POWER OF THE PURSE PERCEPTION OF VOTERS IN TURKEY AND AFFECTING FACTORS

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the perception of voters. It attempts to answer whether the power of

purse defined at the constitutional level has been internalized and used functionally by the voters or

not. A scale of 45 statements has been used to measure the perception of the voters. Factor and

regression analyses have been conducted on the data obtained from the scale and the power of purse

perception not functi level of the voters has been investigated.The results of the study put forward that

voters in Turkey can onally use the power of purse that they get by the constitution. Also it has been

discussed in the study that 6 factors have been effective for the result and that they have the same and

positive effects on this perception.

Keywords

• Public Budget,Power of the Purse,Political Process

POWER OF THE PURSE PERCEPTION OF VOTERS IN TURKEY AND AFFECTING FACTORS

Öz

 This study aims to analyze the perception of voters. It attempts to answer whether the power of purse defined at the constitutional level has been internalized and used functionally by the voters or not. A scale of 45 statements has been used to measure the perception of the voters. Factor and regression analyses have been conducted on the data obtained from the scale and the power of purse perception not functi level of the voters has been investigated.The results of the study put forward that voters in Turkey can onally use the power of purse that they get by the constitution. Also it has been

discussed in the study that 6 factors have been effective for the result and that they have the same and

positive effects on this perception.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public Budget,Power of the Purse,Political Process

Kaynakça

1. BLONDEL, Jean (1995), Comparative Government, London, New York, Prentice Hall.
2. CLEVELAND, Frederick A., (1914) Constitutional Provision for a Budget, Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science in the City of New York, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 141-188. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 1193340 . Accessed: 27/09/2012
3. HARRUP, Martin & BRESLIN, Shaun (1998), Comparative Government and Politics, Houndsmill, Macmillan Press.
4. KALAYCI, Şeref (2008), SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
5. LIENERT, I. (2005)‘Who Controls the Budget:The Legislature or the Executive?’IMFWorking Paper,WP/05/115.
6. MEYERS, R.T. (2001) ‘Will the US Congress’s “Power of the Purse”Become Unexceptional?, American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
7. MICHAEL M. Ting, (2001) The "Power of the Purse”and Its Implications for Bureaucratic Policy-Making”, Public Choice, Vol. 106, No. 3/4, pp. 243-274v http://www.jstor.org/stable/30026219 . Accessed: 24/09/2012
8. NELSON C. DOMETRIUS and Deil S. WRIGHT, (2010) Governors, Legislatures, and State Budgets across Time, Political Research Quarterly, DOI: 10.1177/1065912909334428. http://prq.sagepub.com/content/early/ 2009/04/10/ 1065912909334428

9. PANITCH, Leo (2000), “Degisen Dünyada Devlet: Küresel Kapitalizmi Sosyal Demokratlaştırmak?”, Üçüncü Yol Arayısları ve Türkiye, Yay. Hz. Ve Çev: M. C. Yalçıntan, Büke Yayınları, İstanbul.
10. PHILIPS, Hood & JACKSON, Paul (1987), Constitutional and Administrative Law, London, Sweet & Maxwell.
11. PIERSON, Christopher (2004), The Modern State, Routledge, Second Edition, London and New York.
12. WEHNER, Joachim (2006) Assessing the Power of the Purse: An Index of Legislative Budget Institutions, Political Studies: 2006 VOL 54, 767–785
13. LU, Yı, and XUE, Chenghaı (2011),The Power Of The Purse And Budgetary Accountabılıty: Experıences From Subnatıonal Governments In Chına, Public Administration And Development, 31, pp. 351–362. (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/pad.604.
14. FALAY, Nihat (1997), “Türkiye’nin 1997 Yılı Bütçesi Eleştiri ve Öneriler”, İktisat Dergisi, S: 363.
15. GÖZÜBÜYÜK, A. S. (2000), Anayasa Hukuku, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara.
16. CANBAY, T. Güneş Ç. GERGER, (2012), “Batı’da Bütçe Hakkının Gelişiminin Toplumsal Yapının Degişimi Üzerine Etkileri”, Mali Sosyoloji Üzerine Denemeler, (Ed: Kemal ÇELEBİ), T.C. Maliye Bakanlığı Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlıgı Yayın No: 2012/418, ss. 159-195. TEKELİ, İ. (2005), “Katılımcı Demokrasi, Sivil Aglar ve Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları”, Türkiye’de Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları-İki Sempozyum, Tarih Yayınları Vakfı.