Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Evaluation of Ports in Terms of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy: A Case Study

Yıl 2024, , 1474 - 1488, 01.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1509201

Öz

This study considers green port-based strategies that improve environmental performance in the context of urban areas and promote sustainable solutions to combat climate change. As an important component of the city, ports have a significant impact on socioeconomic development. In fact, given that ports in Turkey operate in limited spaces and city centers, pollution from port operations has a direct impact on both urban life and port workers. In recent years, the green port approach has become increasingly important within the scope of climate change adaptation programs. Particularly in Turkey, a large number of the ports are situated in the center of the city, which is bad for both the environment and community life. Although the Green Port Project in Turkey is currently voluntary, it will become a mandatory initiative in the coming periods due to Turkey's participation in the Paris Climate Agreement. In this study, the efforts to make Samsun Port, one of the important ports of Turkey, a green port are discussed. Studies on greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation measures, renewable energy approaches and their impacts are mentioned. In addition, this study includes the evaluation of integrated management systems, adoption of renewable energy, sustainable waste management, and greenhouse gas emission calculations as important components of a large-capacity port in the Black Sea to contribute to regional development.

Kaynakça

  • Alamoush, A. S., Ölçer, A. I. & Ballini, F. (2022). Ports’role in shipping decarbonisation: A common port incentive scheme for shipping greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Cleanar Logistics and Supply Chain, 3, 100021.
  • Alver, F., Saraç, B. A., & Şahin, Ü. A. (2018). Estimating of shipping emissions in the Samsun Port from 2010 to 2015. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 9(5), 822-828.
  • Anonymous, (2024). https://samsun.ktb.gov.tr/TR-216771/samsun-limani.html (Accessed on 10 February 2024)
  • Botana, C., Fernández, E., & Feijoo, G. (2023). Towards a green port strategy: the decarbonisation of the port of vigo (NW Spain). Science of the Total Environment, 856, 159198.
  • Chen, K., Guo, J., Xin, X., Zhang, T. & Zhang, W. (2023). Port Sustainability Through Integration: A port capacity and profit-sharing joint optimization approach. Ocean & Coastal Management, 245, 106867.
  • Colarossi, D., Lelow, G. & Principi, P. (2022). Local energy production scenarios for emissions reduction of pollutants in small-medium ports, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 13, 100554.
  • Çetintürk, K., & Ünlü, S. (2022). The first observation of antifouling organotin compounds and booster biocides in sediments from Samsun Port area, Black Sea, Turkey. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 176, 113408.
  • European Sea Ports Organization (ESPO), (2021). ESPO Environmental Report 2021; ESPO: Brussel, Belgium. http://www.espo.be/media/ESP-844%20(Sustainability %20Report%202021)_WEB.pdf
  • Gao, S., Xin, X., Li, C., Liu, T. & Chen, K. (2022). Container ocean shipping network design considering carbon tax and choice inertia of cargo owners. Ocean & Coastal Management, 216, 105986.
  • Garcia-Freites, S., Gough, C. & Röder, M. (2021). The greenhouse gas removal potential of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) to support the UK’s net-zero emission target. Biomass and Bioenergy, 151, 106164.
  • IPCC, (2006). Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Volume 5 - Waste. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol5.html
  • ISO (2006) ISO 14064-1: greenhouse gases – part 1: specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
  • Liu, Y., Xin, X., Yang, Z., Chen, K. & Li, C. (2021). Liner shipping network-transaction mechanism joint design model considering carbon tax and liner alliance. Ocean & Coastal Management, 212, 105817.
  • Okşaş, O. (2023). Carbon emission strategies for container handling equipment using the activity-based method: A case study of Ambarlı container port in Turkey. Marine Policy, 149, 105480.
  • Sornn-Friese, H., Poulsen, R. T., Nowinska, A. U. & de Langen, P. (2021). What drives ports around the world to adopt air emissions abatement measures?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 90, 102644.
  • Styhre, L., Winnes, H., Black, J., Lee, J. & Le-Griffin, H. (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions from ships in ports-Case studies in four continents. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 54, 212-224.
  • TS EN ISO 14064-3 Standard (2021). Quality Management Systems - Basic Principles, Terms and Definitions https://www.tse.org.tr/sera-gazi-emisyonlarinin-takibi-hakkinda-yonetmelik-kapsamin-dogrulama/ (Access date: 23.04.2024)
  • Xiong, T., Liu, Y., Yang, C., Cheng, Q., & Lin, S. (2023). Research overview of urban carbon emission measurement and future prospect for GHG monitoring network. Energy Reports, 9, 231-242.
  • Wang, B., Liu, Q., Wang, L., Chen, Y., & Wang, J. (2023). A review of the port carbon emission sources and related emission reduction technical measures. Environmental Pollution, 320, 121000.
  • Winnes, H., Styhre, L., & Fridell, E. (2015). Reducing GHG emissions from ships in port areas. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 17, 73-82.
  • Yang, S., Zhang, J., & Zhou, S. (2023). The cost transportation game for collaboration among transportation companies. Annals of Operations Research, 1-25.
  • Yi, T., Meiping, W., & Shaorui, Z. (2023). Pricing and contract preference in maritime supply chains with downstream competition impact of risk-aversion and contract unobservability. Ocean & Coastal Management, 242, 106691.
  • Zhang, Z., Song, C., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Liu, M., Aziz, F., ... & Yap, P. S. (2023). Digitalization and innovation in green ports: A review of current issues, contributions and the way forward in promoting sustainable ports and maritime logistics. Science of the Total Environment, 169075.
Yıl 2024, , 1474 - 1488, 01.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1509201

