Bulanık Kesitsel SWOT Kullanılarak Türkiye için Yenilenebilir Enerjiye İlişkin Odak Stratejilerinin Belirlenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'nin yenilenebilir enerji alanında odaklanması gereken stratejilerin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bunun için Bulanık AHP ve Parçalı SWOT yöntemlerinden oluşan Bulanık Parçalı SWOT adı verilen entegre bir yöntem kullanılmıştır. Geleneksel SWOT analizinin bazı dezavantajları, kullanılan yöntemle ortadan kaldırılmıştır. Öncelikle, yenilenebilir enerji alanı Parçalı SWOT analizi mantığına göre 6 alt-bölüme (hidroelektrik, güneş, rüzgar, biyokütle, hidrojen ve jeotermal) ayrılmıştır. Daha sonra, bu alt bölümlerin her biri için güçlü, zayıf yönler, fırsatlar ve tehditler, Parçalı SWOT analizi kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Bulanık AHP yöntemi ile yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının her biri için ağırlıklar bulunmuş ve kaynaklar bu ağırlıklara göre önceliklendirilmiştir. Son olarak, yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarına ile ilgili stratejilerin oluşturulması ile Türkiye için yenilenebilir enerji alanına ilişkin odak stratejiler elde edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak öncelikli olarak ele alınması gereken odak stratejiler, yenilenebilir enerji potansiyelinin kullanımı, yenilenebilir enerji konusunda toplumsal farkındalık, yenilenebilir enerji ile ilgili devlet destekleri ve teşvikleri, yenilenebilir enerji santralleri için uygun alanların seçimi ve yenilenebilir enerji santrallerinin bileşenlerinin yerli üretimi ile ilgilidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yenilenebilir enerji
• Parçalı SWOT
• Bulanık AHP
• Strateji

Determination of the Focus Strategies Related to Renewable Energy For Turkey by Using the Fuzzy Sectional SWOT

Öz

Determining the strategies that Turkey need to focus at the renewable energy field is aimed in this study. For this, an integrated method called the Fuzzy Sectional SWOT consisting of the Fuzzy AHP and the Sectional SWOT methods was used. Some disadvantages of the traditional SWOT analysis are eliminated with the method used. Firstly, the renewable energy field was divided into 6 sub-sections (hyropower, solar, wind, biomass, hydrogen and geothermal) according to the logic of Sectional SWOT analysis. Then strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats for each of these sub-sections were determined using the Sectional SWOT analysis. Weights were found with the Fuzzy AHP method for each of the renewable energy sources and they were prioritized according to these weights. Finally, focus strategies related to renewable energy field for Turkey were obtained with the creation of strategies related to renewable energy sources. Consequently, the focus strategies which should be primarily addressed are related to use of renewable energy potential, social awareness about the renewable energy, government supports and incentives related to the renewable energy, selection of suitable areas for renewable energy plants and domestic production of the constituent parts of renewable energy plants.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Renewable energy
• Sectional SWOT
• Fuzzy AHP
• Strategy

Kaynakça

1. Asif, M., Muneer, T., 2007. Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(7), 1388–1413.
2. Bas, E., 2013. The integrated framework for analysis of electricity supply chain using an integrated SWOT-Fuzzy TOPSIS methodology combined with AHP: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 44(1), 897-907.
3. Chang, D.Y., 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655.
4. Eltrop, L., 2013. Renewable energy: resources and technologies. In Jenssen T (ed) Glances at Renewable and Sustainable Energy-Principles, Approaches and Methodologies for an Ambiguous Benchmark, London, England: Springer-Verlag, pp. 15-32.
5. Erdin, C., Ozkaya, G., 2019. Turkey’s 2023 energy strategies and investment opportunities for renewable energy sources: Site selection based on ELECTRE. Sustainability, 11(7), 2136.
6. Ervural, B.C., Zaim, S., Demirel, O. F., Aydin, Z., Delen, D., 2018. An ANP and Fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey’s energy planning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 1538-1550.
7. Evli, S., 2018. Türkiye’de sürdürülebilir kalkinma ve yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklari (In Turkish). Dissertation, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Turkey.
8. Fridleifsson, I.B., Freeston, D.H., 1994. Geothermal energy research and development. Geothermics, 23(2), 175–214.

