Exploring Prospective English Language Teachers’ Perceptions on Leveraging Microteaching and Literature Integration to Enhance Pedagogical Competence in L2 Teacher Education

Öz

Abstract: Integrating literature into English language teaching is widely regarded as a pedagogically beneficial practice because it can improve linguistic skills and nurture cross-cultural sensitivity while fostering cognitive and intellectual growth (Carter & Long, 1991). In line with this perspective, ELT teacher education programs in Turkey include specialized courses to provide prospective teachers with the pedagogical competencies and theoretical knowledge necessary for integrating literature into language instruction. This study explored the perceptions and experiences of pre-service English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers concerning the incorporation of literature into ELT classrooms via microteaching sessions. The participants were 40 English language pre-service teachers enrolled in the Literature and Language teaching course at a state university in Türkiye. Following the conclusion of a semester-long course on literature-based English language instruction, the data of the study were collected through reflection papers and semi-structured focus group interviews conducted in the sequel and evaluated through content analysis. The study’s findings revealed that incorporating literary texts into ELT classrooms and microteaching sessions yielded positive outcomes, enhancing the efficacy of these sessions and the participants’ instructional practices. The findings also suggest that pre-service English language teachers held a favourable orientation toward the pedagogical integration of literature within ELT frameworks.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• pre-service teacher education
• literature integration
• ELT
• microteaching
• pedagogical competence

İngilizce Öğretmen Adaylarının, İkinci Dil Öğretmenliği Eğitiminde Pedagojik Yeterliliği Artırmak İçin Mikro Öğretim ve Edebiyat Entegrasyonundan Yararlanma Konusundaki Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Edebiyatı İngilizce öğretimine entegre etmek, dil becerilerini geliştirebilmesi ve kültürlerarası duyarlılığı besleyebilmesi, aynı zamanda bilişsel ve entelektüel gelişimi teşvik edebilmesi nedeniyle pedagojik açıdan faydalı bir uygulama olarak kabul edilmektedir (Carter & Long, 1991). Bu bakış açısına uygun olarak, Türkiye'deki İngilizce öğretmen eğitimi programları, öğretmen adaylarına edebiyatı dil öğretimine entegre etmek için gerekli pedagojik yeterlilikleri ve teorik bilgileri sağlamak üzere özel dersler içermektedir. Bu çalışma, mikroöğretim oturumları aracılığıyla edebiyatın İngilizce öğretimi derslerine entegre edilmesine ilişkin hizmet öncesi İngilizce öğretmeni adaylarının algılarını ve deneyimlerini araştırmıştır. Katılımcılar, Türkiye'deki bir devlet üniversitesinde Edebiyat ve Dil öğretimi dersine kayıtlı 40 İngilizce öğretmen adayıdır. Edebiyat temelli İngilizce öğretimi üzerine bir dönem süren dersin tamamlanmasının ardından, çalışmanın verileri, devamında yapılan yansıma yazıları ve yarı yapılandırılmış odak grup görüşmeleri yoluyla toplanmış ve içerik analizi yoluyla değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmanın bulguları, edebi metinlerin İngilizce derslerine ve mikroöğretim oturumlarına dahil edilmesinin olumlu sonuçlar verdiğini, bu oturumların etkinliğini ve katılımcıların öğretim uygulamalarını geliştirdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bulgular ayrıca, hizmet öncesi İngilizce öğretmenlerinin İngilizce öğretimi bağlamlarında edebiyatın pedagojik entegrasyonuna olumlu bir yaklaşım sergilediklerini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimi
• Edebiyat Entegrasyonu
• İngilizce Dil Öğretimi
• Mikro Öğretim
• Pedagojik Yeterlilik

Kaynakça

1. Ahn, S., & Park, J. (2020). Pre-service English teachers’ perceptions of microteaching class and evaluation in Korea. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 151–178.
2. Aptoula, N. Y. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions about the efficacy of different types of feedback on micro-teaching activities. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 14(2), 79-92.
3. Arsal, Z. (2014). Microteaching and pre-service teachers’ sense of self-efficacy in teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 453-464.
4. Arsal, Z. (2015). The effects of microteaching on the critical thinking dispositions of pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 40(3), 140-153.
5. Benton-Kupper, J. (2001). The microteaching experience: Student perspectives. Education, 121(4).
6. Borg, S. (2005). Teacher cognition in language teaching. In Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 190-209). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
7. Burns, A., & Richards, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. Cambridge University Press.
8. Carter, R., & Long, M. N. (1991). Teaching Literature. Longman.

