Küresel Lojistik Yönetişiminde Çin Modeli: Logink Üzerinden Bir Jeoekonomik Analiz

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 62 - 76, 25.03.2026

Şerif Dilek

https://doi.org/10.51513/jitsa.1862282

https://izlik.org/JA48DD84ZN

Öz

Küresel tedarik zincirlerinin ve üretim ağlarının yeniden yapılandığı 21. yüzyılda Çin, ticareti dijitalleştirme, lojistik süreçleri iyileştirme ve veri yönetim sistemlerini güçlendirme yönünde kapsamlı adımlar atmaktadır. Ülke, yeni üretim merkezleri kurmakta, lojistik altyapısını modernleştirmekte ve böylelikle hem mevcut pazarlarla bağlarını derinleştirmekte hem de yeni ticaret koridorları açmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, başlangıçta ulusal bir proje olarak tasarlanan Logink, Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi (KYG) kapsamında küresel bir lojistik bilgi platformuna dönüşmüştür. Sistem, verimliliği artıran ve iş birliğini kolaylaştıran bir araç olarak sunulmakta; ancak veri güvenliği, dijital bağımlılık, pazarın merkezileşmesi ve jeopolitik etki alanları açısından tartışmalara yol açmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Çin'in Logink platformunu jeoekonomik rekabet çerçevesinde nasıl konumlandırdığını incelemekte; platformun küresel lojistik standartlarını yeniden belirleme ve uluslararası ticaret altyapısını şekillendirme kapasitesini, beraberindeki riskler ve sınırlılıklarla birlikte değerlendirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Lojistik , Jeoekonomi , Çin , KYG , Logink

China’s Model of Global Logistics Governance: A Geo-economic Perspective on the Logink Platform

https://izlik.org/JA48DD84ZN

Öz

As global supply chains and production networks undergo fundamental restructuring in the 21st century, China pursues extensive initiatives to digitalize trade, improve logistics operations, and reinforce data management systems. The country establishes new production hubs, modernizes its logistics infrastructure, and thereby both deepens ties with existing markets and opens new trade corridors. Within this framework, Logink -initially conceived as a domestic project- has evolved into a global logistics information platform coordinated under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). While presented as a mechanism to enhance efficiency and facilitate cooperation, the system provokes substantial debates concerning data security, technological dependence, market centralization, and geopolitical spheres of influence. This study examines how China positions the Logink platform within the framework of geoeconomic competition, assessing its capacity to redefine global logistics standards and reshape international trade infrastructure, alongside the associated risks and limitations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Logistic , Geoeconomics , China , BRI , Logink

