Trend Analysis of Daily Maximum Rainfall Series in Çoruh Basin, Turkey

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 195 - 205, 31.03.2017

Fatih Tosunoğlu

Öz

In the present study, trends of daily maximum rainfall series in three time scales including annual,
seasonal and monthly time series were investigated by using Mann-Kendall (MK), modifed Mann-Kendall (mMK),
Theil–Sen (TH) and Sequential Mann-Kendall (SMK) trend tests. These tests are applied to daily maximum rainfall
data of fve stations located Çoruh Basin, Turkey. The MK and mMK tests are employed to quantify signifcance
of the trend, the TH test is used to determine magnitude of the trend and the SMK test is also applied for defning
starting year of the signifcant trend. The results of the MK and mMK tests showed that there are considerable
signifcant increasing trends of daily maximum rainfalls in months including January, March, July, August and
October. However, signifcant decreasing trends were detected in daily maximum rainfalls of May and December.
In annual and seasonal time scale, signifcant increasing trends were detected. The TH test also indicated that the
highest magnitude of the negative trends was occurred in daily maximum rainfalls of December while the highest
magnitude of the positive trends was found in daily maximum rainfalls of annual time scale. Furthermore, the SMK
test revealed that the signifcant positive and negative trends mostly began in the mid-1980s and the early 1990s

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çoruh basin, daily maximum rainfalls, mann-kendall test, modifed mann-kendall test, sequential mann-kendall test, theil-sen test

Çoruh Havza’sındaki Günlük Maksimum Yağış Serilerinin Trend Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışmada, yıllık, mevsimlik ve aylık üç zaman dilimdeki günlük maksimum yağışların trendleri
Mann-Kendall (MK), modifye edilmiş Mann-Kendall (mMK), Theil-Sen (TH) ve Mann-Kendall Sıra Korelasyon
(MKSK) testleri kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. Bu testler, Çoruh havzasında bulunan 5 adet istasyonun günlük
maksimum yağış verilerine uygulanmıştır. MK ve mMK testleri trendlerin anlamlılığını belirlemede, TH testi
trendin büyüklüğünü hesaplamada ve MKSK testi ise ele alınan verilerdeki anlamlı trendlerin başladığı yılları
tespit etmede kullanılmıştır. MK ve mMK test sonuçlarına göre Ocak, Mart, Temmuz, Ağustos ve Ekim aylarına
ait günlük maksimum yağış değerlerinde istatistiksel anlamda bir artış varken Mayıs ve Aralık aylarının günlük
maksimum yağış verilerinde ise istatistiki anlamda önemli azalışlar söz konusudur. Yıllık ve mevsimlik zaman
ölçeğinde ise ele alınan verilerde istatistiksel anlamlı artış trendleri tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, TH testi günlük
maksimum yağışlardaki en büyük negatif (azalış) trendin Aralık ayında, en büyük pozitif (artışın) trendin ise
yıllık zaman diliminde meydana geldiğini belirtmektedir. Buna ek olarak, MKSK testide bu tespit edilen anlamlı
negatif ve pozitif trendlerin başlangıç yıllarının çoğunlukla 1980’lerin ortalarında ve 1990’ların başları olduğunu
göstermektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çoruh havzası, günlük maksimum yağışlar, mann-kendall testi, mann-kendall sıra korelasyon testi, modifye edilmiş mann-kendall testi, theil-sen testi

