The Effect of Alkaline Activator Components on the Properties of Fly Ash Added Pumice Based Geopolymer

Öz

The effect of sodium hydroxide (SH) concentration and sodium silicate (SS) content in alkali activator on mechanical properties and wet-dry resistance of fly ash added pumice based geopolymer paste were investigated. In the study, the concentration of SH was used as 8, 10, 12 and 14 molar, while the weight ratio of SS to SH was used as 0, 1, 2 and 3. While the density of geopolymer paste samples increased significantly with the increase of SH molarity in mixtures with low SS content, it was less affected by SH molarity in mixtures with high SS content. For all SH molarity values, the compressive strength of the geopolymer paste samples increased with the increase of the SS/SH ratio, while a slight decrease was observed with the SS/SH ratio increasing from 2 to 3. However, with the increase of the SH molarity, the compressive strength of the samples was less affected by the SS content. As large cracks or splits occur in paste samples activated only with SH under the effect of wet-dry, their compressive strength could not be measured. The wet-dry performance of the paste samples activated with SS + SH was not affected much by the SH molarity and the SS/SH ratio and were close to each other. When looking at the microstructure studies, FTIR analyzes show that SS content provides a better geopolymerization, and SEM images show that micro-cracks relatively decrease with SS content.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Geopolymer materials
• durability
• pumice
• natural pozzolan
• green concrete

Kaynakça

1. Allahverdi A, Mehrpour K, Kani EN, 2008. Investigating the Possibility of Utilizing Pumice-Type Natural Pozzonal in Production of Geopolymer Cement. Ceramics Silikaty, 52(1): 16.
2. Atiş C, Görür E, Karahan O, Bilim C, İlkentapar S, Luga E, 2015. Very High Strength (120 MPa) Class F Fly Ash Geopolymer Mortar Activated at Different NaOH Amount, Heat Curing Temperature and Heat Curing Duration. Construction and Building Materials, 96673-678.
3. Bernal SA, 2016. Microstructural Changes Induced by CO2 Exposure in Alkali-Activated Slag/Metakaolin Pastes. Frontiers in Materials, 343.
4. Bondar D, Lynsdale C, Milestone N, Hassani N, Ramezanianpour A, 2011a. Effect of Adding Mineral Additives to Alkali-Activated Natural Pozzolan Paste. Construction and Building Materials, 25(6): 2906-2910.
5. Bondar D, Lynsdale C, Milestone N, Hassani N, Ramezanianpour A, 2011b. Effect of Heat Treatment on Reactivity-Strength of Alkali-Activated Natural Pozzolans. Construction and Building Materials, 25(10): 4065-4071.
6. Bondar D, Lynsdale C, Milestone NB, Hassani N, Ramezanianpour AA, 2011c. Effect of Type, Form, and Dosage of Activators on Strength of Alkali-Activated Natural Pozzolans. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33(2): 251-260.
7. Criado M, Jiménez AF, Sobrados I, Palomo A, Sanz J, 2012. Effect of Relative Humidity on the Reaction Products of Alkali Activated Fly Ash. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 32(11): 2799-2807.
8. Criado M, Palomo A, Fernández-Jiménez A, 2005. Alkali Activation of Fly Ashes. Part 1: Effect of Curing Conditions on the Carbonation of the Reaction Products. Fuel, 84(16): 2048-2054.

