Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Mikroplastik ve Biyokatı Varlığında Toprakta Nikel Toksisitesinin Belirlenmesi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 1386 - 1394, 01.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1036613

Öz

Hayatımızda büyük bir yer kaplayan plastikler bu yaygın kullanımlarıyla aynı zamanda çeşitli çevre sorunlarını da beraberinde getirmiştir. Atıksu Arıtma Tesislerinin arıtma çamurlarında mikroplastikler birikebilmekte ve daha sonra bu çamurların tarım arazilerinde kullanılması ağır metaller ve mikroplastikler gibi henüz çevreye etkileri net olmayan kirleticilerin yayılmasına neden olabilmektedir. Tarım arazilerinde risk arz eden ağır metallerden biri Nikel olup ilgili yönetmeliklerle de sınırlandırılmıştır. Ancak, mikroplastik ve biyokatı gibi etkileri yeni incelenmeye başlayan potansiyel kirletici kaynaklar ile bulunması durumunda Nikelin toksisitesinde meydana gelebilecek değişim incelenmemiştir. Bu kapsamda, mikroplastik ve biyokatı varlığında Nikel toksisitesi incelenmiştir. Toprakta yaşayan canlıları temsilen kullanılan E. Crypticus üzerinde üremeye olan etkileri EC50 değerleri ile belirlenmiştir. Buna göre hem mikroplastikler hem de biyokatı uygulamaları Nikel toksisitesini düşürücü yönde etki etmiştir. Bu durum, Nikelin biyokatıdaki organik maddelerle kompleks oluşturarak ya da mikroplastik yüzeyinde bulunabilecek yüklü yüzey gruplarıyla etkileşime girerek toksik etkiyi meydana getirdiği bilinen iyonik formun nötrleşmesi ile açıklanabilir.

