Effect of Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and LiQuid Vermicompost Applications on Yield and Yield Coponents in Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Culture

Öz

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is a type of vegetable that can be produced in almost every region of Turkey and is consumed throughout the year. Product yield and quality decrease in soils with poor organic matter content. Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Liquid vermicompost, which support plant growth, were used in the study carried out to increase crop yield and improve soil. In the study; plant head length, head diameter, root collar diameter, leaf fresh and dry weight, root length, leaf number, head weight, water-soluble dry matter content and plant nutrient content (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn and Cu) was measured. As a result of different PGPR strains and vermicompost applications, when single PGPR applications and PGPR and vermicompost combination applications are compared; It has been observed that PGPR+VC applications are more effective in increasing the yield, development and nutrient content of lettuce plant. Among the applications in the study, the combination of YÖ41+VC (bacteria+vermicompost) came to the fore. As a result; the PGPR+VC combination used in the study made a significant contribution to the yield components with its effect on the head weight, number of leaves, stem length and diameter, N, P, K, Ca, Mg and Fe contents of the lettuce plant.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Lettuce
• Rhizobacteri
• Organicfertilizers
• Yield

Kaynakça

1. Ahmed, B., Zaidi, A., Khan, MS., Rizvi, A., Saif S, & Shahid, M. (2017). Perspectives of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in growth enhancement and sustainable production of tomato. Microbial strategies for vegetable production: Springer; p. 125–49.
2. Adak, Ş.E. (2016). Vermikompostun domates ve biberin büyüme ve besin elementi içeriğine etkisi (Master's thesis, Namık Kemal Üniversitesi). Tekirdağ
3. Adiloglu, A., Buyukfiliz, F., M. R. ve Karaman, M.R. (2018). The effect of vermicompost application on some macroelement contents of sunflower (Helianthus annuusL.) plant in Tekirdag. International Eurasian Congress on‘Natural Nutrition and Healthy Life’2018, 12-15 July, Ankara, Turkey. Proceedings book, 394–8.
4. Aloo, B.N., Makumba, BA. & Mbega, E.R. (2019). The potential of bacilli rhizobacteria for sustainable crop production and environmental sustainability. Microbiol Res. ;219: 26–39
5. Armstrong, H. (2001). Natural Supression of Pathogens in Soilless Systems, Flower Tech, 4(7):8-11.
6. Aybak, H.Ç. (2002). Salad / Lettuce Cultivation. Hasad Publishing Ltd.Sti., 96 p., Istanbul.
7. Backman, A.C., Bengtsson, M., & WitzgalL, P. (1997). Pheromone Release by İndividual Females of Codling Moth, Cydia pomonella. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23: 807- 815.
8. Belliturk, K., Hinisli, N. ve Adiloglu, A. (2017). The effect of vermicompost. Sheep manure. and cow manure onnutrition content of curly lettuce (Lactucasativavar.).Fresenius Environmental Bulletin26 (1a):1116–20.

