The Effects of Different Organomineral and Chemical Fertilizers on Fruit Yield, Fruit Quality and Plant Nutrient Uptake in Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch) Cultivation

Öz

Product yield and quality in agricultural production is closely related to plant nutrition. The most important input used in plant nutrition is fertilizers. Since chemical fertilizers, which are used as indispensable in today's modern agriculture, are both costly and harmful to the environment and people, the search for more economical and effective solutions to these inputs has gained importance. In this study, it was aimed to determine the effects of different organomineral and chemical fertilizer applications on yield, quality and nutrient intake in strawberry cultivation. Sweet Charlie strawberry variety was used as plant material, organomineral fertilizer (Agronatura, Agrosulfur, 5x15, and 30.0.0) and chemical fertilizers (Agrohum, Azurite and 4x10) were used as fertilizer materials. The mean values of the measurements made at the end of the study were evaluated statistically. In the research; Quality parameters such as yield per plant, average fruit weight, water-soluble dry matter content, fruit acidity, micro (iron, zinc, manganese and copper) and macro (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and calcium) nutrient contents were examined. According to our findings, organomineral fertilizer applications gave the best results in terms of yield and average fruit weight criteria.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Strawberry
• organomineral fertilizer
• yield per plant
• fruit quality
• nutrients

Çilek (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) Yetiştiriciliğinde Farklı Organomineral ve Kimyasal Gübrelerin Meyve Verimi, Kalitesi ve Bitki Besin Maddesi Alımı Üzerine Etkileri

Öz

Tarımsal üretimde ürün verimi ve kalitesi bitki besleme ile yakından ilgilidir. Bitki beslemede kullanılan en önemli girdi ise gübrelerdir. Günümüz modern tarımında vazgeçilmez olarak kullanılan kimyasal gübreler, hem maliyetli olması hem de çevreye ve insanlara zararlı olması nedeniyle bu girdilere daha ekonomik ve etkili çözüm arayışları önem kazanmıştır. Bu çalışmada çilek yetiştiriciliğinde farklı organomineral ve kimyasal gübre uygulamalarının verim, kalite ve bitki besin alımı üzerine etkilerini belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Bitki materyali olarak Sweet Charlie çilek çeşidi, organomineral gübre olarak Agronatura, Agrosülfür, 5x15, ve 30.0.0 ve kimyasal gübre olarak Agrohum, Azurite ve 4x10 gübre materyalleri olarak kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada elde edilen verilerin ortalama değerleri istatistiksel olarak olarak p<0.005 anlamlılık düzeyinde değerlendirildi. Araştırmada; bitki başına verim, ortalama meyve ağırlığı, suda çözünür kuru madde içeriği, meyve asitliği gibi kalite parametreleri, mikro (demir, çinko, manganez ve bakır) ve makro (azot, fosfor, potasyum ve kalsiyum) besin elementleri içerikleri incelenmiştir Bulgularımıza göre organomineral gübre uygulamalarının verim ve ortalama meyve ağırlığı kriterleri açısından en iyi sonucu vermiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çilek
• Organomineral gübre
• Bitki başına verim
• Ürün kalitesi
• Besin elementleri

Kaynakça

1. Agüero JJ, Salazar SM, Kirschbaum DS, Jerez EF, 2015. Factors Affecting Fruit Quality in Strawberries Grown in a Subtropical Environment. Inter. J Fruit Sci., 15(2), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2015.1017427
2. AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington DC. https://law.resource.org/pub/us/cfr/ibr/002/aoac.methods.1.1990.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 01.12.2021).
3. Anonim, 2022. Sweet Charlie Strawberry Variety + Growing Tips. Modified: Jun 23, 2022 by Mr. Strawberry. https://strawberryplants.org/sweet-charlie-strawberry-plants/ (Erişim tarihi: 01.07.2022)
4. Barton CJ, 1948. Photometric Analysis On Phosphate Rock. Ind. Anal. Eng. Chem., (20), 1068-1073. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60023a024
5. Bayram SE, 2020. Determination of Yield and Some Fruit Quality Characteristics of the Festival and Camarosa Strawberry Cultivars Grown in Aydın/Sultanhisar Conditions. TURJAF., 8(7), 1564-1570. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i7.1564-1570.3451
6. Bettiol W, Ghını R, Galvao JAH, Sıloto RC, 2004. Organic and Conventional Tomato Cropping Systems. Sci Agric, 61(3), 253-259. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162004000300002
7. Cao F, Guan C, Dai H, Li X, Zhang Z, 2015. Soluble solids content is positively correlated with phosphorus content in ripening strawberry fruits. Scientia horticulturae, (195), 183-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.018
8. Crusciol CAC, Campos Md, Martello JM, Alves CJ, Nascimento CAC, Pereira JCdR, Canterella H, 2020. Organomineral Fertilizer as Source of P and K for Sugarcane. Sci. Rep., 10, 5398. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62315-1

