Dijital Rekreasyonun Aile İçi İletişim ve Aile Bağlılığı Üzerindeki Etkileri

Öz

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, dijital rekreasyon bağlamında medya ve teknoloji kullanımının aile içi iletişim ve aile aidiyeti üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Bu doğrultuda akıllı telefon kullanımı ve video oyun oynama düzeyleri ile aile içi iletişim kalıpları ve aile aidiyeti arasındaki ilişkiler değerlendirilmiştir. Yöntem: Araştırma, nicel araştırma yaklaşımı kapsamında ilişkisel tarama modeliyle yürütülmüştür. Çalışma grubu, Kırşehir ilinde yaşayan 18 yaş ve üzeri 576 katılımcıdan oluşmaktadır. Veriler Medya ve Teknoloji Kullanımı ve Tutumları Ölçeği, Aile İçi İletişim Kalıpları Ölçeği ve Aile Aidiyeti Ölçeği aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde korelasyon analizi ve yordayıcı regresyon analizleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırma bulguları, dijital medya kullanımı, akıllı telefon kullanımı ve video oyun oynama davranışlarının aile içi iletişim ve aile aidiyeti ile anlamlı ve kuvvetli düzeyde negatif ilişkiler sergilediğini göstermektedir. Regresyon analizleri, teknoloji kullanımının aile içi iletişim kalıpları ile aile aidiyeti boyutlarını anlamlı biçimde yordadığını ve özellikle aile aidiyeti üzerinde yüksek düzeyde açıklayıcılığa sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Sonuç: Araştırma sonuçları, dijital teknolojilerin yoğun kullanımının aile içi iletişim kalitesini zayıflattığını ve bireylerin aileye yönelik aidiyet algılarını olumsuz yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Bu bağlamda aile yapısının güçlendirilmesine yönelik sosyal, pedagojik ve önleyici müdahalelerin geliştirilmesinin önemli olduğu değerlendirilmektedir. Özgünlük: Çalışma, dijital rekreasyon çerçevesinde medya ve teknoloji kullanımını aile içi iletişim ve aile aidiyeti değişkenleriyle birlikte ele alarak, dijitalleşmenin aile yapısı üzerindeki etkilerine bütüncül bir bakış sunması açısından özgün bir katkı sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Rekreasyon yönetimi
• dijital rekreasyon
• aile içi iletişim
• aile aidiyeti

The Effects of Digital Recreation on Intra-Family Communication and Family Cohesion

Öz

Aim: The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of media and technology use within the context of digital recreation on family communication and family belonging. In this regard, the relationships between levels of digital media use (smartphone use and video game playing), family communication patterns (dialogue and conformity), and family belonging (self-belonging and family belonging) were investigated. Method: This study was conducted using a quantitative research approach and a relational survey design. The study sample consisted of 576 individuals aged 18 and over residing in the province of Kırşehir. Data were collected using the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale, the Family Communication Patterns Scale, and the Family Belonging Scale. Correlation analysis and predictive regression analyses were employed to analyse the data. Results: The findings indicate that digital media use, smartphone use, and video game playing behaviors exhibit significant and strong negative relationships with family communication and family belonging. Regression analyses revealed that technology use significantly predicts all dependent variables and demonstrates particularly high explanatory power for family belonging. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that increased use of digital technologies negatively affects the quality of family communication and weakens individuals’ perceptions of family belonging. In this context, the development of social, pedagogical, and preventive interventions aimed at strengthening family structure is considered essential. Originality: This study makes an original contribution by addressing media and technology use within the framework of digital recreation together with family communication and family belonging, thereby providing a comprehensive perspective on the effects of digitalization on family structure.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Recreation management
• digital recreation
• family communication
• family belonging