Kaynakça

• Acosta, G. M. (2020). China’s one road, one belt grand strategy: Founded on the weaponization of the global supply chain. National Defense Transportation Association. Erişim: 10 Şubat 2025, https://www.ndtahq.com/chinas-one-road-one-belt-grand-strategy-founded-on-the-weaponization-of-the-global-supply-chain/
• Arvis, J.F., Ojala, L., Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., & Kiiski, T. (2018). Connecting to compete 2018: Trade logistics in the global economy-the logistics performance index and its indicators. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. Washington.
• Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive. Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2), 177-200.
• Bartlett, P. (2023). China takes lead over Greece in fleet gross tonnage. Seatrade Maritime. Erişim: 20 Haziran 2025, https://www.seatrade-maritime.com/ship-operations/china-takes-lead-over-greece-in-fleet-gross-tonnage
• Barykin, S. E., Kapustina, I. V., Korchagina, E. V., Sergeev, S. M,. Yadykin, V.K., Abdimomynova, A., & Stepanova, D. (2021). Digital logistics platforms in the BRICS countries: Comparative analysis and development prospects. Sustainability, 13(20), 11228.
• Beeson, M. (2018). Geoeconomics with Chinese characteristics: The BRI and China’s evolving grand strategy. Economic and Political Studies, 6(3), 240–256.
• Berechman, J., Ozmen, D., & Ozbay, K. (2006). Empirical analysis of transportation investment and economic development at state, county and municipality levels. Transportation, 33, 537-551.
• Blackwill, R. D., & Harris, J. M. (2016). War by other means: Geoeconomics and statecraft. Harvard University Press.
• Blanchard, J. M. F. (2017). Probing China’s twenty-first-century maritime silk road initiative (MSRI): an examination of MSRI narratives. Geopolitics, 22(2), 246-268.
• Carter, W. R. (1953). Beans, bullets, and black oil: The story of fleet logistics afloat in the pacific during World War II. Washington DC: Department of the Navy.
• CeBr. (2019). From silk road to silicon road: How the belt and road iniative will transform the global economy. The Chartered Institute of Building. Erişim: 15 Nisan 2025, https://cebr.com/blogs/china-daily-belt-and-road-set-to-transform-global-economy/
• Chen, D., Song, D., & Yang, Z. (2022). A review of the literature on the belt and road initiative with factors influencing the transport and logistics. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(4), 540-557.
• Chen, L. K. (2016). Three questions on China's “belt and road initiative”. China Economic Review 40, 309-313. Christopher, M. (2022). Logistics and supply chain management. Pearson UK.
• Clarke, M. (2017). The Belt and road initiative: China’s new grand strategy?. Asia Policy 24(1), 71-79.
• Clayton, C., Maggiori, M., & Schreger, J. (2023). A framework for geoeconomics. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 31852.
• Corradi, T. (2024). China’s LOGINK: Securing maritime data in european ports. China Observers. Erişim: 10 Mayıs 2025, https://chinaobservers.eu/chinas-logink-securing-maritime-data-in-european-ports/
• Coto-Millán, P., Agüeros, M., Casares-Hontañón, P., & Pesquera, M. Á. (2013). Impact of logistics performance on world economic growth (2007–2012). World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 4(4), 300-310.
• De La Bruyère, E., & Picarsic, N. (2020a). China Standards 2035. Beijing's platform geopolitics and standardization work in 2020. Horizon Advisory China Standards Series. Erişim: 20 Haziran 2025, https://www.horizonadvisory.org/china-standards-2035-first-report
• De La Bruyère, E., & Picarsic N. (2020b). Made in Germany, co-opted by China. Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Erişim: 20 Ocak 2025, https://www.fdd.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/fdd-monograph-made-in-germany-co-opted-by-china.pdf
• Dezenski, E., & Rader, D. (2023). How China uses shipping for surveillance and control. Foreign Policy. Erişim: 9 Mart 2025. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/09/20/china-shipping-maritime-logistics-lanes-trade-ports-security-espionage-intelligence/
• Diesen, G. (2019). The Geoeconomics of Russia’s Greater Eurasia Initiative. Asian Politics & Policy, 11(4), 566-585.
• Du, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Does one belt one road initiative promote Chinese overseas direct investment. China Economic Review 47, 189-205.
• European Parliament. (2022). Chinese presence on data platforms of European ports is detrimental to European autonomy. Parliamentary Question, European Parliament. Erişim: 4 Nisan 2025 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2022-003745_EN.html
• Fasslabend, W. (2015). The silk road: A political marketing concept for World dominance. European View, 14.(2), 293-302.