Kaynakça

  • Besseling E, Wegner A, Foekema E M, Van DHGMJ, Koelmans AA, 2013. Effects of microplastic on fitness and PCB bioaccumulation by the lugworm Arenicola marina (L). Environmental Science and Technology, 47(1), 593–600.
  • Bråte IL, Halsband C, Allan I, Thomas KV, 2014. Microplastics in marine environments : Occurrence, distribution and effects, 754-2014 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273089847_Report_made_for_the_Norwegian_Environment_Agency_Microplastics_in_marine_environments_Occurrence_distribution_and_effects?enrichId=rgreq-0744addf466fd250c28e0768256a6a22-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3M
  • Brennecke D, Duarte B, Paiva F, Caçador I, Canning-Clode J, 2016. Microplastics as vector for heavy metal contamination from the marine environment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 178, 189–195.
  • Bubb IM, Lester JN, 1996. Factors controlling the accumulation of metals within fluvial systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 41(1), 87–105.
  • Buxton S, Garman E, Heim KE, Lyons DT, Schlekat CE, Taylor MD, Oller AR, 2019. Concise Review of Nickel Human Health Toxicology and Ecotoxicology. Inorganics, Vol. 7, Page 89, 7(7), 89.
  • Cao D, Wang X, Luo X, Liu G, Zheng H, 2017. Effects of polystyrene microplastics on the fitness of earthworms in an agricultural soil. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 61(1), 012148.
  • Cempel M, Nikel G, 2006. Nickel: A review of its sources and environmental toxicology. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 15(3), 375–382.
  • Crommentuijn T, Doornekamp A, Van GCAM, 1997. Bioavailability and ecological effects of cadmium on Folsomia candida (Willem) in an artificial soil substrate as influenced by pH and organic matter. Applied Soil Ecology, 5(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(97)00003-6
  • Dris R, Gasperi J, Saad M, Mirande C, Tassin B, 2016. Synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout: A source of microplastics in the environment?, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 104(1–2), 290–293.
  • Hartmann NB, Rist S, Bodin J, Jensen LHS, Schmidt SN, Mayer P, Meibom A, Baun A, 2017. Microplastics as vectors for environmental contaminants: Exploring sorption, desorption, and transfer to biota. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 13(3), 488–493.
  • He E, Qiu H, Qiu R, Rentenaar C, Devresse Q, Van GCAM, 2017. Time-dependent uptake and toxicity of nickel to Enchytraeus crypticus in the presence of humic acid and fulvic acid. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 36(11): 3019–3027.
  • Ho BT, Roberts TK, Lucas S, 2018. An overview on biodegradation of polystyrene and modified polystyrene: the microbial approach. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 38 (2): 308–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2017.1355293
  • Holland ER, Mallory ML, Shutler D, 2016. Plastics and other anthropogenic debris in freshwater birds from Canada. Science of The Total Environment, 571, 251–258.
  • Horton AA, Walton A, Spurgeon DJ, Lahive E, Svendsen C, 2017. Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: Evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities. Science of The Total Environment, 586, 127–141.
  • Huerta LE, Gertsen H, Gooren H, Peters P, Salánki T, Van DPM, Besseling E, Koelmans AA, Geissen V, 2016. Microplastics in the Terrestrial Ecosystem: Implications for Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae). Environmental Science and Technology, 50(5), 2685–2691.
  • Fatma Cansu ULUTUĞ ve Emel TOPUZ 12(3): 1386-1394, 2022. Mikroplastik ve Biyokatı Varlığında Toprakta Nikel Toksisitesinin Belirlenmesi
  • Das KK, Das SN, Dhundasi SA, 2008. Nickel, Its Adverse Health Effects & Oxidative Stress. Indian Journal of Medical Research 128(4): 412–25.
  • Khalid N, Aqeel M, Noman A, Khan SM, Akhter N, 2021. Interactions and effects of microplastics with heavy metals in aquatic and terrestrial environments. Environmental Pollution, 290, 118104.
  • Khanlari ZV, Jalali M, 2008. Concentrations and chemical speciation of five heavy metals (Zn, Cd, Ni, Cu, and Pb) in selected agricultural calcareous soils of Hamadan Province, western Iran. 54(1), 19–32.
  • Kim D, Chae Y, An YJ, 2017. Mixture Toxicity of Nickel and Microplastics with Different Functional Groups on Daphnia magna. Environmental Science and Technology, 51(21), 12852–12858.
  • Koelmans AA, Bakir A, Burton GA, Janssen CR, 2016. Microplastic as a Vector for Chemicals in the Aquatic Environment: Critical Review and Model-Supported Reinterpretation of Empirical Studies. Environmental Science and Technology, 50(7), 3315–3326.
  • Kuperman RG, Amorim MJB, Römbke J, Lanno R, Checkai RT, Dodard SG, Sunahara GI, Scheffczyk A, 2006. Adaptation of the enchytraeid toxicity test for use with natural soil types. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42(SUPPL. 1), S234–S243.
  • Lock K, Janssen CR, 2002. Ecotoxicity of nickel to Eisenia fetida, Enchytraeus albidus and Folsomia candida. Chemosphere, 46(2), 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00112-6
  • Mollazadeh N, 2015. Study of Lead Toxicity Mitigation in Soil in the Presence of Organic Matter. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 6(7), 504–507.
  • Park TJ, Lee SH, Lee MS, Lee JK, Park JH, Zoh KD, 2020. Distributions of Microplastics in Surface Water, Fish, and Sediment in the Vicinity of a Sewage Treatment Plant. Water 2020, Vol. 12, Page 3333, 12(12), 3333. https://doi.org/10.3390/W12123333
  • Peters A, Merrington G, Schlekat C, Schamphelaere K, Stauber J, Batley G, Harford A, Van DR, Pease C, Mooney T, Warne M, Hickey C, Glazebrook P, Chapman J, Smith R, Krassoi R, 2018. Validation of the nickel biotic ligand model for locally relevant species in Australian freshwaters. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 37(10), 2566–2574.
  • Reimonn G, Lu T, Gandhi N, Chen WT, 2019. Review of microplastic pollution in the environment and emerging recycling solutions. Journal of Renewable Materials, 7(12), 1251–1268.
  • Rodriguez SA, Lourenço J, Rocha STAP, da Costa J, Duarte AC, Vala H, Pereira R, 2017. Histopathological and molecular effects of microplastics in Eisenia andrei Bouché. Environmental Pollution, 220, 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2016.09.092
  • Sanchez W, Bender C, Porcher JM, 2014. Wild gudgeons (Gobio gobio) from French rivers are contaminated by microplastics: Preliminary study and first evidence. Environmental Research, 128, 98–100.
  • Santorufo L, Van GCAM, Maisto G, 2012. Ecotoxicological assessment of metal-polluted urban soils using bioassays with three soil invertebrates. Chemosphere, 88(4), 418–425.
  • Saruhan V, Kusvuran A, Kokten K, 2015. Effects of sewage sludge used as fertilizer on the yield and chemical contents of common vetch (vicia sativa L.) and soil. Legume Research, 38(4), 488–495.
  • Steinmetz Z, Wollmann C, Schaefer M, Buchmann C, David J, Tröger J, Muñoz K, Frör O, Schaumann GE, 2016. Plastic mulching in agriculture. Trading short-term agronomic benefits for long-term soil degradation? Science of The Total Environment, 550, 690–705.
  • Toprak Kirliliği Kontrolü Yönetmeliği, 2005. T.C. Resmi Gazete, 25831.
  • Van GCAM, Borgman E, Verweij RA, Diez OM, 2011. The influence of soil properties on the toxicity of molybdenum to three species of soil invertebrates. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 74(1), 1–9.
  • Zhang X, Luo D, Yu RQ, Xie Z, He L,Wu Y, 2021. Microplastics in the endangered Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis) from the Pearl River Estuary, China. Environmental Pollution, 270, 116057. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2020.116057
  • Zhou Y, Liu X, Wang J, 2020. Ecotoxicological effects of microplastics and cadmium on the earthworm Eisenia foetida. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 392, 122273.
  • Zhu F, Zhu C, Wang C, Gu C, 2019. Occurrence and Ecological Impacts of Microplastics in Soil Systems: A Review. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 102(6), 741–749.