9. Davidovits J 1994. "Properties of Geopolymer Cements." In First international conference on alkaline cements and concretes, 131-149. Kiev State Technical University, Ukraine: Scientific Research Institute on ….
10. Davidovits J, 2002. Personal Communication on the Process of Making of Geopolymer Concrete.
11. Davidovits J, 2008. Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications. 2008. Saint Quentin: Geopolymer Institute.
12. Davidovits J, 2017. Geopolymers: Ceramic-Like Inorganic Polymers. J. Ceram. Sci. Technol, 8(3): 335-350.
13. Djobo JNY, Elimbi A, Tchakouté HK, Kumar S, 2016a. Mechanical Activation of Volcanic Ash for Geopolymer Synthesis: Effect on Reaction Kinetics, Gel Characteristics, Physical and Mechanical Properties. RSC advances, 6(45): 39106-39117.
14. Djobo JNY, Elimbi A, Tchakouté HK, Kumar S, 2016b. Mechanical Properties and Durability of Volcanic Ash Based Geopolymer Mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 124606-614.
15. Djobo JNY, Elimbi A, Tchakouté HK, Kumar S, 2017. Volcanic Ash-Based Geopolymer Cements/Concretes: The Current State of the Art and Perspectives. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(5): 4433-4446.
16. Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Palomo A, van Deventer JS, 2007. Geopolymer Technology: The Current State of the Art. Journal of Materials Science, 42(9): 2917-2933.
17. EN T, 12390-3 (2010) Testing Hardened Concrete-Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens. Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
18. Erdogan S, 2015. Properties of Ground Perlite Geopolymer Mortars. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27(7): 04014210.
19. Firdous R, Stephan D, Djobo JNY, 2018. Natural Pozzolan Based Geopolymers: A Review on Mechanical, Microstructural and Durability Characteristics. Construction and Building Materials, 1901251-1263.
20. Görhan G, Kürklü G, 2014. The Influence of the NaOH Solution on the Properties of the Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Mortar Cured at Different Temperatures. Composites Part B: Engineering, 58371-377.
21. Haddad RH, Alshbuol O, 2016. Production of Geopolymer Concrete Using Natural Pozzolan: A Parametric Study. Construction and Building Materials, 114699-707.
22. Hardjito D, Rangan BV, 2005. Development and Properties of Low-Calcium Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete.
23. Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DM, Rangan BV, 2004. On the Development of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. Materials Journal, 101(6): 467-472.
24. Jansson H, Bernin D, Ramser K, 2015. Silicate Species of Water Glass and Insights for Alkali-Activated Green Cement. Aip Advances, 5(6): 067167.
25. Jiang X, Xiao R, Zhang M, Hu W, Bai Y, Huang B, 2020. A Laboratory Investigation of Steel to Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Paste Bonding Behavior after Exposure to Elevated Temperatures. Construction and Building Materials, 254119267.
26. Kani EN, Allahverdi A, Provis JL, 2012. Efflorescence Control in Geopolymer Binders Based on Natural Pozzolan. Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(1): 25-33.
27. Kantarcı F, Türkmen İ, Ekinci E, 2019. Optimization of Production Parameters of Geopolymer Mortar and Concrete: A Comprehensive Experimental Study. Construction and Building Materials, 228116770.
28. Kouamo HT, Elimbi A, Mbey J, Sabouang CN, Njopwouo D, 2012. The Effect of Adding Alumina-Oxide to Metakaolin and Volcanic Ash on Geopolymer Products: A Comparative Study. Construction and Building Materials, 35960-969.
29. Król M, Minkiewicz J, Mozgawa W, 2016. IR Spectroscopy Studies of Zeolites in Geopolymeric Materials Derived from Kaolinite. Journal of Molecular Structure, 1126200-206.
30. Lemougna PN, Melo UC, Delplancke M-P, Rahier H, 2014. Influence of the Chemical and Mineralogical Composition on the Reactivity of Volcanic Ashes During Alkali Activation. Ceramics International, 40(1): 811-820.
31. Ndjock BDL, Elimbi A, Cyr M, 2017. Rational Utilization of Volcanic Ashes Based on Factors Affecting Their Alkaline Activation. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 46331-39.
32. Nematollahi B, Sanjayan J, 2014. Effect of Different Superplasticizers and Activator Combinations on Workability and Strength of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer. Materials & Design, 57667-672.
33. North MR, Swaddle TW, 2000. Kinetics of Silicate Exchange in Alkaline Aluminosilicate Solutions. Inorganic Chemistry, 39(12): 2661-2665.
34. Palomo A, Grutzeck M, Blanco M, 1999. Alkali-Activated Fly Ashes: A Cement for the Future. Cement and Concrete Research, 29(8): 1323-1329.
35. Petrus HTBM, Adelizar AS, Widiyatmoko A, Olvianas M, Suprapta W, Perdana I, Prasetya A, Astuti W 2019. "Kinetics of Fly Ash Geopolymerization Using Semi Quantitative Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR); Corr Data." In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 012001. IOP Publishing.
36. Rees CA, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Van Deventer JS, 2007. In Situ ATR-FTIR Study of the Early Stages of Fly Ash Geopolymer Gel Formation. Langmuir, 23(17): 9076-9082.
37. Risdanareni P, Karjanto A, Ekaputri JJ, Puspitasari P, Khakim F 2016. "Mechanical Properties of Volcanic Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete." In Materials Science Forum, 377-381. Trans Tech Publ.
38. Safari Z, Kurda R, Al-Hadad B, Mahmood F, Tapan M, 2020. Mechanical Characteristics of Pumice-Based Geopolymer Paste. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162105055.
39. Singh B, Ishwarya G, Gupta M, Bhattacharyya S, 2015. Geopolymer Concrete: A Review of Some Recent Developments. Construction and Building Materials, 8578-90.
40. Slavik R, Bednarik V, Vondruska M, Nemec A, 2008. Preparation of Geopolymer from Fluidized Bed Combustion Bottom Ash. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 200(1-3): 265-270.
41. Tchakoute HK, Elimbi A, Kenne BD, Mbey J, Njopwouo D, 2013. Synthesis of Geopolymers from Volcanic Ash Via the Alkaline Fusion Method: Effect of Al2O3/Na2O Molar Ratio of Soda–Volcanic Ash. Ceramics International, 39(1): 269-276.
42. Temuujin Jv, Van Riessen A, Williams R, 2009. Influence of Calcium Compounds on the Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash Geopolymer Pastes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 167(1-3): 82-88.
43. Tho-In T, Sata V, Boonserm K, Chindaprasirt P, 2018. Compressive Strength and Microstructure Analysis of Geopolymer Paste Using Waste Glass Powder and Fly Ash. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1722892-2898.
44. Vafaei M, Allahverdi A, 2016. Influence of Calcium Aluminate Cement on Geopolymerization of Natural Pozzolan. Construction and Building Materials, 114290-296.
45. Xu H, Van Deventer J, 2000. The Geopolymerisation of Alumino-Silicate Minerals. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 59(3): 247-266.
46. Yadollahi MM, Benli A, Demirboğa R, 2015. The Effects of Silica Modulus and Aging on Compressive Strength of Pumice-Based Geopolymer Composites. Construction and Building Materials, 94767-774.
47. Yadollahi MM, Demirboğa R, Polat R, 2014. Effect of Heat Treatment Temperature on Ground Pumice Activation in Geopolymer Composites. Science and Engineering of Composite Materials, 21(3): 377-382.
48. Yener E, Karaaslan C, 2020. Curing Time and Temperature Effect on the Resistance to Wet-Dry Cycles of Fly Ash Added Pumice Based Geopolymer. Cement Based Composites, 1(2): 19-25.
49. Zhang Z, Wang H, Provis JL, 2012. Quantitative Study of the Reactivity of Fly Ash in Geopolymerization by FTIR. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 1(4): 154-166.