Comparison of Energy Requirement for Heating and Cooling of Greenhouses in Adana and Igdir Provinces

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 141 - 156, 01.03.2026

Kaan Küçükerdem , Alper Gulbe

https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1792012

https://izlik.org/JA72HG36GP

Öz

Greenhouse cultivation enables year-round agricultural production by maintaining controlled microclimatic conditions; however, heating and cooling requirements vary significantly with local climate. This study evaluates and compares the energy demands of a model greenhouse located in Adana, representing the Mediterranean Region, and Iğdır, representing the Eastern Anatolia Region of Türkiye. Climatic data including air temperature, solar radiation, humidity, and wind speed from the period 2014-2024 were used to calculate heating and cooling loads through an energy balance approach. Results showed that Iğdır has a heating-dominated profile, with an average heating load of 250.1 kW and a heating season lasting 224 days, nearly four times greater than Adana. Conversely, Adana is cooling-dominated, with an average cooling load of 659.8 kW and a cooling season of 157 days, approximately 80% higher and 27% longer than in Iğdır. While Adana benefits from higher solar radiation (878.5 W/m² annual average), the humid Mediterranean climate restricts the efficiency of conventional evaporative cooling systems, necessitating hybrid or renewable-assisted alternatives. In contrast, Iğdır’s colder climate imposes higher heating costs but offers opportunities for year-round production when supported by geothermal or thermal storage technologies. These findings highlight the critical role of climate-adaptive strategies in reducing operational energy demand. The study provides a comparative framework to guide greenhouse investment decisions, emphasizing that regional climatic variability must be incorporated into design, operation, and technology selection to ensure energy efficiency, economic viability, and sustainable agricultural production.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Adana , Cooling , Greenhouse model , Heating , Iğdır

Kaynakça

• Ahamed, M. S., Guo, H., Taylor, L., Tanino, K. (2019). Heating demand and economic feasibility analysis for year-round vegetable production in Canadian Prairies greenhouses. Information Processing in Agriculture, 6(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2018.09.002
• Aldrich, R. A., Bartok, J. W. (1994). Greenhouse engineering. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service.
• Aljubury, I. M. A., Ridha, H. D. A. (2017). Enhancement of evaporative cooling system in a greenhouse using geothermal energy. Renewable Energy, 111, 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.004
• ASHRAE (2017). ASHRAE handbook: Fundamentals. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
• Boyaci, S., Akyüz, A. (2018). Effect of greenhouse cooling methods on the growth and yield of tomato in a Mediterranean climate. International Journal of Horticulture, Agriculture and Food Science, 2(4), 199-207.
• Çam, N. Y., Ezan, M. A., Biçer, Y. (2024). Transient thermal modelling of a Mediterranean greenhouse for sustainable agriculture: Comparison of desert and dry-summer subtropical climates. Solar Energy, 268, 112280.
• Choab, N., Allouhi, A., El Maakoul, A., Kousksou, T., Saadeddine, S., Jamil, A. (2020). Effect of greenhouse design parameters on the heating and cooling requirement of greenhouses in Moroccan climatic conditions. IEEE Access, 9, 2986-3003. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047832
• Deng, L., Huang, L., Zhang, Y., Li, A., Gao, R., Zhang, L., Lei, W. (2023). Analytic model for calculation of soil temperature and heat balance of bare soil surface in solar greenhouse. Solar Energy, 249, 312-326.
• Faramarzpour, H., Ghaderi, M., Reddick, C., Sorin, M., Grégoire, M. (2025). Specification of a greenhouse in cold climate condition, mathematical model and optimization. Journal of Building Physics, 48(4), 579-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744259124123456
• Joseph, S. (1994). Engineering practice. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 10(4), 565-568. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25919
• Kittas, C., Karamanis, M., Katsoulas, N. (2005). Air temperature regime in a forced ventilated greenhouse with rose crop. Energy and Buildings, 37(8), 807-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.11.003
• Öztürk, H. H. (2024). Seralarda İklim ve Enerji Yönetimi. Akademisyen Kitabevi.
• Öztürk, H.H., 2008. Sera İklimlendirme Tekniği. Hasad Yayıncılık, Ümraniye/Ankara, ISBN 978-975-8377-64-0.
• Öztürk, H.H., Yıldırım, N., Cansevdi, B., Küçükerdem, K., 2019. Yapıya Entegre Fotovoltaik Sistem ile Elektrik Üretilerek İklimlendirilen Sera Tasarımları. 14. Ulusal Tesisat Mühendisliği Kongresi. 17-20 Nisan 2019, İzmir.
• Rodriguez, F., Berenguel, M., Guzmán, J. L., Ramírez-Arias, A. (2015). Modeling and control of greenhouse crop growth. Springer.
• Roy, J. C., Boulard, T., Kittas, C., Wang, S. (2002). Convective and ventilation transfers in greenhouses, Part 1: The greenhouse considered as a perfectly stirred tank. Biosystems Engineering, 83(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1006/bioe.2002.0100
• Santamouris, M., Balaras, C. A., Dascalaki, E., Vallindras, M. (1994). Passive solar agricultural greenhouses: A worldwide classification and evaluation of technologies and systems used for heating purposes. Solar Energy, 53(5), 411-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(94)90021-3
• SERKA (2014). TRA2 Region development plan 2014-2023. Serhat Kalkınma Ajansı.
• SERKA (2017). Women’s profile in the TRA2 Region. Serhat Kalkınma Ajansı. ISBN: 978-605-66913-9-3
• SERKA (2018a). Foreign trade development and external economic environment analysis of the TRA2 Region. Serhat Kalkınma Ajansı. ISBN: 978-605-68045-3-3
• SERKA (2018b). Youth research in the TRA2 Region. Serhat Kalkınma Ajansı. ISBN: 978-605-68045-2-6
• TSMS (2025). Climate classification. Turkish State Meteorological Service.
• TURKSTAT (2025). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Bitkisel Üretim İstatistikleri.
• WeatherSpark (2025). Adana ve Iğdır karşılaştırmalı iklim analizi. https://weatherspark.com/
• Yildirim, N., Bilir, L. (2017). Evaluation of a hybrid system for a nearly zero energy greenhouse. Energy Conversion and Management, 148, 1278-1290