Determination of Nickel Toxicity in Soil in The Presence of Microplastics and Biosolids

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 1386 - 1394, 01.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1036613

Öz

Plastics, which occupy a large place in our lives, have also brought along various environmental problems with their widespread use. Microplastics can accumulate in the sewage sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants, and then the use of these sludges in agricultural lands may cause the spread of pollutants such as heavy metals and microplastics for which the toxic effects are not clear, yet. Nickel is one of the heavy metals that pose a risk in agricultural lands, and it is also limited by the relevant regulations. However, the change in the toxicity of Nickel in the presence of potential pollutants such as microplastics and biosolids, whose effects have just begun to be investigated, has not been examined. In this context, nickel toxicity was investigated in the presence of microplastics and biosolids. The effects on reproduction on E. Crypticus, which is used as a representative of living things living in the soil, were determined by EC50 values. Accordingly, both microplastics and biosolids applications had a decreasing effect on Nickel toxicity. This can be explained by the neutralization of Nickel for which toxicity is sourced from ion forms by complexing with organic substances in the biosolid or interacting with charged surface groups that may be present on the microplastic surface.

Kaynakça

  • Besseling E, Wegner A, Foekema E M, Van DHGMJ, Koelmans AA, 2013. Effects of microplastic on fitness and PCB bioaccumulation by the lugworm Arenicola marina (L). Environmental Science and Technology, 47(1), 593–600.
  • Bråte IL, Halsband C, Allan I, Thomas KV, 2014. Microplastics in marine environments : Occurrence, distribution and effects, 754-2014 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273089847_Report_made_for_the_Norwegian_Environment_Agency_Microplastics_in_marine_environments_Occurrence_distribution_and_effects?enrichId=rgreq-0744addf466fd250c28e0768256a6a22-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3M
  • Brennecke D, Duarte B, Paiva F, Caçador I, Canning-Clode J, 2016. Microplastics as vector for heavy metal contamination from the marine environment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 178, 189–195.
  • Bubb IM, Lester JN, 1996. Factors controlling the accumulation of metals within fluvial systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 41(1), 87–105.
  • Buxton S, Garman E, Heim KE, Lyons DT, Schlekat CE, Taylor MD, Oller AR, 2019. Concise Review of Nickel Human Health Toxicology and Ecotoxicology. Inorganics, Vol. 7, Page 89, 7(7), 89.
  • Cao D, Wang X, Luo X, Liu G, Zheng H, 2017. Effects of polystyrene microplastics on the fitness of earthworms in an agricultural soil. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 61(1), 012148.
  • Cempel M, Nikel G, 2006. Nickel: A review of its sources and environmental toxicology. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 15(3), 375–382.
  • Crommentuijn T, Doornekamp A, Van GCAM, 1997. Bioavailability and ecological effects of cadmium on Folsomia candida (Willem) in an artificial soil substrate as influenced by pH and organic matter. Applied Soil Ecology, 5(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(97)00003-6
  • Dris R, Gasperi J, Saad M, Mirande C, Tassin B, 2016. Synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout: A source of microplastics in the environment?, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 104(1–2), 290–293.
  • Hartmann NB, Rist S, Bodin J, Jensen LHS, Schmidt SN, Mayer P, Meibom A, Baun A, 2017. Microplastics as vectors for environmental contaminants: Exploring sorption, desorption, and transfer to biota. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 13(3), 488–493.
  • He E, Qiu H, Qiu R, Rentenaar C, Devresse Q, Van GCAM, 2017. Time-dependent uptake and toxicity of nickel to Enchytraeus crypticus in the presence of humic acid and fulvic acid. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 36(11): 3019–3027.
  • Ho BT, Roberts TK, Lucas S, 2018. An overview on biodegradation of polystyrene and modified polystyrene: the microbial approach. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 38 (2): 308–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2017.1355293
  • Holland ER, Mallory ML, Shutler D, 2016. Plastics and other anthropogenic debris in freshwater birds from Canada. Science of The Total Environment, 571, 251–258.
  • Horton AA, Walton A, Spurgeon DJ, Lahive E, Svendsen C, 2017. Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: Evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities. Science of The Total Environment, 586, 127–141.