9. Choi, J. (2019). English pre-service teachers’ learning practices in and perceptions of micro-teaching to enhance English teaching competence. English Language Teaching, 31(2), 107–126.
10. Cinici, A. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ science teaching self-efficacy beliefs: the influence of a collaborative peer microteaching program. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(3), 228–249.
11. Cirakli, M.Z., & Kilickaya, F. (2011). Literature courses in EFL curriculum: Pre-service language teachers’ perceptions. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 1(13), 11-15.
12. Collie, J., & S. Slater (1987). Literature in the language classroom: A resource book of ideas and activities. Cambridge University Press.
13. Fernández, M. L. (2010). Investigating how and what prospective teachers learn through microteaching lesson study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 351–362.
14. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Gao, X. (2015). Promoting experiential learning in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(4), 435-438.
16. Hall, G. (2005). Literature in language education. Springer.
17. Hama, H. Q., & Osam, Ű. V. (2021). Revisiting microteaching in search of up-to-date solutions to old problems. Sage Open, 11(4), 21582440211061534.
18. He, C., & Yan, C. (2011). Exploring authenticity of microteaching in pre-service teacher education programmes. Teaching Education, 22(3), 291–302.
19. Hismanoglu, M. (2005). Teaching English through literature. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 53-66.
20. Işıklı, C., & Tarakcioglu, A.O. (2017). Investigating problems of English literature teaching to EFL high school students in Turkey with a focus on language proficiency. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 82-95.
21. Ismail, S. A. A. (2011). Student teachers’ microteaching experiences in a pre-service English teacher education program. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5).
22. Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. Routledge.
23. Karakaş, A., & Yükselir, C. (2021). Engaging pre-service EFL teachers in reflection through video-mediated team micro-teaching and guided discussions. Reflective Practice, 22(2), 159-172.
24. Karçkay, A. T., & Sanlı, Ş. (2009). The effect of micro teaching application on the preservice teachers’ teacher competency levels. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 844-847.
25. Karlström, M., & Hamza, K. (2019). Pre-service science teachers’ opportunities for learning through reflection when planning a microteaching unit. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(1), 44-62.
26. Kaşlıoğlu, Ö., & Ersin, P. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about literature integration in English language teaching classrooms. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(3), 213-232.
27. Koç, H. K. (2023). The perceptions and views of prospective ELT teachers on teaching English in preschools: A microteaching lesson study and practical experiences. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(3), 179-192.
28. Lazar, G. (2015). Literature and language teaching. In The Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 468-482). Routledge.
29. Lima, C. (2010). Selecting literary texts for language learning. Journal of NELTA, 15 (1-2), 110-113.
30. McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., Peterson, M. K., Mikolasy, K., Thompson, J., Valencia, S. W., & Windschitl, M. (2014). Practice makes practice: Learning to teach in teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 500-515.
31. McKnight, P. C. (1971). Microteaching in teacher training. Research in Education, 6(1), 24-38.
32. Mergler, A. G., & Tangen, D. (2010). Using microteaching to enhance teacher efficacy in pre-service teachers. Teaching Education, 21(2), 199–210.
33. Mikulec, E., & Hamann, K. (2020). “My eyes have been opened”: Pre-service secondary teachers exploring behaviour management through a microteaching Project. Action in Teacher Education, 42(2), 102-119.
34. Otsupius, I. A. (2014). Micro-teaching: A technique for effective teaching. African Research Review, 8(4), 183–197.
35. Özcan, Ö., & Gerçek, C. (2019). Multidimensional analyzing of the microteaching applications in teacher education via videograph. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 82-97.
36. Parkinson, B., & Reid Thomas, H. (2019). Teaching literature in a second language. Edinburgh University Press.
37. Shi, J. (2020). A critical analysis of the assessment for the micro-teaching program for English language teachers in secondary education in mainland China. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(2), 168–175.
38. Skinner, B. (2012). Changing identities: an exploration of ESL trainee teacher discourse in microteaching. Classroom Discourse, 3(1), 46-64.
39. Tuncer, H., & Kizildag, A. (2014). Pre-service EFL teachers’ attitude towards the use of literature in practice teaching. International Journal of Language Academy, 2 (3), 170-185.
40. Violetta-Irene, K. (2015). The use of literature in the language classroom: Methods and aims. International journal of information and education technology, 5(1), 74-79.
41. Yeasmin, N., Azad, A.K., & Ferdoush, J. (2011). Teaching language through literature: Designing appropriate classroom activities. ASA University Review, 5(2), 283-297.
42. Yüksel, İ., & Özkanal, Ü. (2019). Investigation of pre-service teachers’ reflective views on microteaching in real classrooms. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 8(4), 2378-2398.
43. Zacharias, N. T. (2016). Exploring identity construction of student teachers practicing ELF pedagogy in a microteaching course. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 26(2), 321–339.
44. Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 376–382.