Place of Global Issues in EFL Lecturers’ Teaching Agenda in Türkiye

Öz

This study examines English as a Foreign Language (EFL) lecturers’ views on integrating global issues into language teaching in Turkish higher education. Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, data were collected from 414 EFL lecturers across 12 universities via a questionnaire, followed by semi-structured interviews with 29 participants. Quantitative results indicate that EFL lecturers generally support the integration of global issues into EFL instruction. While gender, age, or overall teaching experience did not yield significant differences, prior experience specifically with global-issue-based instruction emerged as a significant factor. Among the themes, environmental issues were prioritized due to their perceived familiarity and pedagogical accessibility. In contrast, language imperialism was rated as the least important theme. Qualitative findings further clarify that this reluctance toward language imperialism stems from its ideological sensitivity, despite its relevance to culture and linguistic awareness. The study concludes with practical implications for language teachers, curriculum designers, and materials developers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• global issues
• english as a foreign language
• environmental issues
• language imperialism

Türkiye'de Yüksek Öğretim Düzeyinde İngilizce Eğitimi Veren Öğretim Görevlilerinin Gündeminde Küresel Meselelerin Yeri

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki yükseköğretimde dil öğretimine küresel konuların entegre edilmesine ilişkin Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce (EFL) öğretim görevlilerinin görüşlerini incelemektedir. Sıralı açıklayıcı karma yöntem tasarımı kullanılarak, 12 üniversiteden 414 EFL öğretim görevlisinden anket yoluyla veri toplanmış, ardından 29 katılımcıyla yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Nicel sonuçlar, EFL öğretim görevlilerinin genel olarak küresel meselelerin EFL öğretimine entegre edilmesini desteklediklerini göstermektedir. Cinsiyet, yaş veya genel öğretim deneyimi açısından anlamlı farklılıklar görülmezken, özellikle küresel meselelere dayalı öğretimle ilgili önceki deneyim, önemli bir faktör olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Temalar arasında, algılanan aşinalık ve pedagojik erişilebilirlik nedeniyle çevre meselelerine öncelik verilmiştir. Buna karşılık, dil emperyalizmi en az önemli tema olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Nitel bulgular, dil emperyalizmine yönelik bu isteksizliğin, kültür ve dilsel farkındalıkla ilgisi olmasına rağmen, ideolojik hassasiyetinden kaynaklandığını daha da netleştirmiştir. Çalışma, dil öğretmenleri, müfredat tasarımcıları ve materyal geliştiriciler için pratik çıkarımlarla son bulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• küresel meseleler
• yabancı dil olarak ingilizce
• çevresel meseleler
• dil emperyalizmi

Kaynakça

1. Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051
2. Akbana, Y.E., Koşar, G. (2024). An In-depth Analysis of Foreign Language Course Books to Investigate How and to What Extent Current Global Crises Are Covered in Them. In: Alkiş Küçükaydin, M., Ulum, H., Ulum, Ö.G. (eds) Silencing Refugees’ Voices in Educational Practices. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73518-9_2
3. Akbana, Y. E., & Rathert, S. (2024). Integration of climate change and green technologies into language education. In M. A. Alkış Küçükaydın, H. Ulum, & Ö. G. Ulum (Eds.), Climate change, education, and technology (pp. 95–108). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781032719672-7
4. Akbana, Y. E., & Yavuz, A. (2020). Global issues in EFL teaching: EFL lecturers’ voices at a state university. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 2(1), 83-102.
5. Akbana, Y. E., & Yavuz, A. (2022). Global issues in a series of EFL textbooks and implications for end-users to promote peace education through teaching English. Journal of Peace Education, 19(3), 373-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2022.2140403
6. Akbari, R. (2008). Transforming lives: Introducing critical pedagogy into ELT classrooms. ELT Journal, 62(3), 276-283. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn025
7. Apple, M. W. (2002). Patriotism, pedagogy, and freedom: On the educational meanings of September 11th. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1760-1772. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810210400801
8. Arslan, S., & Curle, S. (2024). Institutionalising English as a foreign language teachers for global sustainability: Perceptions of education for sustainable development in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Research, 125, 102353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102353

