C. (2012). The effect of primary school administrators' team leadership behaviors on teachers' job satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Fırat University.
• Tasdan, M. & Tiryaki, E. (2008). Comparison of job satisfaction levels of private and public primary school teachers, Journal of Education and Science, 33(147), 54-70.
• Tosunoglu, H. (1998). Job satisfaction of Fırat University faculty members [Unpublished master's thesis]. Fırat University.
• Tunacan, S. (2005). Factors affecting job satisfaction of high school teachers in Beykoz district [Unpublished Master's Thesis]. Yeditepe University.
• Tunacan, S. & Cetin, C. (2009). A research on the determination of the factors affecting the job satisfaction of high school teachers. MU Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 29(1), 155-172.
• Voon, M. L., Lo, M. C., Ngui, K. S., & Ayob, N. B. (2011). The influence of leadership styles on employees' job satisfaction in public sector organizations in Malaysia. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Sciences, 2(1), 24-32.
• Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. John Wiley and Sons.
• Yavuzkurt, T. (2017). Secondary school teachers' perception of workplace friendship and their relationship with job satisfaction (Aydın province example) [Unpublished master's thesis]. Adnan Menderes University.
• Yelboğa, A. (2007). Examination of the relationship between individual demographic variables and job satisfaction in the finance sector. Çağ University Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 1-18.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. (9th Enlarged Edition) Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yılmaz, A. & Bull Ceylan, C. (2011). The relationship between primary school administrators' leadership behavior levels and teachers' job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration in Theory and Practice, 17(2), 277-394.
• Yılmaz, K. & Altınkurt, Y. (2012). The relationship between the power sources used by school administrators and the job satisfaction of teachers. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 20(2), 385-402.
• Yin, R. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. (3rd Ed.). Sage Publications.
• Zhu, Y. (2013). A review of job satisfaction. Journal of Asian Social Science, 9(1), 293.