  • Huerta LE, Gertsen H, Gooren H, Peters P, Salánki T, Van DPM, Besseling E, Koelmans AA, Geissen V, 2016. Microplastics in the Terrestrial Ecosystem: Implications for Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae). Environmental Science and Technology, 50(5), 2685–2691.
  • Fatma Cansu ULUTUĞ ve Emel TOPUZ 12(3): 1386-1394, 2022. Mikroplastik ve Biyokatı Varlığında Toprakta Nikel Toksisitesinin Belirlenmesi
  • Das KK, Das SN, Dhundasi SA, 2008. Nickel, Its Adverse Health Effects & Oxidative Stress. Indian Journal of Medical Research 128(4): 412–25.
  • Khalid N, Aqeel M, Noman A, Khan SM, Akhter N, 2021. Interactions and effects of microplastics with heavy metals in aquatic and terrestrial environments. Environmental Pollution, 290, 118104.
  • Khanlari ZV, Jalali M, 2008. Concentrations and chemical speciation of five heavy metals (Zn, Cd, Ni, Cu, and Pb) in selected agricultural calcareous soils of Hamadan Province, western Iran. 54(1), 19–32.
  • Kim D, Chae Y, An YJ, 2017. Mixture Toxicity of Nickel and Microplastics with Different Functional Groups on Daphnia magna. Environmental Science and Technology, 51(21), 12852–12858.
  • Koelmans AA, Bakir A, Burton GA, Janssen CR, 2016. Microplastic as a Vector for Chemicals in the Aquatic Environment: Critical Review and Model-Supported Reinterpretation of Empirical Studies. Environmental Science and Technology, 50(7), 3315–3326.
  • Kuperman RG, Amorim MJB, Römbke J, Lanno R, Checkai RT, Dodard SG, Sunahara GI, Scheffczyk A, 2006. Adaptation of the enchytraeid toxicity test for use with natural soil types. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42(SUPPL. 1), S234–S243.
  • Lock K, Janssen CR, 2002. Ecotoxicity of nickel to Eisenia fetida, Enchytraeus albidus and Folsomia candida. Chemosphere, 46(2), 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00112-6
  • Mollazadeh N, 2015. Study of Lead Toxicity Mitigation in Soil in the Presence of Organic Matter. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 6(7), 504–507.
  • Park TJ, Lee SH, Lee MS, Lee JK, Park JH, Zoh KD, 2020. Distributions of Microplastics in Surface Water, Fish, and Sediment in the Vicinity of a Sewage Treatment Plant. Water 2020, Vol. 12, Page 3333, 12(12), 3333. https://doi.org/10.3390/W12123333
  • Peters A, Merrington G, Schlekat C, Schamphelaere K, Stauber J, Batley G, Harford A, Van DR, Pease C, Mooney T, Warne M, Hickey C, Glazebrook P, Chapman J, Smith R, Krassoi R, 2018. Validation of the nickel biotic ligand model for locally relevant species in Australian freshwaters. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 37(10), 2566–2574.
  • Reimonn G, Lu T, Gandhi N, Chen WT, 2019. Review of microplastic pollution in the environment and emerging recycling solutions. Journal of Renewable Materials, 7(12), 1251–1268.
  • Rodriguez SA, Lourenço J, Rocha STAP, da Costa J, Duarte AC, Vala H, Pereira R, 2017. Histopathological and molecular effects of microplastics in Eisenia andrei Bouché. Environmental Pollution, 220, 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2016.09.092
  • Sanchez W, Bender C, Porcher JM, 2014. Wild gudgeons (Gobio gobio) from French rivers are contaminated by microplastics: Preliminary study and first evidence. Environmental Research, 128, 98–100.
  • Santorufo L, Van GCAM, Maisto G, 2012. Ecotoxicological assessment of metal-polluted urban soils using bioassays with three soil invertebrates. Chemosphere, 88(4), 418–425.
  • Saruhan V, Kusvuran A, Kokten K, 2015. Effects of sewage sludge used as fertilizer on the yield and chemical contents of common vetch (vicia sativa L.) and soil. Legume Research, 38(4), 488–495.
  • Steinmetz Z, Wollmann C, Schaefer M, Buchmann C, David J, Tröger J, Muñoz K, Frör O, Schaumann GE, 2016. Plastic mulching in agriculture. Trading short-term agronomic benefits for long-term soil degradation? Science of The Total Environment, 550, 690–705.
  • Toprak Kirliliği Kontrolü Yönetmeliği, 2005. T.C. Resmi Gazete, 25831.
  • Van GCAM, Borgman E, Verweij RA, Diez OM, 2011. The influence of soil properties on the toxicity of molybdenum to three species of soil invertebrates. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 74(1), 1–9.
  • Zhang X, Luo D, Yu RQ, Xie Z, He L,Wu Y, 2021. Microplastics in the endangered Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis) from the Pearl River Estuary, China. Environmental Pollution, 270, 116057. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2020.116057
  • Zhou Y, Liu X, Wang J, 2020. Ecotoxicological effects of microplastics and cadmium on the earthworm Eisenia foetida. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 392, 122273.
  • Zhu F, Zhu C, Wang C, Gu C, 2019. Occurrence and Ecological Impacts of Microplastics in Soil Systems: A Review. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 102(6), 741–749.
Toplam 37 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Çevre Mühendisliği
Bölüm Çevre Mühendisliği / Environment Engineering
Yazarlar

