Body size and age structure of the Parvilacerta parva (Boulenger, 1887) population from Sivas, Turkey

Öz

Longevity and age of sexual maturity are key life history trait factors directly linked to ecological and evolutionary aspects. In this study, we determined age structure of Parvilacerta parva individuals from Sivas (Turkey) using skeletochronology. The maximum age was found to be seven years for females and six years for males of P. parva. A significant relationship was found between age and body size in individuals whose head length, head width and body length were measured. Additionally, it was seen that there is a significant relationship among body length, head length and head width.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Parvilacerta parva
• skeletochronology
• Dwarf Lizard
• life history traits
• Lacertidae

Parvilacerta parva’nın Sivas, Türkiye’deki populasyonunun vücut büyüklüğü ve yaş yapısı

Öz

Yaşam tarihi özelliklerinden; ömür uzunluğu ve eşeysel olgunluk yaşı, bireyin ekolojik ve evrimsel safhaları ile direkt bağlantılı kilit faktörlerdir. Bu çalışmada Sivas'tan (Türkiye) toplanan Parvilacerta parva bireylerinin iskelet kronolojisi yöntemi ile yaş yapıları belirlenmiştir. Maksimum yaş P. parva'nın dişi bireylerinde 7 yıl, erkeklerinde 6 yıl olarak bulunmuştur. Baş uzunluğu, baş genişliği ve vücut uzunluğu belirlenen bireylerde, yaş ve vücut boyu arasında anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Bununla birlikte, vücut uzunluğu, baş uzunluğu ve baş genişliği arasında da anlamlı bir ilişki mevcuttur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Parvilacerta parva
• Cüce kertenkele
• Lacertidae
• iskelet kronolojisi
• yaşam öyküsü özellikleri

Kaynakça

1. Altunişik A, Eksilmez H, 2018. Demographic Life History Traits in a Population of a Critically Endangered Species, Darevskia dryada (Darevsky & Tuniyev, 1997). Animal Biology, 68: 27-37.
2. Arıkan H, Göçmen B, Yildiz MZ, Ilgaz Ç, Kumlutaş Y, 2009. Morphology of Peripheral Blood Cells From Some Lacertid Lizards From Turkey. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 16 (2): 101-106.
3. Bauwens D, 1999. Life-History Variations in Lacertid Lizards. Natura Croatica, 8: 239-252.
4. Baycan B, Tosunoğlu M, 2017. The Catalog of Amphibia and Reptilia Specimens in The Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Zoology Museum (COMU-ZM). Turkish Journal of Bioscience and Collections, 1 (1): 38-55.
5. Bleu J, Le Galliard JF, Meylan S, Massot M, Fitze PS, 2011. Mating Does Not Influence Reproductive Investment, in a Viviparous Lizard. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A, Ecological Genetics and Physiology, 315A: 458-464.
6. Bologna MA, Venchi A, 1996. Lacerta parva Boulenger, a New Lizard Species For The European Fauna. Amphibia-Reptilia, 17 (1): 89-90.
7. Boretto JM, Cabezas-Cartes F, Ibargüengoytía NR, 2018. Slow Life Histories in Lizards Living in The Highlands of The Andes Mountains. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 188 (3): 491-503.
8. de Buffrénil V, Castanet J, 2000. Age Estimation By Skeletochronology in The Nile Monitor (Varanus niloticus), A Highly Exploited Species. Journal of Herpetology, 34: 414-424.

