Hümik Asit Uygulamalarının Patates (Solanum tuberosum L.) Bitkisinin Gelişimi ve Kalite Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri

Öz

Bu araştırma, Konya ekolojik koşullarında bazı patates çeşitlerinin farklı miktarlardaki hümik asit uygulamalarının bitkinin gelişimi ve kalite özellikleri üzerine etkisini belirlemek amacı ile 2015 yılında Konya Toprak, Su ve Çölleşme ile Mücadele Araştırma İstasyonu Müdürlüğü deneme tarlasında yürütülmüştür. “Tesadüf Blokları Bölünmüş Deneme Deseni”ne göre üç tekerrürlü olarak kurulan bu araştırmada, üç adet farklı patates çeşidi (Agria, VR808, Brooke) ve dört farklı hümik asit dozu (0, 3, 6, 9 L da-1) kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada; dekara büyük, orta, küçük, ıskarta yumru verimleri, protein oranı, özgül ağırlık, cips verimi, cipsin yağ çekme oranı, kuru madde, nişasta oranı incelenmiştir. Dekara büyük, orta, küçük, ıskarta yumru verimlerinde artan hümik asit uygulamalarında önemli artışlar saptanmıştır. Yağ çekme oranı % 32.9-46.2, nişasta oranı % 11.7-17.3 arasında olup, hümik asit uygulamaları arasındaki farklılıklar istatistikî düzeyde önemli bulunmuştur. Cips verimi ve protein oranlarında ise uygulamalar arasında istatistikî düzeyde önem tespit edilmemiştir. İncelenen tüm parametreler göz önüne alındığında artan hümik asit uygulamalarının dekara büyük, orta, küçük ıskarta yumru verimlerini olumlu yönde etkilediği ve çeşitlerin bazı kalite özellikleri arasında da önemli varyasyonlar elde edildiği saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hümik asit
• kalite parametreleri
• patates
• çeşit

The Effect of Humic Acid Applications on Growth and Quality Properties of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L. )

Öz

This study was carried out in Konya Soil, Water and Combating Desertification Research Station in 2015 in order to determine the effect of humic acid applications in different amounts on the development and quality properties of some potato varieties in Konya ecological conditions. Three different potato varieties (Agria, VR808, Brooke) and four different humic acid doses (0, 3, 6, 9 L da-1) were used in this study, which was established in three replications according to "The Randomized Complete Block in a Split Plot Design". In the study, large, medium, small, discarded tuber yields per decare, protein content, specific gravity, chips yield, oil holding capacity of chips, dry matter content, starch content were investigated. It was determined that there was a significant increase in humic acid applications in large, medium, small and discarded tuber yields per decare. Oil holding capacity of chips was between 32.9 % and 46.2 %, starch content was between 11.7 % and 17.3 %, and the differences between humic acid applications were found to be statistically significant for these properties. In terms of chips yield and protein content, statistical significance was not determined among the applications. Considering all the properties examined, it was determined that increasing humic acid applications positively affected the yield of large, medium and small discarded tubers per decare and significant variations were obtained among some quality properties of the varieties.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• humic acid
• quality parameters
• potato
• variety

Kaynakça

1. Abong GO, Okoth MW, Karuri EG, Kabira JN, Mathooko FM, 2009. Influence of potato cultivar and stage of maturity on oil content of French fries (chips) made from eight Kenyan potato cultivars. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 9(8).
2. Augustin J, 1975. Variations in the nutritional composition of fresh potatoes, Journal of Food Science, 40 (6): 1295-1299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1975.tb01076.x
3. Akinci Ş, 2011. Humic acids, plant growth and nutrient uptake, Marmara University Journal of Science, 23 (1): 46-56.
4. Anonymous, 1974. Analitical Methods for Potato Research. No:A-6, The Inst. Res. On Storage and Process. Agrich Pred.
5. Anonymous, 2020a, FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC Accessed: 01.08.2020.
6. Anonymous, 2020b, TÜİK. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/Start.do Accessed: 01.08.2020.
7. Anonymous, 2020c, Self Nutrition Data. http://www.nutritiondata.com/facts/vegetables-and-vegetableproducts/2770/ Accessed: 05.08.2020.
8. Asmaa RM, Hafez MM, 2010. Increasing productivity of potato plants (Solanum tubersoum L.) by using potassium fertilizer and humic acid application. Int. J. Acad. Res. 2:83-88.