9. Aslan, R., & Altınkaya, Z. Ö. (2024). Prospective English language teachers' understandings of global English language teaching. European Journal of Education, 59(2), e12631. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12631
10. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065
11. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
12. Barili, A., & Byram, M. (2021). Teaching intercultural citizenship through intercultural service learning in world language education. Foreign Language Annals, 54(3), 776-799. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12526
13. Başarır, F., & Sarı, M. (2022). An action research on development of students' awareness of global issues through theme-based English language teaching. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 9(2), 811-840.
14. Bayraktar Balkir, N. (2021). Uncovering EFL learners' perspectives on a course integrating global issues and language learning. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 15(1), 118-133.
15. Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. Routledge.
16. Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. Routledge.
17. Bosio, E., Torres, C. A., & Gaudelli, W. (2023). Exploring values and knowledge in global citizenship education: Theoretical and empirical insights from scholars worldwide. Prospects, 53(3-4), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-023-09658-5
18. Bourn, D. (2022). Education for social change: Perspectives on global learning. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350192874
19. Cates, K. A. (1990). Teaching for a better world: Global issues and language education. The Language Teacher, 14(5), 3-5.
20. Cates, K. A. (2000). Global education. In M. Byram (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 241–243). Routledge.
21. Cates, K. A. (2022). A global education approach to ELT materials. JACET Journal, 66, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.32234/jacetjournal.66.0_1
22. Cordova, M. (2024). Integrating sustainable development goals in English language and literature teaching. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1330034. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1330034
23. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
24. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
25. Crookes, G. V. (2021). Critical language pedagogy: An introduction to principles and values. ELT Journal, 75(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab020 Çakmaklı, A. D., Boone, C., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2017). When does globalization lead to local adaptation? The emergence of hybrid Islamic schools in Turkey, 1985–2007. American Journal of Sociology, 122(6), 1822-1868. https://doi.org/10.1086/691347
26. Çavdar, S. S. (2006). Increasing EFL teachers’ awareness on global issues in ELT classroom [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Çukurova University.
27. De Andreotti, V. O. (2014). Soft versus critical global citizenship education. In S. McCloskey (Ed.), Development education in policy and practice (pp. 21-31). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137324665_2
28. DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
29. Diachkova, Y., Sazhko, L., Shevchenko, L., & Syzenko, A. (2021). Global issues in ESP classroom: Challenges and opportunities in higher education. Arab World English Journal, 12(1), 388-400. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.26
30. Dimici, K. (2025). The place of global issues in foreign language classes from the perspective of English lecturers: A critical look. Journal of Language and Education, 11(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.21868
31. Dimici, K., & Başbay, A. (2025). Multicultural education as the supportive component of English language curriculum: A mixed-methods experimental design study at a Turkish university. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 29(7), 1113-1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2262998
32. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
33. Efron, K., & Mori, L. (2023). Deconstructing imperialism in English language teaching with alter-globalization community in education. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(4), 2229-2237. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i4-31
34. Erarslan, A. (2018). Strengths and weaknesses of primary school English language teaching programs in Turkey: Issues regarding program components. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 325-347. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.464194
35. Estellés, M., & Fischman, G. E. (2021). Who needs global citizenship education? A review of the literature on teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(2), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120920254
36. Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
37. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Herder and Herder.
38. Giroux, H. A. (2024). Theory and resistance in education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Bloomsbury Academic.
39. Giroux, H. (2025). Paulo Freire’s legacy and critical pedagogy in dark times. Studia Krytyczne/Critical Studies, (13), 32-45. https://doi.org/10.25167/sk.5866 Gurney, P., & Michaud, M. (2024). English language education and the internationalization of higher education in Japan. TESOL Communications, 3(2), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.58304/tc.20240202
40. Gülle, T., Kurt, Y., & Bayyurt, Y. (2025). Exploring cultural and linguistic diversity in the English‐medium instruction university. World Englishes, 44(4), 667-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12707
41. Gürel, E., & Aslan, B. (2022). Internationalizing teacher education: What is the Erasmus Exchange Program's contribution in Turkey? Higher Education Studies, 12(1), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v12n1p131