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Alamoush, A. S., Ölçer, A. I. & Ballini, F. (2022). Ports’role in shipping decarbonisation: A common port incentive scheme for shipping greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Cleanar Logistics and Supply Chain, 3, 100021.
  • Alver, F., Saraç, B. A., & Şahin, Ü. A. (2018). Estimating of shipping emissions in the Samsun Port from 2010 to 2015. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 9(5), 822-828.
  • Anonymous, (2024). https://samsun.ktb.gov.tr/TR-216771/samsun-limani.html (Accessed on 10 February 2024)
  • Botana, C., Fernández, E., & Feijoo, G. (2023). Towards a green port strategy: the decarbonisation of the port of vigo (NW Spain). Science of the Total Environment, 856, 159198.
  • Chen, K., Guo, J., Xin, X., Zhang, T. & Zhang, W. (2023). Port Sustainability Through Integration: A port capacity and profit-sharing joint optimization approach. Ocean & Coastal Management, 245, 106867.
  • Colarossi, D., Lelow, G. & Principi, P. (2022). Local energy production scenarios for emissions reduction of pollutants in small-medium ports, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 13, 100554.
  • Çetintürk, K., & Ünlü, S. (2022). The first observation of antifouling organotin compounds and booster biocides in sediments from Samsun Port area, Black Sea, Turkey. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 176, 113408.
  • European Sea Ports Organization (ESPO), (2021). ESPO Environmental Report 2021; ESPO: Brussel, Belgium. http://www.espo.be/media/ESP-844%20(Sustainability %20Report%202021)_WEB.pdf
  • Gao, S., Xin, X., Li, C., Liu, T. & Chen, K. (2022). Container ocean shipping network design considering carbon tax and choice inertia of cargo owners. Ocean & Coastal Management, 216, 105986.
  • Garcia-Freites, S., Gough, C. & Röder, M. (2021). The greenhouse gas removal potential of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) to support the UK’s net-zero emission target. Biomass and Bioenergy, 151, 106164.
  • IPCC, (2006). Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Volume 5 - Waste. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol5.html
  • ISO (2006) ISO 14064-1: greenhouse gases – part 1: specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
  • Liu, Y., Xin, X., Yang, Z., Chen, K. & Li, C. (2021). Liner shipping network-transaction mechanism joint design model considering carbon tax and liner alliance. Ocean & Coastal Management, 212, 105817.
  • Okşaş, O. (2023). Carbon emission strategies for container handling equipment using the activity-based method: A case study of Ambarlı container port in Turkey. Marine Policy, 149, 105480.
  • Sornn-Friese, H., Poulsen, R. T., Nowinska, A. U. & de Langen, P. (2021). What drives ports around the world to adopt air emissions abatement measures?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 90, 102644.
  • Styhre, L., Winnes, H., Black, J., Lee, J. & Le-Griffin, H. (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions from ships in ports-Case studies in four continents. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 54, 212-224.
  • TS EN ISO 14064-3 Standard (2021). Quality Management Systems - Basic Principles, Terms and Definitions https://www.tse.org.tr/sera-gazi-emisyonlarinin-takibi-hakkinda-yonetmelik-kapsamin-dogrulama/ (Access date: 23.04.2024)
  • Xiong, T., Liu, Y., Yang, C., Cheng, Q., & Lin, S. (2023). Research overview of urban carbon emission measurement and future prospect for GHG monitoring network. Energy Reports, 9, 231-242.
  • Wang, B., Liu, Q., Wang, L., Chen, Y., & Wang, J. (2023). A review of the port carbon emission sources and related emission reduction technical measures. Environmental Pollution, 320, 121000.
  • Winnes, H., Styhre, L., & Fridell, E. (2015). Reducing GHG emissions from ships in port areas. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 17, 73-82.
  • Yang, S., Zhang, J., & Zhou, S. (2023). The cost transportation game for collaboration among transportation companies. Annals of Operations Research, 1-25.
  • Yi, T., Meiping, W., & Shaorui, Z. (2023). Pricing and contract preference in maritime supply chains with downstream competition impact of risk-aversion and contract unobservability. Ocean & Coastal Management, 242, 106691.
  • Zhang, Z., Song, C., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Liu, M., Aziz, F., ... & Yap, P. S. (2023). Digitalization and innovation in green ports: A review of current issues, contributions and the way forward in promoting sustainable ports and maritime logistics. Science of the Total Environment, 169075.
Toplam 23 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Atık Yönetimi, Azaltma, Yeniden Kullanım ve Geri Dönüşüm, Çevre Kirliliği ve Önlenmesi
Bölüm Çevre Mühendisliği / Environment Engineering
Yazarlar