Kaynakça

1. Abel, S., Machin, T. & Brownlow, C. (2021). Social media, rituals, and long-distance family relationship maintenance: A mixed-methods systematic review. New Media & Society, 23(3), 632-654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820958717
2. Abubakar, A., Schachner, M., Aydnili-Karakulak, A., Alonso-Arbiol, I., Martinez-Fernandez, V., Kachama Nyongesa, M. & Shauri, H. (2017). Family connectedness and its association with psychological well-being among emerging adults across four cultural contexts. In A. C. Petersen, S. H. Koller, F. Motti-Stefanidi & S. Verma (Eds.), Positive youth development in global contexts of social and economic change (pp. 138-156). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315307275-19
3. Adıbelli, D. & Yüksel, R. (2016). The effect of developing technology on the family structure and family relations. In A. A. Çamlı, B. Ak, R. Arabacı & R. Efe (Eds.), Recent advances in health sciences (pp. 580-589). St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.
4. Aktepe, H. N. (2023). Genç yetişkinlerde çevrimiçi oyun bağımlılığı düzeyinin depresyon, aile bağlılığı ve demografik özelliklerle olan ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
5. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: SPSS uygulamalı (4. Baskı). Sakarya Kitabevi.
6. Ambarsari, D. (2025). The role of social media in family communication: Opportunities and challenges in the digital era. TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal, 4(7), 2519-2526. https://doi.org/10.61445/tofedu.v4i7.792
7. Arslan, A. (2023). Characteristics, types and functions of family concept. African Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 45-48. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.111.23.001
8. Aslan, Y., Koçak, O., Kuş, Y. & Sağır Hizmetçi, N. (2025). Acceptance of diversity, social media use, and labeling of refugees in Türkiye: A mediation analysis from a social work perspective. Journal of Social Service Research, 52(1), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2025.2553623