42. Holborow, M. (2013). Applied linguistics in the neoliberal university: Ideological keywords and social agency. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(2), 229–257. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0011
43. Holliday, A. (2013). The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford University Press.
44. Kaplan, M. (2019). Perceptions and practices of Turkish EFL teachers and students on the use of global issues [Master’s thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=7Gv30WoGfq8WRTSrLHc73w&no=1UNdGJD_5pSOE2OaS0Kd4A
45. Kimsesiz, F. (2023). Exploring EFL teachers’ perceptions of project-based language teaching in Turkey. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 13(2), 954-970. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1257110
46. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
47. Kubota, R. (2004). Critical multiculturalism and second language education. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp. 30–52). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524834.003
48. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. Yale University Press.
49. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615725
50. Lindgren, B. M., Lundman, B., & Graneheim, U. H. (2020). Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 108, 103632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632
51. McLaren, P. (2015). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (6th ed.). Routledge.
52. Mouboua, P. D., Atobatele, F. A., & Akintayo, O. T. (2024). Language as a tool for intercultural understanding: Multilingual approaches in global citizenship education. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 11(1), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.11.1.0071
53. Natow, R. S. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(2), 160-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119830077
54. Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (Eds.). (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524834 Omar, A. (2024). Enhancing intercultural communicative competence in EFL education for sustainable development and globalization challenges. World Journal of English Language, 14(1), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n1p247
55. Omidvar, R., & Sukumar, B. (2013). The effects of global education in the English language conversation classroom. English Language Teaching, 6(7), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n7p151
56. Oxley, L., & Morris, P. (2013). Global citizenship: A typology for distinguishing its multiple conceptions. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 301-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.798393
57. Özcan, E. N., & Gürsoy, E. (2026). Teaching English and the environment to EFL young learners in Turkey. ELT Journal, 80(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaf056
58. Pennycook, A. (2021). Critical applied linguistics: A critical re-introduction. (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003090571
59. Santamaría-Cárdaba, N., Gajardo-Espinoza, K., & Cáceres-Iglesias, J. (2024). Global citizenship education: A systematic review of educational research. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(4), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.134.7
60. Sarı, T., Nayır, F., & Poyrazlı, Ş. (2025). Educare, educere, or holistic? Exploring researchers' educational approaches in education for sustainable development research. Sustainable Development, 33, 6590-6603. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3481
61. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., Agrusti, G., Damiani, V., & Friedman, T. (2025). Education for citizenship in times of global challenge: IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2022 international report. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65603-3
62. Takkaç Tulgar, A. (2024). A compromise between global and local: Glocal identity and its effects on pragmatic development. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 23(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2021.1956319
63. Tarhan, Ö. (2024). Perspectives of social studies teachers on global issues. Pedagogical Perspective, 3(1), 52-70. https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2024.48
64. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430
65. Tezcan Ünal, B., & Schmitt, D. (2022). Reflections on English-medium instruction in Turkish higher education institutions, educational quality and insights from international experience. In Y. Kırkgöz & A. Karakaş (Eds.), English as the medium of instruction in Turkish higher education: Policy, practice and progress (pp. 47-68). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88597-7_3
66. Uma, P. (2024). Integrating resilience considerations into English language teaching in the context of climate change. Shanlax International Journal of English, 12(S1-Feb), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.34293/english.v12is1-feb.7404
67. UNESCO. (2023). Recommendation on education for peace and human rights, international understanding, cooperation, fundamental freedoms, global citizenship and sustainable development. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391686
68. UNESCO. (2025). Recommendation on education for peace, human rights and sustainable development: An implementation guide. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000396358
69. Wang, Y. (2025). Integrating ideological education into university English curriculum: A model for fostering global citizenship. Journal of Education, Humanities, and Social Research, 2(2), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.71222/swjjf337
70. Yakovchuk, N. (2004). Global issues and global values in foreign language education: Selection and awareness raising. English Language Teacher Education and Development, 8, 28–47. https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/3245/
71. Yanniris, C. (2021). Education for sustainability, peace, and global citizenship: An integrative approach. Education Sciences, 11(8), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080430