Göçmen Çocukların Dijital Hikayeleri/Medya Yapımları Aracılığıyla Kimlik Biçimlenmesi ve Kendini İfade Etme

Öz

Bu makale, CHICAM (Children in Communication About Migration) adlı Avrupa araştırma projesinden yola çıkmaktadır. Araştırma,dışlanmış genç gruplar arasında internet üzerinden kurulan, kültürlerarası iletişim hakkındaki konulara ve bir kişisel ifade ve kimlik biçimlenme aracı olarak medya yapımlarına işaret etmektedir. Makale, 12-14 yaş arası mülteci çocuklar tarafından seçilmiş bir dizi medya yapımı üzerine temellenen ampirik analizlere bağlantılı, kültürel kuramsal perspektiften başlamaktadır. Çocukların üretmiş oldukları medya yapımları,çeşitli program türleri ve formatlarını simgelemektedir. Kimliklerin medya yapımlarının üretimi sürecinde nasıl tekrar yaratıldığını bulmak için görsel dilin kullanımına, temsili geleneklere dikkat çekilmektedir. Makalede, araştırma grubu çocukların “eski” ve “yeni” dünyaları arasındaki kültürel gerilimlerle ilgili deneyimlerini yansıtmalarına yalnızca ürettikleri yapımlarla değil, ayrıca kendi gelecek yaşamlarında ve kendilerini geliştirmede çok önemli buldukları şartlara bakış açılarına da değinilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Avrupa, kültürlerarası iletişim, medya yapımı, göçmen, yeni medya, görsel dil, gençler.

Öz

This article starts out from the European research project Children in Communication about Migration (CHICAM). It addresses questions about intercultural communication via the internet and about media production as a vehicle for personal expression and identity formation among excluded youth groups. The article starts out from a cultural theoretical perspective linked to an empirical analysis, which is based on a series of selected productions made by 12 to 14-year-old refugees. The productions represent various programme genres and formats. The use of visual language such as representational conventions are highlighted in order to find out how identities are (re)created in the process of media production. The article touches upon these productions as they reflect not only experiences in dealing with cultural tensions between the “old” and the “new” world, but also their views on their future life and on the conditions that they find crucial in developing themselves.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Europe, intercultural communication, media production, migrant, new media, visual language, young people

Kaynakça

1. Alasuutari, P. (ed.) (1999) Rethinking the Media Audience. London: Sage.
2. Barker, C. (1997) Global Television. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Baumann, G. (1999) The Multicultural Riddle. Rethinking National, Ethnic and Religious Cultures. London: Routledge.
4. Braziel, J.E. and A. Mannur (eds) (2005) Theorizing Diaspora. A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Buckingham, D. (2005) Media Education: Literacy, Learning and Contemporary Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6. Christopoulou, N. (2004) ‘Intercultural Communication’, working report (WP 6), CHICAM, European Commission, Community Research. Athens: Greek Centre for Refugees.
7. Christopoulou, N. and S. de Leeuw (eds) (2004) ‘Home Is Where the Heart Is. Family Relations of Migrant Children in Media Clubs in Six European Countries’, European Commission, Community Research deliverables 11 and 12, February. >Available at: http://www.chicam.org@
8. Christopoulou, N. and I. Rydin (eds) (2004) ‘Children’s Social Relations in Peer Groups: Inclusion, Exclusion and Friendships’, European Commission, Community Research deliverables 7 and 8, February. >Available at: http://www.chicam.org@

9. Dayan, D. (1999) ‘Media and Diasporas’, in J. Gripsrud (ed.) Television and Common Knowledge, pp. 18-33. London: Routledge.
10. De Block, L. and I. Rydin (2006) ‘Digital Rapping in Media Productions. Intercultural Communication through Youth Culture’, in D. Buckingham and R. Willett (eds) Digital Generations. Children, Young People and New Media, pp. 295-312. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. De Block, L., D. Buckingham, P. Holzwarth and H. Niesyto (eds) (2004) ‘Visions across Cultures: Migrant Children Using Visual Images to Communicate’, European Commission, Community Research deliverables 14 and 15, May. >Available at: http://www.chicam.org@
12. de Leeuw, S. (2004) ‘Intercultural Communicatin-Visual Language: The Netherlands’, working report (WP 6), CHICAM, European Commission. Utrecht: OGC
13. de Leeuw, S. (2005) ‘Migrant Children Mediating Family Relations’, in P. Pisters and W. Staat (eds) Shooting the Family. Transnational Media and Intercultural Values, pp. 41-55. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
14. Frith, S. (1993) ‘Youth/Music/Television’, in S. Frith, A. Goodwin and L. Grossberg (eds) Sound and Vision. The Music Video Reader, pp. 67-83. London: Routledge.
15. Frith, S. (1996) ‘Music and Identity’, in S. Hall and P. du Gay (eds) Questions of Cultural Identity, pp. 108-27. London: Sage.
16. Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
17. Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. Gillespie, M. (2000 >1995@) Television, Ethnicity and Cultural Change. London: Routledge.
19. Goffman, E. (1969 >1959@) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Allen Lane.
20. Hall, S. (1996a) ‘New Ethnicities’, in D. Morley and K.H. Chen (eds) Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, pp. 441-9. London: Routledge.
21. Hall, S. (1996b) ‘Introduction’, in S. Hall and P. du Gay (eds) Questions of Cultural Identity, pp. 1-17. London: Sage.
22. Holzwarth, P. and B. Maurer (2004) ‘Intercultural Communication – Visual Language: Germany’, working report (WP 6), CHICAM, European Commission, Ludwigsburg.
23. Hoskins, A. (2001) ‘New Memory: Mediating History’, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 21(4): 333-46.
24. Huntemann, N. and M. Morgan (2001) ‘Mass Media and Identity Development’, in D.G. Singer and J.L. Singer (eds) Handbook of Children and the Media, pp. 309-20. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Morley, D. and K. Robins (1995) Spaces of Identity. Global Media, Electronic Landscapes and Cultural Boundaries. London: Routledge.
26. Naficy, H. (2001) An Accented Cinema. Exilic and Diasporic Filmmaking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Passani, A. and I. Rydin (eds) (2004) ‘Schools as an Arena for Education, Integration and Socialization’, European Commission, Community Research deliverables 9 and 10, February. >Available at: http://www.chicam.org@
28. Sernhede, O. (2002) Alienation Is My Nation. Hiphop och unga mäns utanförskap i det nya Sverige >Alienation Is My Nation. Hiphop and the Marginalisation of Young Immigrant Men in the New Sweden@. Stockholm: Ordfronts förlag.
29. Tate, S. A. (2005) Black Skins, Black Masks, Hybridity, Dialogism, Performativity. London: Ashgate.
30. Tulloch, J. (1999) ‘The Implied Audience in Soap Opera Production – Everyday Rhetorical Strategies among Television Professionals’, in P. Alasuutari (ed.) Rethinking the Media Audience, pp. 151-78. London: Sage.
31. Vansina, J. (1985) Oral Tradition as History. London: Currey.