9. Bülbül U, Kurnaz M, Eroğlu Aİ, Koç H, Kutrup B, 2016. Age And Growth of The Red-Belied Lizard, Darevskia parvula. Animal Biology, 66 (1): 81-95.
10. Cabezas-Cartes F, Boretto JM, Ibargüengoytía NR, 2015. Age, Growth and Life-History Parameters of an Endemic Vulnerable Lizard From Patagonia, Argentina. The Herpetological Journal, 25 (4): 215-224.
11. Castanet J, 1994. Age Estimation and Longevity in Reptiles. Gerontology, 40 (2-4): 174-192.
12. Eden CJ, Whiteman H., Dubois-Gray L, Wissinger SA, 2007. Accuracy Assessment of Skeletochronology in The Arizona Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum nebulosum). Copeia, 2007 (2): 471-477.
13. Gül S, Özdemir N, Kumlutas Y, Ilgaz C, 2014. Age Structure and Body Size in Three Populations of Darevskia rudis (Bedriaga, 1886) From Different Altitudes. Herpetozoa, 26:151-158.
14. Gül S, Özdemir N, Avci A, Kumlutas Y, Ilgaz C, 2015. Altitudinal Effects On The Life History of The Anatolian Lizard (Apathya cappadocica, Werner 1902) From Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 39: 507-512.
15. Harris DJ, Arnold EN, Thomas RH, 1998. Relationships Of Lacertid Lizards (Reptilia: Lacertidae) Estimated From Mitochondrial DNA Sequences and Morphology. Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Science B, 265:1939-1948
16. Horváthová T, Cooney CR, Fitze PS, Oksanen TA, Jelić D, Ghira I, Uller T, Jandzik D, 2013. Length of Activity Season Drives Geographic Variation in Body Size of a Widely Distributed Lizard. Ecology and Evolution, 3 (8): 2424-2442.
17. Khonsue W, Matsui M, Misawa Y, 2000. Age Determination By Skeletochronology of Rana nigrovittata a Frog From Tropical Forest of Thailand. Zoological Science, 17: 253-257.
18. Kubisch E, Piantoni C, Williams J, Scolaro A, Navas CA, Ibargüengoytía NR, 2012. Do Higher Temperatures Increase Growth in The Nocturnal Gecko Homonota darwini (Gekkota: Phyllodactylidae)? A Skeletochronological Assessment Analyzed at Temporal and Geographic Scales. Journal of Herpetology, 46 (4): 587-596.
19. Kumlutaş Y, Durmuş SH, Kaska Y, Öz M, Tunç MR, 2004. A Morphological and Taxonomic Study On Lacerta parva Boulenger, 1887 (Sauria: Lacertidae) From West Taurus, Turkey. Asiatic Herpetological Research, 10: 202-207.
20. Kurnaz M, Bülbül U, Eroğlu Aİ, Uzun F, Koç H, Kutrup B, 2018. Age and Growth of the Artvin Lizard, Darevskia derjugini (Nikolsky, 1898), in Turkey (Squamata: Sauria: Lacertidae). Herpetozoa, 30: 147-158.
21. Lemaître JF, Gaillard JM, 2017. Reproductive Senescence: Newperspectives in the Wild.Biological Reviews, 92: 2182-2199.
22. Müller J, 2002. Skull Osteology of Parvilacerta parva, a Small‐Sized Lacertid Lizard From Asia Minor. Journal of Morphology, 253 (1): 43-50.
23. Pianka ER, Vitt LJ, 2003. Lizards: Windows to The Evolution of Diversity, University of California Press, Berkeley,USA.
24. Piantoni C, Ibargüengoytía NR, Cussac VE, 2006. Age and Growth of The Patagonian Lizard Phymaturus patagonicus. Amphibia–Reptilia, 27: 385-393.
25. Robson DS, Chapman DG, 1961. Catch Curves and Mortality Rates. Transactions of The American Fisheries Society, 90 (2): 181-189.
26. Ryser J, 1988. Determination of Growth and Maturation in The Common Frog, Rana temporaria, by Skeletochronology. Journal of Zoology, 216: 673-685.
27. Seber GAF, 1973. The Estimation of Animal Abundance, Hafner Press, New York, USA.
28. Smirina EM, 1994. Age Determination and Longevity in Amphibians. Gerontology, 40 (2-4): 133-146.
29. Stearns SC, 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories, Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
30. Tarkhnishvili DN, Gokhelasvili RK, 1996. A Contribution To The Ecological Genetics Of Frogs: Age Structure and Frequency of Striped Specimens in Some Caucasian Populations of The Rana macrocnemis Complex. Alytes, 14: 27-71.
31. Toïgo C, Gaillard J‐M, Festa‐Bianchet M, Largo E, Michallet J, Maillard D, 2007. Sex‐and Age‐Specific Survival of The Highlydimorphic Alpine İbex: Evidence For a Conservative Life‐History Tactic. Journal of Animal Ecology,76: 679-686.
32. Tok V, Ugurtas I, Sevinç M, Böhme W, Crochet P, Akarsu F, 2009. Parvilacerta parva. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2009: e.T164674A5917051. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2009.RLTS.T164674A5917051.en. Downloaded on 17 May 2019.
33. Yakin BY, Gürkan M, Hayretdağ S, Tok CV, 2012. Preliminary Data on Age Estimation and Body Size of the Dwarf Lizard, Parvilacerta parva (Boulenger, 1887) (Reptilia: Lacertilia) from Akşehir, Konya (Turkey). Ecologia Balkanica, 4(1): 81-85.
34. Wapstra E, Swain R, O'Reilly JM, 2001. Geographic Variation in Age And Size At Maturity in a Small Australian Viviparous Skink. Copeia, 2001: 646-655.