9. Caliskan ME, Onaran H, , Arioglu H, 2010. Overview of the Turkish potato sector: challenges, achievements and expectations. Potato Research, 53(4): 255-266. doi: 10.1007/s11540-010-9170-1.
10. Celik M, Yildirim M, Yildirim Z, 2015. Potato proteins, Ömer Halisdemir University Journal of Engineering Faculty, 4 (2): 68-77.
11. Dogan A, Basoglu F, 1985. Cooking vegetable oil chemistry and technology application guide, Ankara University Agricultural Faculty Course Publications, 951.
12. Gecit H, Ciftci C, Emeklier Y, İkincikarakaya S, Adak M, Kolsarici Ö, Ekiz H, Altinok S, Sancak C, , Sevimay C, 2009. Field Crops, Ankara University Agricultural Faculty Course Publications (1569).
13. Incekara F, 1973. Industrial Crops and Breeding. Starch Sugar Plants and Breeding. Ege University Agricultural Faculty Course Publications, (101).
14. Kacar B, 1972. Chemical analysis of plants and soil. II. Plant analysis. Ankara University Agricultural Faculty Course Publications, 453: 50-72.
15. Kadaster I, 1960. Agricultural Chemistry Application, Forage Crops -I. Ankara University Agricultural Faculty Course Publications, 113.
16. Kara K, Kara T, 2016. Quality Characteristics of Some Registered Potato Varieties in Erzurum Ecological Conditions, Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 47 (2):85-88.
17. Karadogan T, Gunel E, 1992. An Experiment on The Yield And Adaptation Some Potatoes under Ecological Condition in Erzurum, Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 23: 1-15.
18. Karadogan T, 1994. A Study on Chips and French-Fried Quality Of Potato Cultivars, Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 25 (1): 30-38.
19. Karadogan T, Oral E, 1995. Effect of Nitrogen Source and Application Times on Quality of Potatoes, Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 26 (1).
20. Mosa AA, 2012. Effect of the application of humic substances on yield, quality, and nutrient content of potato tubers in Egypt. In Sustainable Potato Production: Global Case Studies (pp. 471-492). Springer, Dordrecht.
21. Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Muscolo A, , Vianello A, 2002. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34 (11): 1527-1536.
22. Ozkan S, 2007. Production of humic acid and fertilizer from Turkish lignites, Ankara University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Master Thesis (Printed).
23. Ozyildirim N, 2014. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer forms on yiled and yiled components of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes of different maturity group, Ankara University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Master Thesis (Printed).
24. Polat T, Ozturk,E, Kavurmaci Z, , Kara K, 2008. Determination of Some Quality Properties of Potato Cultivars under Erzurum Ecological Conditions, Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science, 15 (2): 33-39.
25. Selim EM, El-Neklawy AS, El-Ashry SM, 2009. Beneficial effects of humic substances ferrtigation on soil fertility to potato grown on sandy soil. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 3:4351-4358.
26. Seyedbagheri MM, 2010. Influence of humic products on soil health and potato production, Potato research, 53 (4): 341-349.
27. Smith O, 1968. Potatoes: production, storing, processing, Potatoes: production, storing, processing.
28. Suh, H. Y, Yoo KS , Suh SG, 2014. Tuber growth and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as affected by foliar or soil application of fulvic and humic acids, Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 55 (3): 183-189.
29. Sanli A, Karadogan T, Tonguc M, 2013. Effects of leonardite applications on yield and some quality parameters of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 18(1): 20-26.
30. Senol S, 1973. Effect of temperature, duration, tuber specific gravity and variety feature on sugar, dry matter and chips quality in potato storage, Atatürk University Agricultural Faculty Course Publications,159.