9. Develi EA, Yavuz A, Erdoğan Ü, 2021. Vermikompost Uygulamalarının San Andreas (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) Çilek Çeşidinin Bazı Verim ve Kalite Değerlerine Etkisi. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 9(sp), 2641-2648. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v9isp.2641-2648.4950
10. FAO, 2020. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (Erişim tarihi: 12.12.2020)
11. Galetta GJ, Maas JL, Enns JM, Drapper AD, Dale A, Swartz HJ, 1995. 'Mohawk' stawberry. Hort Science:30(3), 631- 634. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.30.3.631
12. Gecer MK, Eyduran E, Yilmaz H, 2013. The Effect of Different Applications on Fruit Yield Characteristics of Strawberries Cultivated Under Van Ecological Condition. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 23(5), 1431-1435. https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/42897d62-8e9f-3775-aaaf-32688bbc11f7/ (Erişim tarihi: 12.12.2020)
13. Geçer MK, Gündoğdu M, Başar G, 2018. Bazı Çilek Çeşitlerinin Merzifon (Amasya) Ekolojisindeki Verim Durumlarının Tespiti. Iğdır Üni. Fen Bilimleri Enst. Der. 8(2), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.427752
14. Giampieri F, Alvarez-Suarez JM, Battino M, 2014. Strawberry and human health: effects beyond antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem. 62(18), 3867-76. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf405455n
15. Goss MJ, Tubeileh A, Goorahoo D, 2013. A Review of the Use of Organic Amendments and the Risk to Human Health. Advances in Agronomy. (120), 275-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407686-0.00005-1 Jones JR, Wolf B, Mills HA, 1991. Plant Analysis Handbook. Micro-Macro Publishing Inc., Athens, GA, 213p.
16. Kays SJ, 1999 Preharvest factors affecting appearance. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 15, 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(98)00088-X
17. Kirk PL, 1950. Kjeldahl Method for Total Nitrogen. Analyt. Chem. 22(2), 354-358. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60038a038
18. NCDA&CS, 2017. Strawberry Tissue Analysis. North Caroline Department of Agriculture Consumer Services Agronomic Division. https://www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/documents/StrawberryInterpretationArticle2017.pdf (Erişim tarihi 15.12.2021).
19. Nicolopoulou-Stamati P, Maipas S, Kotampasi C, Stamatis P, Hens L, 2016. Chemical Pesticides and Human Health: The Urgent Need for a New Concept in Agriculture. Frontiers in Public Health. (4), 148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00148
20. Nune G, Teixeira F, Schwarz K, Camargo CK, Vilela de Resende TJ, Dos Santos E.F, Franco BC, Novello D, 2021. Influence of genetic variability on the quality of strawberry cultivars: sensorial, physical-chemical and nutritional characterization. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy. (43), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v43i1.46862
21. Pakyürek M, Al-Shatrı AHN, Yavıç A, 2020. Effect of Seaweed Applıcatıon on The Vegetatıve Growth of Strawberry Cv. Albıon Grown Under Iraq Ecologıcal Condıtıons. Applıed Ecology and Envıronmental Research, 18(1), 1211-1225. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1801_12111225
22. Pritts MP, 2015. Nutrient Management Practices in Perennial Strawberry are Informed by Understanding the Relationships among Carbohydrate Status, Nitrogen Availability, and Soil Composition. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 25(4), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.25.4.447
23. Singh B, 2018. Are Nitrogen Fertilizers Deleterious to Soil Health? Agronomy. 8(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8040048
24. Souri MK, Tohidloo G, Eskandarpour S, 2018. Growth and Fruit Biochemical Characteristics of Three Strawberry Genotypes under Different Potassium Concentrations of Nutrient Solution. Open Agriculture, 3, 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2018-0039
25. Strik B, Righetti T, Buller G, 2004. Influence of rate, timing and method of nitrogen fertilization application on uptake and use of fertilizer nitrogen, growth and yield of June-bearing strawberry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. (129) 165 174 https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.129.2.0165
26. Taghavi T, Siddiqui R, Rutto LK, 2019. The Effect of Preharvest Factors on Fruit and Nutritional Quality in Strawberry. In T. Asao, & M. Asaduzzaman (Eds.), Strawberry - Pre- and Post-Harvest Management Techniques for Higher Fruit Quality. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84619
27. Tagliavini M, Baldi E, Lucchi P, Antonelli M, Sorrenti G, Baruzzi G, Faedi W, 2004. Dynamics of nutrients uptake by strawberry plants (Fragaria×Ananassa Dutch.) grown in soil and soilless culture. Europ. J. Agronomy. (23), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2004.09.002
28. Tejada M, Benítez C, González JL, 2005. Effects of Application of Two Organomineral Fertilizers on Nutrient Leaching Losses and Wheat Crop. Agronomy Journal, 97, 960-967. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.0092 Torun AA , Erdem N, Serçe S, Kaçar YA, Torun MB, 2022. Screening of Wild Strawberry Germplasm for Iron-deficiency Tolerance Under Hydroponic Conditions. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28(2), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.863463
29. TÜİK, 2021. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Bitkisel-Uretim-Istatistikleri-2021-37249&dil=1 (Erişim tarihi: 30.06.2022)
30. Veazie PP, 1995. Growth and ripening of strawberry fruit. (Ed: J.Janick). John. Whiley and Sons. Inc. Horticultural Review. (17), 267-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470650585.ch8
31. Wang SY, 2014. Antıoxıdants and Health Benefıts of Strawberrıes. Acta Hortic. (1049), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1049.1
32. Watson R, Wright CJ, McBurney T, Taylor AJ, Linforth RST, 2002. Influence of harvest date and light integral on the development of strawberry flavor compounds. Journal of Experimental Botany. (53), 2121-2129. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erf088
33. Whitaker VM, Hasing T, Chandler CK, Plotto A, Baldwin E, 2011. Historical Trends in Strawberry Fruit Quality Revealed by a Trial of University of Florida Cultivars and Advanced Selections. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 46(4), 553–557. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.46.4.553
34. Yaltır, 2022. Çilek Fidesi Çeşitleri. http://www.yaltir.com.tr/main.aspx?Id=3 (Erişim tarihi: 01.07.2022)
35. Yommi AK, Borquez AM, Quipildor SL, Kirschbaum DS, 2003. Fruıt Qualıty Evaluatıon of Strawberry Cultıvars Grown in Argentına. Acta Hortic. (628), 871-878 https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.628.111