Fatma Cansu Ulutuğ 0000-0003-2407-1076

Emel Topuz 0000-0002-8985-5958

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 26 Ağustos 2022
Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Eylül 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Aralık 2021
Kabul Tarihi 5 Haziran 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Ulutuğ, F. C., & Topuz, E. (2022). Mikroplastik ve Biyokatı Varlığında Toprakta Nikel Toksisitesinin Belirlenmesi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 12(3), 1386-1394. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1036613
AMA Ulutuğ FC, Topuz E. Mikroplastik ve Biyokatı Varlığında Toprakta Nikel Toksisitesinin Belirlenmesi. Iğdır Üniv. Fen Bil Enst. Der. Eylül 2022;12(3):1386-1394. doi:10.21597/jist.1036613
Chicago Ulutuğ, Fatma Cansu, ve Emel Topuz. “Mikroplastik Ve Biyokatı Varlığında Toprakta Nikel Toksisitesinin Belirlenmesi”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 12, sy. 3 (Eylül 2022): 1386-94. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1036613.
EndNote Ulutuğ FC, Topuz E (01 Eylül 2022) Mikroplastik ve Biyokatı Varlığında Toprakta Nikel Toksisitesinin Belirlenmesi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 12 3 1386–1394.
IEEE F. C. Ulutuğ ve E. Topuz, “Mikroplastik ve Biyokatı Varlığında Toprakta Nikel Toksisitesinin Belirlenmesi”, Iğdır Üniv. Fen Bil Enst. Der., c. 12, sy. 3, ss. 1386–1394, 2022, doi: 10.21597/jist.1036613.
ISNAD Ulutuğ, Fatma Cansu - Topuz, Emel. “Mikroplastik Ve Biyokatı Varlığında Toprakta Nikel Toksisitesinin Belirlenmesi”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 12/3 (Eylül 2022), 1386-1394. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1036613.
JAMA Ulutuğ FC, Topuz E. Mikroplastik ve Biyokatı Varlığında Toprakta Nikel Toksisitesinin Belirlenmesi. Iğdır Üniv. Fen Bil Enst. Der. 2022;12:1386–1394.
MLA Ulutuğ, Fatma Cansu ve Emel Topuz. “Mikroplastik Ve Biyokatı Varlığında Toprakta Nikel Toksisitesinin Belirlenmesi”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, c. 12, sy. 3, 2022, ss. 1386-94, doi:10.21597/jist.1036613.
Vancouver Ulutuğ FC, Topuz E. Mikroplastik ve Biyokatı Varlığında Toprakta Nikel Toksisitesinin Belirlenmesi. Iğdır Üniv. Fen Bil Enst. Der. 2022;12(3):1386-94.