• Flint, C., & Zhu, C. (2019). The geopolitics of connectivity, cooperation, and hegemonic competition: The Belt and Road Initiative. Geoforum 99, 95-101.
• Forsyth, D. J. (2002). The crisis of liberal Italy. Cambridge University Press.
• Funaiole, M. P., Hart, B., & Powers-Riggs, A. (2025). Ship wars confronting China’s dual-use shipbuilding empires. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Erişim: 28 Haziran 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/ship-wars-confronting-chinas-dual-use-shipbuilding-empire
• Goswami, N. (2026). Digital Twin Technology for Port Operations: A Roadmap for 2026, INTECH Group. https://theintechgroup.com/blog/digital-twin-ports-smart-port-technology-automation/
• Grosse, T. G. (2014). Geoeconomic relations between the EU and China: the lessons from the EU weapon embargo and from Galileo. Geopolitics, 19(1), 40-65.
• Hayaloglu, P. (2015). The impact of developments in the logistics sector on economic development: The case of OECD countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2), 523–530.
• Hong, J., Chu, Z., & Wang, Q. (2011). Transport infrastructure and regional economic growth: Evidence from China. Transportation, 38, 737-752.
• Hsiung, J. C. (2009). The age of geoeconomics, China’s global role, and prospects of cross-strait integration. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 14, 113-133.
• Jingyan, G. (2015). National transport and logistics ınformation platform in China: Logink. Ministry of Transport. China. Erişim: 10 Şubat 2025, https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/01%20-%20LOGINK.pdf
• Khandekar, G. (2014). Modi’s foreign policy mantra: Geoeconomics, regional hegemony, global aspirations. Agora Asia-Europe, 17.
• Khanna, P. (2016). Connectography: Mapping the future of global civilization. Random House.
• Lam, W. W. L. (2012). “China wages quasi-superpower diplomacy”. In: Cheng, J. Y. (ed) China: a new stage of development for an emerging superpower. City University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong.
• Lambert, N. A. (2012). Planning armageddon: British economic warfare and the first world war. Harvard University Press.
• Lau, A., & Su, M. (2016). China’s e-commerce soft spot: Logistics. The McKinsey Quarterly.
• Lean, H. H., Huang, W., & Hong, J. (2014). Logistics and economic development: Experience from China. Transport policy 32, 96-104.
• Lee, H. L., & Shen, Z. J. M. (2020). Supply chain and logistics innovations with the belt and road Initiative. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 5(2), 77-86.
• Leonard, M. (2016). “Introduction” In Geo-economics with Chinese characteristics: How China’s economic might is reshaping world politics. The World Economic Forum.
• Li, J., Wen, J., & Jiang, B. (2017). Spatial spillover effects of transport infrastructure in Chinese new silk road economic belt. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 6, 1-8.
• Li, K. X., Jin, M., Qi, G., Shi, W., & Ng, A. K. (2018). Logistics as a driving force for development under the belt and road initiative–the Chinese model for developing countries. Transport Reviews, 38(4), 457-478.
• Li, M. (2020). The belt and road Initiative: Geo-economics and Indo-Pacific security competition. International affairs 96(1), 169-187.
• Liu, N., Chen, Y., & Zhou, Q. (2007). Spatial spillover effects of transport infrastructure on regional economic growth. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 23, 33-39.
• Luttwak, E. N. (1990). From geopolitics to geo-economics: Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest, 20, 17-23.
• Martiningui, A., & Youngs, R. (Eds.). (2011). Challenges for European foreign policy in 2012: What kind of geo-economic Europe?. Fride.
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (2021). The inevitable rivalry: America, China, and the tragedy of great-power politics. Foreign Affairs, 100(6), 48-58.
• Miller, C. (2022). Chip war: The fight for the world's most critical technology. Simon and Schuster.
• Mingyang, T. (2025). China leads three shipbuilding indicators for 15th year. Global Times. Erişim: 22 Haziran 2025. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202501/1327019.shtml
• Nelan, W. B. (1992). How the world will look in 50 years. TIME. Erişim: 10 Kasım 2024. https://time.com/archive/6721415/how-the-world-will-look-in-50-years
• O’Dea, C. R. (2020). Pandemic impact on China’s global expansion: delayed, but not derailed. Hoover Institution. Erişim: 10 Ocak 2025, https://www.hoover.org/research/pandemic-impact-chinas-global-expansion-delayed-not-derailed
• Okazaki, Y. (2018). Unveiling the potential of Blockchain for customs. WCO Research Paper Series, No. 45, World Customs Organization, Brussels.
• Overholt, W. H. (2015). One belt, one road, one pivot. Global Asia 10(3), 1-8.