Kaynakça

• Acar R, Senocak S, 2012. Annual extreme precipitation trends for western Turkey in associated with north Atlantic oscillation (NAO) index. Energy Education Science and Technology Part a-Energy Science and Research, 29(1): 475-486.
• Ay M, Kisi O, 2015. Investigation of trend analysis of monthly total precipitation by an innovative method. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 120(3-4): 617-629.
• Cigizoglu HK, Bayazit M, Onoz B, 2005. Trends in the maximum, mean, and low flows of Turkish rivers. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 6(3): 280-290.
• Hamed KH, Rao AR, 1998. A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data. Journal of Hydrology, 204(1-4): 182-196.
• Kadioglu M, 1997. Trends in surface air temperature data over Turkey. International Journal of Climatology, 17(5): 511-520.
• Kahya E, Kalayci S, 2004. Trend analysis of streamflow in Turkey. Journal of Hydrology, 289(1-4): 128-144.
• Karaca M, Anteplioglu U, Karsan H, 1995. Detection of Urban Heat-Island in Istanbul, Turkey. Nuovo Cimento Della Societa Italiana Di Fisica C-Geophysics and Space Physics, 18(1): 49-55.
• Kendall M, 1975. Rank Correlation Methods, London: CharlesGriffin.
• Khaliq MN, Ouarda TBMJ, Gachon P, Sushama L, St-Hilaire A, 2009. Identification of hydrological trends in the presence of serial and cross correlations: A review of selected methods and their application to annual flow regimes of Canadian rivers. Journal of Hydrology, 368(1-4): 117-130.
• Kumar V, Jain SK, Singh Y, 2010. Analysis of long-term rainfall trends in India. Hydrological Sciences Journal-Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques, 55(4): 484-496.
• Mann HB, 1945. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica, 13: 245-259.
• Modarres R, da Silva VDR, 2007. Rainfall trends in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran. Journal of Arid Environments, 70(2): 344-355.
• Nasri M, Modarres R, 2009. Dry spell trend analysis of Isfahan Province, Iran. International Journal of Climatology, 29(10): 1430-1438.
• Onoz B, Bayazit M, 2003. The Power of Statistical Tests for Trend Detection. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 27: 247-251.
• Partal T, Kahya E, 2006. Trend analysis in Turkish precipitation data. Hydrological Processes, 20(9): 2011-2026.
• Rashid MM, Beecham S, Chowdhury RK, 2015. Assessment of trends in point rainfall using Continuous Wavelet Transforms. Advances in Water Resources, 82: 1-15.
• Saplioglu K, Kilit M, Yavuz BK, 2014. Trend Analysis of Streams in the Western Mediterranean Basin of Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 23(1A): 313-324.
• Sonali P, Kumar DN, 2013. Review of trend detection methods and their application to detect temperature changes in India. Journal of Hydrology, 476: 212-227.
• Şen Z, 2012. Innovative Trend Analysis Methodology. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17(9): 1042-1046.
• Tayanc M, Karaca M, Yenigun O, 1997. Annual and seasonal air temperature trend patterns of climate change and urbanization effects in relation to air pollutants in Turkey. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 102(D2): 1909-1919.
• Tecer LH, Cerit O, 2009. Temperature Trends and Changes in Rize, Turkey, for the Period 1975 to 2007. Clean-Soil Air Water, 37(2): 150-159.
• Topaloglu F, 2006. Trend detection of streamflow variables in Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 15(7): 644-653.
• Toros H, 2012. Spatio-temporal variation of daily extreme temperatures over Turkey. International Journal of Climatology, 32(7): 1047-1055.
• Turkes M, 1996. Spatial and temporal analysis of annual rainfall variations in Turkey. International Journal of Climatology, 16(9): 1057-1076.
• Turkes M, Koc T, Saris F, 2009. Spatiotemporal variability of precipitation total series over Turkey. International Journal of Climatology, 29(8): 1056-1074.
• Turkes M, Sumer UM, Kilic G, 1995. Variations and Trends in Annual Mean Air Temperatures in Turkey with Respect to Climatic Variability. International Journal of Climatology, 15(5): 557-569.
• Yenigun K, Gumus V, Bulut H, 2008. Trends in streamflow of the Euphrates basin, Turkey. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management, 161(4): 189-198.
• Yerdelen C, Karimi Y, Kahya E, 2010. Frequency Analysis of Mean Monthly Stream Flow in Coruh Basin, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 19(7): 1300-1311.
• Yue S, Wang CY, 2004. The Mann-Kendall test modified by effective sample size to detect trend in serially correlated hydrological series. Water Resources Management, 18(3): 201-218.