9. Gedik-Torunoglu, O., 2015. Türkiye’de yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklari ve çevresel etkileri. Dissertation, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey.
10. Gottfried, O., De Clercq, D., Blair, E., Weng, X., Wang, C., 2018. SWOT-AHP-TOWS analysis of private investment behavior in the Chinese biogas sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 632-647.
11. Heshmati, A., Abolhosseini, S., Altmann, J., 2015. The development of renewable energy sources and its significance for the environment. Springer, Singapore.
12. Hill, T., Westbrook, R., 1997. SWOT analysis: It's time for a product recall. Long Range Planning, 30(1), 46-52. International Energy Agency – IEA, 2021. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/.
13. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ulukan, Z., 2003. Multi-criteria supplier selection using Fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 382-394.
14. Karali, S., 2017. Yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarinin Türkiye ve dünya ekonomisine katkisi (In Turkish). Dissertation, Bahçeşehir University, Turkey.
15. Karatop, B., 2015. Yerli otomotiv yatırımında odak strateji karar modeli: Bulanık AHP uygulaması (In Turkish). Istanbul, Turkey: Doğu Kütüphanesi.
16. Karatop, B., Kubat, C., Uygun, O., 2018. Determining the strategies on turkish automotive sector using Fuzzy AHP based on the SWOT analysis. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 22(5), 1314-1325.
17. Kaya, I., Colak, M., Terzi, F., 2019. A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making. Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 207-228.
18. Learned, E.P., Christensen, C.R., Andrews, K.E., Guth, W.D., 1965. Business policy: Text and cases. Homewood, IL, USA: Irwin.
19. Lund, H., 2010. Renewable energy systems: The choice and modeling of 100% renewable solutions. Academic Press, Burlington, MA, USA.
20. Ngô, C., Natowitz, J.B., 2009. Our energy future: Resources, alternatives, and the environment. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.
21. Okello, C., Pindozzi, S., Faugno, S., Boccia, L., 2014. Appraising bioenergy alternatives in Uganda using Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)-Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and a desirability functions approach. Energies, 7(3), 1171-1192. Online, 2020. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources. Accessed: Jan. 13, 2020. Avaliable: https://www.enerji.gov.tr.
22. Papapostolou, A., Karakosta, C., Apostolidis, G., Doukas, H., 2020. An AHP-SWOT-Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for achieving a Cross-Border RES cooperation. Sustainability, 12(7), 2886.
23. Purkus, A., Barth, V., 2011. Geothermal power production in future electricity markets—A scenario analysis for Germany. Energy Policy, 39(1), 349–357.
24. Sevkli, M., Oztekin, A., Uysal, O., Torlak, G., Turkyilmaz, A., Delen, D., 2012. Development of a Fuzzy ANP based SWOT analysis for the airline industry in Turkey. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 14-24.
25. Solangi, Y.A., Tan, Q., Mirjat, N.H., Ali, S., 2019. Evaluating the strategies for sustainable energy planning in Pakistan: An integrated SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117655.
26. Tasri, A., Susilawati, A., 2014. Selection among renewable energy alternatives based on a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Indonesia. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 7, 34-44.
27. Tester, J.W., Drake, E.M., Driscoll, M.J., Golay, M.W., Peters, W.A., 2005. Sustainable energy: Choosing among options. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, England.
28. Toksari, M., Toksari, M.D., 2011. Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) yaklaşımı kullanılarak hedef pazarın belirlenmesi (In Turkish). ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 38, 51-70.
29. Tsoutsos, T., Frantzeskaki, N., Gekas, V., 2005. Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies. Energy Policy, 33(3), 289–296.
30. Wang, Y., Xu, L., Solangi, Y.A., 2020. Strategic renewable energy resources selection for Pakistan: Based on SWOT-Fuzzy AHP approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101861.