Eda Nur Kaya 0000-0003-0726-5741

Bilge Aydın Er 0000-0002-6546-0089

Yüksel Ardalı 0000-0003-1648-951X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 2 Temmuz 2024
Kabul Tarihi 18 Eylül 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024

Kaynak Göster

APA Kaya, E. N., Aydın Er, B., & Ardalı, Y. (2024). Evaluation of Ports in Terms of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy: A Case Study. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 14(4), 1474-1488. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1509201
AMA Kaya EN, Aydın Er B, Ardalı Y. Evaluation of Ports in Terms of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy: A Case Study. Iğdır Üniv. Fen Bil Enst. Der. Aralık 2024;14(4):1474-1488. doi:10.21597/jist.1509201
Chicago Kaya, Eda Nur, Bilge Aydın Er, ve Yüksel Ardalı. “Evaluation of Ports in Terms of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy: A Case Study”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 14, sy. 4 (Aralık 2024): 1474-88. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1509201.
EndNote Kaya EN, Aydın Er B, Ardalı Y (01 Aralık 2024) Evaluation of Ports in Terms of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy: A Case Study. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 14 4 1474–1488.
IEEE E. N. Kaya, B. Aydın Er, ve Y. Ardalı, “Evaluation of Ports in Terms of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy: A Case Study”, Iğdır Üniv. Fen Bil Enst. Der., c. 14, sy. 4, ss. 1474–1488, 2024, doi: 10.21597/jist.1509201.
ISNAD Kaya, Eda Nur vd. “Evaluation of Ports in Terms of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy: A Case Study”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 14/4 (Aralık 2024), 1474-1488. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1509201.
JAMA Kaya EN, Aydın Er B, Ardalı Y. Evaluation of Ports in Terms of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy: A Case Study. Iğdır Üniv. Fen Bil Enst. Der. 2024;14:1474–1488.
MLA Kaya, Eda Nur vd. “Evaluation of Ports in Terms of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy: A Case Study”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, c. 14, sy. 4, 2024, ss. 1474-88, doi:10.21597/jist.1509201.
Vancouver Kaya EN, Aydın Er B, Ardalı Y. Evaluation of Ports in Terms of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy: A Case Study. Iğdır Üniv. Fen Bil Enst. Der. 2024;14(4):1474-88.