9. Buchanan, MA., Russell, E. & Block S.D. (1988). Chemical Characterization and Nitrogen Earthworms in Environmental and Waste Management In C.A.Edwards and E.F. Neuhauser (Eds.), SPB Acad. Publ., The Netherlands, 231-240.
10. Cıtak, S., Sonmez, S., Kocak, F. ve Yasin, S. (2011). Vermikompost ve Ahir Gubresi Uygulamalarinin Ispanak (Spinacia Oleraceavar. L.) Bitkisinin Gelisimi ve Toprak Verimliligi Uzerine Etkileri. BatıAkdeniz TarımsalAras ̧tırma Enstitüsü. Derim Dergisi28 (1):56–69.
11. Choudhary, M., Ghasal, P.C., Yadav, R.P., Meena, V.S., Mondal, T. & Bisht, J.( 2018).Towards plant-beneficiary rhizobacteria and agricultural sustainability. Role of rhizospheric microbes in soil: Springer; p. 1–46.
12. Deniel, F, Renault, D., Tirilly, Y., Barbier, G. & Rey, P. (2006). A Dynamic Biofilter to Remove Pathogens During Tomato Soilless Culture, Agron. Sustain. Dev., 26:185-193.
13. Eşiyok, D. (2012). Winter and Summer Vegetable Growing. Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications, 404 p, Bornava-İzmir.
14. Gunay, A. (2005). Vegetable Cultivation, Special Vegetable Cultivation.Volume 2., 531 pp, Izmir. Gül, A., Kıdoğlu, F., Tüzel, Y. ve Tüzel, İ.H. (2007). Different Treatments for İncreasing Sustainability in Soilless Culture, Acta Hort., 747:595-602.
15. Gül, A., Kıdoğlu, F., Tüzel, Y., ve Tüzel, İ.H. (2008a). Effects of Nutrition and Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Growing in Perlite, Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(3):422-429.
16. Gül A, Özaktan, H.ve Kidoğlu, F. (2008b). The Effect of Selected Root Bacteria on Cultivation of Head Salad on Different Substrates, Ege University Scientific Research Project Final Report, Project No: 2007 ZRF 027.
17. Gül, A., Özaktan, H., Legal, Y., ve Öztan-Kıdoğlu, F. (2008c).Effects of Some Root Bacteria on Plant Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake in Important Greenhouse Vegetable Species, Project no. 105 O 571, TÜBİTAK.
18. Hınıslı, N. (2014). Determination of the Effect of Vermicompost Fertilizer on the Growth of Curly Plants and Comparison with Some Other Organic Fertilizers.b Namik Kemal University.Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Master Thesis, 50s, Tekirdag.
19. Kacar, B. ve Inal, A., (2008). Plant analysis. Nobel publication, Ankara.
20. Kıdoğlu, F., Gül, A. ve Tüzel, Y. (2007). The Effects of Root Bacteria on the Development of Head Salad Seedlings, Turkey V. National Horticultural Congress, 4-7 September 2007, Erzurum, 2:1-5.
21. Kıdoğlu, F., Gül, A. ve Tüzel, Y. (2008). The Effects of Root Bacteria on the Development of Pepper Plants Grown in Soilless Environment, VII. Vegetable Agriculture Symposium, 26-29 August 2008, Yalova, 155-159.
22. Mondal, T., Datta, J.K. & Mondal N.K. (2015). Chemical Fertilizer inConjunction with Biofertilizer and Vermicompost Induced Changes inMorpho-Physiological and Bio-Chemical Traits of Mustard Crop, KingSaud University, Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricaltural Science, 16,135-144.
23. Nicolle, C., Cardinault, N., Gueux, E., Jaffrelo, L., Rock, E. & Mazur, A. (2004). Health effect of Vegetable-Based Diet: Lettuce Consumption İmproves Cholesterol Metabolism and Antioxidant Status in the Rat. Clinical Nutrition, 23, 605–614.
24. Parewa, H.P., Meena, V.S, Jain, L.K. & Choudhary, A. (2018). Sustainable crop production and soil health management through plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Role of rhizospheric microbes in soil: Springer; . p. 299–329.
25. Pezeshkpour, P., Ardakani, M.R., Paknejad, F. & Vazan, S. (2014). Effects of Vermicompost. mycorrhizal symbiosisand biphosphate solubilizing bacteria on seed yield and quality of chickpea as autumn plantation in rain fedconditions. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences3 (2):53–8.
26. Pierce, L.C. (1987). Vegetables: Caracteristics, Production And Maketing, John Wiley and Sons, 433 p,USA.
27. Postma, J., Willimsen de Klein, M.J.E.I.M., Rattink, H. & Van Os, E.A. (2001). Disease Suppressive Soilless Culture Systems; Characterisation of its microflora, Acta Hort., 554: 323-331.
28. Ryder E.J. (1979). Leafy Solad Vegetables. The AVI Publishing Company. Inc. ABD.
29. Shirani, H., Hajabbasi, M.A., Afyuni, M. & Hemmat, A. (2002). Effect of Farmyard Manure and Tillage Systems on Soil Physical Praperties and Corn Yield in Central Iran. Soil and Tillage Research 68, 101-108.
30. Sinha, R.K., Valani, D., Chauhan, K. & Agarwal S. (2014). Embarking on a secondgreen revolution for sustainable agricultureby vermiculture biotechnology usingearthworms: reviving the dreams of SirCharles Darwin. Int J Agric Health Saf2014, 1:50–64.
31. Sharma, I.P., Chandra, S., Kumar, N. & Chandra, D. (2017). PGPR: Heart of soil and their role in soil fertility. Agriculturally important microbes for sustainable agriculture: Springer; p. 51–67.
32. Soltanpour, P.N. & Workman, SM. (1981). Soil-testing methods used at Colorado State University Soil-Testing Laboratory for the evaluation of fertility, salinity, sodicity, and trace-element toxicity. Technical Bulletin 142 (No.NP-2906200). Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins (USA). Colorado State Univ. Experiment Station.
33. Sönmez, S., Çıtak, S., Koçak, F. ve Yassin, S. (2011). The Effects of Vermicompost and Barn Manure Applications on the Development of Spinach (Spinacia Oleracea Var. L.) Plant Soil Fertility. West Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute Derim Journal, 2011, 28(1):56-69.
34. Tavalı, İ.E, Uz, İ.ve Orman, Ş.(2014). The Effects of Vermicompost and Chicken Manure on the Yield and Quality of Summer Squash (Cucurbita pepo L. cv. Gum) and Some Chemical Properties of the Soil. Akdeniz Univ. Faculty of AgricultureJournal, 27(2), 119-124.
35. Thompson, R.C. (1957). Vegetable Croms, Mc Graw Hill Book company Inc. New York. Toranto. Yıldız, N. (2008). Fundamentals of Plant Nutrition and Symptoms of Nutritional Disorder in Plants Atatürk University, Faculty of Agriculture, ISBN 975-442-110-2.(2nd Edition).
36. Yolcu, H., ve Daşcı, M. (2008). The Current Situation of Organic Forage Crops Production in Our Country. Harvest Journal of Livestock, 24, 40-46.
37. Zaller, J.G. (2007). Vermicompost as a substitute for peat in potting media: Effects on germination. biomass alloca-tion. yields and fruit quality of three tomato varieties. Scientia Horticulturae112 (2):191–9. doi:10,1016/j.sci-enta.2006.12.023.
38. Weller, DM. (1988). Biological Control of Soilborne Plant Pathogens in the Rhizosphere with Bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 26, 379.