9. Bales, R. F. & Parsons, T. (2014). Family: Socialization and interaction process. Routledge.
10. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2024). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum (31. Baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (20. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
12. Caprì, T., Gugliandolo, M. C., Iannizzotto, G., Nucita, A. & Fabio, R. A. (2021). The influence of media usage on family functioning. Current Psychology, 40(6), 2644-2653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00204-1
13. Cardoso-Leite, P., Kludt, R., Vignola, G., Ma, W. J., Green, C. S. & Bavelier, D. (2016). Technology consumption and cognitive control: Contrasting action video game experience with media multitasking. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(1), 218-241. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0988-0
14. Campbell, B. (2021). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 33(1-2), 196-199.
15. Corkin, M. T., Henderson, A. M. E., Peterson, E. R., Kennedy-Costantini, S., Sharplin, H. S. & Morrison, S. (2021). Associations between technoference, quality of parent-infant interactions, and infants’ vocabulary development. Infant Behavior and Development, 64, 101611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101611
16. DataReportal. (2025). Digital 2025: Device trends for 2025. Erişim Tarihi: 02.12.2025, Erişim Adresi: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025
17. Dehon, C., Weems, C. F., Stickle, T. R., Costa, N. M. & Berman, S. L. (2005). A cross-sectional evaluation of the factorial invariance of anxiety sensitivity in adolescents and young adults. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(6), 799-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.008
18. El Khouli, M. A. (2013). The most important negative aspects of using social networking affecting the family stability in Abu Dhabi - A pilot study. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(1), 85-90.
19. Erdem, D. & Bozkurt, A. K. (2023). Dijital rekreasyon kavramına genel bir bakış ve bibliyometrik analizi. ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(3), 3511-3527. https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1232612
20. Erdoğan, Ö. & Anık, C. (2018). Aile iletişim kalıpları ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, (29), 21-46.
21. Erum, H., Abid, G., Contreras, F. & Islam, T. (2020). Role of family motivation, workplace civility and self-efficacy in developing affective commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(1), 358-374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10010027
22. Fitzpatrick, M. A. & Ritchie, L. D. (1994). Communication schemata within the family: Multiple perspectives on family interaction. Human Communication Research, 20(3), 275-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00324.x
23. Geraee, N., Eslami, A. A. & Soltani, R. (2019). The relationship between family social capital, social media use and life satisfaction in adolescents. Health Promotion Perspectives, 9(4), 307-313.
24. Gökçe, Ş. I. & Tunç, E. (2024). Family communication patterns as a predictor of psychological resilience level in adolescents. Journal of New Paradigms in Education, 1(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14228672
25. Guo, N., Wang, M. P., Luk, T. T., Ho, S. Y., Fong, D. Y. T., Chan, S. S. C. & Lam, T. H. (2019). The association of problematic smartphone use with family well-being mediated by family communication in Chinese adults: A population-based study. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 8(3), 412-419. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.8.2019.39
26. Güncan, Ö. (2021). Elektronik boş zaman uygulamaları “sanal rekreasyon” mudur yoksa “dijital rekreasyon” mu? Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 163-181.
27. Hamami, M. A. N. & Widyatno, A. (2025). Parental phubbing and adolescent loneliness: A study of digital neglect in families. Jurnal Sains Psikologi, 14(1), 172-187.
28. Hatak, I., Kautonen, T., Fink, M. & Kansikas, J. (2016). Innovativeness and family-firm performance: The moderating effect of family commitment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 120-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.020
29. Hiniker, A., Schoenebeck, S. Y. & Kientz, J. A. (2016). Not at the dinner table: Parents' and children's perspectives on family technology rules. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1376–1389. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819940
30. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
31. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
32. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Karasar, N. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (27. Baskı). Nobel Yayıncılık.
34. Kildare, C. A. & Middlemiss, W. (2017). Impact of parents’ mobile device use on parent-child interaction: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 579-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.003
35. Koerner, A. F. & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1997). Family type and conflict: The impact of conversation orientation and conformity orientation on conflict in the family. Communication Studies, 48(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979709368491
36. Korcz, N., Ciesielski, M., Kamińska, A., Choromański, K., Gotlib, D., Stefán, F. & Taczanowska, K. (2024). The use of digital tools in forest tourism and recreation-experiences from Warsaw agglomeration in Poland. Trees, Forests and People, 18, 100697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100697
37. Koropp, C., Grichnik, D. & Kellermanns, F. (2013). Financial attitudes in family firms: The moderating role of family commitment. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(1), 114-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00380.x
38. Lian, S. L., Cao, X. X., Xiao, Q. L., Zhu, X. W., Yang, C. & Liu, Q. Q. (2023). Family cohesion and adaptability reduces mobile phone addiction: The mediating and moderating roles of automatic thoughts and peer attachment. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1122943. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122943
39. Mavili, A., Kesen, N. F. & Daşbaş, S. (2014). Aile aidiyeti ölçeği: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 33, 29-42. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.19507
40. McDaniel, B. T. & Radesky, J. S. (2018). Technoference: Parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development, 89(1), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12822
41. McLeod, J. M. & Chaffee, S. H. (1973). Interpersonal approaches to communication research. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(4), 469-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427301600402
42. Meriläinen, M., Hietajärvi, L., Aurava, R. & Stenros, J. (2023). Games in everyday life: Profiles of adolescent digital gaming motives and well-being outcomes. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 12, 100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2023.100104
43. Merkaš, M., Bodrožić Selak, M. & Žulec Ivanković, A. (2024). Problematic smartphone use and communication in families with adolescents. Adolescents, 4(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.3390/adolescents4010008
44. Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family relations and the Internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0602_2
45. Meydan, C. H. & Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi: AMOS uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
46. Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J. & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514539755
47. Mukba, G., Akgün, G. E. & Yayla, A. (2023). Aile aidiyetine çok yönlü bakış. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 60, 29-43. https://doi.org/10.53568/yyusbed.1277271
48. Mullan, K. & Chatzitheochari, S. (2019). Changing times together? A time-diary analysis of family time in the digital age in the United Kingdom. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(4), 795–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12564
49. Newzoo. (2025). Global games market report 2025. Erişim Tarihi: 07.12.2025, Erişim Adresi: https://newzoo.com/resources/trend-reports/newzoo-global-games-market-report-2025
50. Nilsen, R., Johansen, T., Løvstad, M. & Linnestad, A. M. (2024). Playing online videogames—more than just entertainment? A qualitative study of virtual social participation in persons with spinal cord injury. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 5, 1395678. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1395678
51. OECD. (2025). PISA 2025 results: Learning in the digital world (Volume I-III). OECD Publishing.
52. Olson, D. H., Waldvogel, L. & Schlieff, M. (2019). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: An update. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 11(2), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12331
53. Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L. & Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(1), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2
54. Özgür, H. (2016). Adapting the media and technology usage and attitudes scale to Turkish. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(5), 1711-1735. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.5.0085
55. Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M. & Fraser, A. M. (2012). Getting a high-speed family connection: Associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61(3), 426-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00710.x
56. Peleg, O. & Peleg, M. (2025). Is resilience the bridge connecting social and family factors to mental well-being and life satisfaction? Contemporary Family Therapy, 47(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-024-09707-x
57. Procentese, F., Gatti, F. & Di Napoli, I. (2019). Families and social media use: The role of parents’ perceptions about social media impact on family systems in the relationship between family collective efficacy and open communication. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 5006. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245006
58. Razzak, M. R., Abu Bakar, R. & Mustamil, N. (2019). Socioemotional wealth and family commitment: Moderating role of controlling generation in family firms. Journal of Family Business Management, 9(4), 393-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2018-0050
59. Ritchie, L. D. & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Family communication patterns: Measuring interpersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research, 17(4), 523-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365090017004007
60. Roberts, J. A. & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
61. Roman, N. V., Balogun, T. V., Butler-Kruger, L., Danga, S. D., de Lange, J. T., Human-Hendricks, A., Khaile, F. T., October, K. R. & Olabiyi, O. J. (2025). Strengthening family bonds: A systematic review of factors and interventions that enhance family cohesion. Social Sciences, 14(6), 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14060371
62. Rosen, L. D., Whaling, K., Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A. & Rokkum, J. (2013). The media and technology usage and attitudes scale: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2501-2511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.006
63. Sabah, A., Aljaberi, M. A., Martin, J., Lee, K. H. & Lin, C. Y. (2025). Family resilience as a mediator in the relationship between family functioning and well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 20(5), 1859-1885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-025-10499-x
64. Scabini, E. & Manzi, C. (2011). Family processes and identity. In S. Schwartz, K. Luyckx & V. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 565-584). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_23
65. Segaro, E. L., Larimo, J. & Jones, M. V. (2014). Internationalisation of family small and medium sized enterprises: The role of stewardship orientation, family commitment culture and top management team. International Business Review, 23(2), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.06.004
66. Sevilla, G. D. (2025). Family cohesion, self-esteem, and resilience: A correlational analysis among selected junior high school students. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(8), 429-435. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.455
67. Shen, Y. (2020). Digital media engagement and children’s health and well-being: A divide by family structure. International Journal of Psychiatric Research, 3(2), 1-7.
68. Simon, D., Kriston, L., Loh, A., Spies, C., Scheibler, F., Wills, C. & Harter, M. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the Autonomy-Preference-Index (API). Health Expectations, 13(3), 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00584.x
69. Stothart, C., Mitchum, A. & Yehnert, C. (2015). The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(4), 893-897.
70. Şişmanlar, Ş. G., Dursun, Y., Ünverdi, G., Olgun, N. N. & Coşkun, A. (2022). Factors associated with family belongingness in children under legally required health care. Archives of Neuropsychiatry, 59(4), 303-308. https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.27915
71. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
72. Telefónica. (2025). Smartphones in 2024: how many there are, usage time or main uses. Erişim Tarihi: 09.12.2025, Erişim Adresi: https://www.telefonica.com/en/communication-room/blog/smartphones-2024/telefonica.com
73. Thulin, E. & Vilhelmson, B. (2007). Mobiles everywhere: Youth, the mobile phone, and changes in everyday practice. Young, 15(3), 235-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330880701500302
74. Tutar, Ö. F. & Turhan, F. H. (2023). Digital leisure: Transformation of leisure activities. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 11, 16-28.
75. UNICEF. (2022). Early childhood development: Ensuring the best start in life. UNICEF Publications.
76. Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267
77. Valkenburg, P. M., van Driel, I. I. & Beyens, I. (2022). The associations of active and passive social media use with well-being: A critical scoping review. New Media & Society, 24(2), 530-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211065425
78. Van Deursen, A. J., Bolle, C. L., Hegner, S. M. & Kommers, P. A. (2015). Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 411-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039
79. Verduyn, P., Lee, D. S., Park, J., Shablack, H., Orvell, A., Bayer, J., Ybarra, O., Jonides, J. & Kross, E. (2015). Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), 480-488. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000057
80. Wehmeyer, M. L. (2014). Self-determination: A family affair. Family Relations, 63(1), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12052
81. Yu, J., Wang, Y., Tang, X., Wu, Y., Tang, X. & Huang, J. (2021). Impact of family cohesion and adaptability on academic burnout of Chinese college students: Serial mediation of peer support and positive psychological capital. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 767616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767616