• Pradhan, R. P., & Bagchi, T. P. (2013). Effect of transportation infrastructure on economic growth in India: The VECM approach. Research in Transportation economics, 38(1), 139-148.
• Saidi, S., Mani, V., Mefteh, H., Shahbaz, M., & Akhtar, P. (2020). Dynamic linkages between transport, logistics, foreign direct Investment, and economic growth: Empirical evidence from developing countries. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 141, 277-293.
• Schenk, K. (2019). Customs operations and the blockchain technology. Customs Support Group. Erişim: 20 Şubat 2026, https://www.customssupport.com/customs-operations-and-blockchain-technology/
• Scholvin, S., & Wigell, M. (2018). Power politics by economic means: Geoeconomics as an analytical approach and foreign policy practice. Comparative Strategy, 37(1), 73-84.
• Shen, C. (2025). China dominates global shipbuilding with seven of top 10 yards in 2024. Lloyd’s List Intelligence Seasearcher. Erişim: 15 Mart 2025. https://www.lloydslist.com/LL1152305/China-dominates-global-shipbuilding-with-seven-of-top-10-yards-in-2024
• Shi, W., Bang, H. S., & Li, K. X. (2016). A cross-region analysis of the output elasticity of transport investment in China. Maritime Policy & Management 43(2), 222-241.
• Stone, J. (2023). US bans pentagon from using Chinese port logistics platform. VOA News. Erişim: 10 Nisan 2025, https://www.voanews.com/a/us-bans-port-logistics-platform-china-offers-free-worldwide-/7408269.html
• Sturm, J. E., Jacobs, J., & Groote, P. (1999). Output effects of infrastructure investment in the Netherlands, 1853-1913. Journal of Macroeconomics, 21(2), 355-380.
• Szabo, S. F. (2015). Germany, Russia, and the rise of geo-economics. Bloomsbury Academic.
• Tan, J., Wang, X., & Chan, K. C. (2020). Does a national reform of a logistics system matter in corporate cash management? Evidence from logistics service standardization in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 63, 101399.
• UN ESCAP. (2016). Regional study: The use of logistics information systems for increased efficiency and effectiveness. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
• USSC. (2022). LOGINK: Risks from China’s promotion of a global logistics management platform. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Erişim: 20 Mart 2025, https://www.uscc.gov/research/logink-risks-chinas-promotion-global-logistics-management-platform
• Vidal, A. (2023). Securing maritime data: The battle against China’s LOGINK in U.S. and European ports. Center for Maritime Strategy.
• Wang, M., Childerhouse, P., & Abareshi, A. (2024). Global logistics and supply chain integration in the digital era: a focus on China's Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of international logistics and trade, 22(2), 58-79.
• Wheeler, A. (2021). Implications of integration in global digital supply chains. Smart Maritime Network. Erişim: 18 Mart 2025. https://smartmaritimenetwork.com/2021/08/31/implications-of-integration-in-global-digital-supply-chains/
• Wheeler, A. (2022). China’s Logink digital platform: A weapon to bring about a new economic hegemon through data control, ownership, and manipulation. Asia Power Watch. Erişim: 10 Nisan 2025, https://asiapowerwatch.com/chinas-logink-digital-platform-a-weapon-to-bring-about-a-new-economic-hegemon-through-data-control-ownership-and-manipulation/
• Wheeler, A. (2024). The Chinese digital octopus spreading its tentacles through smart port ambitions. Asia Shipping Media. Erişim: 20 Nisan 2025, https://splash247.com/the-chinese-digital-octopus-spreading-its-tentacles-through-smart-port-ambitions/
• Wigell, M. (2016). Conceptualizing regional powers’ geoeconomic strategies: Neo-imperialism, neo-mercantilism, hegemony, and liberal institutionalism. Asia Europe Journal, 14, 135-151.
• Xin, H. (2025). Reduced logistics costs help release China's economic vitality. People's Daily Online. Erişim: 20 Şubat 2026, https://en.people.cn/n3/2025/0208/c90000-20274156.html
• Xinhua. (2017). President Xi Jinping’s keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the international cooperation forum of Belt and Road Initiative. Xinhuanet. Erişim: 20 Mart 2025, http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-05/14/c_136282982.htm
• Yu, N., De Jong, M., Storm, S., & Mi, J. (2013). Spatial spillover effects of transport infrastructure: evidence from Chinese regions. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, 56-66.
• Zarate, J. (2012). “Playing a new geoeconomic game.” In: Cohen, C., & Gabel, J., (eds) Global forecast: Risk, opportunity and the next administration. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC.
• Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Liu, Y., & Li, R. (2016). Smart box-enabled product-service system for cloud logistics. International Journal of Production Research, 54(22), 6693-6706.